Effect of N-fertigation Frequency on the Lint Yield, Chlorophyll, and Photosynthesis Rate of Cotton

Authors
1 Department of Farm Structures and Irrigation, Agricultural Faculty, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
2 Department of Field Crops, Agricultural Faculty, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of nitrogen fertigation frequency on lint yield, lint properties, chlorophyll content (SPAD readings), and the photosynthesis rate (PR) of cotton. This study was carried out in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey in 2011 and 2012 with drip-irrigated cotton. The maximum lint yield (1,856 kg ha-1) was obtained with one lateral for every two rows and the application of equal doses every two irrigation cycles (10 days). Fertigation frequency of every two irrigation cycles (10 days) increased (P≤ 0.05) the fiber strength (32.3 g tex-1), the fiber elongation (6.5%), and the fiber length (28.9 mm). The SPAD readings ranged from 40.1 to 54.9, depending on the treatment and experimental year. There was no significant difference (P≤ 0.05) among the SPAD readings. The PR ranged from 35.9 to 74.7 µmol m-2 s-1, and there was no significant difference between the treatments. One possible reason for the lack of difference in PR, or SPAD, was that there was no difference in the total amount of nitrogen applied in the different treatments. The PR measured in cotton leaves may also change depending on the environmental conditions during measurement, prevailing ecological conditions, age, and location of the leaf on a plant.

Keywords


1. Albers, W.D., Hefner, S. and Kolbe, D. 1993. Fertility Management in Cotton. University of Missouri Extension Services.
2. Anonymous. 2013. Soil Analysis Key to Nutrient Management Planning. The Potash Development Association. Leaflet 24. Available on 10.12.2013: http://www.pda.org.uk/leaflets
3. Basbag, S., Ekinci, R. and Oktay, G. 2008. Relationships between Some Physio-morphological Traits and Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield. International Cotton Advisory Committee, Tenth Regional Meeting, September 28-October 1, 2008, Alexandroupoli, Greece.
4. Bauer, P.J. and Roof, M.E. 2004. Nitrogen, Aldicarb, and Cover Crop Effects On Cotton Yield And Fiber Properties. Agron. J. 96:369-376.
5. Bharud, R. W. 2012. Studies on Photosynthesis Efficiency in G. hirsutum Cotton Hybrids. International Cotton Advisory Committee, Eleventh Regional Meeting, November 5-7, 2012, Antalya, Turkey,
6. Bibi, A. C., Oosterhuis, D. M. and Gonias, E. D. 2008. Photosynthesis, Quantum Yield of Photosystem II and Membrane Leakage as Affected by High Temperatures in Cotton Genotypes. J. Cotton Sci., 12: 150-159.
7. Bilgel, L., Nacar, A. S. and Ogur, N. O. 2005. Effects of Water Stress on Some Cotton Varieties under Harran Plain Conditions. Research Project Report, Research Institute of Soil and Water Resources, Sanliurfa, 45 PP. (in Turkish with English Abstract).
8. Boman, R., and Leser, J. 2003. Management of Late Cotton in 2003. Texas A and M Research and Extension Center, Lubbock, TX
9. Boman, R. K. and Westerman, R. L. 1994. Nitrogen and Mepiquat Chloride Effects on the Production of Nonrank, Irrigated, Short-season Cotton. J. Prod. Agric., 7: 70-75.
10. Brito, G. G., Sofiatti, V., Brandão, Z. N., Silva, V. B., Silva, R. M. and Silva, D. A. 2011. Non-destructive Analysis of Photosynthetic Pigments in Cotton Plants. Acta Scientiarum Agron., 33(4).
11. Bullock, D. G. and Anderson, D. S. 1998. Evaluation of the Minolta SPAD-502 Chlorophyll Meter for Nitrogen Management in Corn. J. Plant Nutr., 21(4): 741–755.
12. Burt, M.C. 1998. Fertigation Basics. ITRC Paper 98-001, Irrigation Training and Research Center (ITRC), California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA.
