Seasonal Occurrence, Abundance, and Within-Plant Distribution of the Citrus Rust Mite, Phyllocoptruta oleivora Ashmead (Acari: Eriophyidae), on Different Citrus Species in Southern Türkiye

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Acarology Laboratory, Department of Plant Protection, Agricultural Faculty, Çukurova University, 01330 Adana, Türkiye
Abstract
This study investigated the seasonal occurrence and abundance of the Citrus rust mite, Phyllocoptruta oleivora Ashmead (Acari: Eriophyidae), on leaves and fruits, and its directional preferences on different citrus species in Adana, Türkiye from 2019 to 2021. The research was conducted in two orchard types: a commercial, sprayed orchard with lemon (Citrus limon cv. Interdonato), orange (C. sinensis cv. W. Navel), mandarin (C. reticulata cv. W. Murcott), and grapefruit (C. paradisi cv. Riored), and a minimally sprayed experimental orchard with lemon (cv. Meyer), orange (cv. W. Navel), and mandarin (cv. Okitsu). Among the citrus species examined in both orchard types, lemon exhibited the highest mean population density of P. oleivora. The mean total density of P. oleivora on lemon leaves was 0.757 and 1.899 all stages/cm² in the commercial and experimental orchards, respectively. In the commercial orchards, no mite population development was observed on the fruits. However, in the experimental orchards, the mean population density reached 4.680 all stages/cm² on lemon. In the experimental orchards, P. oleivora was first observed in May on lemon and reached its peak in August on the same host. In contrast, in the commercial orchards, the mite was first detected in September on lemon, and peaked in November. Directional preferences varied between orchard types. In the commercial orchards, no directional differences were detected except on lemon, where P. oleivora densities were higher in the west and north. In the experimental orchards, P. oleivora densities were highest in the west and north across all citrus species.
Keywords
Subjects

1.   Aghajanzadeh, S. and Mallik, B. 2007. Sampling and Distribution Pattern of Citrus Rust Mite, Phyllocoptruta oleivora Ashmead (Acari, Eriophyidae) Using Adhesive Tape Method. Int. J. of Agric. Biol., 9(2): 329–332.
2.   Al-Azzazy, M. M. 2016. Population Fluctuation and Control of the Citrus Rust Mite, Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead) (Arachnida: Prostigmata: Eriophyidae). J. Agric. Vet. Sci., 9(2): 175–186.
3.   Athanassiou, C. G., Kavallieratos, N. G., Palyvos, N. E., Sciarretta, A. and Trematerra, P. 2005. Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Insects and Mites in Horizontally-Stored Wheat. J.  Econ. Entomol., 98: 1058–1069.
4.   Brussel, E. W. 1975. Inter-Relations Between Citrus Rust Mite, Fungi, Hirsutella thompsonii and Greasy Spot on Citrus in Surinam. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation Wageningen. Agricultural Research Report No: 842, 66 PP.
5.   Chen, P. H., Wang, T. C., Chen, C. N., Huang, C. H. and Huang, S. A. 2018. Population Dynamic and Spatial Distribution of the Citrus Rust Mite, Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead), on Three Varieties of Citrus in Taiwan. J. of Taiwan Agric. Res., 67(2): 166–180.
6.   Demard, E. and Qureshi, J. A. 2020. Citrus Rust Mite Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead) (Arachnida: Acari: Eriophyidae): University of Florida, IFAS, Extension Finesville, FL. USA. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN1278
7.   Gerson, U. 2003. Acarine Pests of Citrus: Overview and Non Chemical Control. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 8: 3–12.
8.   Hall, D. G., Childers, C. C. and Eger, J. E. 1991. Estimating Citrus Rust Mite (Acari: Eriophyidae) Levels on Fruit in Individual Citrus Trees. Environ. Entomol., 20(1): 382–390.
9.   Hoy, M. A. 2011. Agricultural Acarology: Introduction to Integrated Mite Management. CRC Press, 430 PP.
10.  IBM Corp. 2015. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY, IBM Corp.
11.  Jeppson L. R., Keifer, H. H. and Baker, E. W. 1975. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. University of California Press, Berkeley, 614 PP.
12.  Jyotika, K.G. and Mandeep, K. 2003. Biochemical Basis of Differential Susceptibility of Citrus Cultivars to Infestation with the Citrus Mite Eutetranychus orientalis (Klein). Ann. Biol., 19: 235–240.
