Exploring Source-Sink Relationship for the Formation of Grain Yield in Sunflower

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Department of Plant Genetics Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization, Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Developing high-yielding varieties of sunflower as oilseed staple crops requires knowledge of physiological and molecular mechanisms involved in yield formation. Source strength, sink demand, and their interactions play crucial roles in the yield formation of sunflowers. The persistence of assimilate flux to the developing grains mainly determines sink demand. There was no information on the molecular mechanism for assimilate flux to the sink organ of sunflowers. To shed light on molecular events engaging in assimilate flux to sink organs, two experiments were carried out on five sunflower inbred lines differing in their grain yields. Source-related parameters (such as leaf biomass, area, and number) and sink-associated attributes (such as floret number at the first anthesis and capitulum biomass and diameter, in addition to changes in biomass of capitulum and stem, at the first anthesis with those at physiological maturity) were evaluated across all the inbred lines. The Invertase gene expression level was measured on the receptacle base of three inbred lines, showing discrepancies in the source, sink, and grain yield performances. While no significant correlation was found between source strength and sink demand with grain yield, the results showed that higher grain yield was likely attributed to the persistence of assimilate flux to the capitulum base during grain filling. This phenomenon is discussed to be due to higher Invertase activity in the receptacle base.

Keywords

Subjects


Alkio, M., Diepenbrock, W., Grimm, E., 2002. Evidence for sectorial photoassimilate supply in the capitulum of sunflower (Helianthus annuus). New Phytol., 156(3): 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00524.x
Alkio, M., Grimm, E., 2003. Vascular connections between the receptacle and empty achenes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). J. Exp. Bot., 54(381): 345-348. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg019
Baker, D., Chapman, G., Standish, M., Bailey, M., 1984. Growth habit in relat ion to assimilate partitioning and some consequences for field bean breeding, Vicia faba: Agronomy, physiology and breeding. Springer, p. 23-28.
Behbahanzadeh, S.A., Akbari, G., Farahani, L., Irannejad, H., 2012. Morphological and qualitative propreties of sunflower seeds in different levels of source and sink reduction. Int. J. Agric.: Res. Rev., 2(5): 618-623.
Bihmidine, S., Hunter III, C.T., Johns, C.E., Koch, K.E., Braun, D.M., 2013. Regulation of assimilate import into sink organs: update on molecular drivers of sink strength. Front. Plant Sci., 4: 177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00177
Connor, D., Sadras, V., 1992. Physiology of yield expression in sunflower. Field Crops Res., 30(3-4): 333-389.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(92)90006-U
English, S., McWilliam, J., Smith, R., Davidson, J., 1979. Photosynthesis and partitioning of dry matter in sunflower. Func. Plant Biol. 6(2): 149-164.https://doi.org/10.1139/b77-338
Epila, J., Hubeau, M., Steppe, K., 2018. Drought Effects on Photosynthesis and Implications of Photoassimilate Distribution in 11C-Labeled Leaves in the African Tropical Tree Species Maesopsis eminii Engl. Forests 9(3): 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9030109
Evans, L.T., 1996. Crop evolution, adaptation and yield. Cambridge university press. P. 500.
Farrar, J., Minchin, P., 1991. Carbon partitioning in split root systems of barley: relation to metabolism. J. Exp. Bot., 42(10): 1261-1269. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/42.10.1261
Farrar, J., Pollock, C., Gallagher, J., 2000. Sucrose and the integration of metabolism in vascular plants. Plant Sci., 154(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00260-5
Grompone, M.A., 2005. Sunflower oil. In: Frank D. Gunstone , F.D. Ed. Vegetable Oils in Food Technology: Composition, Properties and Uses, Blackwell Publishing; p. 137-167.
