Analyzing the Association between Citrus Farm Income and Extension Service Providers of Citrus Farmers of Central India

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Agricultural Extension, ICAR-Central Citrus Research Institute, Nagpur-440033, Maharashtra, India.
2 Horticulture, ICAR-Central Citrus Research Institute, Nagpur-440033, Maharashtra, India.
3 Indian Statistical Service, NSSTA, Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation, Greater Noida-201310
4 Young Professional-II, Agricultural Extension Lab, ICAR-Central Citrus Research Institute, Nagpur-440033, Maharashtra, India
5 Scientist (Agricultural Meteorology), ICAR - Mahatma Gandhi Integrated Farming Research Institute, Motihari-845429, Bihar, India
6 Research Associate, KAB-II, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi-110012, India
7 Agricultural Economics, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal-736165
Abstract
The agricultural extension system of India has various kinds of service providers like state agriculture departments, universities, research institutes, Farm Science Centers and private players. This study was conducted in 2020 and attempted to explore the association between average annual net income earned from citrus cultivation and the source of availing citrus extension services through Correspondence Analysis (CA) method of 300 citrus farmers selected from three districts in Maharashtra, India. The farmers with high income (1808.31USD to 2411.09USD/ha) received advisory services of the public research institute ICAR-Central Citrus Research Institute (CCRI) through either personal contact or electronic platforms. Awareness about CCRI services, source of seeking citrus cultivation related information, source of purchasing citrus planting material, using CCRI mobile app and website for citrus advisories, and contacting CCRI scientists for solving citrus farming related issues was found to have significant (P< 0.05) positive relationship with net income from citrus farming through Pearsons’ correlation coefficient, while cost of cultivation and orchard age had negative significant relationship. The multi-linear regression analysis, depicted cost of cultivation, awareness about CCRI services, source of seeking citrus advisories, and source of purchasing planting material had significant association with net income. The findings of correlation and regression thus emphasized the positive significant association of CCRI’s extension services to income from citrus farming. Identifying homogenous target groups of citrus farmers through Classification and Regression Tree (CART) method can serve as policy implication for extension service providers to deliver customized need-based advisories to target clientele.

Keywords

Subjects


1. Anderson, J. 2007. Agricultural Advisory Services. A background paper for “Innovating through science and technology”, Chapter 7 of the WDR 2008.
2. Birner, R. and Anderson, J.R.. 2007. How to make agricultural extension demand driven? The case of India's agricultural extension policy (Vol. 729). Intl Food Policy Res Inst.
3. Bruce, A., Jackson, C. and Lamprinopoulou, C. 2021. Social networks and farming resilience. Outlook on Agric., 50(2): 196–205.
4. Das, S., Munshi, M.N. and Kabir, W. 2021. Strategies of Extension Service Providers To Meet the Information Needs of the Farmers. SAARC J. Agric., 19(1): 249-258.
5. ICAR-Central Citrus Research Institute. 2021. Director’s Message. Available at: https://ccri.icar.gov.in/ccringp/ (accessed on 11 June 2021).
6. Kumar, N., Reddy, P.G. and Ratnakar, R. 2018. Perception of farmers on agricultural extension service providers (public, private and NGO extension service providers) in Andhra Pradesh, India. Int. J. Current Micro. App. Sc., 7(3):3772-3779.
7. Kumari, V., Chander, S., & Sharma, S. 2021. Knowledge and Adoption of Drip Irrigation in Citrus Crops among Farmers of Western Haryana. Ind. J. Ext. Edu., 58(1): 151–156.
8. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. 2023. 2021-22 (First Advance Estimates) of Area and Production of Horticulture Crops. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India.
9. Pandit, A., Kumar, A., Rana, R.K., Pandey, N.K. and Kumar, N.R. 2010. A study on socio-economic profile of potato farmers: Comparison of irrigated and rain-fed conditions in Himachal Pradesh. Potato Journal, 37(1-2): 56-63.
10. Sarker, M.N.I., Barman, S.C., Islam, M., Islam, R. and Chakma, A.S. 2017. Role of lemon (Citrus limon) production on livelihoods of rural people in Bangladesh. J. Agric. Econ. Rural Dev., 2(1):167-175.
11. Suvedi, M., Ghimire, R. and Kaplowitz, M. 2017. Farmers’ participation in extension programs and technology adoption in rural Nepal: a logistic regression analysis. The J. Agric. Edu. Ext., 23(4):351- 371.
12. Wankhede, Y., Kale, N.M., Bhople, P.P and Jangwad, N.P. 2017. Profile and constraints of Orange Growers in Adoption of Soil Testing Techniques in Amravati District. Agric. Update, 12(1): 52- 60.