Differences in Rainfall Interception during the Growing and Non-growing Seasons in a Fraxinus rotundifolia Mill. Plantation Located in a Semiarid Climate

Authors
S. M. M. Sadeghi 1
P. Attarod 1
T. G. Pypker 2
1 Department of Forestry and Forest Economic, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Science, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, Canada.
Abstract
We estimated the rainfall interception loss (I), canopy storage capacity (S), the ratio of mean evaporation rate from the wet canopy () over the mean rainfall intensity () (mm h-1) (), and free throughfall coefficient (p) in a Fraxinus rotundifolia Mill. stand located in an afforested Park land in a semiarid region of Iran. For each storm event, I was calculated as the gross rainfall (GR) minus throughfall (TF). S was estimated by indirect methods: the minimum, the mean, and the Gash and Morton. Fifty-five rainfall events were recorded (cumulative GR 197.2 mm), with 31 events occurring during the growing season(total GR 88.0 mm) and 24 events measured during the non-growing season (total GR 109.2 mm). The mean ratio of I to GR equalled 39.2% during the growing season vs. 23.9% during the non-growing season. For the growing season, S was estimated to be 0.27, 0.21, and 0.23 mm using the minimum, mean, and Gash and Morton methods, respectively. For the non-growing season, these values were estimated to be 0.17, 0.13, and 0.15 mm, respectively. During the growing and non-growing seasons, were estimated to be 0.13 and 0.11, respectively, with the corresponding p values of 0.39 and 0.52. The loss of the leaves resulted in decline in I, S, and, and increase in p. For semiarid regions, these values are useful for solving some water management problems.

Keywords

1. Aboal, J. R., Morales, D., Hernández, M. and Jiménez, M. S. 1999. The Measurement and Modeling of the Variation of Stemflow in a Laurel Forest in Tenerife, Canary Islands. J. Hydrol., 221: 161–175.
2. Ahmadi, M. T., Attarod, P., Marvi-Mohadjer, M. R., Rahmani, R. and Fathi, J. 2009. Partitioning Rainfall into Throughfall, Stemflow and Interception Loss in an Oriental Beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) Forest during the Growing Season. Turk. J. Agric. For., 33: 557–568.
3. Ahmadi, M. T., Attarod, P. and Bayramzadeh, V. 2011. Rainfall Redistribution by an Oriental Beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) Forest Canopy in the Caspian Forests, Northern Iran. J. Agric. Sci. Tech., 13: 1105–1120.
4. André, F., Mathieu, J. and Ponette, Q. 2008. Effects of Biological and Meteorological Factors on Stemflow Chemistry within a Temperate Mixed Oak-beech Stand. Sci. Total. Environ., 393: 72–83.
5. Asadian, Y. 2007. Rainfall Interception in an Urban Environment. MSc. Thesis, the University of British Columbia, 84 PP.
6. Bruijnzeel, L. A. 2000. Forest Hydrology. In: “The Forestry Handbook”, (Ed.): Evans, J. S.. Blackwell, Oxford, 1: 301–343.
7. Carlyle-Moses, D. E. 2004. Throughfall, Stemflow, and Canopy Interception Loss Fluxes in a Semi-Arid Sierra Madre Oriental Matorral Community. J. Arid. Environ., 58: 181–202.
8. Carlyle-Moses, D. E., Park, A. D. and Cameron, J. L. 2010. Modelling Rainfall Interception Loss in Forest Restoration Trials in Panama. Ecohydrol., 3: 272–283.
9. Chang, M. 2006. Forest Hydrology: An Introduction to Water and Forests. Second Edition, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, USA, 488 pp.
10. Crockford, R. H. and Richardson, D. P. 1990. Partitioning of Rainfall in a Eucalypt Forest and Pine Plantation in Southeastern Australia. I. Throughfall Measurement in a Eucalypt Forest: Effect of Method and Species Composition. Hydrol. Process., 4: 131–144.
11. Crockford, R. H. and Richardson, D. P. 2000. Partitioning of Rainfall into Throughfall, Stemflow, and Interception: Effect of Forest Type, Ground Cover and Climate. Hydrol. Process., 14: 2903–2920.
12. Dunin, F. X., McIlroy, I. C. and O’Loughlin, E. M. 1985. A Lysimeter Characterization of Evaporation by Eucalypt Forest and its Representativeness for the Local Environment, In: “The Forest-atmosphere Interaction”, (Eds.): Hutchinson, B. A. and Hicks, B. B.. Reidel, Dordrecht, PP. 271–291.
13. Dunkerley, D. 2000. Measuring Interception Loss and Canopy Storage in Dryland Vegetation: A Brief Review and Evaluation of Available Research Strategies. Hydrol. Process., 14: 669–678.