Hall, A., Connor, D., Sadras, V., 1995. Radiation-use efficiency of sunflower crops: effects of specific leaf nitrogen and ontogeny. Field Crops Res., 41(2): 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(94)00108-O
Hall, A., Connor, D., Whitfield, D., 1989. Contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates to grain-filling in irrigated and water-stressed sunflower crops I. Estimates using labelled carbon. Field Crops Res., 20(2): 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(89)90055-5
Hall, A., Whitfield, D., Connor, D., 1990. Contribution of pre-anthesis assimilates to grain-filling in irrigated and water-stressed sunflower crops II. Estimates from a carbon budget. Field Crops Res., 24(3-4): 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(90)90044-C
Hernández, L.F., 2015. Spatial constraints also regulates final achene mass in the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) capitulum. Int. J. Plant Biol., 6(1): 6014. https://doi.org/10.4081/pb.2015.6014
Ion, V., Dicu, G., Basa, A.-G., Dumbrava, M., Temocico, G., Epure, L.-L., State, D., 2015. Sunflower yield and yield components under different sowing conditions International Conference Agriculture for Life, Life for Agriculture. Elsevier B.V, Romania, p. 44 – 51.
Ishimaru, T., Hirose, T., Matsuda, T., Goto, A., Takahashi, K., Sasaki, H., Terao, T., Ishii, R.-i., Ohsugi, R., Yamagishi, T., 2005. Expression patterns of genes encoding carbohydrate-metabolizing enzymes and their relationship to grain filling in rice (Oryza sativa L.): comparison of caryopses located at different positions in a panicle. Plant Cell Physiol., 46(4): 620-628. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pci066
Kühbauch, W., Thome, U., 1989. Nonstructural carbohydrates of wheat stems as influenced by sink-source manipulations. J. Plant Physiol., 134(2): 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(89)80063-X
Lee, E., Tollenaar, M., 2007. Physiological basis of successful breeding strategies for maize grain yield. Crop Sci., 47: S-202-S-215. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0010IPBS
Lichthardt, C., Chen, T.-W., Stahl, A., Stützel, H., 2020. Co-evolution of sink and source in the recent breeding history of winter wheat in Germany. Front. Plant Sci., 10: 1771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01771
Lindström, L.I., Pellegrini, C.N., Aguirrezأ،bal, L.A.N., Hernأ،ndez, L.F., 2006. Growth and development of sunflower fruits under shade during pre and early post-anthesis period. Field Crops Res., 96(1): 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.06.006
Lloyd, N.D., Canvin, D.T., 1979. Photosynthesis and photorespiration in sunflower selection. Can. J. Bot., 55(24): 3006-3012. https://doi.org/10.1139/b77-338
Ludewig, F., Sonnewald, U., 2016. Demand for food as driver for plant sink development. J. Plant Physiol., 203: 110-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2016.06.002
Ochogavía, A.C., Novello, M.A., Picardi, L.A., Nestares, G.M., 2017. Identification of suitable reference genes by quantitative real-time PCR for gene expression normalization in sunflower. Plant Omics 10(4).
Pereira, M.L., Berney, A., Hall, A.J., Trápani, N., 2008. Contribution of pre-anthesis photoassimilates to grain yield: Its relationship with yield in Argentine sunflower cultivars released between 1930 and 1995. Field Crops Res., 105(1-2): 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.08.002
Pereira, M.L., Trapani, N., Sadras, V., 2000. Genetic improvement of sunflower in Argentina between 1930 and 1995: Part III. Dry matter partitioning and grain composition. Field Crops Res., 67(3): 215-221. https://doi.org/. 10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00096-4
Pereira, M.L., Trápani, N., Sadras, V., 1999. Genetic improvement of sunflower in Argentina between 1930 and 1995: II. Phenological development, growth and source–sink relationship. Field Crops Res., 63(3): 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00041-6
Rafiei, F., Darbaghshahi, M.R.N., Rezai, A., Nasiri, B.M., 2013. Survey of yield and yield components of sunflower cultivars under drought stress. Int. J. Advanced Biol. Biomed. Res., 1(12): 1628-1638.
