Farmers’ Participation and Its implications for Farms’ Economic Viability in Collectively Managed Irrigation Systems: A Case Study in Pakistan

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Economics, Ondokuz Mayis University 55010, Samsun, Turkey.
2 Institute of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture 38000, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
3 Department of Integrative Agriculture (Visiting Faculty) United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, 15551 UAE.
4 Department of Economics, Division of Management and Administrative Science, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.
Abstract
Participatory Irrigation Management (PIM) has emerged as a significant intervention in which farmers are given more control over irrigation management. The primary goal of this study was to identify the factors that influence farmers' participation in PIM activities and compare the economic viability of participation levels. A multi-stage random sampling technique was used to collect the data from 240 farmers of Nasrana and Maduana distributaries located at the tail end of the Lower Chenab Canal (LCC) west circle in district Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan, using a structured questionnaire. The factors influencing farmers' participation in PIM activities were identified using an ordered Probit Regression model. The findings revealed that education level (β= 0.12; P=0.00), village leadership (β= 0.97; P= 0.00), and being a beneficiary of a water user association (β=1.20; P= 0.00) all had a significant positive influence on farmers' participation in PIM activities. On the other hand, family size (β= -0.05 P= 0.04), land ownership (β= -0.44; P= 0.05), and off-farm income (β= -0.52; P= 0.01) were found to have a significant negative impact on farmers' participation. Farmers with a high level of participation had higher farm technical efficiency and crop productivity. For these reasons, farming communities must be encouraged to participate in PIM activities in order to achieve a sustainable irrigation system.

