Ecosystem Services Valuation of Rig-Ishaqabad Rangeland in Iran: The Provisioning and Regulating Services of Rangeland Vegetation Types

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
H. Eskandari Nasab 1
S. Amirtaimoori 1
M. R. Zare mehrjerdi 2
H. Mirzaei khalilabad 2
M. Baniasadi 3
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
3 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
10.52547/jast.25.2.267
Abstract
One way to better appreciate the value of rangelands with the purpose of developing better policies and make sustainable use of these resources is to determine the monetary valuation of the ecosystem services of these rangelands. Thus, the present study aimed to estimate the economic values of provisioning and regulating services of Rig Ishaqabad Rangeland in Kerman Province, Iran. To this end, samples of the soil and vegetation cover of the region were taken. Following conduction of various experiments, the type and texture of the soil and its content of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium nutrients, the soil erosion coefficient, and the amount of carbon absorption for each vegetation type were determined. Then, the monetary values of forage production, carbon absorption, oxygen production, soil production, nutrient absorption, and erosion prevention were estimated using the Revealed Preference Approach. According to the findings, in 2019, the total economic value of the rangeland's services was USD 0.54 million; and the values of provisioning and regulating services were USD 260,102.85 and 283,841.77, respectively. In addition, the economic value of vegetation types of Artemisia sieberi-Denderostellera lessertii (Ar si-De Le), Denderostellera lessertii- Peganum harmala (De le-Pe ha), Cousinia congesta (Co co), Calligonum polygonoides- Astragalus sp (Capo- As sp), Artemisia Sieberi-Peganum harmala (Ar si-Pe ha) were USD 115,466.42, 159,045.6, 54,815.14, 85,220.66, and 129,396.78, respectively. Based on the results, the De le-Pe ha vegetation type was of the highest value with a value of 49.07 US dollars per hectare. The calculated monetary values can be a useful tool in determining the long-term rental rate of this rangeland and determine the amount of investment to preserve or restore it.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Ahmadpour, H., Heshmati, G.A. and Joulaie, R. 2016. Rangeland Condition Assessment Based on Economic Criteria. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 9(2): 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlecol-2016-0009.
2. Alipour, M., Ahmadpour, M., Mosapour, SH. and Moudi, H. 2015. Economic valuation of multiple functions of rangelands. National Conference on new ideas in agriculture, environment and tourism. Ardabil, Iran. 21 November. (in Persian)
3. Almas, L.K., Lust, D.G. and Brooks, K.R. 2013. Estimation of the Value of Old World Bluestem and Optimum Grazing Season under Alternative Stocking Rates. Southern Agricultural Economics Association 45th Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida.
4. Amiri, F. and Mohamed Shariff, A.R.B. 2012. An approach for analysis of integrated components on available forage in semi-arid rangelands of Iran. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(5): 546-556.
5. Amiri, F., Mohamed Shariff, A.R., Tabatabaie, T. and Pradhan, B. 2014. A geospatial model for the optimization grazing management in semi-arid rangeland of Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7(3): 1101-1114.
6. Arzani, H., Ahmadi, H., Jafari, M., Azarnivand, H., Salajeghe, A. and Tavili, A. 2008. Determination of criteria and indices of rangeland suitability assessment. Organization of Forests. Rangelands and Watershed Management.
7. Baniasadi, M. 2017. Evaluating economical-environmental externalities caused by excessive extraction of groundwater in Orzouiyeh catchment. Ph.D thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran. (in Persian)
8. Baniasadi, M., Zare' Mehrjordi, M.R., Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H., Mirzaei Khalilabad, H.R. and Rezaei Estakhrooye, H. 2020. Evaluation of negative economic-environmental externalities of overextraction of groundwater. Journal of Groundwater, 58(4): 560-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12933.
9. Barth, N. C. and Döll, P. 2016. Assessing the ecosystem service flood protection of a riparian forest by applying a cascade approach. Ecosystem Services, 21: 39-52.
