Prioritization of factors preventing participation of rural people in soil & water conservation projects (The case of Vers watershed)

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
J. Mosaffaie
A. Salehpour Jam
Assistant Professor, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute (SCWMRI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Peoplechr('39')s participation is an important strategy for successful watershed management. This study aimed to identify and prioritize the factors prevent people from participation based on local peoplechr('39')s and expertchr('39')s viewpoints in Vers watershed. These factors were identified and categorized using literature reviews and interviews with experts and local residents. The validity and reliability of the questionnaires were checked by experts and Cronbachchr('39')s alpha test respectively. The sample size was also calculated by the Cochran formula. Finally, the indicators and sub-indicators which preventing peoplechr('39')s participation were prioritized using the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Friedman test. The results indicated that the views of experts and local residents about the preventing factors are in some cases consistent and in others inconsistent. In general, managerial and economic indicators have a greater role in preventing people from participating than social and educational ones. Experts believe that the factors X13 (lack of timely and complete project budget allocation) and X2 (local disputes) have respectively the most and the least degree of importance. But local residents ranked X7 (lack of multipurpose projects) and X6 (weakness in teamwork) respectively as the most and the least important factors. These differences imply that in addition to the viewpoints of experts, policy-makers must also consider the views of stakeholders on the factors preventing their participation. These findings can be appropriate and practical for executive officials since, removing these participation barriers especially the high-priority ones will increase the stakeholders’ participation level.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Agidew, A. A. and Singh, K. N. 2018. Factors affecting farmers’ participation in watershed management programs in the Northeastern highlands of Ethiopia: a case study in the Teleyayen sub-watershed. Ecol Processes, 7: 2-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-018-0128-6
2. Askin, O. and Guzin, O. 2007. Comparison of AHP and Fuzzy AHP for the multicriteria decision making processes with linguistic evaluations, Istanbul ticaret universitesi fen bilimleri dergisi, 6: 65-85.
3. Bagdi, G. L. and Kurothe, R. S. 2014. People’s participation in watershed management programmes: Evaluation study of Vidarbha region of Maharashtra in India. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res., 2 (3): 57-66.
4. Bijani, M., Ghazani, E., Valizadeh, N., & Haghighi, N. F. 2017. Pro-environmental analysis of farmers' concerns and behaviors towards soil conservation in central district of Sari County, Iran. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res., 5(1): 43-49.
5. Bijani, M., Ghazani, E., Valizadeh, N., and Haghighi, N. F. 2019. Predicting and understanding farmers' soil conservation behavior in Mazandaran province, Iran. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. (JAST), 21(7): 1705-1719.
6. Carr, Gemma. 2015. Stakeholder and public participation in river basin management—an introduction. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water, 2: 393–405. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1086
7. Chizari, M., Karimi, S., Lindner, R. J., & Pezeshki-Rad, G. 2003. Perception of soil conservation competencies among farmers in Markazi Province, Iran. J. Int. Agric. Ext. Educ., 10(3): 13-19.
8. Karami, E. 1995. Models of soil conservation technology adoption in developing countries: the case of Iran. Iran Agric. Res., 14(1): 39-62.
9. Mansouri, A., A. Salehpourjam, M. Mohammadi and M. K. Kianian. 2016. Investigation and prioritizing preventing factors of people participation in natural resources plans (case study: Kan watershed area, Tehran, Iran), 2th national conference on conservation of natural resources and environment, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil.
10. Mosaffaie, J., Nikkami, D., Salehpour Jam, A. 2019. Watershed management in Iran: history, evolution and future needs. Watershed Engineering and Management, 11 (2): 283-300. DOI: 10.22092/ijwmse.2018.121169.1459
11. Mosaffaie, J., Salehpour Jam, A. 2018. Economic assessment of the investment in soil and water conservation projects of watershed management. Arabian J. Geosci., 11, 368. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-018-3706-0.
