Executive Coherence in Iranian Pluralistic Agricultural Extension and Advisory System

Authors
E. Alimirzaei
S. M. Hosseini
S. Y. Hejazi
H. Movahed Mohammadi
Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
The performance of a pluralistic extension and advisory system is strongly influenced by the presence of multidisciplinary professional actors and their executive interactions for synergistic achievements in a balanced institutional framework. The specific purpose of this study was to explore the institutional boundary of Iranian pluralistic extension system and the extent to which the multiple providers interact with each other in implementation of related programs. A sequential mixed methods research was developed. Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews, and were analyzed by theme analysis. Quantitative data were gathered using a researcher-made questionnaire and were analyzed by social network analysis. According to the qualitative findings, multiple service providers were classified into 21 distinctive institutional categories. Also, findings showed that the current executive network was not satisfactory in terms of institutional coherence, such that a few dominant providers were very influential in the center, while most of the others had little linkages and thus power at the margin of the extension network. Such a highly centralized network is unsustainable and vulnerable from different viewpoints and cannot fulfill the tasks expected from extension system in Iranian heterogeneous agriculture sector. In this regard, establishing a multi-sectoral institutional platform to focus on enhancing mutual coordination and combining collective actions is recommended as an important structural adjustment in the current extension system. To this end, facilitating roles of the public extension agency as the most influential actor of the existing extension network will be extremely significant.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Alex, G., Byerlee, D., Helene-Collion, M. and Rivera, W. 2004. Extension and Rural Development: Converging Views on Institutional Approaches? Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 4, The World Bank, Washington DC.
2. Alimirzaei, E., Hosseini, S. M., Hejazi, Y. and Movahed Mohammadi, H. 2017. Indicators for Evaluating the Private Enterprises Providing Agricultural Extension and Advisory Services. Iran. J. Agric. Econ. Dev. Res., 48: 491-505.
3. Asadihkoob, H. and Ebrahimi, M. S. 2015. Farmer’s Attitude to Agricultural and Rural Development in Southwest Iran. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci. 5: 86-90.
4. Birner, R., Davis, K., Pender, J., Nkonya, E., Anandajayasekeram, P., Ekboir, J., Mbabu, A., Spielman, D. J., Horna, D., Benin, S. and Cohen, M. 2009. From Best Practice to Best Fit: Framework for Designing and Analyzing Pluralistic Agricultural Advisory Services Worldwide. J. Agric. Edu. Ext., 15: 341-355.
5. Bodin, O. and Crona, B. I. 2009. The Role of Social Networks in Natural Resource Governance: What Relational Patterns Make a Difference? Global Environ. Change, 19: 366-374.
6. Calvet-Mir, L., Maestre-Andres, S., Molina, J. L. and van den Bergh, J. 2015. Participation in Protected Areas: A Social Network Case Study in Catalonia, Spain. Ecol. Soc. 20: 45.
7. Chowa, C., Garforth, C. and Cardey, S. 2013. Farmer Experience of Pluralistic Agricultural Extension, Malawi. J. Agric. Edu. Ext., 19: 147-166.
8. Davis, K. 2008. Extension in Sub-Saharan Africa: Overview and assessment of past and current models, and future prospects. J. Int. Agric. Edu. Ext., 15: 15-28.
9. Davis, K. and Heemskerk, W. 2012. Investment in Extension and Advisory Services as Part of Agricultural Innovation Systems. Agricultural Innovation Systems: An Investment Sourcebook. World Bank, Washington DC.
10. Davis, K., Nkonya, E., Kato, E., Mekonnen, D. A., Odendo, M., Miro, R. and Nkuba, J. 2012. Impact of Farmer Field Schools on Agricultural Productivity and Poverty in East Africa. World Dev., 40: 402-413.
11. Ernstson, H., Sorlin, S. and Elmqvist, T. 2009. Social Movements and Ecosystem Services- The Role of Social Network Structure in Protecting and Managing Urban Green Areas in Stockholm. Ecol. Soc., 13(2): 39.