10. Behmanesh, B., Barani, H., Abedi Sarvestani, A., Shahraki, M.R. and Sharafatmandrad, M. 2016. Rangeland degradation assessment: a new strategy based on the ecological knowledge of indigenous pastoralists. Solid Earth, 7: 611–619. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-7-611-2016.
11. Bostan, Y., Fatahiardakani, A., Fehresti Sani, M. and Sadeghinia, M. 2018. A Pricing Model for Value of Gas Regulation Function of Natural Resources Ecosystems (Case Study: Sheikh Musa Rangeland, Mazandaran Province, Iran). Journal of Rangeland Science, 8(2): 186-200.
12. Bostan, Y., Fattahi, A., Sadeghinia, M. and Fehresti, M. 2019. Estimating the economic value of soil and water regulatory services of rangeland ecosystems (Case study: Sheykh Musa rangeland of Babol. Rangeland, 12(4): 464-480. (in Persian)
13. Costanza, R., De Groot, R., Sutton, P., Van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S. and Turner, R.K. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26: 152–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.
14. Costanza, R., Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S. and Turner, R. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26: 152-158.
15. Daryanto, S., Fu, B., Zhao, W. and Wang, L. 2019. One-hundred years after shrub encroachment: Policy directions towards sustainable rangeland-use. Land Use Policy, 84: 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.008.
16. De Lange, W. J., Veldtman, R. and Allsopp, M.H. 2013. Valuation of pollinator forage services provided by Eucalyptus cladocalyx. Journal of Environmental Management, 125: 12-18.
17. DNRWMKP. 2018. Rangeland management plan in Rig Ishaqabad Rangeland of Sirjan County. Ministry of Agriculture, Organization of Forests, Rangelands and Watershed Management, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)
18. Farley, J. 2012. Ecosystem services: The economics debate. Ecosystem Services, 1: 40–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.002.
19. Freeman, A.M. 1993. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values -Theory and Methods. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
20. FRWMOI. 2020. Overview of rangelands in Iran. Retrieved from https://frw.ir/02/fa/staticpages/page.aspx?tid=1501. (in Persian)
21. Ghermandi, A., Nunes, P.A.L.D., Portela, R., Rao, N. and Teelucksingh, S.S. 2011. Recreational, Cultural, and Aesthetic Services from Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystems. Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science, 12: 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374711-2.01212-2.
22. Guo, Z., Xiao, X., Gan, Y. and Zheng, Y. 2001. Ecosystem functions, services and their values–a case study in Xingshan County of China. Ecological Economics, 38(1): 141-154.
23. Hesse, P.R. 1971. A text book of soil chemical analysis. John Murray, London.
24. Hosseini, S., Amirnejad, H. and Oladi, J. 2018. Estimating the Economic Value of Environmental Benefits of Rangelands in Iran (Case Study: Rangeland Ecosystem of Kiasar National Park). Environmental researches, 8(16): 87-102. http://www.iraneiap.ir/article_63829.html. (in Persian)
25. Ibáñez, J., Martínez-Valderrama, J. and Schnabel, S. 2007. Desertification due to overgrazing in a dynamic commercial livestock-grass-soil system. Ecological Modeling, 205(3): 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.02.024.
26. Ibáñez, J., Martínez-Valderrama, J., Papanastasis, V., Evangelou, C. and Puigdefábregas, J. 2014. A multidisciplinary model for assessing degradation in Mediterranean rangelands. Land Degradation and Development, 25(5): 468-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2165.
27. Jackson, M.L. 1969. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersy, USA, 521p.
28. Jahanifar, K., Amirnejad, H., Azadi, H., Adenle, A.A. and Scheffran, J. 2019. Economic analysis of land use changes in forests and rangelands: Developing conservation strategies. Land Use Policy, 88: 104003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.022.