Rawson, H., Constable, G., 1980. Carbon production of sunflower cultivars in field and controlled environments. I. Photosynthesis and transpiration of leaves, stems and heads. Func. Plant Biol., 7(5): 555-573. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9800555
Rennie, E.A., Turgeon, R., 2009. A comprehensive picture of phloem loading strategies. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 106(33): 14162-14167. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902279106
Roitsch, T., Tanner, W., 1996. Cell wall invertase: bridging the gap. Bot. Acta 109(2): 90-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1996.tb00547.x
Sadras, V., Connor, D., Whitfield, D., 1993. Yield, yield components and source-sink relationships in water-stressed sunflower. Field Crops Res., 31(1-2): 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90048-R
Saeedipour, S., Moradi, F., 2011. Comparison of the drought stress responses of tolerant and sensitive wheat cultivars during grain filling: impact of invertase activity on carbon metabolism during kernel development. J. Agric. Sci., 3(2): 32.
Seebauer, J.R., Singletary, G.W., Krumpelman, P.M., Ruffo, M.L., Below, F.E., 2010. Relationship of source and sink in determining kernel composition of maize. J. Exp. Bot., 61(2): 511-519. . https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp324
Sharma, R., Smith, E., 1986. Selection for high and low harvest index in three winter wheat populations. Crop Sci., 26(6): 1147-1150. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600060013x
Sheligl, H., 1986. Die verwertung orgngischer souren durch chlorella lincht. Planta J., 47: 51.
Sinclair, T.R., 1994. Limits to crop yield? In Boote, K. J., Bennett, J. M., Sinclair, T. R., and Paulsen, G. M., Eds. Physiology and determination of crop yield. New York; American Society of Agronomy. P. 509-532.
Sinsawat, V., Steer, B.T., 1993. Growth of florets of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in relation to their position in the capitulum, shading and nitrogen supply. Field Crops Res., 34(1): 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90113-2
Smith, M.R., Rao, I.M., Merchant, A., 2018. Source-sink relationships in crop plants and their influence on yield development and nutritional quality. Front. Plant Sci., 9: 1889. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01889
Steer, B., Hocking, P., Low, A., 1988. Dry matter, minerals and carbohydrates in the capitulum of sunflower (Helianthus annuus): Effects of competition between seeds, and defoliation. Field Crops Res., 18(1): 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(88)90060-3
Streeter, J., Jeffers, D., 1979a. Distribution of total non‐structural carbohydrates in soybean plants having increased reproductive load. Crop Sci., 19(5): 729-734. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1979.0011183X001900050046x
Sturm, A., 1999. Invertases. Primary structures, functions, and roles in plant development and sucrose partitioning. Plant Physiol., 121(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.1.1
Troncoso-Ponce, M.A., Kruger, N.J., Ratcliffe, G., Garcés, R., Martínez-Force, E., 2009. Characterization of glycolytic initial metabolites and enzyme activities in developing sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seeds. Phytochem., 70(9): 1117-1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.07.012
Vear, F., 2016. Changes in sunflower breeding over the last fifty years. Oilseeds Fats Crops Llipids 23(2): 1-8.
Venkateswarlu, B., Visperas, R.M., 1987. Source-sink relationships in crop plants. International Rice Research Institute Publisher, Manila IRPS 125.
Villalobos, F.J., Hall, A.J., Ritchie, J.T., Orgaz, F., 1996. OILCROP-SUN: A development, growth, and yield model of the sunflower crop. Agron. J., 88(3): 403-415. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800030008x
White, A.C., Rogers, A., Rees, M., Osborne, C.P., 2016. How can we make plants grow faster? A source–sink perspective on growth rate. J. Exp. Bot., 67(1): 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv447
Yang, J., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., Xu, G., Zhu, Q., 2004. Activities of key enzymes in sucrose-to-starch conversion in wheat grains subjected to water deficit during grain filling. Plant Physiol., 135(3): 1621-1629. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.041038