12. Fuller, J. D., Kelly, B., Law, S., Pollard, G. and Fragar, L. 2009. Service Network Analysis for Agricultural Mental Health. BMC Health Services Research, 9:87.
13. Garforth, C. 2004. Demand-led approaches. In “Extension reforms for rural development: Demand-driven approaches to agriculture extension”, (Eds.): Rivera, W. and Alex. G. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
14. Gemo, H. R., Stevens, J. B. and Chilonda, P. 2013. The Role of a Pluralistic Extension System in Enhancing Agriculture Productivity in Mozambique. South Afr. J. Agric. Ext., 41: 59-75.
15. GFRAS. 2012. Building Knowledge Systems in Agriculture: Five Key Areas for Mobilizing the Potential of Extension and Advisory. Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services, Eschikon 28, Switzerland.
16. Giller, K. E., Leeuwis, C., Andersson, J. A., Andriesse, W., Brouwer, A., Frost, P., Hebinck, P., Heitkonig, I., van Ittersum, M. K., Koning, N., Ruben, R., Slingerland, M., Udo, H., Veldkamp, T., van de Vijver, C., van Wijk, M. T. and Windmeijer, P. 2008. Competing Claims on Natural Resources: What Role for Science? Ecol. Soc., 13(2): 34.
17. Hall, A. and Clark, N. 2010. What Do Complex Adaptive Systems Look Like and What Are The Implications for Innovation Policy? J. Int. Dev., 22: 308-324.
18. Hall, A., Janssen, W., Pehu, E. and Rajalahti, R. 2006. Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to Go Beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems. World Bank, Washington DC.
19. Hall, A., Rasheed Sulaiman, V., Clark, N. and Yoganand, B. 2003. From Measuring Impact to Larning Institutional Lessons: an Innovation Systems Perspective on Improving The Management of International Agricultural Research. Agric. Syst., 78: 213-241.
20. Hauck, J., Schmidt, J. and Werner, A. 2016. Using Social Network Analysis to Identify Key Stakeholders in Agricultural Biodiversity Governance and Related Land-use Decisions at Regional and Local Level. Ecol. Soc., 21(2): 49.
21. Hawe, P. and Ghali, L. 2008. Use of Social Network Analysis to Map the Social Relationships of Staff and Teachers at School. Health Edu. Res., 23: 62-69.
22. Hawe, P., Webster, C. and Shiell, A. 2004. A Glossary of Terms for Navigating the Field of Social Network Analysis. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, 58: 971-975.
23. Hellin, J. 2012. Agricultural Extension, Collective Action and Innovation Systems: Lessons on Network Brokering from Peru and Mexico. J. Agric. Edu. Ext., 18: 141-159.
24. Hosseini, S. M. and Rezaei, A. 2013. Developing an Information System for Sustainable Natural Resource Management in Alborz Watershed, Northern Iran. System Practice Action Research, 26: 131-152.
25. Hounkonnou, D., Kossou, D., Kuyper, T. W., Leeuwis, C., Nederlof, E. S., Roling, N., Sakyi-Dawson, O., Traore, M. and van Huis, A. 2012. An Innovation Systems Approach to Institutional Change: Smallholder Development in West Africa. Agric. Syst., 108: 74-83.
26. Kidd, A. D., Lamers, J. P. A., Ficarelli, P. P. and Hoffmann, V. 2000. Privatizing Agricultural Extension: Caveat Emptor. J. Rur. Stud., 16: 95-102.
27. Klerkx, L., Aarts, N. and Leeuwis, C. 2010. Adaptive Management in Agricultural Innovation Systems: The Interactions between Innovation Networks and Their Environment. Agric. Syst., 103: 390-400.
28. Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C. 2009. Operationalizing Demand-driven Agricultural Research: Institutional Influences in a Public and Private System of Research Planning in the Netherlands. J. Agric. Edu. Ext., 15: 161-175.
29. Klerkx, L. and Proctor, A. 2013. Beyond Fragmentation and Disconnect: Networks for Knowledge Exchange in the English lLnd Management Advisory System. Land Use Policy, 30: 13-24.
30. Klerkx, L., van Mierlo, B. and Leeuwis, C. 2012. Evolution of Systems Approaches to Agricultural Innovation: Concepts, Analysis and Interventions. In: “Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic”, (Eds.): Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D. and Dedieu, B. Springer, Dordrecht, PP. 457-483.
31. Lambrecht, E., Kuhne, B. and Gellynck, X. 2015. Asymmetric Relationships in Networked Agricultural Innovation Processes. British Food J., 117: 1810-1825.
32. Lamprinopoulou, C., Renwick, A., Klerkx, L., Hermans, F. and Roep, D. 2014. Application of an Integrated Systemic Framework for Analyzing Agricultural Innovation Systems and Informing Innovation Policies: Comparing the Dutch and Scottish Agrifood Sectors. Agric. Syst., 129: 40-54.
33. Lapple, D., Renwick, A., Cullinan, J. and Thome, F. 2016. What Drives Innovation in the Agricultural Sector? A Spatial Analysis of Knowledge Spillovers. Land Use Policy, 56: 238-250.
34. Leeuwis, C. and van den Ban, W. 2004. Communication for Rural Innovation: Rethinking Agricultural Extension. Third Edition, Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford.
35. Neef, A. and Neubert, D. 2011. Stakeholder Participation in Agricultural Research Projects: a Conceptual Framework for Reflection and Decision-making. Agric. Hum. Values, 28: 179-194.
36. OECD. 2013. Agricultural Innovation Systems: A Framework for Analyzing the Role of the Government. OECD Publishing, Paris.
37. OECD/Eurostat. 2005. Oslo Manual Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. In: “The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities”. 3rd Edition, OECD Publishing, Paris.
38. Okorley, E. L., Gray, D. and Reid, J. 2010. Towards a Cross-sector Pluralistic Agricultural Extension System in a Decentralized Policy Context: A Ghanaian Case Study. J. Sustain. Dev.in Africa, 12: 1-10.
39. Qamar, M. K. 2000. Agricultural Extension at the Turn of the Millennium: Trends and challenges. In T. V. di Caracalla (Ed.), Human Resources in Agricultural and Rural Development. Rome: FAO.
40. Prager, K., Creaneya, R. and Lorenzo-Arribas, A. 2017. Criteria for a System Level Evaluation of Farm Advisory Services. Land Use Policy, 61: 86-98.
41. Pretty, J. N. 2003. Social Capital and the Collective Management of Resources. Science, 302: 1912-1914.
42. Ragasa, C., Ulimwengu, J., Randriamamonjy, J. and Badibanga, T. 2016. Factors Affecting Performance of Agricultural Extension: Evidence from Democratic Republic of Congo. J. Agric. Edu. Ext., 22: 113-143.
43. Rezvanfar, A. and Alimirzaei, E. 2014. The Importance of Technology Audit in Agricultural Extension System in Iran. The First International Conference of Asia and Pacific Islands Rural Advisory Services (APIRAS), University of Zanjan.
44. Rivera, W. M. and Alex, G. 2004. The Continuing Role of Government in Pluralistic Extension Systems. J. Int. Agric. Ext. Edu., 19: 41-51.
45. Rivera, W. and Alex, G. 2004. Decentralised Systems: Case Studies of International Initiatives. World Bank, Washington, D. C.
46. Rivera, W. M. and Qamar, M. K. 2003. Agricultural Extension, Rural Development and the Food Security Challenge. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome.
47. Sandoval, R. R., Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, J. M. and Mas-Verdu, F. 2016. Innovation Behavior and the Use of Research and Extension Services in Small-Scale Agricultural Holdings. Spanish J. Agric. Res., 14: 1-14.