29. Kontoleon, A. and Pascual, U. 2007. Incorporating Biodiversity into Integrated Assessments of Trade Policy in the Agricultural Sector. Volume II: Reference Manual. Chapter 7. Economics and Trade Branch, United Nations Environment Programme. Geneva. Available at: http://www.unep.ch/etb/pdf/UNEP%20T+B%20Manual.Vol%20II.Draft%20 June07.pdf
30. Kumar, P. 2012. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Routledge: Taylor & Francis.
31. Li, J., Ren, Z. and Zhou, Z. 2006. Ecosystem services and Their Values: A Case Study in the Qinba Mountains of China. Ecological Researches, 21: 597-604.
32. Liu, S., Costanza, R., Farber, S. and Troy, A. 2010. Valuing ecosystem services: theory, practice and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185: 54–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05167.x.
33. Lockeretz, W. 1978. The lessons of the dust bowl. American Scientist, 66: 560-569.
34. Mackenzie, C. 2012. Analysis Accruing benefit or loss from a protected area: Location matters. Ecological Economics, 76: 119-129. http://doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.013.
35. Martínez-Valderrama, J., Ibáñez, J., Del Barrio, G., Alcalá, F.J., Sanjuán, M.E., Ruiz, A., Hirche, A. and Puigdefábregas, J. 2018. Doomed to collapse: Why Algerian steppe rangelands are overgrazed and some lessons to help land-use transitions. Science of the Total Environment, 613-614: 1489-1497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.058.
36. Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., García-Llorente, M. and Montes, C. 2014. Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecological Indicators, 37: 220–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003.
37. Micklin, P.P. 1988. Desiccation of the Aral Sea: a water management disaster in the Soviet :union:. Science, 241: 1170–1176. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.241.4870.1170.
38. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
39. Mirzabaev, A., Ahmed, M., Werner, J., Pender, J. and Louhaichi, M. 2016. Rangelands of Central Asia: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Arid Land, 8: 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-015-0057-5.
40. Nábrádi, A. 2007. The economic value of grassland products. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 1(1): 19-28.
41. National Research Council. 1985. Nutrient requirements of sheep (Vol. 5). National Academies.
42. Ning, J., Jin, J., Kuang, F., Wan, X., Zhang, C. and Guan, T. 2019. The valuation of grassland ecosystem services in Inner Mongolia of China and its spatial differences. Sustainability, 11: 7117. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247117.
43. Oddy, V.H., Robars, G.E. and Low, S.G. 1983. Prediction of in vivo dry matter digestibility from the fiber nitrogen content of a feed. In: Robards, G.E. and R.G. Packham. (eds.). Feed Information and Animal Production. Commonwealth Agriculture Bureaux, Farnham Royal, UK. p. 395-398.
44. Ojeda, M.I., Mayer, A.S. and Solomon, B.D. 2008. Economic valuation of environmental services sustained by water flows in the Yaqui River Delta. Ecological Economics, 65: 155-166.
45. Olsen, S.R. and Sommers, L.E. 1982. Phosphorus. p. 539-579. In: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. and Keeney, D.R., Eds., Methods of soil analysis: Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison.
46. Pascual, U., Muradian, R., Brander, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, B., Verma, M., Armsworth, P., Christie, M., Cornelissen, H., Eppink, F., Farley, J., Loomis, J., Pearson, L., Perrings, C., Polasky, S., McNeely, J. A., Norgaard, R., Siddiqui, R., David Simpson, R. and Simpson, R.D. 2012. The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. In: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations (pp. 183-256). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775489.
47. Richter, F., Jan, P., Benni, N.E., Lüscher, A., Buchmann, N. and Klaus, V.H. 2021. A guide to assess and value ecosystem services of grasslands. Ecosystem Services, 52: 101376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101376.
48. Roche, L.M., Saitone, T.L. and Tate, K.W. 2021. Rangeland ecosystem service markets: panacea or wicked problem? Frontiers in Sustainable Food System, 5: 554373. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.554373.
49. Sala, O.E., Yahdjian, L., Havstad, K. and Aguiar M.R. 2017. Rangeland Ecosystem Services: Nature’s Supply and Humans’ Demand. In: Briske D. (eds) Rangeland Systems. Springer Series on Environmental Management. Springer, Cham.