13. Campbell, R. J., Mobley, K. N., Marini, R. P. and Pfeiffer, D. G. 1990. Growing Conditions Alter The Relationship between SPAD-501 Values And Apple Leaf Chlorophyll. HortSci., 25(3): 330–331.
14. Cetin, O., Uzen, N. and Karaer, M. 2013. Application Techniques of Fertigation. Scientific Papers, Faculty of Land Reclamation and Environmental Engineering, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Land Reclamataion, Earth Observation and Surveying, Environmental Engineering, Series E, II: 77-81
15. Cetin, O. and Bilgel, L.2002. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Shedding and Yield of Cotton. Agric. Water Manag., 54(1): 1-15.
16. Chapman, S. C. and Barreto, H. J. 1997. Using a Chlorophyll Meter to Estimate Specific Leaf Nitrogen of Tropical Maize during Vegetative Growth. Agron. J., 89: 557–562.
17. Dwyer, L. M., Anderson, A. M., Ma, B. L., Stewart, D. W., Tollenar, M. and Gregorich, E. 1995. Quantifying the Nonlinearity in Chlorophyll Content Meter Response to Corn Leaf Nitrogen Concentration. Can. J. Plant Sci., 75: 179–182.
18. Ebrahimian, H., and Playán, E. 2014. Optimum Management of Furrow Fertigation to Maximize Water and Fertilizer Application Efficiency and Uniformity. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 16: 591-607
19. Edmisten, K. 2008. Cotton. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University.
20. Fontes, P. C. R. and Araujo, C. 2006. Use of a Chlorophll Meter and Plant Visual Aspect for Nitrogen Management in Tomato Fertigation. J. Appl. Hort., 8(1): 8-11.
21. Fontes, P. C. R. and Ronchi, C. P. 2002. Critical Values of Nitrogen Indices in Tomato Plants Grown in Soil and Nutrient Solution Determined by Different Statistical Procedures. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 37(10): 1421-1429.
22. Fritschi, F. B., Roberts, B. A., Travis, R. L., Rains, D. W. and Hutmacher, R. B. 2003. Response of Irrigated Acala and Pima Cotton to Nitrogen Fertilization: Growth, Dry Matter Partitioning, and Yield. Agron. J., 95: 133-146
23. Gerik, J. T., Oosterhuis, D. M. and Torbert, H. A. 1998. Managing Cotton Nitrogen Supply. In: “Advances in Agronomy”, (Ed.): Sparks, D. L.. Academic press, San Diego, CA.
24. Girma, K., Teal, R. K., Freeman, K. W., Boman, R. K. and Raun, W. R. 2007. Cotton Lint Yield and Quality as Affected by Applications of N, P, and K Fertilizers. J. Cotton Sci., 11: 12–19
25. Grace, J., Nichol, C., Disney, M., Lewis, P., Qualife, T. and Bowyer, P. 2007. Can We Measure Terrestrial Photosynthesis from Space Directly, Using Spectral Reflectance and Fluorescence? Glob. Change Biol., 13: 1484–1497
26. Guinn, G. and Mauney, J. R. 1984. Fruiting of Cotton. II. Effects of Moisture Status on Flowering. Agron. J., 68: 701-705.
27. Hartz, T. K. 1993. Drip Irrigation Scheduling For Fresh-market Tomato Production. HortSci., 28: 35–37.
28. Hartz, T. K. and Hochmuth, G. J. 2005. Fertility Management of Drip-irrigated Vegetables. Vegetable Research and Information Center, UC Davis, USA, 6 PP.
29. Hassan, M., Nasrullah, M., Iqbal, M. Z., Muhammad, T., Iqbal, M. and Ahmad, S. 2003. Effects of Different Sowing Dates on Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) Cultivars. Asia. J. Plant Sci., 2(6): 461-463.
30. Hutmacher, B. 2001. California Cotton Review. The Newsletter of the UC Cooperative Extension Cotton Advisors, 59.
31. Johnson, J. R. and Saunders, J. R. 2003. Evaluation of Chlorophyll Meter for Nitrogen Management in Cotton. Available on 10.12.213: http://msucares.com/nmrec/reports
32. Kanber, R., Tekinel, O., Baytorun, N., Kumova, Y. and Alagoz, T. 1991. Use of Class A Pan on Water Consumptive Use and Irrigation Intervals. GAP Publication No: 44, Project Report, Souteastern Anatolia Project, Regional Development Administration, Adana. (in Turkish with English Abstract)
33. Karademir, E. and Sakar, D. 1999. Effecets of Nitrogen and Sowing Dates on Cotton Yield and Fibre Qualities. 3rd Congress of Field Crops, 15-19 November 1999, Adana, Turkey, II: 247-252. (in Turkish with English Abstract)
34. Karademir, E., Karademir, C., Ekinci, R., Basbag, S. and Basal, H. 2012. Screening Cotton Varieties (Gossypium hirsutum L.) for Heat Tolerance Under Field Conditions. African J. Agric. Res., 7(47): 6335-6342.
35. Karademir, C., Karademir, E., Doran, I. and Altikat, A. 2005. Effects of Different Doses of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on Yield and Fibre Properties Under Diyarbakır Condirions. J. Agric. Faculty, Gaziosmanpaşa Univ., 22(1): 55-61. (in Turkish with English Abstract)
36. Karademir, E., Karademir, C., Ekinci, R. and Gencer, O. 2008. Relationships between Leaf Chlorophyll Content, Yield and Yield Components of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). 10th Meeting of Inter-Regional Cooperative Research Network on Cotton, 28 September-1 October, Greece.
37. Kariya, K., Matsuzaki, A. and Machida, H. 1982. Distribution of Chlorophyll Content in Leaf Blade of Rice Plant. Japan. J. Crop Sci., 51(1): 134-135,
38. Keller, J. and Bliesner, R. D. 1990. Sprinkle and Trickle Irrigation. Chapman and Hall, 115 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003.
39. Kienzler, K. M. 2010. Improving the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Crop Quality in the Khorezm Region, Uzbekistan. Ecology and Development Series no. 72, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn.
40. Marquard, R. D. and Tipton, J. L. 1987. Relationship between Extractable Chlorophyll and In Situ Method to Estimate Leaf Greenness. HortSci., 22: 1327.
41. Martinez, D. E. and Guiamet, J. J. 2004. Distortion of the SPAD 502 Chlorophyll Meter Readings by Changes in Irradiance and Leaf Water Status. Agronomie, 24(1): 41-46.
42. Morrow, M. and Krieg, D.R. 1990. Cotton Management Strategies for a Short Growing Season Environment: Water-Nitrogen Considerations. Agron. J., 84: 52-56.
43. Mullins, G. L. and Burmester, C. H. 1990. Dry Matter, Nitrogen, Phosphorous, and Potassium Accumulation by Four Cotton Varieties. Agron. J., 82: 729-736.
44. Oosterhuis, D. M., Chipamaunga, J. and Bate, G. C. 1983. Nitrogen Uptake in Field-Grown Cotton. I. Distribution of in Plant Components in Relation to Fertilization and Yield. Exp. Agric., 19: 91-101.
45. Ozer, S. M. and Dagdeviren, I. 1986. Requirement of Nitrogen for Cotton under Harran Plain Conditions. Report Series No: R-17, Publication No: 25, The Research Institute of Rural Affirs, , Sanliurfa, Turkey. (in Turkish with English Abstract).
46. Ozer, M.S. 1992. Requirment of Phosphorus for Cotton under Harran Plain Conditions. Report Series No: R-47, Publication No: 71, The Research Institute of Rural Affirs, , Sanliurfa, Turkey. (in Turkish with English Abstract).
47. Peng, S., Garcia, F. V., Laza, R. C. and Cassman, K. G. 1993. Adjustment for Specific Leaf Weight Improves Chlorophyll Meter’s Estimate of Rice Leaf Nitrogen Concentration. Agron. J., 85: 987–990.
48. Pettigrew, W. T. and Gerik, T. J. 2007. Cotton Leaf Photosynthesis and Carbon Metabolism. Adv. Agron., 94: 209–236.
49. Roche, R., Bange, M., Milroy, S.P., Roberts, G. and Constable, G. 2004. Management for Ultra Early Cotton Systems. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, 26 September –1 October, 2004, Brisbane, Australia.
