Design, Fabrication and Evaluation of Electric Forage Chopper with Adjustable Helix Angle

Authors
1 Mechanics of Biosystem Engineering Department, Agricultural faculty, Tarbiat Modares University
2 Department of Biosystems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to design and make an electric forage chopper having a cylinder type cutterhead. In recent years, several models of forage chopper have been manufactured but each of these machines has had problems such as type of power supply system, type of cutting mechanism and feeding mechanism, lack of safety, etc. These problems were solved in this study. In the device that was manufactured in this research, feed rolls rotational speed, rotational speed of the cutting cylinder, blades’ helix angle and blades’ rake angle was adjustable. So, with these capabilities, these variables can be optimized for any kind of forage, and this information can be used to design and construct suitable machines for crushing any kind of forage. Alfalfa was used to test the machine, where its test matrix was determined using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) modeling method. The results showed that, on average, power requirements for chopping alfalfa was decreased from 12.6 to 9.7% by increasing the helix angle from 0° to 10° and from 10° to 20°, respectively. As rotational speed of the cutting cylinder increases from 500 to 800 rpm, the power used for chopping forage increases by about 56 W. In the conducted tests, maximum power requirements for chopping alfalfa was roughly equal to 200W, which was associated with 158.5 rpm feed rolls rotational speed, 800 rpm rotational speed of the cutting cylinder, and helix angle of zero. Contrarily, minimum power requirements for chopping alfalfa was 114W which was related to 158.5 rpm feed rolls rotational speed, 500 rpm rotational speed of the cutting cylinder, and 20º helix angle. Optimizing test results showed that the most suitable values for the feed rolls rotational speed, rotational speed of the cutting cylinder, and helix angle were 150 rpm, 677 rpm, and 9.22º, respectively, provided that power requirements and particle size are minimized and device capacity is maximized.

Keywords

Subjects


1. Allen, M. S. 1996. Physical Constraints on Voluntary Intake of Forage by Ruminants. J. Anim. Sci., 74: 3063-3075.
2. ASAE Standard. 1998. D251.1. Friction Coefficients of Chopped Forages.
3. ASAE Standard. 1998. S472. Terminology for Forage Harvesters and Forage Harvesting.
4. Chancelleor, W. J. 1987. Cutting of Biological Material. Agricultural Engineering Hand Book, (Ed.): Brown, R. CRC Press Inc.
5. Devries, T. J., Dohme, F. and Beauchemin, K. A. 2008. Repeated Ruminal Acidosis Challenges in Lactating Dairy Cows at High and Low Risk for Developing Acidosis: Feed Sorting. J. Dairy Sci., 91: 3958–3967.
6. Hemmatian, R. Najafi, G. Hosseinzadeh, B. Tavakoli Hashjin, T. Khoshtaghaza, M. H. 2012. Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of the Effects of Moisture Content and Internodes Position on Shearing Characteristics of Sugar Cane Stems. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 14: 963-974.
7. Hoseini, s.s. Najafi, G. Ghobadian, B. Mamat, R. Ebadi, M. T. Talal Yusaf. 2018. Ailanthus altissima (Tree of Heaven) Seed Oil: Characterisation and Optimization of Ultrasonication-Assisted Biodiesel Production. J. Fuel, 220: 621-630
8. Kepner, R. A., Bainer, R. and Brager, E. L. 1978. Principal of Farm Machinery. Third Edition, Westport Connecticut, USA.
9. Khorramdel, Y. Pir Mohammadi, R. Farhumand, P. and Sahraei Bloordy, M. 2012. Effect of Alfalfa Particle Size on Feed Consumption, Chewing Behavior and Performance of Holstein Cows at Mid-Lactation. J. Anim. Sci., 102: 122-129.
10. Madadi, Q. 2012. Electric Grinders. Official Gazette, List of Ads, Patents: 74628.
11. Mahmoudi Sorkizadeh, M. and Mahmoudi Sorkizadeh, H. 2014. Electro-Mutated Grinder for Dry and Wet Fodder. Official Gazette of the Country, Patent P., Patent Number: 84511.
12. Mertens, D. R. 2000. Physically Effective NDF and Its Use in Dairy Rations Explorids. Feedstuffs, PP. 11-14.
13. Minaei, S. 2001. Agricultural Machinery Design. Undergraduate Journal of Agricultural Machinery Mechanics, Tarbiat Modarres University.
14. Persson, S. 1987. Mechanics of Cutting Plant Material. St. Joseph. Michigan USA.
15. Shadrvan, O. 2012. Mechanical Engineering Design. Translation, Norpardazan Publisher.
16. Shahbazi, F. and Nazari Galedar, M. 2012. Bending and Shearing Properties of Safflower Stalk. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 14: 743-754
17. Shahi, T. and Galychi, A. 2014. Motorcycle Chopper for Small Animal Units. Official Country Newspaper, List of Ads, Patent Number: 82112.
18. Tavakoli Hashjin, T. 2003. Mechanics of Agricultural Products. Translation, Salakan Publishing.
19. Teimouri Yansari, A. Valizadeh, R. Naserian, A. Christensen, D. A. Yu, P. and Eftekhari Shahroodi, F. 2004. Effect of Alfalfa Particle Size and Specific Gravity on Chewing Activity, Digest-Ability, and Performance of Holstein Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci., 87: 3912-3924.
20. Valinejad, A. 2013. Steel Key Tables and Standards. Translation, Designer Publishing.