The Knowledge-Behavior Gap in Soil Conservation: An Interventional Study with Small-Scale Farmers in Chile

Authors
1 Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, Chile
2 Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
3 Escuela de Psicología, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
4 Escuela de Agronomía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Quillota, Chile
5 Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198, Russia
6 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Scientific literature proposes that the central objective of soil science education, particularly within the context of soil management education, is to promote soil conservation. The purpose of the study was to analyze the impact of a soil management course, taught by soil professionals, on the farmers’ soil science knowledge and their soil conservation behaviors. This research makes a novel contribution, as few existing investigations have examined potential behavioral changes resulting from an intervention with farmers. The research involved 33 small-scale farmers in the Arica and Parinacota Region, Chile. This study employed both qualitative and quantitative methods, with data collected through surveys (pre- and post- course, and a subsequent retention test) and interviews following the retention test. The training course significantly enhanced farmers’ understanding of soil science, as demonstrated by their performance on the post-course survey and retention test. However, no statistically significant improvement was observed in farmers’ soil conservation behavior. Interview results confirmed these quantitative findings, and provided insights into underlying mechanisms, which are consistent with the theories of the stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Our study offers current evidence of the knowledge-behavior gap in agricultural decision-making. This study challenges the typical focus of agricultural extension activities on knowledge alone, highlighting how this approach overlooks potential behavioral changes resulting from the intervention. The format of our training program (traditional lectures and interactive discussions) is widely used in Chile. A future training course could focus on practical workshops and real-scale demonstrations of the recommended practices, as requested by participating farmers.



