1- Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036
2. Ainin, S., Naqshbandi, M. M., Mogavvemi, S., & Jaafar, N. I. (2015). Facebook usage, socialization and academic performance. Computers & Education, 83, 64–73.
3. Al-Gahtani, S. S. (2016). Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation : A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 12(1), 27–50.
4. Al-rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Musa, M. A. (2017). The Improvement of Students ’ Academic Performance by Using Social Media through Collaborative Learning in Malaysian Higher Education. Asian Social Science, 10(8), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n8p210
5. Alizadeh, I. (2018). Evaluating the educational usability of Telegram as an SNS in ESAP programs from medical students’ perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2569–2585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9731-5
6. Alshurideh, M., Salloum, S. A., Al Kurdi, B., & Al-Emran, M. (2019). Factors affecting the social networks acceptance: An empirical study using PLS-SEM approach. In ICSCA ’19 Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications (pp. 414–418). Penang, Malaysia: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3316615.3316720
7. Arteaga Sánchez, R., Cortijo, V., & Javed, U. (2014). Students’ perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Computers and Education, 70.
8. Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage. Human Relations, 45(7), 659–686.
9. Binobaid, S. A. (2017). A Model on Factors Affecting Nurses Adoption of Health Information Technology. Cranfield University.
10. Cao, Y., Ajjan, H., & Hong, P. (2013). Using social media applications for educational outcomes in college teaching: A structural equation analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12066
11. Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers and Education, 63, 160–175.
12. Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analysis. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares (pp. 655–690). Springer International Publishing.
13. Chou, P. C. (2006). Understanding User ’ s Perceived Playfulness toward Mobile Information and Entertainment Services in New Zealand. Auckland University of Technology.
14. Cramer, C. (2013). Social media uses by students in an agricultural student orientation course. Oklahoma State University. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ecar
15. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
16. Dahlstrom, E. (2012). ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology. Louisville. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ecar
17. Dastani, M., Mohammadpour, A., & Bagheri, J. (2019). The Opportunities and Damages of Virtual Social Networks from Students ’ Perspectives ; the Experience of Iranian Users. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), 2956, 1–9.
18. Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model For Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory And Results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
19. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
20. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
21. Doğan, B., Demir, Ö., & Ülkü, E. E. (2018). Applying social networks to engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(5), 1782–1791.
22. Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., & Lemay, D. J. (2018). Social Networking and Academic Performance: A Generalized Structured Component Approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(7), 1129–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117738281
23. Doleck, T., & Lajoie, S. (2018). Social networking and academic performance: A review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 435–465.
24. Dumpit, D. Z., & Fernandez, C. J. (2017). Analysis of the use of social media in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) using the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1).
25. Faqih, K. M. S., & Mousa Jaradat, M. R. (2015). Assessing the moderating effect of gender differences and individualism-collectivism at individual-level on the adoption of mobile commerce technology: TAM3 perspective. Jou. of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 37–52.
26. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior, An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-wesley publication company. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing Behavior, The Reasoned Action Approach. New york-Hove: Psychology Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
28. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
29. Galanek, J. D., Gierdowski, D. C., & Brooks, D. C. (2018). ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology. Research report. Louisville, Co: ECAR.
30. Giunchiglia, F., Zeni, M., Gobbi, E., Bignotti, E., & Bison, I. (2018). Mobile social media usage and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 177–185.
31. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–151.
32. Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Kurnia, S., & Chang, S. (2015). Understanding students’ perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.004
33. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–319.
34. Jankovic, B., Nikolic, M., Vukojanski, J., & Terek, E. (2016). The impact of Facebook and smart phone usage on the leisure activities and college adjustment of students in Serbia. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.022
35. Jeffrey, D. A. (2015). Testing the Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM3) with the Inclusion of Change Fatigue and Overload, in the Context of Faculty from Seventh- day Adventist Universities: A Revised Model. Andrews University.
36. Junco, R. (2015). Student class standing, Facebook use, and academic performance. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.001
37. Kabir, K. H., Roy, D., & Abul Kashem, M. (2016). Social Computing Behavior of the Students of Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh. Social Sciences, 5(6), 86–93.
38. Kabir, K. H., Roy, D., & Kashem, M. abdul. (2016). Social Computing Behavior of the Students of Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh. Social Sciences, 5(6), 86–93.
39. Kipkurgat, T., Onyiego, M., & Chemwaina, S. (2016). Impact of social media on agricultural extension in kenya: a case of kesses district. International Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development Studies, 3(1), 30–36.
