Study on Phosphorus Supply management of Poinsettia Grown in Peat-Based Substrate

Authors
A. Khandan-Mirkohi 1
M. Schenk 2
M. Fereshtian 1
1 Department of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
2 Institute of Plant Nutrition, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, D-30419 Hannover, Germany
Abstract
Poinsettia as an ornamental pot plant is widely grown in peat-based substrates with high phosphorus (P) fertilization. The aim of current study was to evaluate the P demand of poinsettia according to its depletion ability during the growth stages by using a mechanistic simulation model. For this purpose, rooted poinsettia cuttings were grown in the medium with 80: 20 (V: V %) peat+ mineral component (generally is called as clay) and treated with different P levels of 0, 10, 35, 100, and 170 mg P [L substrate]-1. The yield and quality performance of the plants were evaluated thoroughly. Also, depletion of P around the root surface and the effect of buffering power on the depletion profile were assessed by means of mechanistic simulation model. The results showed that in peat-based substrates, P was transported to the root surface mainly by mass-flow. The simulation approach as well revealed that the well supplied plants cultivated in the peat-substrates needed a higher concentration gradient (30-50 µM) to drive the necessary flux and that the amount of plant available P (Cs) was limiting at later growth stages. The optimum yield and quality of poinsettia was obtained at the P application rate of 35 mg L-1 substrate, with Cs of 11-12 and 15-16 mg [L substrate]-1 at planting and 53 days after planting. It has been concluded that, to ensure a sufficiently high concentration gradient, P had to be supplemented by frequent fertigation at later growth stages but not at the early growing stage.

Keywords

1. Alt, D. and Peters, I. 1992. Die CaCl2/DTPA-Methode zur Untersuchung gärtnerischer Erden auf Mengen- und Spurenelemente. Agribiol. Res., 45: 204–214.
2. Armitage, A. M. 1993. Bedding Plants. Prolonging Shelf Performance. Ball Publishing, Batavia, III, 71P.
3. Barber, S. A. 1995. Soil Nutrient Bioavailability: A Mechanistic Approach. Wiley, New York, PP. 85–110.
4. Barrachlough, P. B. and Tinker, P. B. 1981. The Determination of Ionic Diffusion Coefficients in Field Soils. I. Diffusion Coefficients in Sieved Soils in Relation to Water Content and Bulk Density. J. Soil Sci., 32: 225–236.
5. Bhadoria, P.B.S., Dessougi, H.E.I., Liebersbach, H. and Claassen, N. 2004. Phosphorus Uptake Kinetics, Size of Root System and Growth of Maize and Groundnut in Solution Culture. Plant Soil, 262(1-2): 327–336.
6. Borch, K., Miller, C., Brown, K. M. and Lynch, J. P. 2003. Improved Drought Tolerance in Marigold by Manipulation of Root Growth with Buffered-Phosphorus Nutrition. HortSci., 38: 212-216.
7. Claassen, N. and Steingrobe, B. 1999. Mechanistic Simulation Models for a Better Understanding of Nutrient Uptake from the Soil. In: "Mineral Nutrition of Crops: Fundamental Mechanisms and Implications", (Ed.): Rengel, Z.. The Haworth Press Inc., New York, London, Oxford, PP. 327-367.
8. Cox, D. 2001. Using Phosphorus Starvation to Regulate Growth. Greenhouse Product News, 11: 22-25.
9. Ehret, D. L., Zebarth, B. J., Portree, J. and Garland, T. 1998. Clay Addition to Soilless Media Promotes Growth and Yield of Greenhouse Crops. HortSci., 33: 67-70.
10. Föhse, D., Claassen, N. and Jungk, A. 1988. Phosphorous Efficiency of Plants. I. External and Internal P Requirement and P Uptake Efficiency of Different Plant Species. Plant Soil, 110: 101–109.
11. Gericke, V. S. and Kurmies, B. 1952. Die Kolorimetrische Phosphors-äurebestimmung mit Ammonium-Vanadat-Molybdat und ihre Anwendung in der Pflanzenanalyse. Z. Pflanzenernähr Bodenk, 59: 235–245.
12. Jungk, A. and Claassen, N. 1997. Ion Diffusion in the Soil-root System. Adv. Agro., 61: 53-110.
13. Khandan-Mirkohi, A. and Schenk, M. K. 2008. Phosphorus Dynamics in Peat-based Substrates. J. Plant Nut. Soil Sci., 171: 804-809
14. Khandan-Mirkohi, A. and Schenk, M. K. 2009a. Phosphorus Efficiency of Ornamental Plants in Peat-substrates. J. Plant Nut Soil Sci., 172: 369–377.
15. Khandan-Mirkohi, A. and Schenk, M. K. 2009b. Characteristics of Phosphorus Uptake Kinetics of Poinsettia and Marigold. Scientia Hort., 122: 251–257.
16. Murphy, J. and Riley, J. P. 1962. A Modified Single Solution Method for the Determination of Phosphate in Natural Waters. Anal. Chim. Acta, 27: 31–36.
17. Nye, P. H. 1979. Diffusion of Ions and Uncharged Solutes in Soils Clays. Adv. Agron., 31: 225–273.
18. SAS. 1996. SAS/STAT Software. Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
19. Tennant, D. 1975. A Test of a Modified Line Intersect Method of Estimating Root Length. J. Ecol., 63: 995–1001.
20. Ulrich, A. 1952. Physiological Bases for Assessing the Nutritional Requirements of Plants. Annul. Rev. Plant Phys., 3: 207-228.
21. VDLUFA, 1991. Bestimmung der Rohdichte (Volumengewicht) von gärtnerischen Erden und Substraten ohne sperrige Komponenten. VDLUFA Methodenbuch, Band I. Die Untersuchung von Böden 4 Auflage, VDLUFA Verlag, Darmstadt.
22. Verhagen, J. 2004. Effectiveness of Clay in Peat Based Growing Media. Acta Hort., 644: 115–118.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 17, Issue 1
January and February 2015
Pages 179-188