Keywords

Subjects


1. APA, 2018. APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association, https://dictionary.apa.org/.
2. Bamberg, S., 2013. Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34: 151–159.
3. Bamberg, S., Schulte, M., 2019. Processes of Change. In: L. Steg, J.I.M. de Groot (Eds.), Environmental psychology: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons, Toronto, Canada, pp. 307–318.
4. Bartkowski, B., Bartke, S., 2018. Leverage Points for Governing Agricultural Soils: A Review of Empirical Studies of European Farmers' Decision-Making. Sustainability, 10(9).
5. Baumgart-Getz, A., Prokopy, L., Floress, K., 2012. Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. Journal of Environmental Management, 96(1): 17–25.
6. Berroeta, H., de Carvalho, L.P., Solano, R., 2024. What facilitates the socio-spatial reattachment after a disaster? A sense of place approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 100.
7. Burnham, E., Zabel, S., Navarro-Villarroel, C., Ermakov, D.S., Castro, M., Neaman, A., Otto, S., 2023. Enhancing farmers’ soil conservation behavior: beyond soil science knowledge. Geoderma, 437: 116583.
8. Casanova, M., Salazar, O., Seguel, O., Luzio, W., 2013. The Soils of Chile. Springer, Dordrecht.
9. Castillo, M., Pérez-Silva, R., Chamorro, C., Sepúlveda, M., 2022. Public policies, sustainability, and smallholder producers' access to the market. The Productive Alliance Programme in Chile: A case study. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6.
10. Chouinard, H.H., Paterson, T., Wandschneider, P.R., Ohler, A.M., 2008. Will farmers trade profits for stewardship? Heterogeneous motivations for farm practice selection. Land Economics, 84(1): 66–82.
11. Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Routledge, New Your, NY.
12. Colombo, S., Chiarella, S., Lefrançois, C., Fradin, J., Raffone, A., Simione, L., 2023. Why Knowing about Climate Change Is Not Enough to Change: A Perspective Paper on the Factors Explaining the Environmental Knowledge-Action Gap. Sustainability, 15(20).
13. Cronbach, L.J., 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16: 297–334.
14. Dessart, F., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., van Bavel, R., 2019. Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3): 417–471.
15. Diamond, J., 2011. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Revised Edition. Penguin Group, London, UK.
16. Editorial, 2004. Soil and trouble. Science, 304(5677): 1614–1615.
17. Farani, A.Y., Mohammadi, Y., Ghahremani, F., Ataei, P., 2021. How can Iranian farmers' attitudes toward environmental conservation be influenced? Global Ecology and Conservation, 31.
18. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., Buchner, A., 2007. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2): 175–191.
19. Floress, K., Reimer, A., Thompson, A., Burbach, M., Knutson, C., Prokopy, L., Ribaudo, M., Ulrich-Schad, J., 2018. Measuring farmer conservation behaviors: Challenges and best practices. Land Use Policy, 70: 414–418.
20. Gallo, I., Gollwitzer, P.M., 2007. Implementation intentions: A look back at fifteen years of progress. Psicothema, 19(1): 37–42.
21. Gholami, M., Papzan, A., 2021. Knowledge, attitude and behavior of farmers about conservation agriculture in Kermanshah province. Agricultural Education Administration Research, 13(57): 131–147.
22. Gollwitzer, P.M., 1999. Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7): 493–503.
23. González Vallejos, F., Riquelme Garcés, A., Contreras Luque, P., Mazuela, P., 2013. Antecedentes generales para la sustentabilidad de la producción hortícola en el valle de Azapa, Arica, Chile. Idesia (Arica), 31(4): 119–123.
24. Hillel, D., 1992. Out of the Earth: Civilization and the Life of the Soil. University of California Press.
25. Hungerford, H., Volk, T., 1990. Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21: 8–21.
26. Jalilian, N., Mohammadi, Y., Naderi-Mahdei, K., Nael, M., Neaman, A., 2025. Land ownership rights enhance farmers’ attitudes toward soil and soil conservation behavior: Insights from Iran. Journal of Environmental Management, 392: 126821.
27. Kikuchi, C.P., Ferré, T.P.A., 2017. Analysis of subsurface temperature data to quantify groundwater recharge rates in a closed Altiplano basin, northern Chile. HydJ, 25(1): 103–121.
28. Kirkpatrick, D., Kirkpatrick, J., 2006. Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
29. Koch, A., McBratney, A., Adams, M., Field, D., Hill, R., Crawford, J., Minasny, B., Lal, R., Abbott, L., O'Donnell, A., Angers, D., Baldock, J., Barbier, E., Binkley, D., Parton, W., Wall, D.H., Bird, M., Bouma, J., Chenu, C., Flora, C.B., Goulding, K., Grunwald, S., Hempel, J., Jastrow, J., Lehmann, J., Lorenz, K., Morgan, C.L., Rice, C.W., Whitehead, D., Young, I., Zimmermann, M., 2013. Soil Security: Solving the Global Soil Crisis. Global Policy, 4(4): 434–441.
30. Kollmuss, A., Agyeman, J., 2002. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8: 239–260.
31. Lal, R., Bouma, J., Brevik, E., Dawson, L., Field, D.J., Glaser, B., Hatano, R., Hartemink, A.E., Kosaki, T., Lascelles, B., Monger, C., Muggler, C., Ndzana, G.M., Norra, S., Pan, X.C., Paradelo, R., Reyes-Sanchez, L.B., Sanden, T., Singh, B.R., Spiegel, H., Yanai, J., Zhang, J.B., 2021. Soils and sustainable development goals of the United Nations: An International :union: of Soil Sciences perspective. Geoderma Regional, 25: e00398.
