Model Sites: A New Direction towards Cooperation among Extension Agents, Field Experts, Researchers, and Farmers

Author
M. R. Shahpasand
Imam Khomeini Educational Centre, Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Participatory approaches have been advocated as ways of increasing knowledge through technology transfer to farmers. Model sites as a participatory approach consist of a Main Unit (MU), owned by the extension local assistant or facilitator, and about 25 subordinate units belonging to the surrounding farmers. These sites disseminate technical knowledge through the MU among the subordinate units. This approach seeks to create synergies among researchers, extension agents, field experts, and farmers to improve the quality and quantity of agricultural products. This investigation, carried out in the production units of Extension Local Assistants (ELA) along with the participation of farmers through the dissemination of knowledge, benefits from the results of a survey through researcher-made checklists. The sample population consisted of 724 farmers in Khuzestan Province, Iran, selected through census method, 34 of whom were extension local assistants and the rest (as large as 690) included ordinary farmers. The results showed that the farmers participating in the sites had gained significantly higher quantity and quality of field crops, horticulture, and vegetables production. Degrees of reduction in water consumption, chemical fertilizers, and pesticides application were observed in MU sites and subordinate units. Moreover, in each site, some new technologies were transferred to subordinate farmers. The sites could be considered as demonstration farms for non-member farmers. This study brings new insights into the impact of synergy between all stakeholders in the form of new agricultural extension approach to improve quantity and quality of field crops, horticulture, and vegetables production, using the capacity of local communities.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Abdoulaye, T. and Sanders, J. H. 2005. Stages and Determinants of Fertilizer Use in Semiarid African Agriculture: the Niger Experience. Agric. Econ., 32: 167-179.
2. Afrakhteh, H. Armand, M. and Askari Bozayeh, F. 2015. Analysis of Factors Affecting Adoption and Application of Sprinkler Irrigation by Farmers in Famenin County, Iran. Int. J. Agric. Manag. Dev., 5(2): 89-99.
3. Ajewole, O. C. 2010. Farmer’s Response to Adoption of Commercially Available Organic Fertilizers in Oyo State, Nigeria. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 5(18): 2497-2503.
4. Amudavi, D. M., Khan, Z. R., Wanyama J. M. Midega, C. A. O. Pittchar, J. and Nyangau, I. M. 2009. Assessment of Technical Efficiency of Farmer Teachers in the Uptake and Dissemination of Push-Pull Technology in Western Kenya. Crop. Prot., 28: 987-996.
5. Asiabaka, C. 2002. Promoting Sustainable Extension Approach: Farmer Field School (FFS) and Its Role in Sustainable Agriculture Development in African. Department of Agricultural Economic and Extension, Federal University of Technology PMB, Owerri, Nigeria. Available on: https://www.codesria.org/IMG/pdf/Asiabaka
6. Baloch, M. A. and Thapa, G. B. 2016. The Effect of Agricultural Extension Services: Date Farmers’ Case in Balochistan, Pakistan. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci., 17(3): 282-289
7. Benjamin, A. M. N 2013. Farmers’ Perception of Effectiveness of Agricultural Extension Delivery in Cross-River State Nigeria. IOSR J. Agric. Vet. Sci. 2(6): 01–07.
8. Carlberg, E., Kostandini, G. and Dankyi, A. 2014. The Effects of Integrated Pest Management Techniques Farmer Field Schools on Groundnut Productivity: Evidence from Ghana. Q. J. Int. Agric, 53(1): 73-88.
9. Chambers, R. 1990. Rural Development- Putting the Last First. Longman Scientific and Technical, Longman Group UK Ltd, PP. 75-102.
10. Franzel, S., Sinja, J. and Simpson, B. 2014. Farmer-to-Farmer Extension in Kenya: the Perspectives of Organizations Using the Approach. ICRAF Working Paper No. 181, World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi. Available on: www.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/Publications/PDFS/WP14380.pdf
11. Freeman, H. A. and Omiti, J. M. 2003. Fertilizer Use in Semi-Arid Areas of Kenya: Analysis of Smallholder Farmers’ Adoption Behavior under Liberalized Market. Nutr. Cycl. Agro Ecosyst, 66: 23-31.
12. Hellin, J. and Dixon, J. 2008. Operationalizing Participatory Research and Farmer-to-Farmer Extension: The Kamayoq in Peru. Dev. Pract., 18: 627-632.
13. Kormawa, P., Awoyemi, T. and Akingbile, A. 2001. Farm Management in the Provision of Extension Services in Nigeria: An Assessment and a Strategy for Improvement. Report Submitted to the FAO, UN.
14. Kormawa, P. M. Ezedinma, C. I. and Singh, B. B. 2004. Factors Influencing Farmer-to-Farmer Transfer of an Improved Cowpea Variety in Kano State, Niger. J. Agric. Rur. Dev. Trop. Subtrop., 105(1): 1–13.
15. Lukuyu, B., Place, F., Franzel, S. and Kiptot, E. 2012. Disseminating Improved Practices: Are Volunteer Farmer Trainers Effective? J. Agric. Edu. Ext, 18: 525- 540.
16. Mancini, F., Van-Bruggen, A. H. C. and Jiggins, J. L. E. 2006. Evaluating Cotton Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Farmer Field Schools Outcomes Using Sustainable Livelihoods Approach in India. Agric. J., 43: 97-112.