13.  Kalkan, Ç. and Satar, S. 2024. Resistance of Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Acari: Eriophyidae) to Acaricides in Turkey. Crop Prot., 182: 10642.
14.  Madanlar, N. 1991. Studies on Acarina Species and Population Densities in Citrus in İzmir Province, Ph.D. Thesis, Ege University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, İzmir, Türkiye, 258 PP.  (Turkish with English summary).
15.  McCoy, C. W., Davis, P. L. and Munroe, K. A. 1976. Effect of Late Season Fruit Injury by the Citrus Rust Mite, Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea), on the Internal Quality of Valencia Orange. Fla. Entomol., 59: 335–342.
16.  Mohamed, I. I. 1965. Host Preference of the Citrus Brown Mite Eutetranychus banksi (McGregor). Bull. Ent. Soc. Egypt, 48: 163–170.
17.  Puspitarini, R. D. and Endarto, O. 2021. Notes on the Citrus Rust Mite, Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead), as a Major Pest of Citrus in Indonesia. AGRIVITA J. Agric. Sci., 43(3): 550–557.
18.  Saad, A. S. A., Tayeb, E. H. M., El-Shazly, M. E. and Attia, S. A. A. B. 2018. Population Dynamics and Control of the Citrus Rust Mite, Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead) Infesting Orange Trees in Egypt. J. Adv. Agric. Res., 23(1): 24–43.
19.  Sarada, G., Nagalakshmi, T., Gopal, K. and Yuvaraj, K.M. 2018. Citrus Rust Mite (Phyllocoptruta oleivora Ashmead): A Review.  J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 6(6): 151–158.
20.  Satar S., Tiring, G., İşpınar, D. and Yayla, M. 2020. Population Development of Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead) (Acari: Phyllocoptidae) Under Adana Ecological Conditions. Plant Prot. Bull., 60(1): 11–16.
21.  Shivarju, B. 1990. Population Dynamics, Biology and Control of Citrus Rust Mite, Phyllocoptruta oleivora Ashmead. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India.
22.  Silva, R. R., Teodoro, A. V., Martins, C. R., Carvalho, H. W. L., Silva, S. S., Farias, A. P. and Guzzo, E. C. 2017. Seasonal Variation of Pest Mite Populations in Relation to Citrus Scion Cultivars in Northeastern Brazil. Acta Agron., 66(2): 290–295.
23.  Southwood T. R. E. and Henderson, P. A. 2000. Ecological Methods. Blackwell Science, USA, 575 PP.
24.  Stansly, P. A. and Kostyk, B. C. 2015. Acaricidal Control of Citrus Rust mites 2014. Arth. Manag. Tests, 40(1): D21.
25.  Vacante V. and Gerson, U. 2012. Acari. In: “Integrated Control of Citrus Pests in the Mediterranean Region”. Bentham Science Publishers, Sharjah, UAE, PP. 88–108.
26.  Villanueva, R. T. 2002. A Study of the Biology and Ecology of Selected Predators of Phytophagous Mites on Florida Citrus. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. USA, 157 PP.
27.  Wermelinger, B., Oertli, J. J. and Baumgärtner, J. 1991. Environmental Factors Affecting the Life-Tables of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) III. Host-Plant Nutrition. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 12: 259–274.
28.  Yalçın, K., Döker, İ. and Kazak, C. 2022. Impact of Citrus Species on the Biological Characteristics and Life Table Parameters of Eutetranychus orientalis (Klein) (Acari: Tetranychidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol., 27(1): 107–117.
29.  Yalçın, K. and Kazak, C. 2025. Seasonal Occurrence and Prevalence of the Invasive Spider Mite Eutetranychus orientalis (Klein, 1936) and the Citrus Red Mite Panonychus citri (McGregor, 1916) (Prostigmata: Tetranychidae) in Citrus-Growing and Recreational Areas of Adana (Türkiye). Türk. Entomol. Derg., 49(2): 89102
30.  Yang, Y. 1994. Population Dynamics and Damage Effects of the Citrus Rust Mite Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead) (Acari: Eriophyidae). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA, 192 PP.
31.  Yothers W. W. and Mason, A. C. 1930. The Citrus Rust Mite and Its Control. USDA Agric. Tech. Bull., 176: 7–16.
32.  Zanardi, O. Z., Bordini, G. P., Franco, A. A. de Morais, M. R. and Yamamoto, P. T. 2015. Development and Reproduction of Panonychus citri (Prostigmata: Tetranychidae) on Different Species and Varieties of Citrus Plants. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 67: 565–581.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 22 July 2026