32. Liang, X., Rehman, S.U., Zhiqi, W., Raza, M.A., Haider, I., Khalid, M.H.B., Saeed, A., Iqbal, Z., Fatima, S., Siddiqa, A., Ansar, M., Ijaz, S.S., Ma, Z.M., 2024. Impacts of Conservation Tillage on Agricultural Land Development: A Review. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition.
33. Lobry de Bruyn, L.L., Jenkins, A., Samson-Liebig, S., 2017. Lessons Learnt: Sharing Soil Knowledge to Improve Land Management and Sustainable Soil Use. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81(3): 427–438.
34. Lu, J., Ranjan, P., Floress, K., Arbuckle, J.G., Church, S.P., Eanes, F.R., Gao, Y., Gramig, B.M., Singh, A.S., Prokopy, L.S., 2022. A meta-analysis of agricultural conservation intentions, behaviors, and practices: Insights from 35 years of quantitative literature in the United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 323: 116240.
35. Márquez-García, M., Jacobson, S.K., Barbosa, O., 2018. Evaluating biodiversity workshops in Chile: are farmers responding with conservation action? Environmental Education Research, 24(12): 1669–1683.
36. Maruthi, V., Reddy, K.S., Pankaj, P.K., Salini, K., Srinivas, K., Maheswari, M., Prabhakar, M., Reddy, A.G.K., Kumari, V.V., Singh, V.K., 2024. Soil Resource Conservation Technologies on Rainfed Mung bean Root Growth and Their Potential Root Carbon Additions under Variable Rainfall Situations in Semi-Arid Agroecosystem. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 24(3): 5799–5814.
37. Mazuela Águila, P.C., 2013. Agricultura en zonas áridas y semiáridas. Idesia (Arica), 31(2): 3–4.
38. Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 2025. www.merriam-webster.com.
39. Muggler, C.C., Pinto, F.D., Machado, V.A., 2006. Soil education: Principles, theory and methods. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo, 30(4): 733–740.
40. Neaman, A., 2024. Methodological aspects for soil conservation behavior research. Idesia (Chile), 42(4): 86–94.
41. Neaman, A., 2025a. Psychological determinants of soil conservation behavior among farmers: conceptual drawbacks and alternative research approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 16.
42. Neaman, A., 2025b. Psychological drivers of the ecological practices of farmers in the context of soil conservation. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 46(3): 25–35.
43. Neaman, A., Baierl, T.-M., Navarro-Villarroel, C., Poblete-Ramos, F., Lizardi, N., Burnham, E., Ermakov, D.S., Castro, M., 2025. How emotional connection empowers farmer-driven soil conservation. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo, (in press).
44. Neaman, A., Navarro-Villarroel, C., Poblete-Ramos, F., Lizardi, N., Burnham, E., Huerta-Salinas, O., Zabel, S., D.S., E., Castro, M., Otto, S., 2024. Reconciling the soil stewardship paradox: Knowledge without care, care without knowledge. Geoderma Regional, 37: e00794.
45. ODEPA, 2020. Región de Arica y Parinacota. Información regional 2019. . Oficina de Estudios y Políticas Agrarias, Ministerio de Agricultura, Santiago, Chile.
46. Pan, D., Zhang, N., 2018. The Role of Agricultural Training on Fertilizer Use Knowledge: A Randomized Controlled Experiment. Ecological Economics, 148: 77–91.
47. Piran, H., Zamani, J., Shekofteh, H., Jalali, G., Mehdizadehrayeni, M., 2025. Investigating the most important factors affecting on attention to soil management, based on the perspectives of farmers in Kahnuj County. Management of Natural Ecosystems, 3(3): 49–61.
48. Prochaska, J.O., Velicer, W.F., 1997. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1): 38–48.
49. Prokopy, L.S., Floress, K., Arbuckle, J.G., Church, S.P., Eanes, F.R., Gao, Y., Gramig, B.M., Ranjan, P., Singh, A.S., 2019. Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 74(5): 520–534.
50. Ranjan, P., Church, S.P., Floress, K., Prokopy, L.S., 2019. Synthesizing Conservation Motivations and Barriers: What Have We Learned from Qualitative Studies of Farmers' Behaviors in the United States? Society & Natural Resources, 32(11): 1171–1199.
51. Rejesus, R.M., Mutuc, M.E.M., Yasar, M., Lapitan, A.V., Palis, F.G., Truong, T.N.C., 2012. Sending Vietnamese Rice Farmers Back to School: Further Evidence on the Impacts of Farmer Field Schools. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(3): 407–426.
52. Roesch-McNally, G., Arbuckle, J.G., Tyndall, J.C., 2018. Soil as Social-Ecological Feedback: Examining the "Ethic" of Soil Stewardship among Corn Belt Farmers. Rural Sociology, 83(1): 145–173.
53. Schultz, P.W., 2002. Knowledge, information, and household recycling: Examining the knowledge-deficit model of behavior change. In: T. Dietz, P.C. Stern (Eds.), New tools for environmental protection: Education, information, and voluntary measures. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 67–82.
54. Strijker, D., Bosworth, G., Bouter, G., 2020. Research methods in rural studies: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. Journal of Rural Studies, 78: 262–270.
55. Winkler-Schor, S., Coon, J., Sanji, D., Barefoot-Yaeger, M., 2024. When it comes to research on land management behavior, how are we doing? A systematic review on theory, measurement, and suggestions for improvement. Conservation Science and Practice, 6(7).

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 16 September 2025