50. Sawan, Z. M., Mahmoud, M. H. and El-Guibali, A. H. 2006. Response of Yield, Yield Components, and Fiber Properties of Egyptian Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) to Nitrogen Fertilization and Foliar-applied Potassium and Mepiquat Chloride. J. Cotton Sci., 10: 224–234.
51. Schaper, H. and Chacko, E. K. 1991. Relation between Extractable Chlorophyll and Portable Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Leaves of Eight Tropical and Subtropical Fruit-Tree Species. J. Plant Physiol., 138: 674–677.
52. Shaahan, M. M., El-Sayed, A. A., Abou El-Nour, E. A. A. 1999. Predicting Nitrogen, Magnesium and Iron Nutritional Status in Some Perennial Crops Using a Portable Chlorophyll Meter. Sci. Hortic., 82: 339–348.
53. Simorte, V., Bertoni, G., Dupraz, C. and Masson, P. 2001. Assessment of Nitrogen Nutrition of Walnut Trees Using Foliar Analysis and Chlorophyll Measurements. J. Plant Nutr., 24: 1645–1660.
54. Singh, B., Singh, Y., Jagdish, K., Ladha, J. K., Bronson, K. F., Balasubramanian, V., Singh, J., Charan, S. and Khind, C. S. 2002. Chlorophyll Meter– and Leaf Color Chart–Based Nitrogen Management for Rice and Wheat in Northwestern India. Agron. J., 94: 821–829.
55. Sne. M. 2006. Micro Irrigation in Arid and Semi-arid Regions, Guidelines for Planning and Design, ICID, Holland.
56. Tewolde, H. and Fernandez, C.J. 2003. Fiber Quality Response of Pima Cotton to Nitrogen and Phosphorus Deficiency. J. Plant Nutr., 26(1): 223–235
57. Tisdale, S. L., Nelson, W. L., Beaton, J. D. and Havlin, J. L. 1993. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. Fifth Edition. MacMillan Publishing Company, NY.
58. Torres-Netto, A., Campostrini, E., Oliveira, J. G. and Smith, R. E. B. 2005. Photosynthetic Pigments, Nitrogen, Chlorophyll A Fluorescence and SPAD-502 Readings in Coffee Leaves. Scientia Horticulturae, 104(2): 199-209.
59. Vries, A. R. G. 2013. Measuring Fluorescence and Photosynthesis. EARS Plant Photosynthesis Monitoring Ltd, Kanaalweg 1, Delft, Netherlands. Available on 17.12.2013: www.ears.nl
60. Wang, J., Xing, D. and Xu, W. 2006. Development of a Portable Photosynthesis Rate Measurement Device. Proc. SPIE 6047, Fourth International Conference on Photonics and Imaging in Biology and Medicine, 60473W (October 27, 2006) Tianjin, China
61. Wullschleger, S. D. and Oosterhuis, D. M. 1990. Photosynthesis of Individual Field-grown Cotton Leaves during Ontogeny. Photosynthesis Res., 23(2): 163-170.
62. Yamamoto, A., Nakamura, T., Adu-Gyamfi, J. J. and Saigusa, M. 2002. Relationship between Chlorophyll Content in Leaves of Sorghum and Pigeonpea Determined By Extraction Method and by Chlorophyll Meter (SPAD-502). J. Plant Nutr., 25: 2295–2301.
63. Yolcu. S. 1993. Sowing Date on Cotton Crop. Project Report, Akçakale Agricultural Research Institute, Sanliurfa, Turkey. (in Turkish)
64. Yurtsever, N. 1984. Experimental Statistical Methods. Pub. No: 121, Technical Pub. No: 56, Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute, Ankara. (in Turkish).
65. Zhao, D. and Oosterhuis, D.M. 2000. Nitrogen Application Effects on Leaf Photosynthesis, Nonstructural Carbonhydrate Concentrations and Yield of Filed-Grown Cotton. Proceedings of the 2000 Cotton Research Meeting, Arkansas, USA, AAES Special Report 198. 69-71.