Age-specific Functional Response of Trichogramma brassicae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Parasitizing Different Egg Densities of Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Authors
R. Nikbin 1
A. Sahragard 1
M. Hosseini 2
1 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
The parasitoid Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko is used for inundative releases in biological control programs against lepidopteran pests in agro-ecosystems. Age-specific functional responses of T. brassicae to different egg densities (5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, and 80) of sterilized eggs of Ephestia kuehniella at 23±1°C, 60±5% RH, and 16:8 h (L:D photoperiod ) were studied. E. kuehniella densities were separately presented to a single mated female of T. brassicae (1-day-old). The egg densities were replaced every day until the parasitoid died and each density was replicated 20 times. A type III functional response was obtained for the one-day-old females and a type II for two- to nine-day-old ones. Results show that parasitoid age influences searching efficiency and handling time. Searching efficiency (a´) varied as adult parasitoids aged. In contrast, handling time increased with age. The lowest and highest values were obtained in days 1 and 9 of the parasitoid's life, respectively. The maximum rate of parasitism (T/Th) decreased significantly with an increase in parasitoid age. It was concluded that T. brassicae females were most efficient at early ages of their life and might be capable of efficiently suppressing lepidopteran pest populations.

Keywords

1. Allahyari, H., AzmayeshFard, P. and Nozari, J. 2004. Effects of Host on Functional Response of Offspring in Two Populations of Trissolcus grandis on the Sunn Pest. J. Appl. Entomol., 128: 39-43.
2. Ambrose, D. P, Claver, M. A. and Mariappan, P. 1996. Functional Response of Hynocoris marginatus Fabricius (Heteroptera: Reduvidae) to Mylabris pustulata (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Fresenius Environ. Bull., 5: 85-89.
3. ArbabTafti, R., Sahragard, A., Salehi, L. and Asgari, Sh. 2004. Study on Functional Response of Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) to Different Densities of Sitotroga cerealella Olivier (Lepidoptera: Gelechidae) Eggs. J. Agric. Sci., 1(1): 1-8.
4. Asadi, R., Talebi, A. A., Khalaghani, J., Fathipour, Y., Moharramipour, S. and Askari Siahooei, M. 2012. Age-specific Functional Response of Psyllaephagus zdeneki (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), Parasitoid of Euphyllura pakistanica (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). J. Crop. Protec., 1(1): 1-15.
5. Atlihan, R. and BoraKaydan, M. 2010. Functional Response of the Coccinellid Predator, Adalia fasciatopunctata revelierei to Walnut Aphid (Callaphis juglandis). Phytopara., 38: 23- 29.
6. Atlihan, R. and Chi, H. 2008. Temperature-dependent Development and Demography of Scymnus subvillosus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Reared on Hyalopterus pruni (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol., 101: 325-333.
7. Atlihan, R. and Guldal, H. 2009. Prey Density-Dependent Feeding Activity and Life History of Scymnus subvillosus. Phytopara., 37: 35-41.
8. Azema, M. and Mirabzadeh, A. 2005. Issues on Different Aspects of Applying Natural Enemies in Biological Control of Insect Pests. Sepehr Publication, Iran, 213 PP.
9. Badii, M. H., Hemandez-Ortiz, E., Flores, A. and Landerose, J. N. 2004. Prey Stage Preference and Functional Response of Euseius hibisci to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 34: 263-273.
10. Berryman, A. A. 1999. The Theoretical Foundations of Biological Control. In: “Theoretical Approaches to Biological Control”, (Eds.): Hawkins, B. A and Cornell, H. V.. Cambridge University Press, PP. 3-21.
11. Bueno, R. C. O. F., Parra, J. R. P. and Bueno, A. F. 2009. Biological Characteristics and Thermal Requirements of a Brazilian Strain of the Parasitoid, Trichogramma pretiosum Reared on Eggs of Pseudoplusia includens and Anticarsia gemmatalis. Biol. Cont., 51: 355-361.
12. Chen, W. L., Leopold, R. A. and Harris, M. O. 2006. Parasitism of the Glassy-winged Sharpshooter, Homalodisca coagulata (Homoptera: Cicadellidae): Functional Response and Superparasitism by Gonatocerus ashmeadi (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae). Biol. Cont., 37: 119-129.
13. Chong, J. H. and Oetting, R. D. 2006a. Functional Response and Progeny Production of the Madeira Mealybug Parasitoid, Anagyrus sp.nov.nr. sinope: The Effect of Host Stage Preference. Biol. Cont., 41: 78- 85.
14. Chong, J. H. and Oetting, R. D. 2006b. Host Stage Selection of the Mealybug Parasitoid Anagyrus sp. nov.nr. sinope. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 121: 39-50.
15. Coll, M. and Ridgway, R. L. 1995. Functional and Numerical Response of Orius insidiosus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) to Its Prey in Different Vegetable Crops. Ann. Entomol. Soci. Am., 88: 732-738.
16. Ding-Xu, L., Juan, T. and Zuo-Rui, Sh. 2007. Functional Response of the Predator Scolothrips takahashii to Hawthorn Spider Mite, Tetranychus viennensis: Effect of Age and Temperature. Bio. Cont., 52: 41-61.
17. Ebrahimi, E., Pinturea, B. and Shojai, M. 1998. Morphological and Enzymatic Study of the Genus Trichogramma in Iran. Appl. Entomol. Phytopathol., 66(2 and 1): 39-43.
18. Farazmand, A. and Iranipour, Sh. 2006. Functional Response of Trichogramma brassicae Bez. (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae) to Different Densities of Anagasta kuehniella Zell. And Plodia interpunctella Hub. Eggs in Laboratory Conditions. 1. Pests. Proceedings of the 17th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, 2-5 September 2006, Campus of Agricultural and Natural resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. (in Persian with English Abstract)
19. Farrokhi, S., Ashouri, A., Shirazi, J., Allahyari, H. and Huigens, M. E. 2010. A comparative Study on the Functional Response of Wolbachia-infected and Uninfected forms of the Parasitoid wasp Trichogramma brassicae. J. Insect. Sci., 10: 167.
20. Fathipour,Y., Kamali, K., Khalaghani, J. and Abdollahi, G. 2001. Functional Response of Trissolcus grandis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) to Different Egg Densities of Eurygaster integriceps (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae) and Effects of Wheat Genotypes on It. Appl. Entomol. Phytopathol., 68: 123-136.
21. Fathipour,Y., Hosseini, A., Talebi, A. A. and Moharramipour, S. 2006. Functional Response and Mutual Interference of Diaeretiella rapae (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) on Brevicoryne brassicae (Homoptera: Aphididae). Entomol. Fenn., 17: 90-97.
22. Gonza'lez-Hernandez, H., Pandey, R. R. and Johnson, M. W. 2005. Biological Characteristics of Adult Anagyrus ananatis Gahan (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae): A Parasitoid of Dysmicoccus brevipes Cockerell (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Biol. Cont., 35: 93-103.
23. Hassell, M. P. 1978. The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator–Prey Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 237 PP.
24. Hassell, M. P. 1982. Patterns of Parasitism by Insect Parasites in Patchy Environments. Ecol. Entomol., 7: 365-377.
25. Hassell, M. P. 2000. The Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Host Parasitoid Interactions. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution, Oxford University Press, London, PP.212.
26. Hassell, M. P. and Waage, J. K. 1984. Host-parasitoid Population Interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 29: 89- 114.
27. Hassell, M. P., Lawton, J. H. and Beddington, J. R. 1977. Sigmoid Functional Responses by Invertebrate Predators and Parasitoids. J. Anim. Ecol., 46: 249-262.
28. Holling, C. S. 1966. Functional Response of Invertebrate Predators to Prey Density. Mem. Entomol. Soci. Can., 48: 1- 87.
29. Holling C. S. 1959. Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism. Can. Entomol., 91: 317-324.
30. Jamshidnia, A., Kharazi-Pakdel, A., Allahyari, H. and Soleymannejadian, E. 2010. Functional Response of Telenomus busseolae (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) an Egg Parasitoid of the Sugarcane Stem borer, Sesamia nonagrioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) at Different Temperatures. Biocont. Sci. Techno., 20: 631-640.
31. Jervis, M. A. and Kidd, N. A. C. 1996. Insect Natural Enemies. Practical Approaches to Their Study and Evaluation. Chapman and Hall, London, 491 PP.
32. Juliano, S. A. 1993. Nonlinear Curve Fitting: Predation and Functional Response Curves. In: “Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments”, (Eds.): Scheiner, S. M. and Gurevitch, J. Chapman and Hall, London, PP. 159-138.
33. Juliano, S. A. 2001. Nonlinear Curve Fitting: Predation and Functional Curves. In: “Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments”, (Eds.): Scheiner, S. M. and Gurevitch, J.. 2nd Edition, Chapman and Hall, PP. 159-182.
34. Li, Y. L. 1994. Worldwide use of Trichogramma for Biological Control on Different Crops: A Survey. In: “Biological Control with Egg Parasitoids”, (Eds.): Wajnberg, E. and Hassann, S. A.. CAB International. 286 PP.
