Understanding Iranian Rural People’s Intention to Use Renewable Energy Technologies: Pro-Self or Pro-Social Orientations?

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
R. Rezaei 1
P. G. M. van der Heijden 2
1 Department of Agricultural Extension, Communication and Rural Development, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
The increasing need for energy resources and the threat of shortage of available fossil fuels in the future along with the adverse environmental issues arising from consumption of these fuels, especially climate change, have led countries to pursue sustainable and eco-friendly modes of producing energy. Meanwhile, in recent years, many researchers have considered renewable energies and their related technologies. However, the evidence indicates that social or public acceptance of Renewable Energy Technologies (RETs) is low and people, especially in rural areas of developing countries, are less likely to adopt and use such technologies. Accordingly, the current study was undertaken to investigate the factors influencing Iranian villagers’ intention to use RETs through two socio-psychological models with pro-self and pro-social motivations and to integrate them into one comprehensive theoretical framework. A questionnaire survey was conducted for 393 villagers in Zanjan County in northwestern Iran. The study results disclosed that personal norm, attitude, social norm, and perceived behavioral control had significant positive impacts on the intention to use RETs. Most importantly, the findings confirmed the effectiveness of the original models of Norm Activation Model (NAM) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) in explaining the villagers' intention. However, the utility and applicability of an integrative model of TPB-NAM were superior to the original models. Additionally, the original NAM contributed considerably more to the integrative model than the original TPB. Collectively, the pro-social orientations outweighed the pro-self motives in the case of explaining the behavioral intention regarding the use of RETs among Iranian villagers. Overall, this study's findings contribute to the theory and practice around sustainable energy development in Iran and other developing countries.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Afsharzade, N., Papzan, A., Ashjaee, M., Delangizan, S., Van Passel, S., Azadi, H. 2016. Renewable energy development in rural areas of Iran. Renew. Sustain. Ener. Rev., 65: 743-755.
2. Alizadeh, R., Soltanisehat, L., Lund, P.D., Zamanisabzi, H., 2020. Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through a hybrid MCDM method. Energ. Policy, 137: 111174
3. Bahrami, M., Abbaszadeh, P., 2013. An overview of renewable energies in Iran. Sust. Energ. Rev., 24: 198-208.
4. Bakhtiyari, Z., Yazdanpanah, M., Forouzani, M., Kazemi, N., 2017. Intention of agricultural professionals toward biofuels in Iran: Implications for energy security, society, and policy. Renew. Sustain. Ener. Rev., 69: 341-349.
5. Bamberg, S., Möser, G., 2007. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. J. Environ. Psychol., 27: 14-25.
6. Chen, M.F., 2016. Extending the theory of planned behavior model to explain people’s energy savings and carbon reduction behavioral intentions to mitigate climate change in Taiwan-moral obligation matters. J. Clean. Prod., 112: 1746-1753.
7. Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, United States.
8. De Groot, J.I.M., Steg, L., 2009. Morality and pro-social behavior: the role of awareness, responsibility and norms in the norm activation model. J. Soc. Psychol., 149(4): 425-449.
9. Guagnano, G.A., 2001. Altruism and market-like behavior: An analysis of willingness to pay for recycled paper products. Popul. Environ., 22: 425-438.
10. Han, H., Hsu, L.J., Lee, J., 2009. Empirical investigation of the roles of attitudes toward green behaviors, overall image, gender, and age in hotel customers’ eco-friendly decision-making process. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 28: 519-528.
11. Han, H., Hyun, S.S., 2017. Drivers of customer decision to visit an environmentally responsible museum: Merging the theory of planned behavior and norm activation theory. J. Travel Tour. Mark., 34: 1155-1168.
12. Harland, P., Staats, H., Wilke, H.A.M., 2007. Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: Questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol., 29: 323-334.
13. Hoang, H., 2017. Determinants of pro-environmental behavior: bioethanol fuel purchasing in Vietnam. MSc Thesis, Lincoln University, New Zealand.
14. Huijts, N.M., Molin, E.J., Steg, L., 2012. Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renew. Sustain. Ener. Rev., 16: 525-531.
15. Irfan, M., Zhao, Z.Y., Li, H., Rehman, A., 2020. The influence of consumers’ intention factors on willingness to pay for renewable energy: A structural equation modeling approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 27: 21747-21761.
16. Ji, W., Edwin, H., Chan, W., 2019. Critical factors influencing the adoption of smart home energy technology in China: A Guangdong Province case study. Energies, 12: 4180-4203.
17. Komendantova, N., Yazdanpanah, M., Shafiei, R., 2018. Studying young people’ views on deployment of renewable energy sources in Iran through the lenses of social cognitive theory. AIMS Energy, 6(2): 216-228.
18. Liu, W., Wang, C., Mol, A.P.J., 2013. Rural public acceptance of renewable energy deployment: The case of Shandong in China. Appl. Energ., 102: 1187-1196.
19. Lv, R.S., Lu, H.N., Hong, S., 2016. Research on affecting factors of energy saving behavior based on norm activation model. J. Arid Land Resour. Environ. 9: 14-18.
20. Nugier, A., Niedenthal, P., Brauer, M., Chekroun, P., 2007. Moral and angry emotions provoked by informal social control. Cognition. Emotion, 2: 1699-1720.
21. Onwezen, M.C., Antonides, G., Bartels, J., 2013. The norm activation model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behavior. J. Econ. Psychol., 39: 141-153.
