Effects of Land Use Changes on Water Balance in Taleghan Catchment, Iran

Authors
M. Hosseini 1
A. M. Ghafouri 1
M. S. M. Amin 2
M. R. Tabatabaei 3
M. Goodarzi 1
A. Abde Kolahchi 1
1 Research Institute for Water Scarcity and Drought (RIWSD)
2 University Putra Malaysia (UPM)
3 Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute (SCWMRI)
Abstract
In recent years, changes in catchments water balance due to land use management have become the main concern of water resources authorities in Iran. Due to rapid population growth and land use changes, especially construction of Taleghan dam, Taleghan catchment has undergone rapid changes such as urban development, declining of rangelands, and deterioration of environment and erosion of soil resources by cultivating the hilly lands along the slopes for wheat or barely production. The extent of rangeland area shrinkage is substantial: from 83% during the early stages of dam construction down to 35% by the end of the study period. The ‘good’ rangeland area decreased to 5.90% from 34.49% while the poor rangeland increased from 19.04 to 23.35% during the period of 1987 to 2007. These changes could potentially have devastating impacts on water balance of the catchment. The main objective of this research was to examine the effects of land use changes on water balance of the Taleghan catchment before and after the dam construction. The Soil and Water Assessment Tools (SWAT) model was applied for predicting water balance in the middle and outlet of the catchment. The main input data for simulation of SWAT are Digital Elevation Model (DEM), soil type, soil properties, and hydro-climatological data. Comparing the water balance for 1987's land use for the middle station (Joestan) and the outlet station (Galinak) showed that surface runoff was 21% of the precipitation for the upper part of the catchment and 33% at the outlet. Total groundwater and lateral flows were 37 and 19%, respectively. The water balance at the outlet was predicted for two other scenarios of 2001 and 2007. The results showed 7.3% increase in surface runoff and 11.3 and 11% decrease in the lateral flow and groundwater flow, respectively. These results indicated progressive increase in surface runoff and decline in interflow and groundwater flow.Therefore, one of the main challenges facing development planners is the control of the accelerated degradation of the natural resources that has been taking place during the last decade.

Keywords

1. Abbaspour, K. C., Yang, J., Maximov, I., Siber, R., Bonger, K., Mieleitner, J., Zobrist, J. and Srinivasen, R. 2007. Modelling Hydrology and Water Quality in the Pre-Alpine/Alpine Tour Watershed Using SWAT. J. Hydrol., 333:413-430.
2. Abbaspour, K. C. and Yang, J. 2006. A Calibration and Uncertainly Analysis Program for SWAT. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Scientific and Technology, pp.29-32.
3. Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S. and Williams, J. R. 1998. Large Area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment Part I: Model Development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1): 73–89.
4. Beven K., Lamb R., Quinn P., Romanowicz R., and Freer J. 1995. TOPMODEL. In: "Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology", (Ed.): Singh, V. P.. Department of Civil and Environment Engineering Louisiana State University, Water Resources Publications, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-64405, USA, pp.627-668.
5. DeFries, R. and Eshleman, K.N. 2004. Land-use Change and Hydrologic Processes: a Major Focus for the Future. Hydrol. Processes, 18: 2183-2186.
6. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran (FAUT). 1993. General Investigation of Taleghan Basin: Hydrometeology and Climatology Report. 2: 20-25.
7. Fohrer, N., Haverkamp, S., Frede, H. G. 2005. Assessment of the Long-term Effects of Land Use Patterns on Hydrologic Landscape Functions—sustainable Land Use Concepts for Low Mountain Range Areas. Hydrol. Processes, 19: 659–672.
8. FAUT, (1993). Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran. General investigation of Taleghan basin, Hydrometeology and climatology report: 2: 20-25.
9. Hatton, T. J. and Dawes, W. 1993. TOPOG_IRM. 2. Examples Simulation. CSIRO Division of Water Resources, Tech. Memo. 93/6.
10. Hosseini, M. 2011. Effect of Land use Changes on Water Balance and Suspended Sediment Yield of Taleghan Catchment, Iran. PhD Thesis, UPM, Serdang, Malaysia.
11. Klemes, V. 1986. Dilettantism in Hydrology: Transition or Destiny? Water Resour. Res., 22(9): 177-188.
12. Kokkonen, T. S. and Jakeman, A. J. 2002. Structural Effects of Landscape and Land Use on Streamflow Response. 14. In: "Environmental Foresight and Models", (Eds.): Manifesto, A., Beck, M. A.. Elsevier, Amsterdam, PP. 303-321.
13. Linsley, Jr. R. K., Kohler, M. A. and Paulhus, J. L. H. 1982. Hydrology for Engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York, 508 PP.
14. Linsley, Jr. R. K., Kohler, M. A. and Paulhus, J. L. H. 1949. Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York.
15. Moria, T. F., Charls, W. D. and Aaran, R. B. 2007. A GSSHA Model of the Perris Basin of the San Jacinto River Watershed, Riverside County, California. US Army Crops of Engineers.
16. Motovilov, Y. G., Gottschalk, L., Engeland, K. and Rodhe, A. 1999. Validation of a Distributed Hydrological Model against Spatial Observations. Agric. For. Meteorol., 98-99: 257-277.
17. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe J. V. 1970. River Flow Forecasting through Conceptual Models: A Discussion of Principles. J. Hydrol., 10(3): 282-290.
18. Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R. and Williams, J. R. 2005. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2005. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Blackland Research Center, Temple, Texas.
19. Priestley, C. H. B. and Taylor, R. J. 1972. On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-scale Parameters. Monthly Weather Review, 100: 81-92.
20. Ritchie, J. T. 1972. Mode for Predicting Evaporation from a Row Crop with Incomplete Cover. Water Resour. Res., 8: 1204-1213.
21. Saadati, H., Gholami, S.A., Sharifi, F. and Ayoubzadeh, S.A. 2006. An Investigation of the Effects of Land Use Change on Simulating Surface Runoff Using SWAT Mathematical Model (Case Study: Kasilian Catchment Area). J. Iran's Natu. Reso., 301-313.
22. USDA-SCS. 1972. National Engineering Handbook. Part 630. Hydrology, Section 4, Chapter 10. Estimation of Direct Runoff from Storm Rainfall. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC, 10.1-10.24.
23. Williams, J. R.1975. Sediment Routing for Agricultural Watersheds. Water Resources Bull. 11(5): 965–974.
24. Williams, J. R. 1969. Flood Routing with Variable Travel Time or Variable Storage Coefficients. Trans. ASAE, 12(1): 100-103.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 14, Issue 5
September and October 2012
Pages 1161-1174