Sustainability Analysis of Family Farming System in Kermanshah Province: Using DPSIR Framework

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
This study aimed to address analysis and zoning of sustainability of family farming system in Kermanshah province. To achieve this objective, two steps were taken: (1) Identification of a comprehensive framework to measure the sustainability of family farming system, and (2) Evaluation criteria and sub-criterion weight for the proposed framework by conducting Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP). In this regard, firstly, 12 agrarian experts who had theoretical and practical experiences were selected by purposed sampling for FAHP. Secondly, descriptive cross-sectional survey was carried out on family farming system. Results of FAHP revealed that management, capitals, vulnerabilities, and stresses were of utmost importance in a context of sustainability of family farming system, respectively. According to the findings, Eslamabad-e Gharb and Harsin with scores of 72.91 and 58.76 have high sustainability. In contrast, Qasr-e Shirin (20.92) showed high unsustainability. Furthermore, Sarpol-e Zahab, Kermanshah, and Javanroud with values of, respectively, 57.95, 57.37, and 52.92 lie in the middle of the spectrum.

Keywords

Subjects


1. Abbasizaded Qanavati, M. S., Papzan, A. & Mirak Zadeh, A. A. Sustainability analysis of family farming systems in Khanom Abad Village, Kermanshah city. Journal of Rural Development. 2012, 15, 114-95. http://rvt.agri-peri.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-42-26&slc_lang=fa&sid=1
2. Adger, W. N. Social and ecological resilience: are they related?. Progress in Human Geography. 2000, 24, 327-364. DOI: 10.1191/030913200701540465
3. Aghili, S. M. F. Khoshfar, Gh., & Salehi, S. Social capital and concerned environmental behaviors in the north of Iran (Case study: Gilan, Mazandaran and Golestan). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 2009, 16, 250-236.
4. Antle, J. M. Human capital, infrastructure, and the productivity of Indian rice farmers. Journal of Development Economics. 1984, 14, 163-181. DOI:10.1016/0304-3878(84)90048-8
5. Asadi, A. & Varmazyari, H. Assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems. Rahbord Yas Quarterly. 2010, 288- 261.
6. Badri, S. A. A., Rokn Al-Din Eftekhari, A., Salmani, M. & Behmand, D. The role of arable farming (family) systems in sustainable rural development (Case Study: Qir and Karzin, Fars province). Journal of human geography. 2011, 2, 48-33.
7. Bartlett, J. E., kotrlik. J. W. & Higgins, Ch. C. Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal. 2001, 19, 43-50. https://www.opalco.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Reading-Sample-Size1.pdf
8. Behboudi, D., Asgharpour, H. & Mami Pour, S. Abundant natural resources, human capital and economic growth in the countries exporting oil. Journal of the Iranian Economy. 2009, 13, 147-125.
9. Berkes, F. & Folke, C. Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability.1 rd ed.;Island Press. Washington, United state of America, 1994; pp.128-151.
10. Binder, C., & Wiek, A. F. The role of transdisciplinary processes in sustainability assessment of agricultural systems. In F. Häni, L. Pintér, & H. Ferren (Eds.), from common principles to common practice. Proceedings and Outputs of the First Symposium of the International Forum on Assessing Sustainability in Agriculture (INFASA) (pp. 33–48). Bern: INFASA and Swiss College of Agriculture, 2007.
11. Blingout, J., Aronson, J. & Groot, R. D. Restoration of natural capital: A key strategy on the path to sustainability. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2014, 54-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.003
12. Chirwa, E. & Dorward, A. Agricultural input subsidies: recent Malawi experience. Published by Oxford University press. 2009; 320 p.
13. Crowe, J. The Role of Natural Capital on the Pursuit and Implementation of Economic Development. Sociological Perspectives. 2008, 51, 827-851. DOI: 10.1525/sop.2008.51.4.827.
14. Dimitris, D. The development dimension coherence of agricultural and rural development policies. OECD publishing, Paris, France, 2006, 415 p.
15. FAOSTAT. Share of food in total trade, Accessed on August 30. 2014, http://faostat.fao.org/site/535/default.aspX#ancor.
16. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg. J. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2005, 441- 473. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.
17. Ghaffari Ghajar, Gh. and Palouj, M. On the relationship between high-value social, human and physical capital of crops and livestock products in the rural sector of Isfahan Province. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development. 2012, 19, 210-187.
18. Ghahremani Ghajar, S., Mohammadi Doustdar, H. & Ranjbar Noei, A. The application of science and technology education in different countries. Culture Strategy Quarterly. 2012, 103-128.
19. Hoanh, C. T., Tuong, T. p., Gowing, J. W. & Hardy, B. Environment and livelihood in tropical coastal Zone: managing agriculture- fishery- aquaculture conflicts. CABI published; London, UK, 2006; 309 p.
20. Honar Amooz, N. Iran agricultural sector's growth model with an emphasis on technology and human capital. Journal of New Economics and Business. 2005, 137-119.