22. Pilling, V.K., Brannon, L.A., Shanklin, C.W., Howells, A.D., Roberts, K.R., 2008. Identifying specific beliefs to target to improve restaurant employees’ intentions for performing three important food safety behaviors. J. Am. Diet Assoc., 108(6): 991-997.
23. Razzaghi, M., Rezaei, R., Shabanali Fami, H.S., 2012. Identifying the inhibiting factors of application development of renewable energies in smallholder farming systems of the Tafresh Township. Iranian J. Energy, 15(3): 1-18.
24. Rezaei, R., Ghofranfarid, M., 2018. Rural households’ renewable energy usage intention in Iran: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Renew. Energ., 122: 382-391.
25. Rezaei, R., Karimi. A., Mangeli, N., Safa, L. 2017. Effect of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities on greenhouse businesses performance in Jiroft. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 19(4): 771-783.
26. Rezaei, R., Mianaji, S. 2019. Using the health belief model to understand farmers’ intentions to engage in the on-farm food safety practices in Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 21(3): 561-574.
27. Rezaei, R., Safa, L., Damalas, C.A., Ganjkhanloo, M.M., 2019. Drivers of farmers’ intention to use integrated pest management: integrating theory of planned behavior and norm activation model. J. Environ. Manage., 236: 328-339.
28. Safieddin Ardebili, M., 2020. Green electricity generation potential from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of farm animal waste and agriculture residues in Iran. Renew. Energ., 154: 29-37.
29. Saleh, A., Haris, A., Ahmad, N., 2014. Towards a UTAUT- based model for the intention to use solar water heaters by Libyan households. Int. J. Energ. Econ. Policy, 4(1): 26-31.
30. Schwartz, S.H., 1973. Normative explanations of helping behavior: a critique, proposal, and empirical test. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 9: 349-364.
31. Schwartz, S.H., 1977. Normative influences on altruism. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 10: 221-279.
32. Shabanali Fami, H., Ghasemi, J., Malekipoor, R., Rashidi, P., Nazari, S., Mirzaee, A., 2010. Renewable energy use in smallholder farming systems: A case study in Tafresh Township of Iran. Sustain., 2: 702-716.
33. Shaw, A., Strohbehn, C., Naeve, L., Domoto, P., Wilson, L., 2015. Systematic approach to food safety education on the farm. J. Ext., 53(6): 1-8.
34. Sok, J., Borges, J.R., Schmidt, P., Ajzen, I., 2020. Farmer behaviour as reasoned action: A critical review of research with the theory of planned behavior. J. Agric. Econ., 72(2): 388-412.
35. Tan, C., Ooi, H., Goh, Y., 2017. A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict consumers’ purchase intention for energy-efficient household appliances in Malaysia. Energ. Policy, 107: 459-471.
36. Taufique, K.M.R., Vaithianathan, S., 2018. A fresh look at understanding green consumer behavior among young urban Indian consumers through the lens of theory of planned behavior. J. Clean. Prod., 183: 46-55.
37. Turaga, R.M.R., Howarth, R.B., Borsuk, M.E., 2010. Pro-environmental behavior rational choice meets moral motivation. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci., 1185: 211-224.
38. Wang, B., Wang, X., Guo, D., Zhang, B., Wang, Z., 2018a. Analysis of factors influencing residents’ habitual energy-saving behavior based on NAM and TPB models: Egoism or altruism? Energ. Policy, 116: 68-77.
39. Wittenberg, I., Blöbaum, A., Matthies, E., 2018. Environmental motivations for energy use in PV households: Proposal of a modified norm activation model for the specific context of PV households. J. Environ. Manage., 55: 110-120.
40. Yaghoubi, J., Yazdanpanah, M., Komendantova, N., 2019. Iranian agriculture advisors' perception and intention toward biofuel: green way toward energy security, rural development and climate change mitigation. Renew. Energ., 130: 452-459.
41. Yazdanpanah, M., Komendantova, N., Namjouyan Shirazi, Z., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., 2015a. Green or in between? Examining youth perceptions of renewable energy in Iran. Energ. Res. Soc. Sci., 8: 78-85.
42. Yazdanpanah, M., Komendantova, N., Shafiei Ardestani, R., 2015b. Governance of energy transition in Iran: Investigating public acceptance and willingness to use renewable energy sources through socio-psychological model. Renew. Sustain. Ener. Rev., 45: 565-573.
43. Yun, S., Lee, J., 2015. Advancing societal readiness toward renewable energy system adoption with a socio-technical perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc., 95: 170-181.
44. Zareei, S., 2018. Evaluation of biogas potential from livestock manures and rural wastes using GIS in Iran. Renew. Energy, 18, 351-356.
45. Zhang, X., Liu, J., Zhao, K., 2018. Antecedents of citizens’ environmental complaint intention in China: An empirical study based on norm activation model. Resour. Conserv. Recy., 134: 121-128.
46. Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Zhou, G., 2013. Antecedents of employee electricity saving behavior in organizations: An empirical study based on norm activation model. Energ. Policy, 62: 1120-1127.
47. Zomorodian, Z.S., Tahsildoost, M., 2019. Capacities, barriers and incentives for development of renewable energies in Iran’s rural areas. J. Housing Rural Environ., 38(165): 17-32.
48. Safa, L., Mohammadian Saghinsara, V., 2020. Understanding rural people’s engagement in pro-environmental behaviors: An integrated conceptual framework. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 22(5): 1205-1217.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 24, Issue 3
May and June 2022
Pages 551-566