35. Messina, F. J. and Hanks, J. B. 1998. Host Plant Alters the Shape of Functional Response of an Aphid Predator (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environ. Entomol., 27: 1196-1202.
36. Moezipour, M., Kafil, M. and Allahyari, H. 2008. Functional Response of Trichogramma brassicae at Different Temperatures and Relative Humidities. Bull. Insectol., 62(2): 245-250.
37. Mohaghegh, J., DeClercq, P. and Tirry, L. 2001. Functional Response of the Predators Podisus maculiventris (Say) and Podisus nigrispinus (Dallas) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) to the Beet Age-specific Functional Response of Trichogramma brassicae Armyworms, Spodoptera exigua Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Effect of Temperature. J. Appl. Entomol.,125: 131-134.
38. Munyaneza, J. and Obrycki, J. J. 1997. Functional Response of Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae) to Colorado Potato Beetle Eggs (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Biol. Cont., 8: 215-224.
39. Mills, N. J. and Lacan, I. 2004. Ratio Dependence in the Functional Response of Insect Parasitoids: Evidence from Trichogramma minutum Foraging for Eggs in Small Host Patches. Ecol. Entomol., 29: 208-216.
40. Parra, J. R. P. and Zucchi, R. A. 2004. Trichogramma in Brazil: Feasibility of Use after Twenty Years of Research. Neotrop. Entomol., 33: 271-281.
41. Parajulee, M. N, Shrestha, R. B, Lester, J. F., Wester, D. B. and Blanco, C. A. 2006. Evaluation of the Functional Response of Selected Arthropod Predators on Bollworm Eggs in the Laboratory and Effect of Temperature on Their Predation Efficiency. Environ. Entomol., 35: 379-386.
42. Price, P. W. 1986. Ecological Aspects of Host Plant Resistance and Biological Control: Interactions among Three Trophic Levels. In: “Interactions of Plant Resistance and Parasitoids and Predators of Insects”, (Eds.): Boethel, D. J. and Eikenbry, R. D.. 224 Ellis Horwood Ltd, PP. 11-30.
43. Reay-Jones, F. P. F., Rochat, J., Goebel, R. and Tabone, E. 2006. Functional Response of Trichogramma chilonis to Galleria mellonella and Chilo sacchariphagus Eggs. Entomol. Exp. Applic., 118: 229-236.
44. Reznik, S. Y., Umarova, T. Y. and Voinovich, N. D. 2003. Egg Retention in chogramma (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Trichogrammatidae): Learning or Diapause? Acta Soc. Zool. Bohem., 67: 25–33.
45. Royama, T. 1971. A Comparative Study of Models for Predation and Parasitism. Res. Popul. Ecol. Suppl., 1: 1-90.
46. Rogers, D. 1972. Random Search and Insect Population Models. J. Anim. Ecol., 41: 369-383.
47. SAS Institute. 2001: SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
48. Sahragard, A. 1989. Biological Studies on Dicondylus indianus (Olmi) (Hymenoptera: Drynidae) with Particular Reference to Foraging Behavior. PhD. Thesis, College of Cardiff, University of Wales, Wales, UK, 297 PP.
49. Shojaei, Sh., Safaralizadeh, M. H. and Shayesteh, N. 2006. Effect of Temperature on the Functional Response of Habrobracon hebetor S. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to Various Densities of the Host, Plodia interpunctella H. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Pak. Entomol., 28: 51-56.
50. Smith, S. M. 1996. Biological Control with Trichogramma: Advances, Successes, and Their Potential Use. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 41: 375-406.
51. Solomon, M. E. 1949. The Natural Control of Animal Populations. J. Anim. Ecol., 18: 1-35.
52. Tahriri, S., Talebi, A. A., Fathipour, Y. and Zamani, A. A. 2007. Host Stage Preference, Functional Response and Mutual Interference of Aphidius matricariae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) on Aphis fabae (Homoptera: Aphididae). Entomol. Sci., 10: 323-331.
53. Timms, J. E., Oliver, T. H., Straw, N. A. and Leather, S. R. 2008. The Effects of Host Plant on the Coccinellid Functional Response: Is the Conifer Specialist, Aphidecta obliterate (L.)(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Better Adapted to Spruce than the Generalist, Adalia bipunctata (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Biol. Cont., 47: 273-281.
54. Wajnberg, E., Carlos Bernstein, C. and Van Alphen, J. 2008. Behavioural Ecology of Insect Parasitoids: From Theoretical Approaches to Field Applications. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, 464 PP.
55. Wang, B. and Ferro, D. N. 1998. Functional Response of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) to Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) under Laboratory and Field Conditions. Environ. Entomol., 27: 752-758.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 16, Issue 6
November and December 2014
Pages 1217-1227