50. Sannigrahi, S., Chakraborti, S., Banerjee, A., Rahmat, S., Bhatt, S., Jha, S., Singh, L.K., Paul, S.K. and Sen, S. 2020. Ecosystem service valuation of a natural reserve region for sustainable management of natural resources. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 5: 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2019.100014.
51. Schild, J.E.M., Vermaat, J.E. and van Bodegom, P.M. 2018a. Differential effects of valuation method and ecosystem type on the monetary valuation of dryland ecosystem services: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Arid Environments, 159: 11-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.09.001.
52. Schild, J.E.M., Vermaat, J.E., de Groot, R.S., Quatrini, S. and van Bodegom, P.M. 2018b. A global meta-analysis on the monetary valuation of dryland ecosystem services: The role of socio-economic, environmental and methodological indicators. Ecosystem Services, 32: 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.06.004.
53. Sheehy, D.P. 1992. A perspective on desertification of grazing land ecosystems in North China. Ambio, 21(4): 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.667.
54. Standing Committee on Agriculture. 1990. Feeding Standards for Australian Livestock. Ruminants. CSIRO Publ., Melbourne, Australia.
55. Stapleton, L.M. and Garrod, G.D. 2008. Do we ecologically model what we economically value?. Ecological Economics, 65(3): 531-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007. 07.020.
56. Wang, Y., Bilsborrow, R.E., Zhang, Q., Li, J. and Song, C. 2019. Effects of payment for ecosystem services and agricultural subsidy programs on rural household land use decisions in China: Synergy or trade-off?. Land Use Policy, 81: 785-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.057.
57. Wang, Y., Li, X., Zhang, Q., Li, J. and Zhou, X. 2018. Projections of future land use changes: Multiple scenarios-based impacts analysis on ecosystem services for Wuhan city, China. Ecological Indicators, 94(1): 430-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.047.
58. World Bank. 2017. Guidance note on shadow price of carbon in economic analysis (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Working Paper, Report Number 123940. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/621721519940107694/Guidance-note-on-shadow -price-of-carbon-in-economic-analysis.
59. Xue, D. and Tisdell, C. 2001. Valuing ecological functions of biodiversity in Changbaishan Mountain Biosphere Reserve in northeast China. Biodiversity & Conservation, 10(3): 467-481.
60. Yang, S., Zhao, W., Liu, Y., Wang, S., Wang, J. and Zhai, R. 2018. Influence of land use change on the ecosystem service trade-offs in the ecological restoration area: Dynamics and scenarios in the Yanhe watershed, China. Science of The Total Environment, 644: 556-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.348.
61. Yeganeh, H. 2014. Evaluation and economic valuation of rehabilitation projects in the country's rangeland (Tahom watershed of Zanjan, Iran). Ph.D thesis, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)
62. Yeganeh, H., Azarnivand, H., Saleh, I., Arzani, H. and Amirnejad, H. 2015. Estimation of economic value of the gas regulation functions in rangeland ecosystems of Taham watershed basin. Jour. Rangeland, 9(2): 106-119. (in Persian)
63. Zakeri, E., Mousavi, S.A. and Karimzadeh, H. 2020. Scenario-based modelling of soil conservation function by rangeland vegetation cover in northeastern Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 79: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-8846-3.
64. Zha, X., Liao, X., Zhao, X., Liu, F., He, A.Q. and Xiong, W.X. 2018. Turning Waste drilling fluids into a new, sustainable soil resources for landscaping. Ecological Engineering, 121: 130-136.
65. Zhang, Q., Bilsborrow, R.E., Song, C., Tao, S. and Huang, Q. 2019. Rural household income distribution and inequality in China: Effects of payments for ecosystem services policies and other factors. Ecological Economics, 160: 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.019.
66. Zhang, Q., Song, C. and Chen, X. 2018. Effects of China’s payment for ecosystem services programs on cropland abandonment: A case study in Tiantangzhai Township, Anhui, China. Land Use Policy, 73: 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.001.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 25, Issue 2
January and February 2023
Pages 267-284