Direct and Indirect Effects of Aphis gossypii (Hemi.: Aphididae) and Lasius brunneus (Hym.: Formicidae) Mutualism on Cotton Yield in Field Condition

Authors
S. Mirzamohammadi 1
M. Hosseini 1
J. Karimi 1
H. Sadeghi 1
T. Darvish Mojeni 2
1 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Cotton Research Institute of Iran (CRI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Gorgan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Ant-aphid mutualism may increase or decrease plant yield. This depends on the relative cost of damage by ant-tended aphids versus the relative benefit of ant suppression of other (non-aphid) herbivores and associated yield losses. To evaluate the effect of mutualism between cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii, and brown ant, Lasius brunneus, on the productivity of cotton plant, a field experiment was conducted in the presence or absence of ants in the Cotton Research Center of Golestan province (Iran), in 2014. During the two-month test, the numbers of A. gossypii and visiting ants L. brunneus as well as Coccinella septempunctata and Helicoverpa armigera on each plant were counted in four-day intervals and, finally, the yield of cotton plants was measured. Ant presence significantly increased the abundance of cotton aphid, whereas the ant with suppression in presence of C. septempunctata and H. armigera significantly reduced their abundance. Regardless of the increase in the abundance of A. gossypii, cotton plant yields significantly increased in the presence of L. brunneus. This could be due to the effect of ant presence and the reduction of H. armigera abundance and the associated yield losses on cotton plant. In general, the results of the current study showed that indirect benefits of ant-aphid mutualism influence cotton plants by suppression of H. armigera damage. Since this pest causes serious damage on cotton plant, increasing attention to the role of ant predation is economically useful.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Afshari, A., Soleiman-Negadian, E. and Shishebor, P. 2009. Population Density and Spatial Distribution of Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae) on Cotton in Gorgan, Iran. J. Agric. Sci. Tech. 11: 27-38.
2. Agnew, C.W., Sterling, W.L. and Dean, D.A. 1982. Influence of Cotton Nectar on Red Imported Fire Ants and other Predators. Environ. Entomol., 11: 629-634.
3. Altfeld, L. and Stiling, P. 2009. Effects of Aphid-Tending Argentine Ants, Nitrogen Enrichment and Early-Season Herbivory on Insects Hosted by a Coastal Shrub. Biol. Invasions., 11: 183-191.
4. Bednarz, C.W., Bridges, D.C. and Brown, S.M. 2000. Analysis of Cotton Yield Stability Across Population Densities. Agron. J., 92: 128-135.
5. Buckley, R. 1987. Interactions Involving Plants, Homoptera, and Ants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 18: 111-135.
6. Carroll, C. and Janzen, D.H. 1973. Ecology of Foraging by Ants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 4: 231-257.
7. Delabie, J.H. 2001. Trophobiosis between Formicidae and Hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha and Auchenorrhyncha): An Overview. Neotrop. Entomol., 30: 501-516.
8. Dreistadt, S.H. and Flint, M.L. 1996. Melon Aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) Control by Inundative Convergent Lady Beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Release on Chrysanthemum. Environ. Entomol., 25: 688-697.
9. Canedo-Júnior, E.O., Santiago, G.S., Zurlo, L. F., Ribas, C.R., Carvalho, R.P., Alves, G.P., Carvalho, M.C.S. and Souza, B. 2017. Isolated and Community Contexts Produce Distinct Responses by Host Plants to the Presence of Ant-Aphid Interaction: Plant Productivity and Seed Viability. Plos One., 12(1):1-12.
10. Ebert, T.A. and Cartwright, B. 1997. Biology and Ecology of Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae). Southwest. Entomol., 22: 116-145.
11. Farid, A. 1986. Study of bollworm Heliothis armigera (Hub.) on tomato in Jyroft and Kahnuj. Appl. Entomol. Phytopathol., 54: 15-24.
12. Flatt, T. and Weisser, W. W. 2000. The effects of mutualistic ants on aphid life history traits. Ecology., 81: 3522-3529.
13. Gavrilyuk, A. and Novgorodova, T. 2007. Efficiency of aphid protection from enthomophages by ants of various species. Dokl. Biol. Sci., 417: 427-429.
14. Ghahari, H., Jedryczkowsky, W. B., Aslan, M. and Oovan, H. 2009. Lady beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) of Iranian cotton fields and surrounding grasslands. Biol. Control., 23: 265-269.
15. Henneberry, T., Jech, L. F., De La Torre, T. and Hendrix, D. 2000. Cotton aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) biology, honeydew production, sugar quality and quantity, and relationships to sticky cotton. Southwest. Entomol., 25: 161-174.
16. Holldobler, B. and Wilson, E.O. 1990. The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
17. Holway, D. A., Lach, L., Suarez, A.V., Tsutsui, N. D. and Case, T. J. 2002. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 33: 181–233.