14. Fathizadeh, O., Attarod, P., Pypker, T. G., Darvishsefat, A. A. and Zahedi Amiri, G. 2013. Seasonal Variability of Rainfall Interception and Canopy Storage Capacity Measured under Individual Oak (Quercus brantii) Trees in Western Iran. J. Agric. Sci. Tech., 15: 175–188.
15. Feller, M. C. 1981. Water Balances in Eucalyptus regnans, E. Obliqua, and Pinus radiata Forests in Victoria. Aust. Forestry, 44: 153–161.
16. Friesen, P., Park, A. and Sarmineto-Serrud, A. A. 2013. Comparing Rainfall Interception in Plantation Trials of Six Tropical Hardwood Trees and Wild Sugar Cane Saccharum spontaneum L. Ecohydrol., 6: 765-774.
17. Gash, J. H. C., Lloyd, C. and Lachau, G. 1995. Estimating Sparse Sorest Rainfall Interception with an Analytical Model. J. Hydrol., 170: 79–86.
18. Gash, J. H. C. and Morton, A. J. 1978. An Application of the Rutter Model to the Estimation of the Interception Loss from the Thetford Forest. J. Hydrol., 48: 89–105.
19. Gash, J. H. C., Wright, I. R. and Lloyd, C. R. 1980. Comparative Estimates of Interception Loss from Three Coniferous Forests in Great Britain. J. Hydrol., 38: 49–58.
20. Gonzalez-Sosa, E., Mastachi-Loza, C. A., Braud, I. and Guevara- Escobar, A. 2009. The Rainfall Interception in the Semiarid Plateau of Center of Mexico. EGU General Assembly, A266, 19-24 April, Vienna, Austria. P. 2211.
21. Herwitz, S. R. 1985. Interception Storage Capacities of Tropical Rainforest Canopy, Trees. J. Hydrol., 77: 237–252.
22. Holder, C. D. 2004. Rainfall Interception and Fog Precipitation in a Tropical Montane Cloud Forest of Guatemala. For. Ecol. Manage., 190: 373–384.
23. Horton, R. E. 1919. Rainfall Interception. Mon. Weather. Rev., 47: 608–623.
24. Hörmann, G., Branding, A., Clemen, T., Herbst, M., Hinrichs, A. and Thamm, F. 1996. Calculation and Simulation of Wind Controlled Canopy Interception of a Beech Forest in Northern Germany. Agric. For. Meteorol., 79: 131–148.
25. Jackson, I. J. 1975. Relationships between Rainfall Parameters and Interception by Tropical Rainforest. J. Hydrol., 24: 215–238.
26. Jazirei, M. H. and Ebrahimi-Rostaghi, M. 2005. Silviculture of Zagros. University of Tehran, Iran, 560 pp.
27. Jetten, V. G. 1996. Interception of Tropical Rain Forest: Performance of Canopy Water Balance Model. Hydrol. Process., 10: 671–685.
28. Klaassen, W., Bosveld, F. and de Water, E. 1998. Water Storage and Evaporation as Constituents of Rainfall Interception. J. Hydrol., 212–213: 36–50.
29. Leyton, L., Reynolds, E. R. C. and Thompson, F. B. 1967. Rainfall Interception in Forest and Moorland. In: “International Symposium on Forest Hydrology”, (Eds.): Sopper, W. E. and Lull, H. W.. Pergamon, Oxford, PP. 163–178.
30. Link, T. E., Unsworth, M. and Marks, D. 2004. The Dynamics of Rainfall Interception by a Seasonal Temperate Rainforest. Agric. For. Meteorol., 124: 171–191.
31. Llorens, P. and Gallart, F. 2000. A Simplified Method for Forest Water Storage Capacity Measurement. J. Hydrol., 240: 131–144.
32. Lloyd, C. R. and De Marques, F. 1988. Spatial Variability of Throughfall and Stemflow Measurements in Amazonian Rainforest. Agric. For. Meteorol., 42: 63–73.
33. Mateos, B. and Schnabel, S. 2001. Rainfall Interception by Holm Oaks in Mediterranean Open Woodland. Cuad. Investig. Geogr., 27: 27–38.
34. Motahari, M., Attarod, P., Pypker, T. G., Etemad, V. and Shirvany, A. 2013. Rainfall Interception and Canopy Storage Capacity of a Pinus eldarica Plantation in a Semi-Arid Climate Zone: an Application of the Gash Model. J. Agric. Sci. Tech., 15: 981–994.
35. Muzylo, A., Llorens, P. and Domingo, F. 2012. Rainfall Partitioning in a Deciduous Forest Plot in Leafed and Leafless Periods. Ecohydrol., 5: 759-767.
36. Muzylo, A., Llorens, P., Valente, F., Keizer, J. J., Domingo, F. and Gash, J. H. C. 2009. Review of Rainfall Interception Modelling. J. Hydrol., 370: 191–206.