48. Schut, M., Rodenburg, J., Klerkx, L., Kayeke, J., van Ast, A. and Bastiaans, L. 2015. RAAIS: Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems. (Part II). Integrated Analysis of Parasitic Weed Problems in Rice in Tanzania. Agric. Syst., 132: 12-24.
49. Schut, M., Rodenburg, J., Klerks, L., van Ast, A. and Bastiaans, L. 2014. Systems Approaches to Innovation in Crop Protection. A Systematic Literature Review. Crop Protec., 56: 98-108.
50. Schut, M., van Asten, P., Okafor, C., Hicintuka, C., Mapatano, S., Leon Nabahungu, N., Kagabo, D., Muchunguzi, P., Njukwe, E., Dontsop-Nguezet, P. M., Sartas, M. and Vanlauwe, B. 2016. Sustainable Intensification of Agricultural Systems in Central African Highlands: The Need for Institutional Innovation. Agric. Syst., 145: 165-176.
51. Scott, J., Tallia, A., Crosson, J. C., Orzano, A. J., Stroebel, C., DiCicco-Bloom, B., O’Malley, D., Shaw, E. and Crabtree, B. 2005. Social Network Analysis as an Analytic Tool for Interaction Patterns in Primary Care Practices. Annals of Family Medicine, 3: 443-448.
52. Singh, K. M., Swanson, B. E. and Meena, M. S. 2013. Reforming India’s Pluralistic Extension System: Some Policy Issues. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract.
53. Smits, R. and Kuhlmann, S. 2004. The Rise of Systemic Instruments in Innovation Policy. Int. J. Foresight Innov. Policy, 1: 4-32.
54. Struik, P. C., Kuyper, T. W., Brussaard, L. and Leeuwis, C. 2014. Deconstructing and Unpacking Scientific Controversies in Intensification and Sustainability: Why the Tensions in Concepts and Values? Curr. Opinion Environ. Sustain., 8: 80-88.
55. Swanson, B. E. 2009. Changing Extension Paradigms Within a Rapidly Changing Global Economy. In: Paffarini C, Santucci F M, ed., Proceedings of the 19th European Seminar on Extension Education: Theory and Practice of Advisory Work in a Time of Turbulences, PP. 113-117.
56. Swanson, B. E. and Rajalahti, R. 2010. Strengthening Agricultural Extension and Advisory Systems: Procedures for Assessing, Transforming, and Evaluating Extension Systems. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 45, World Bank, Washington DC.
57. Swanson, B. E. and Samy, M. M. 2004. Introduction to decentralization of agricultural extension systems: Key elements for success. In “Decentralised systems: Case studies of international initiatives”, (Eds.): Rivera, W. and Alex, G. World Bank, Washington, D. C.
58. Turner, J. A., Klerkx, L., Rijswijk, K., Williams, T. and Barnard, T. 2016. Systemic Problems Affecting Co-innovation in the New Zealand Agricultural Innovation System: Identification of Blocking Mechanisms and Underlying Institutional Logics. NJAS - Wageningen J. Life Sci., 76: 99–112.
59. van den Ban, A. W. and Hawkins, H. S. 1988. Agricultural Extension. Longman Scientific & Technical. London. UK.
60. van den Ban, A. W. and Samanta, R. K. 2006. Changing Roles of Agricultural Extension in Asian Nations. B. R. Publishing, Delhi.
61. World Bank. 2000. Decentralizing Agricultural Extension: Lessons and Good Practice. Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems (AKIS) Good Practice Note. Washington, DC.
62. Zarafshani, K., Ghasemi, Sh., Houshyar, E., Ghanbari, R., Van Passel, S. and Azaedi, H. 2017. Canola Adoption Enhancement in Western Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 19: 47-58.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 21, Issue 3
May and June 2019
Pages 531-543