18. Kaneko, S. 2002. Aphid-attending ants increase the number of emerging adults of the aphids primary parasitoid and hyperparasitoids by repelling intraguild predators. Entomol. Sci., 5: 131-146.
19. Kaplan, I. and Eubanks, M. D. 2002. Disruption of cotton aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) natural enemy dynamics by red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environ. Entomol., 31: 1175-1183.
20. Karhu, K. J. 1998. Effects of ant exclusion during outbreaks of a defoliator and a sap‐sucker on birch. Ecol. Entomol., 23: 185-194.
21. Lach, L. 2003. Invasive ants: unwanted partners in ant-plant interactions? Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard., 90: 91-108.
22. Loi, A., Luciano, P., Gilioli, G. and Bodini, A.2012. Lasius brunneus (Hymenoptera: Formicinae) and Stomaphis quercus (Hemiptera: Aphididae): trophobionts harmful to cork oak forests in Sardinia (Italy). Redia, 95: 21-29.
23. Mahdi, T. and Whittaker, J. 1993. Do birch trees (Betula pendula) grow better if foraged by wood ants? J. Anim. Ecol., 62: 101-116.
24. McDaniel, S. and Sterling, W. 1982. Predation of Heliothis virescens (F.) eggs on cotton in east Texas. Environ. Entomol., 11: 60-66.
25. McDaniel, S., Sterling, W. and Dean, D. 1981. Predators of tobacco budworm larvae in Texas cotton. Southwest. Entomol., 6: 102-108.
26. Mirzamohamadi, S., Hosseini, M., Sadeghi Nameghi, H., Karimi, J. and Mehrparvar, M. 2015. Mutualistic ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) associated with aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Golestan province, Iran. Iran. J. Anim. Biosyst., 11: 101-111.
27. Mojeni, T., Bayat asadi, H., Noori Ghanbalani, G. andShojaei, M. 2005. Study on bioregional aspects of bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in the cotton fields of Golestan province. Iran. J. Agr. Sci., 11: 97-115.
28. Morales, M. A. and Beal, A. L. 2006. Effects of host plant quality and ant tending for treehopper Publilia concava. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 99: 545-552.
29. Powell, B. and Silverman, J. 2010. Impact of Linepithema humile and Tapinoma sessile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on three natural enemies of Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Biol. Control., 54: 285-291.
30. Renault, C., Buffa, L. and Delfino, M. 2005. An aphid-ant interaction: effects on different trophic levels. Ecol. Res., 20: 71-74.
31. Rico-Gray, V. and Castro, G. 1996. Effect of an ant-aphid interaction on the reproductive fitness of Paullinia fuscecens (Sapindaceae). Southwest. Nat., 41: 434-440.
32. Ruberson, J., Herzog, G., Lambert, W. and Lewis, W. 1994. Management of the beet armyworm in cotton: role of natural enemies. Fla. Entomol., 77: 440-453.
33. Sakata, H. and Hashimoto, Y. 2000. Should aphids attract or repel ants? Effect of rival aphids and extrafloral nectaries on ant–aphid interactions. Popul. Ecol., 42: 171-178.
34. SAS Institute. 2003. SAS users guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
35. Schwartzberg, E. G., Johnson, D. and Brown, G. 2010. The influence of Lasius neoniger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on population growth and biomass of Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in soybeans. Environ. Entomol., 39: 1788-1793.
36. Stadler, B. and Dixon, A. F. 2008. Mutualism: ants and their insect partners, Cambridge University Press.
37. Stewart, S., Graham, L., Gaylor, M. and Vanderberg, L. 2001. Combining exclusion techniques and larval death-rate analyses to evaluate mortality factors of Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in cotton. Fla. Entomol., 84: 7-22.
38. Styrsky, J. D. and Eubanks, M. D. 2007. Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 274: 151-164.
39. Styrsky, J. D. and Eubanks, M. D. 2010. A facultative mutualism between aphids and an invasive ant increases plant reproduction. Ecol. Entomol., 35: 190-199.
40. Takizawa, T. and Yasuda, H. 2006. The effects of attacks by the mutualistic ant, Lasius japonicus Santschi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on the foraging behavior of the two aphidophagous ladybirds, Coccinella septempunctata brucki Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Propylea japonica (Thunberg) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool., 41: 161-169.
41. Van den Berg, H. and Cock, M. J. W. 1993a. Exclusion cage studies on the impact of predation on Helicoverpa armigera in cotton. Biocontrol. Sci. Technol., 3: 491-497.
42. Van den Berg, H. and Cock, M.J.W. 1993b. Stage-specific mortality of Helicoverpa armigera in three smallholder crops in Kenya. J. Appl. Ecol., 30: 640-653.
43. Way, M. J. 1963. Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing Homoptera. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 8: 307-344.
44. Yao, I. 2014. Costs and constraints in aphid-ant mutualism. Ecol. Res., 29: 383-391.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 21, Issue 3
May and June 2019
Pages 637-646