Keywords

Subjects


Agidew, A. M. A., and Singh, K. N. 2018. Factors affecting farmers’ participation in watershed management programs in the Northeastern highlands of Ethiopia: a case study in the Teleyayen sub-watershed. Ecological processes, 7(1): 1-15.
Ahmad, B., Pham, H. D., Ashfaq, M., Memon, J. A., Bano, R., Dahri, Z. H., and Naseer, M. A. U. R. 2020. Impact of institutional features on the overall performance assessment of participatory irrigation management: Farmers’ response from Pakistan. Water, 12(2): 497.
Arun, G., Singh, D. R., Kumar, S., and Kumar, A. 2012. Canal irrigation management through water users associations and its impact on efficiency, equity and reliability in water use in Tamil Nadu. Agricul. Econ. Res. Rev., 25(347-2016-17053): 409-419.
Baig, I. A. 2009. An analysis of irrigation charges and cost recovery under the reforms era: a case study of Punjab, Pakistan. J. Agric. Res, 47: 281-291.
Boz, I., and Akbay, C. 2005. Factors influencing the adoption of maize in Kahramanmaras province of Turkey. Agricul. Econ., 33, 431-440.
Boz, I., Haq, S. U., Yildirim, C., Turkten, H., and Shahbaz, P. 2018. Technical and water use efficiency estimation of adopters and non-adopters of pressurized irrigation systems among hazelnut farmers. Afri. J. of Agricul. Res., 13(43), 2449-2459.
Bozoğlu, M., and Ceyhan, V. 2007. Measuring the technical efficiency and exploring the inefficiency determinants of vegetable farms in Samsun province, Turkey. Agricultural systems, 94(3): 649-656.
Ceyhan, V., and Gene, H. 2014. Productive efficiency of commercial fishing: evidence from the Samsun Province of Black Sea, Turkey. Tur. J. of Fish. and Aq. Sci., 14(2): 309-320.
Chavas, J. P., and Aliber, M. 1993. An analysis of economic efficiency in agriculture: a nonparametric approach. J. of Agri. and Res. Econ., 18(1): 1-16.
Coelli, T. 1996. A guide to DEAP version 2.1: a data envelopment analysis (computer) program. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, Australia, 96(08), 1-49.
Dabhi, R. A., Soni, N. V., and Patel, J. K. 2010. Problems faced by the members of participatory irrigation management society. Guj. J. of Ext. Edu., XX-XXI: 103-106.
Dolisca, F., Carter, D. R., McDaniel, J. M., Shannon, D. A., and Jolly, C. M. 2006. Factors influencing farmers’ participation in forestry management programs: A case study from Haiti. For. Eco. and Man., 236(2-3): 324-331.
Farrel, M. J. 1957. The measure of productive efficiency. J. of the Roy. Stat. Soci., 120, 28.
Farrell, M. J., and Fieldhouse, M. 1962. Estimating efficient production functions under increasing returns to scale. J. of the Roy. Stat. Soci., 125(2): 252-267.
Gandhi, V. P., and Johnson, N. 2019. Enhancing performance of participatory water institutions in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic plains: what can we learn from new institutional economics and governance theories?. Water, 12(1): 70.
Güvercin, Ö., and Boz, İ. 2003. Üreticilerin sulu tarım konusundaki deneyimleri ve sulama birliklerine bakışı: Düziçi ilçesi örneği. KSÜ Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 6(2), 80-90.
Haq, S. U., Boz, I., and Shahbaz, P. 2021. Adoption of climate-smart agriculture practices and differentiated nutritional outcome among rural households: a case of Punjab province, Pakistan. Food Security, 13: 913-931.
Hussain, S., Khan, M. M., Shoaib, M., Raza, A., Shah, S. A. R., Khan, T. A., and Khan, S. 2021. Performance evaluation of participatory irrigation management as an alternative to a state‐managed irrigation system. Irrigation and Drainage, 70(1); 150-168.
Johnston, C., McDonald, J., and Quist, K. 2020. A generalized ordered Probit model. Commun. in Stat.-The. and Meth., 49(7): 1712-1729.
Karamjavan, K. M. 2014. Factors affecting the participation of farmers in irrigation management: The Case Study of Zonouz Irrigation Network in Iran. Sci. Agric, 6: 34-40.
Khalkheili, T. A., and Zamani, G. H. 2009. Farmer participation in irrigation management: the case of Doroodzan Dam Irrigation Network, Iran. Agricultural water management, 96(5): 859-865.
Nadeem, A. M., Rafique, M. Z., Bakhsh, K., Makhdum, M. S. A., and Huang, S. 2020. Impact of socio-economic and water access conditions on life satisfaction of rural farmers in Faisalabad district of Pakistan. Water Policy, 22(4): 686-701.
Nasir, J., Ashfaq, M., Baig, I. A., Punthakey, J. F., Culas, R., Ali, A., and Hassan, F. U. 2021. Socioeconomic Impact Assessment of Water Resources Conservation and Management to Protect Groundwater in Punjab, Pakistan. Water, 13(19): 2672.
Okoye, C. O. B., and Ugwu, J. N. 2010. Impact of environmental cadmium, lead, copper and zinc on quality of goat meat in Nigeria. Bulletin of the chemical society of Ethiopia, 24(1): 133-138.
PIDA, 2018. Institutional reforms in Punjab. Punjab Irrigation & Drainage Authority (PIDA), Lahore. (http://www.punjab.gov.pk/irrigation/pida) (Accessed 10 March, 2022).
Raza, M.A., M. Ashfaq, S.H. Abidi and A. Ali. 2010. Change in management of irrigation sector of Punjab (Pakistan) and its impact on income of wheat growers. Pak. J. of Agri. Sci., 47(4): 399-403.
Razzaq, A., Qing, P., Abid, M., Anwar, M., and Javed, I. 2019. Can the informal groundwater markets improve water use efficiency and equity? Evidence from a semi-arid region of Pakistan. Science of the Total Environment, 666: 849-857.
Riaz, M., and Ashfaq, M. 2019. Impact of Participatory Irrigation Management on water availability and agricultural productivity (No. 2186-2019-1412).
Shahbaz, P., Abbas, A., Aziz, B., Alotaibi, B. A., and Traore, A. 2022. Nexus between Climate-Smart Livestock Production Practices and Farmers’ Nutritional Security in Pakistan: Exploring Level, Linkages, and Determinants. Int. J. of Envir. Res. and Pub. Heal., 19(9): 5340.
Shahbaz, P., Boz, I. and Haq, S.U. 2020. Adaptation options for small livestock farmers having large ruminants (cattle and buffalo) against climate change in Central Punjab Pakistan. Envir. Sci. and Pol. Res., 27(15), 17935-17948.
Sinclair, A. J., Kumnerdpet, W., and Moyer, J. M. 2013. Learning sustainable water practices through participatory irrigation management in Thailand. Natur. Resour. For., 37(1): 55-66.
Watto, A., and Mugera, A. 2014. Does the risk of groundwater depletion drive tube-well technology adoption: a case of Pakistan?. 11th International Conference on Hydroinformatics
Wilson, G. A. 1997. Factors influencing farmer participation in the environmentally sensitive areas scheme. Journal of environmental management, 50(1), 67-93.
World Bank. 2020. Water in agriculture. Available at:https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water-in-agriculture#1) (Accessed 10 May, 2022).
Zhou, Q., Deng, X., Wu, F., Li, Z., and Song, W. 2017. Participatory irrigation management and irrigation water use efficiency in maize production: evidence from Zhangye City, Northwestern China. Water, 9(11): 822.