Risk Managing of Wheat Sustainable Production in Iran: A Portfolio Theory

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Azar Sheikhzeinoddin 1
Fatemeh Fathi 1
Seyed Abbas Seyed Salehi 2
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
The challenge of water scarcity poses a significant environmental challenge for the agricultural sector, jeopardizing the sustainable production of vital crops like wheat. Iranian provinces that produce wheat have varying water resources and climatic conditions. These differences have resulted in distinct economic benefits and environmental risks in wheat production among the provinces. In this study, the water footprint of wheat in each province was calculated from 2000 to 2020, and its environmental costs were deducted from the gross margin. Consequently, the social benefit was considered as the return of the wheat production portfolio in each province to manage the risk of sustainable production. Subsequently, the portfolio theory was employed through quadratic mathematical programming to minimize the social benefit-risk and determine the proportion of wheat cultivation in each province for optimal portfolio and sustainable production. The results showed that the provinces of Khuzestan (21.6%), Fars (17.1%), Hamedan (16.1%), Kurdestan (13.2%), Khorasan Razavi (11.4%), Golestan (11.3%), Qazvin (5%), and Kermanshah (4.3%) are in the optimal portfolio. In the optimal portfolio, a significant share of wheat production was related to the provinces with low risk in production (Khuzestan and Fars). The findings suggest that it is necessary to consider economic risks along with environmental risks to achieve sustainable production in the long run. As a result, the eastern and central provinces (Sistan and Baluchestan, South Khorasan, Semnan, Isfahan, Yazd) with the highest water footprint were removed from the optimal portfolio, and the western provinces with higher gross margin and lower water footprint were replaced with a larger share (Kermanshah, Hamedan, and Kurdistan provinces).