12. Mosaffaie, J. 2016. Application of artificial neural network, multiple-regression and index-flood techniques in regional flood frequency estimation. Int. J. Water., 10 (4): 328-342.
13. Mosaffaie, J., Ekhtesasi, M. R., Dastorani, M. T., Azimzadeh, H. R., Zare Chahuki, M. A. 2015. Temporal and spatial variation of the water erosion rate. Arabian J. Geosci., 8: 5971–5979. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-014-1628-z.
14. Mosaffaie, J. 2015. Comparison of two methods of regional flood frequency analysis by using L-moments. Water Resour., 42 (3): 313-321.
15. Nambiar,P. 1996. “Managing watersheds: Successful cooperation”, The Hindu: Survey of the Environment: 223-224.
16. Rashvand, S., Mosaffaie, J., Darvish, M., Rafiei Emam, A. 2013. Investigation on potential of desertification in terms of decay of vegetation. Case study: rude shoor, Qazvin. Iranian J. Range Desert Res., 20 (1): 38-49.
17. Reed, M. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biol. Conserv., 141: 2417-2431.
18. Sadoddin, A., Sheikh, V.B., Ownegh, M. Najafinejad, A., Sadeghi, S.H.R. 2016. Development of a national mega research project on the integrated watershed management for Iran. Environ. Resour. res., 4 (2): 231-238.
19. Salehpour Jam, A., Sarreshtehdari, A., Tabatabaei, M.R. 2018. Prioritizing preventing factors affecting on stakeholder's participation in watershed plans based on experts' idea, case study: watershed area surrounding city of Tehran. J. Watershed Eng. Manag., 9 (4): 441-450.
20. Salehpour Jam, A., Fahimeh, R., Sarreshtehdari, A., Mosaffaie, J., & Kianian, M. K. (2020). Prioritization of preventing social indices affecting on peoples' participation in natural resources plans using AHP method and nonparametric tests. J. Watershed Eng. Manag., 12(1): 330-339. doi:10.22092/ijwmse.2018.121767.1480
21. Scolobig, A., Lilliestam, J. 2016. Comparing Approaches for the Integration of Stakeholder Perspectives in Environmental Decision Making. Resour., 5(37): 1-16. Doi:10.3390/resources5040037.
22. Seifi, R., Chizari, M., & Abbasi, E. 2018. Factors affecting framers' soil conservation behavior in West Azerbaijan province: a cultural approach. Iranian J. Agric. Ext. Educ., 13(2): 219-234.
23. Shah S. 1993. “Important imperatives of joint forest management” Wasteland News, May- July 1993, pp38-39.
24. Sharma, C., Sisodia, S.S. 2008. Peoples’ participation in watershed development programme: A case study of Rajasthan. Indian Res. J. ext. edu., 8 (1): 71-72.
25. Soleimanpour, S. M., Salehpour Jam, A., Noroozi, A. A., Khalili, N., 2019a. Investigation of Stakeholders in Prioritizing Factors Affecting Their Poor Participation in Watershed Management Projects (Case Study: Morad Abad Watershed in Meymand, Fars Province). J. Range Watershed Manag., 72 (4): 979-994.
26. Soleimanpour, S. M., Salehpour Jam, A., Noroozi, A. A., Khalili, N., Keshavarzi, H. 2019b. Experts' Viewpoints on Prioritizing Factors Affecting Lack of Sustainable Participation of Rural Communities in Watershed Management Projects on the Moradabad Watershed, Meymand the Province of Fars. Watershed Manag. Res., 32 (3): 53-62.
27. Tyagi, L. K. 1998. People’s participation in rural development, employment news, New Delhi, Vol. XXIII, No.11, pp. 1-2.
28. Valizadeh, N., Bijani, M., & Abbasi, E. 2018. Farmers’ active participation in water conservation: insights from a survey among farmers in southern regions of West Azerbaijan province, Iran. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. (JAST), 20(5): 895-910.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 23, Issue 5
September and October 2021
Pages 975-986