37. Návar, J. 1993. The Causes of Stemflow Variation in Three Semi-Arid Growing Species of Northeastern Mexico. J. Hydrol., 145: 175–190.
38. Návar, J. 2011. Stemflow Variation in Mexico’s Northeastern Forest Communities: Its Contribution to Soil Moisture and Aquifer Recharge. J. Hydrol., 408: 35–52.
39. Návar, J. 2013. The Performance of the Reformulated Gash’s Interception Loss Model in Mexico’s Northeastern Temperate Forests. Hydrol. Process., 27: 1626–1633.
40. Návar, J. and Bryan, R. 1990. Interception Loss and Rainfall Redistribution by Three Semi-Arid Growing Shrubs in Northeastern Mexico. J. Hydrol., 115: 51–63.
41. Návar, J. and Bryan, R. 1994. Fitting the Analytical Model of Rainfall Interception of Gash to Individual Shrubs of Semi-arid Vegetation in Northeastern Mexico. Agric. For. Meteorol., 68: 133–143.
42. Návar, J., Carlyle-Moses, D.E. and Martínez, A. 1999a. Interception Loss from the Tamaulipan Matorral Thornscrub of North-Eastern Mexico: An Application of the Gash Analytical Interception Loss Model. J. Arid. Environ., 41: 1–10.
43. Návar, J., Charles, F. and Jurado, E. 1999b. Spatial Variations of Interception Loss Components by Tamaulipan Thornscrub in Northeastern Mexico. For. Ecol. Manage., 124: 231–239.
44. Neal, C., Robson, A. J., Bhardwaj, C. L., Conway, T., Jefery, H. A., Meal, M., Ryland, G. P., Smith, C. J. and Walls, J. 1993. Relationships between Precipitation, Stemflow and Throughfall for a Lowland Beech Plantation, Black Wood, Hampshire, Southern England: Interception at a Forest Edge and the Effects of Storm Damage. J. Hydrol., 146: 221–233.
45. Pypker,T. G., Bond, B. J., Link, T. E., Marks, D. and Unsworth, M. H. 2005. The Importance of Canopy Structure in Controlling the Interception Loss of Rainfall: Examples from a Young and an Old-growth Douglas-Fir Forest. Agric. For. Meteorol., 130: 113–129.
46. Pypker, T. G., Levia, D. F., Staelens, J. and Van Stan, J. T. 2011. Canopy Structure in Relation to Hydrological and Biogeochemical Fluxes. XVII. In: "Forest Hydrology and Biogeochemistry: Synthesis of Past Research and Future Directions", (Eds.): Levia, D. F., Carlyle-Moses, D. E. and Tanaka, T.. Ecological Studies Series, No. 216, Springer– Verlag, Heidelberg, PP. 371–388.
47. Rowe, L. 1983. Rainfall Interception by an Evergreen Beech Forest, Nelson, New Zealand. J. Hydrol., 66: 143–158.
48. Rutter, A. J., Morton, A. J. and Robins, P. C. 1975. A Predictive Model of Rainfall Interception in Forests. II. Generalization of the Model and Comparison with Observations in some Coniferous and Hardwood Stands. J. App. Ecol., 12: 367–380.
49. Sadeghi, S. M. M., Attarod, P., Pypker, T. G. and Bayramzadeh, V. 2013. Mathematical Models for Estimation of Canopy Water Storage Capacity by Individual Pinus eldarica Trees. Biosphere Reserves: The Way to Sustainability (Gian). 20–21 April, Karaj, Iran.
50. Sadeghi, S. M. M., Attarod, P., Pypker T.G. and Dunkerley, D. 2014. Is Canopy Interception Increased in Semiarid Tree Plantations? Evidence from a Field Investigation in Tehran, Iran. Turk. J. Agric. For., 38: 792–806.
51. Sadeghi, S. M. M., Attarod, P., Van Stan II, J. T., Pypker, T. G. and Dunkerley, D. 2015. Efficiency of the Reformulated Gash's Interception Model in Semiarid Afforestations. Agric. For. Meteorol., 201: 76-85.
52. Šraj, M., Brilly, M. and Mikos, M. 2008. Rainfall Interception by Two Deciduous Mediterranean Forests of Contrasting Stature in Slovenia. Agric. For. Meteorol., 148: 121–134.
53. Staelens, J., De Schrijver, A., Verheyen, K. and Verhoest, N. E. C. 2008. Rainfall Partitioning into Throughfall, Stemflow, and Interception within a Single Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Canopy: Influence of Foliation, Rain Event Characteristics, and Meteorology. Hydrol. Process., 22: 33–45.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 17, Issue 1
January and February 2015
Pages 145-156