Improving Probiotic Viability: The Effect of Alyssum homolocarpum gum as an Encapsulation Material

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Department of Biology, ET.C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Nutrition, Electronic Health and Statistics Surveillance Research Center, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
3 Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
As a practical approach, spray-drying microencapsulation is employed to protect probiotic cultures from intense thermal treatments and physiological stresses in the gut. Nonetheless, ensuring the survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 remains a significant concern when subjected to industrial-scale drying at high inlet temperatures (140–150°C). This study investigated the protective effects of Alyssum homolocarpum seed (AHS) gum, combined with two wall systems: low methoxyl pectin/β-glucan and sodium alginate/maltodextrin. Fabrication of the microcapsules involved a spray-dryer operating with a feed-in temperature of 140–150°C, while the discharge air was maintained at 80–85°C. The findings indicated that AHS gum significantly boosted both encapsulation efficiency (EE %) and the resilience of probiotic cells. Specifically, the survival rate of these microencapsulated strains improved from 68.4% up to 82.6% when exposed to thermal stress (55–75 °C) for periods of 1 to 10 minutes. Furthermore, SEM images revealed that the addition of AHS gum resulted in smoother microcapsule surfaces with reduced porosity (mean diameter: 18.5–22.3 μm). Under simulated gastrointestinal conditions, the LMP/β-glucan/AHS formulation retained 79.8% viability after 120 min in SIF, significantly higher than the control (28.0%). These findings confirm that AHS gum acts as an effective co-wall material, enhancing both the physical stability and probiotic resilience during processing and storage

 

Keywords

Subjects


1.  Ahmad, S. U. et al. (2021) Recent advances in microencapsulation of drugs for veterinary applications. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther., 44 (3): 298–312.
2.  Akbarbaglu, Z. et al. (2021) Effect of maltodextrin and gum Arabic carriers on the physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of spraydried casein hydrolysates. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther., 44(4): 541-552.
3.  Arenales-Sierra, I. M. et al. (2019) Calcium alginate beads loaded with Mg (OH) 2 improve L. casei viability under simulated gastric condition. LWT., 112108220.
4.  de Barros Fernandes, R. V. et al. (2014) Gum arabic/starch/maltodextrin/inulin as wall materials on the microencapsulation of rosemary essential oil. Carbohydr. Polym., 101524–532.
5.  Bhagwat, A. et al. (2020) Spray drying studies of probiotic Enterococcus strains encapsulated with whey protein and maltodextrin. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 9 (1): 1–8.
6.  Călinoiu, L.-F. et al. (2019) Chitosan coating applications in probiotic microencapsulation. Coatings., 9 (3): 194.
7.  Chew, S. C. et al. (2018) Microencapsulation of refined kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) seed oil by spray drying using β-cyclodextrin/gum arabic/sodium caseinate. J. Food Eng., 23778–85.
8.  Commission, C. A. (2011) Joint FAO/WHO food standards programme codex committee on contaminants in foods. fifth session, The Hague, the netherlands. 21–25.
9.  Corona‐Hernandez, R. I. et al. (2013) Structural stability and viability of microencapsulated probiotic bacteria: a review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 12 (6): 614–628.
10.   Damodharan, K. et al. (2017) Co-encapsulation of lactic acid bacteria and prebiotic with alginate-fenugreek gum-locust bean gum matrix: Viability of encapsulated bacteria under simulated gastrointestinal condition and during storage time. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 22265–271.
11.   Dong, L. M. et al. (2020) Enhancing the viability rate of probiotic by co-encapsulating with prebiotic in alginate microcapsules supplemented to cupcake production. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett., 48 (2): 113–120.
12.   Dong, Q. et al. (2013) Alginate‐based and protein‐based materials for probiotics encapsulation: a review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 48 (7): 1339–1351.
13.   Fang, Y. et al. (2012) Functionality of milk protein concentrate: Effect of spray drying temperature. Biochem. Eng. J., 62101–105.
14.   Fazilah, N. F. et al. (2019) Microencapsulation of Lactococcus lactis Gh1 with gum arabic and synsepalum dulcificum via spray drying for potential inclusion in functional yogurt. Molecules., 24 (7): 1422.
15.   Fritzen-Freire, C. B. et al. (2012) Microencapsulation of bifidobacteria by spray drying in the presence of prebiotics. Food Res. Int., 45 (1): 306–312.
16.   Homayouni-Rad, A. et al. (2021) Effect of Alyssum homolocarpum mucilage and inulin microencapsulation on the survivability of Lactobacillus casei in simulated gastrointestinal and high-temperature conditions. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 35102075.
17.   Hu, X. et al. (2021) In vitro digestion of sodium alginate/pectin co-encapsulated Lactobacillus bulgaricus and its application in yogurt bilayer beads. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 1931050–1058.
18.   Huq, T. et al. (2013) Encapsulation of probiotic bacteria in biopolymeric system. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 53 (9): 909–916.
19.   Koocheki, A. et al. (2010) Optimization of mucilage extraction from Qodume shirazi seed (Alyssum homolocarpum) using response surface methodology. J. Food Process Eng., 33 (5): 861–882.
20.   Kuck, L. S. & Noreña, C. P. Z. (2016) Microencapsulation of grape (Vitis labrusca var. Bordo) skin phenolic extract using gum Arabic, polydextrose, and partially hydrolyzed guar gum as encapsulating agents. Food Chem., 194569–576.
21.   Lasta, E. L. et al. (2021) Encapsulation and dispersion of Lactobacillus acidophilus in a chocolate coating as a strategy for maintaining cell viability in cereal bars. Sci. Rep., 11 (1): 20550.
22.   Magazù, S. et al. (2008) Structural and dynamical properties of water in sugar mixtures. Food Chem., 106 (4): 1460–1466.
23.   Mahmoud, M. et al. (2020) Survivability of alginate-microencapsulated Lactobacillus plantarum during storage, simulated food processing and gastrointestinal conditions. Heliyon., 6 (3): e03541.
24.   Martin, M. J. et al. (2013) Effect of unmodified starch on viability of alginate-encapsulated Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716. LWT., 53 (2): 480–486.
25.   Mirzaei, H. et al. (2011) The effect of microencapsulation with calcium alginate and resistant starch on the Lactobacillus acidophilus (La5) survival rate in simulated gastrointestinal juice conditions. J. Vet. Res., 66 (4): 337–377.
26.   Rajam, R. et al. (2012) Effect of whey protein–alginate wall systems on survival of microencapsulated Lactobacillus plantarum in simulated gastrointestinal conditions. J. Funct. Foods., 4 (4): 891–898.
27.   Shaharuddin, S. & Muhamad, I. I. (2015) Microencapsulation of alginate-immobilized bagasse with Lactobacillus rhamnosus NRRL 442: Enhancement of survivability and thermotolerance. Carbohydr. Polym., 119173–181.
28.   Soukoulis, C. et al. (2014) Probiotic edible films as a new strategy for developing functional bakery products: The case of pan bread. Food Hydrocoll., 39231–242.
29.   Tarifa, M. C. et al. (2021) Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus rhamnosus in pectin and pectin-inulin microgel particles: Effect on bacterial survival under storage conditions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 179457–465.
30.   Uday, K. V et al. (2014) A generalized relationship for determination of tensile strength of fine-grained soils from shrinkage characteristics. Dry. Technol., 32 (7): 869–876.
31.   Villarruel-López, A. et al. (2017) Microalgae, a potential natural functional food source–a review. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci., 67 (4) : 251-263.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 16 May 2026