21. Ikerd, J. E. The need for a system approach to sustainable agriculture. Journal of Agriculture, Ecosystems, Environment. 1993, 46, 147-160. DOI: 10.1016/0167-8809(93)90020-P.
22. Junxia, Z., Jialin, Y., & Ying, Ch. Investment problems of China rural human capital. Journal of Northeast agricultural university. 2011, 18, 77- 83. DOI: 10.1016/S1006-8104(12)60029-4.
23. Komijani, A. & Elmi, Z. The impact of human capital on income. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development. 2005, 13, 111-91.
24. Kong, F. & Liu, H. Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate success factors of E-commerce. International journal of information and systems sciences. 2005, 1, 406-412.
25. Kruezwizer, R., De loë, R., Imgrund, K., Conboy, M. J. & Simpson, H. Understanding stewardship behaviour factor facilitating and constraining private water well stewardship. Journal of Environmental Management. 2011, 92, 1104-1114. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.017.
26. Kuramoto, J. & Sagasti, F. Integrating local and global knowledge, technology and production systems: challenges for technical cooperation. Science, Technology &Society. 2002, 7, 215-247. DOI: 10.1177/097172180200700202.
27. Lopez-Ridaura, S., Van Keulen, H., Van Ittersum, M. K. & Leffelaar, P. A. Multiscale methodological framework to derive criteria and indicators for sustainability evaluation of peasant natural resource management system. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2005, 7, 51–69. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-003-6976-x.
28. MacKinnon, N., Bryden, J. M., Bell, C., Fuller, A. M. & Spearman, M. Pluriactivity, structural change & farm household vulnerability in Western Europe. Journal of the European Society For Rural Sociology. 1991, 31, 58-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1991.tb00980.x.
29. Mauerhofer, V. Social capital, social capacity & social carrying capacity: perspectives for the social basics within environmental sustainability. Futures. 2013, 53, 63-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.08.006.
30. Motiei Langroodi, S. H., Rezvani, M., Faraji Sabokbar, H., & Khajeh Shahkuhi, A. Sustainability Analysis of family farming systems and rural production cooperatives (Case study: Aq Qala city). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development. 2010, 333-323.
31. Patton, M. Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2 rd ed.: SAGE: Newbury Park, California, 1990, 536p.
32. Pervanchon, F. When farmers integrate sustainable development in their strategy thank a tree: The sustainable farm tree. In F. Häni, L. Pintér, & H. Ferren (Eds.), from common principles to common practice. Proceedings and Outputs of the First Symposium of the International Forum on Assessing Sustainability in Agriculture (INFASA) (pp. 111–120). 2007 Bern: INFASA and Swiss College of Agriculture.
33. Pour Mohammadi, M., Zali, N. Human development, challenges and solutions (with regard to the indices of development in Iran). Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (Tabriz). 2004, 10.
34. Pretty, J. & Ward, H. Social Capital and the Environment. World Development. 2013, 29, 209- 227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X (00)00098-X.
35. Rao, N. H. & Rogers, P. P. Assessment of agricultural sustainability. Current science. 2006, 91, 439- 448.
36. Ribot, J. C., Magahalaes, A. R., & Panagides, S. Climate variability, climate change and social vulnerability in the semi-arid tropics. 1rd ed.; Cambridge: USA, 2005; 192 p.
37. Rigby, D., Woodhouse, P., Young, T. & Burton, M. constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice. Journal of Ecological Economics. 2001, 463–478. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00245-2.
38. Seymour, S., & Steven, M. Sustainable farmland management transdisciplinary approaches. CABI: UK, 2008; 263 pp.
39. Souri, A., & Mehregan, N. The role of social capital in human capital formation. Quarterly Journal of Commerce. 2007, 219-207.
40. Taherifard, A. & Hosseini, S. J. Examining the feasibility of development based on natural resources. Journal of management and development process. 2011, 107-91.
41. Toupchi, B. Rostami, F. & Khodabakhshi, A. Comparing the indices of irrigated wheat production in peasant commercial and cooperative farming systems in Kordestan province. Iran Agricultural Economics and Development Research (Iran Agricultural Sciences). 2011, 229-219.
42. Tow, Ph., Copper, L., Partidge, L. & Brich, C. Rainfed farming systems. Springer Science & Business Media. Australia, 2011; 1354 p.
43. Upton, M. African farm management. Published by press syndicate of the university Cambridge: New York, USA, 1987; 190 P.
44. Wakhungu, J. W. Science, Technology, & public policy in africa: a framework for action. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 2001, 21, 246-252. DOI: 10.1177/027046760102100402.
45. Zahm, F., ViauX, P., Girardin, P., Vilain, L., & Mouchet, C. Farm sustainability assessment using the IDEA method. from the concept of farm sustainability to case studies on French farms. In F. Häni, L. Pintér, & H. Ferren (Eds.), from common principles to common practice. Proceedings and Outputs of the First Symposium of the International Forum on Assessing Sustainability in Agriculture (INFASA) (pp. 77–110). 2007. Bern: INFASA and Swiss College of Agriculture.