40. Kwon, O., & Wen, Y. (2010). An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.011
41. Lacka, E., & Wong, T. C. (2019). Examining the impact of digital technologies on students’ higher education outcomes: the case of the virtual learning environment and social media. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1698533
42. Lai, P. (2017). The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), 21–38.
43. Lambić, D. (2016). Correlation between Facebook use for educational purposes and academic performance of students. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 313–320.
44. Leong, L. W., Ibrahim, O., Dalvi-Esfahani, M., Shahbazi, H., & Nilashi, M. (2018). The moderating effect of experience on the intention to adopt mobile social network sites for pedagogical purposes: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2477–2498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9726-2
45. Liu, D., Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2017). A meta-analysis of the relationship of academic performance and Social Network Site use among adolescents and young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.039
46. Luo, T., Shah, S. J., & Crompton, H. (2019). Using Twitter to support reflective learning in an asynchronous online course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 31–44.
47. Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning ? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12007
48. Masrom, M., & Usat, S. (2015). Use of Online Social Networking and Academic Performance of Students. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology (Third Edit, pp. 2654–2661). IGI Global.
49. Momani, A. M., Jamous, M. M., & Hilles, S. M. S. (2018). Technology Acceptance Theories: review and classification. In Technology Adoption and Social Issues: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (first edit, pp. 1–16). IGI Global.
50. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
51. Moorthy, K., T, L. C., Wei, K. M., Tan, P., Mei, Z., Yee, C. Y., … Mei, Z. (2019). Is facebook useful for learning ? A study in private universities in Malaysia. Computers & Education, 130, 94–104.
52. Müller, D. (2013). Design Characteristics of Virtual Learning Environments. Saarbrucken, Germany: Springer Gabler.
53. Murphrey, T. P., Rutherford, T. A., Doerfert, D. L., Edgar, L. D., & Edgar, D. W. (2012). Technology Acceptance Related to Second Life TM , Social Networking , Twitter TM , and Content Management Systems : Are Agricultural Students Ready, Willing, and Able? Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(3), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2012.03056
54. Nikolopoulos, F., & Likothanassis, S. (2018). Acomplete evaluation of the TAM3 model for cloud computing technology acceptance. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (OTM 2018 Conferences) (pp. 289–296). Valletta, Malta: Springer Switzerland.
55. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/34567890 DOCmoC 998765 ISBN
56. Ogaji, I. J., Okoyeukwu, P. C., Wanjiku, I. W., Osiro, E. A., & Ogutu, D. A. (2017). Pattern of use of social media networking by Pharmacy students of Kenyatta university, Nairobi, Kenya. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.035
57. Owusu, G. M. Y., Bekoe, R. A., Otoo, D. S., & Koli, A. P. E. (2019). Adoption of social networking sites for educational use. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2018-0069
58. Persico, D., Manca, S., & Pozzi, F. (2014). Adapting the technology acceptance model to evaluate the innovative potential of e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 614–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.045
59. Saini, C., & Abraham, J. (2019). Modeling educational usage of social media in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(1), 21–55.
60. Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061
61. Sayed, H., Dafoulas, G., & Saleeb, N. (2018). Social network sites and methodological practices. Int. Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration, 5(38), 1–10.
62. Simonson, M. R., Maurer, M., Montag-Torardi, M., & Whitaker, M. (1987). Development of a standardized test of computer literacy and a computer anxiety index. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.2190/7CHY-5CM0-4D00-6JCG
63. Thongmak, M. (2014). Factors determining learners’ acceptance of Facebook in a higher education classroom. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 6(3), 316–331.
64. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use : Integrating Control , Intrinsic Motivation , and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.
65. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
66. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model : Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
67. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
68. Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty Perceptions about Teaching Online: Exploring the Literature Using the Technology Acceptance Model as an Organizing Framework. Online Learning, 21(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.761
69. Yaghoubi, J., Najafloo, P., & Mohammadi, V. (2018). Application of social networks in educational and research activities of agricultural students in university of Zanjan. Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research, (43), 17-29 (In Persian).
70. Yousafzai, S. (2012). Internet Banking Behavior. In Encyclopedia of Cyber Behavior (pp. 489–502). Hershey: IGI Global.
71. Zaidieh, A. J. Y. (2012). The use of social networking in education: Challenges and opportunities. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal, 2(1), 18–21.
72. Zaki, M. Z. M., & Khan, A. (2016). Intention to Use Facebook for Learning Support : The Case of College Students. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 6(2), 1–14.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology