Resource Use Efficiency of Tomato Production under Plastic House in Pokhara Metropolitan City, Nepal

Document Type : Original Research

Author
B. Kunwar
College of Agriculture, Purdue University, USA
10.22034/JAST.26.5.945
Abstract
A survey was conducted to assess the technical and allocative efficiency of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) production under the plastic house in metropolitan city of Pokhara, Nepal. From the total tomato growers, 80 farmers were selected through multistage sampling. Stochastic frontier approach is applied to the obtained survey data and analyzed to study the technical and allocative efficiency of tomato production. This research is essential for enhancing tomato yields without incurring additional input expenses. Our results find the mean technical efficiency of 78.19%, which shows the great opportunity of improvement of tomato production in Pokhara. Technical efficiency is positively influenced by education level and training availability and negatively affected by farmers' ages. Subsidy has non-significant effect on technical efficiency in the study area. The allocative efficiency ratio of plastic house area, seed, and di-ammonium phosphate shows its underutilization with a score above 1. On the contrary, farmyard manure, urea and muriate of potash application are overutilized with a score of less than 1. The efficiency in tomato production can be improved by optimal allocation of resources, encouraging young farmers in farming, increasing access to education and training to farmers, and change in current subsidy mechanism. Through corrective measures, policies, and practices, an efficient frontier could be achieved by the tomato-growing farmers of the study area, which ultimately will maximize profit without necessarily increasing input level.

Keywords

Subjects

Asante, B. O., Osei, M. K., Dankyi, A. A., Berchie, J. N., Mochiah, M. B., Lamptey, J. N. L., Haleegoah, J., Osei, K., & Bolfrey-Arku, G. (2013). Producer characteristics and determinants of technical efficiency of tomato based production systems in Ghana. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 5(3), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.5897/JDAE12.054
Bravo‐Ureta, B. E., & Rieger, L. (1990). ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTION FRONTIER METHODOLOGIES AND DAIRY FARM EFFICIENCY. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 41(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1477-9552.1990.TB00637.X
Dawson, P. J., Lingard, J., & Woodford, C. H. (1991). A Generalized Measure of Farm-Specific Technical Efficiency. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4), 1098–1104. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242438
FAO. (2019). Food and Agricultural data- FAOSTAT.
Jaforullah, M., & Devlin, N. J. (2009). Technical efficiency in the New Zealand dairy industry: A frontier production function approach. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/00779959609544246, 30(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779959609544246
Jaforullah, M., & Premachandra, E. (2011). Sensitivity of technical efficiency estimates to estimation approaches: an investigation using New Zealand dairy industry data. https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/handle/10523/896
Kadakoğlu, B. ;, Karh, B., & Karlı, B. (2022). Technical efficiency of potato production in Turkey by Stochastic Frontier Analysis. www.custoseagronegocioonline.com.br
MOALD. (2019). Statistical Information in Nepalese Agriculture. Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, 290.
Najjuma, E., Kavoi, M. M., & Mbeche, R. (2016). Assessment of technical efficiency of open field tomato production in Kiambu county, Kenya (stochastic frontier approach).
Parlakay, O., Yilmaz, H., Gül, M., Akkoyun, S., Bilgili, M. E., Vurarak, Y., Hizli, H., & Kiliçalp, N. (2017). TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF DAIRY CATTLE FARMS IN THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN REGION OF TURKEY BY STOCHASTIC FRONTIER ANALYSIS. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences., 27(5), 1689–1694.
Paudel, P., & Matsuoka, A. (2009). Cost efficiency estimates of maize production in Nepal: a case study of the Chitwan district. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská Ekonomika), 55(3), 139–148.
Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental Research Statistics for The Behavioural Sciences (2nd Edition). Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York.
Shrestha, R. B., Huang, W., & Pradhan, U. (2015). Resource use efficiency in vegetable production in the high hills of eastern Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2(3), 79–87.
Shrestha, R. B., & Huang, W.-C. (2014). Resource Use Efficiency in Vegetable Production in the High Hills of Eastern Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Agricultural Economics Volume 2 & 3, 65–72.
Shrestha, R. B., Huang, W.-C., & Ghimire, R. (2014). Production Efficiency of Smallholder Vegetable Farms in Ilam District, Eastern Hill, Nepal. J. Agric. & Environ. Sci, 14(2), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2014.14.02.12287
Subedi, M., Pandey, M., Ojha, R. K., & Acharya, B. (2020). Production economics and resource use efficiency of tomato under open field condition in Kapilvastu, Nepal. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 3(1), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.3126/janr.v3i1.27181
Tabe-Ojong, M. P. Jr., & Molua, E. L. (2017). Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Tomato Production in Semi-Urban Farms in Cameroon: A Stochastic Frontier Production Approach. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 7(4), 27. https://doi.org/10.5539/JMS.V7N4P27
USAID/Nepal. (2011). Value Chain / Market Analysis of the vegetable Sub-Sector in Nepal. August.
Weldegiorgis, L. G., Mezgebo, G. K., Gebremariam, H. G. egzabher, & Kahsay, Z. A. (2018). Resources Use Efficiency of Irrigated Tomato Production of Small-scale Farmers. International Journal of Vegetable Science, 24(5), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2018.1438552
Xu, X., & Jeffrey, S. R. (1998). Efficiency and technical progress in traditional and modern agriculture: evidence from rice production in China. Agricultural Economics, 18(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(98)80004-2
Yilmaz, S. G., & Mevlut Gul. (2020). Technical efficiency of goat farming in the Western Mediterranean Region of Turkey by Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Custos E Agronegocio Line, 16, 165–184.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 26, Issue 5
September and October 2024
Pages 945-956