Keywords

Subjects

1.       Ababaei, B. and Etedali, H. R. 2017. Water Footprint Assessment of Main Cereals in Iran. Agric. Water Manage. 179: 401–411.
2.       Aliqliania T, Sheibani H, Mohammadi A. and Hesam M. 2017. Comparison and Evaluation of Blue, Green and Gray Water Footprints of Wheat in Different Climates of Iran. Iran. Water Resour. Res., 15(3): 234–245.
3.       Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 56(97): e156.
4.       Alvarez, S., Larkin, S. L. and Ropicki, A. 2017. Optimizing Provision of Ecosystem Services Using Modern Portfolio Theory. Ecosyst. Serv., 27: 25–37.
5.       Atmaca, M. E. 2022. Portfolio Management and Performance Improvement with Sharpe and Treynor Ratios in Electricity Markets. Energy Rep., 8: 192–201.
6.       Bai, L., Shi, H., Kang, S. and Zhang, B. 2023. Project Portfolio Risk Analysis with the Consideration of Project Interdependencies. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., 30(2): 647-670.
7.       Barkley, A., Peterson, H. H. and Shroyer, J. 2010. Wheat Variety Selection to Maximize Returns and Minimize Risk: An Application of Portfolio Theory. J. Agric. Appl. Econ., 42(1): 39–55.
8.       Chouchane, H., Krol, M. S. and Hoekstra, A. Y. 2018. Virtual Water Trade Patterns in Relation to Environmental and Socioeconomic Factors: A Case Study for Tunisia. Sci. Total Environ., 613: 287–297.
9.       D'Ambrosio, E., De Girolamo, A. M. and Rulli, M. C. 2018. Assessing Sustainability of Agriculture through Water Footprint Analysis and in-Stream Monitoring Activities. J. Clean. Prod., 200: 454–470.
10.    FAO, 2021. GIEWS - Global Information and Early Warning System.  Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/giews/countrybrief/country.jsp?lang=ru&code=IRN
11.    Fathi, F., Sheikhzeinoddin, A. and Talebnejad, R. 2020. Environmental and Economic Risk Management of Seed Maize Production in Iran. J. Clean. Prod., 258: 120772.
12.    González, C. J., Ibarrola, R. and García, P. 2019. Risk and Return in Agricultural Systems: A Framework for Analyzing Economic and Environmental Trade-Offs. Agric. Syst. 172, 1–12.
13.    Goodwin, B. K. and Hungerford, A. 2015. Copula‐Based Models of Systemic Risk in US Agriculture: Implications for Crop Insurance and Reinsurance Contracts. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 97(3): 879–896.
14.    He, X., Zhang, L. and Xu, J. 2021. Regional Adaptation Strategies for Sustainable Wheat Production under Changing Environmental Conditions. Agric. Syst., 187: 102940.
15.    Herold, N., Ekström, M., Kala, J., Goldie, J. and Evans, J. P. 2018. Australian Climate Extremes in the 21st Century According to a Regional Climate Model Ensemble: Implications for Health and Agriculture. Weather Clim. Extrem., 20: 54–68.
16.    Hoekstra, A. Y. and Chapagain, A. K. 2007. Water Footprints of Nations: Water Use by People as a Function of Their Consumption Pattern. Water Resour. Manag., 21(1): 35–48.
17.    Hoekstra, A. Y. and Mekonnen, M. M. 2012. The Water Footprint of Humanity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109(9): 3232–3237.
18.    Hoekstra, A. Y., Chapagain, A. K., Aldaya, M. M. and Mekonnen, M. M. 2011. The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard. Routledge, London, 192.
19.    Holly Wang, H. and Zhang, H. 2003. On the Possibility of a Private Crop Insurance Market: A Spatial Statistics Approach. J. Risk Insur., 70(1): 111–124.
20.    Kim, H. S. 2021. Risk Management and Optimal Capital Structure under Ambiguity. Fin. Res. Lett., 40: 101752.
21.    Kim, S. T. and Choi, B. 2019. Price Risk Management and Capital Structure of Oil and Gas Project Companies: Difference between Upstream and Downstream Industries. Energy Econ., 83: 361–374.
22.    MAJ. 2020. Retrieve by https://biamar.maj.ir/ManagementReport/powerbi/DataBank/AgriBiReport?rs:embed=true
23.    Marko, O., Brdar, S., Panic, M., Lugonja, P. and Crnojevic, V. 2016. Soybean Varieties Portfolio Optimization Based on Yield Prediction. Comput. Electron. Agric., 127: 467–474.
24.    Markowitz, H. M. 1991. Foundations of Portfolio Theory. J. Fin., 46(2):469–477.
25.    Mekonnen, M. M. and Hoekstra, A. Y. 2011. The Green, Blue and Grey Water Footprint of Crops and Derived Crop Products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15(5): 1577–1600.
26.    Meteorological Services of Iran. 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.irimo.ir/Eng/.
27.    Ministry of Agriculture-Jihad (MAJ). 2020. Retrieved from http://www.maj.ir/Portal/Home/Default. aspx? CategoryID¼c5c8bb7b-ad9f-43dd-8502-cbb9e37fa2ce.
28.    Monjardino, M., McBeath, T. M., Brennan, L. and Llewellyn, R. S. 2013. Are Farmers in Low-Rainfall Cropping Regions Under-Fertilising with Nitrogen? A Risk Analysis. Agric. Syst., 116: 37–51.
29.    Moss, C. B. 2010. Risk, Uncertainty and the Agricultural Firm. World Scientific Publishing Company, Amazon.
30.    Najafi, M. S., & Alizadeh, O. 2023. Climate zones in Iran. Meteorological Applications, 30(5), e2147.
31.    Nguyen-Huy, T., Deo, R. C., Mushtaq, S., Kath, J. and Khan, S. 2018. Copula-Based Agricultural Conditional Value-at-Risk Modelling for Geographical Diversifications in Wheat Farming Portfolio Management. Weather Clim. Extrem., 21: 76–89.
32.    Odening, M. and Shen, Z. 2014. Challenges of Insuring Weather Risk in Agriculture. Agric. Fin. Rev., 74(2): 188–199.
33.    Paquin, J. P., Gauthier, C. and Morin, P. P. 2016. The Downside Risk of Project Portfolios: The Impact of Capital Investment Projects and the Value of Project Efficiency and Project Risk Management Programs. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34(8): 1460–1470.
34.    Parry, M. L., Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A., Livermore, M. and Fischer, G. 2004. Effects of Climate Change on Global Food Production under SRES Emissions and Socio-Economic Scenarios. Glob. Environ. Change, 14(1):53–67.
35.    Paut, R., Sabatier, R. and Tchamitchian, M. 2019. Reducing Risk through Crop Diversification: An Application of Portfolio Theory to Diversified Horticultural Systems. Agric. Syst., 168: 123–130.
36.    Prol, J. L. and Kim, K. 2022. Risk-Return Performance of Optimized ESG Equity Portfolios in the NYSE. Fin. Res. Lett., 50: 103312.
37.    Razzaghi, F. and Sepaskhah, A. R. 2012. Calibration and Validation of Four Common ET0 Estimation Equations by Lysimeter Data in a Semi-Arid Environment. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 58(3): 303–319.
38.    Sewando, P. T. 2022. Efficacy of Risk Reducing Diversification Portfolio Strategies among Agro-Pastoralists in Semi-Arid Area: A Modern Portfolio Theory Approach. J. Agric. Food Res., 7: 1-8.
39.    Tom, M. S., Fischbeck, P. S. and Hendrickson, C. T. 2016. Energy Use, Blue Water Footprint, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Current Food Consumption Patterns and Dietary Recommendations in the US. Environ. Syst. Decis., 36(1): 92–103.
40.    United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1993. Natural Engineering Handbook, Part 632. Irrigation Water Requirements, Chapter 2.
41.    Viganò, L. and Castellani, D. 2020. Financial Decisions and Risk Management of Low-Income Households in Disaster-Prone Areas: Evidence from the Portfolios of Ethiopian Farmers. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 45: 101475.
42.    Yang, H., Wang, L., Abbaspour, K. C. and Zehnder, A. J. B. 2006. Virtual Water Highway: Water Use Efficiency in Global Food Trade. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 3(1): 1–26.
43.    Zhang, J., Terrones, M., Park, C. R., Mukherjee, R., Monthioux, M., Koratkar, N. and Chen, Y. 2016. Carbon Science in 2016: Status, challenges and perspectives. Carbon, 98(70): 708–732.
44.    Ziakas, V. 2021. Event Portfolio Management: An Emerging Transdisciplinary Field of Theory and Praxis. Tour. Manag., 83: 104233.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 28, Issue 1
January and February 2026
Pages 103-117