17. Mangisoni, J. H. 2008. Impact of Treadle Pump Irrigation Technology on Smallholder Poverty and Food Security in Malawi: A Case Study of Blantyre and Mchinji Districts. Int. J. Agric. Sustain., 6(4): 248-266.
18. Masangano, C. and Mthinda, C. 2012. Pluralistic Extension System in Malawi (IFPRI Discussion Paper 01171). International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC. [Available on]: http://www.ifpri.org/publication/pluralistic-extension-system-malawi
19. Mofakkarul-Islam, M. David, G. Reid, J. and Kemp, P. 2011. Developing Sustainable Farmer-Led Extension Groups: Lessons from a Bangladeshis Case Study. J. Agric. Edu. Ext., 17(5): 425–443
20. Namara, R. Hussain, I. Bossio, D. and Verma, Sh. 2007. Innovative Land and Water Management Approaches in ASIA: Productivity Impacts, Adoption Prospects and Poverty. Outreach. Irrig. Drain, 56: 335–348.
21. Okoedo-Okojie, D. U. and Aphunu, A. 2011. Assessment of Farmers’ Attitude towards the Use of Chemical Fertilizers in Northern Agricultural Zone of Delta State, Nigeria. Scholar Research Library. Appl. Sci. Res., 3(1): 363-369.
22. Praneetvatakul, S. and Waibel, H. 2006. Farm Level and Environmental Impacts of Farmer Field School in Thailand. Working Paper, No.7. Dev. Agric. Econ. J., Available on: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241758639_Farm_Level_and_Environmental_Impacts_of_Farmer_Field_Schools_in_Thailand
23. Rivera, W. M. and Carry, J. W. 1998. Privatizing Agricultural Extension Worldwide: Institutional Changes in Funding and Delivering Agricultural Extension. In: “Agricultural Extension: Reference Manual”, (Ed.): Swanson, B. E. 3rd Edition, FAO, Rome.
24. Saravanan, R. 2008. Agricultural Extension: Worldwide Innovations. New India Publishing Agency (NIPA), New Delhi.
25. Selener, D., Chenier, J. and Zelaya R. 1997. Farmer to Farmer Extension: Lessons from the Field. International Institute for Rural Reconstruction (IIRR), New York.
26. Shahpasand, M. R. 2015. Analysis of Demographic and Cognitive Factors Affecting the Level of Fertilizer Use Farmers in the City Bajestan. Iran. J. Agric. Econ. Dev., 4(2): 749-763. (in Persian)
27. Shahpasand, M. R. 2017. Model Sites and Learning Center (A New Approach in Utilization of Capacity of Local Communities). Asrar-e Elm Press, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)
28. Shahpasand, M. R. and Ghaffari, J. 2012. Model Sites Guidebook. Deputy Extension, Ministry of Agriculture, Iran. (in Persian)
29. Shakeri, A and Garshasbi, A. R. 2008. Estimate the Technical Efficiency of Rice in Selected Provinces of Iran. J. Econ., 8(3): 81-96.
30. Simpson, B. M. and Owens, M. 2002. Farmer Field Schools and the Future of Agricultural Extension in Africa. J. Int. Agric. Ext. Edu., 9(2):29-36.
31. Sinja, J. Karugia, W. M. Miano, D. Baltenweck, I. Franzel, S. Nyikal, R. and Romney, D. 2004. Adoption of Fodder Legumes Technology through Farmer –to- Farmer Extension Approach. Uganda J. Agric. Sci., 9:222-226
32. Ssemakula, E. and Mutimba, J. K. 2011. Effectiveness of the Farmer-to-Farmer Extension Model in Increasing Technology Uptake in Masaka and Tororo Districts of Uganda. S. Afr. J. Agric. Ext., 39(2): 30-46.
33. Suranga, M. S., Ilangesinghe, M. and Jayathilake, A. M. 2011. Adoption of Integrated Farming Concept through Farmer–to-Farmer Extension Approach in Dry Zone of Sri Lanka. Twenty Third Annual Congress of the PGIA, 17-18 November. Plant Genetic Resources Centre, Sri Lanka, PP. 20-29.
34. Tanui, J. K. 2002. Farmer-Trainer Extension Approach in Agroforestry: An Application of Cost Benefit Analysis in Selected Project Sites in Kenya. Doctoral Dissertation, Kenyatta University.
35. Van den Ban, A. W. and Hawkins, H. S. 1996. Agricultural Extension: No. 2. Blackwell Science.
36. Yu, L. Jun-biao, Z. H. and Jiang, D. 2009. Factors Affecting Reduction of Fertilizer Application by Farmers: Empirical Study with Data from Jianghan Plain in Hubei Province. Contributed Paper Prepared for Presentation at the International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, August 16-22, Beijing, China.
37. Zhou, S., Herzfeld, T., Zhang, Y. and Hu, B. 2008. Factors Affecting Chinese Farmers’ Decisions to Adopt a Water-Saving Technology. Can. J. Agric. Econ, 3(4): 51-61.
38. Zuger, R. 2004. Impact Assessment of Farmer Field School in Cajamerca, Peru: An Economic Evaluation. Social Sciences Working Paper, No. 1-2004, International Potato Center. Available on: https://research.cip.cgiar.org/confluence/display/GILBWEB/Impact+assessment+of+Farmer+Field+Schools+in+Cajamarca%2C+Peru+An+economic+evaluation1
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 22, Issue 1
January and February 2020
Pages 81-94