Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Conservation Using Dichotomous Choice Approach (Case Study: Khabar National Park)

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
I. Saleh 1
M. Khosravy 2
A. Sadeghi Boshrabadi 1
H. Rafiee 1
N. Shahnabati 1
H. R. Saleh 3
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar, University of Kerman, Kerman, Islamic Republic of Iran.
3 Kowsar Educational Institution, Ghazvin, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
The development of economic valuation techniques and their potential applications to environmental assessment have important role in environmental economics. The objective of this study was to evaluate the conservation value of the Khabr National Park in Iran and people's willingness to pay for preserving it. This park is one of the most important environmental resources of the country in terms of its flora and fauna in Iran. A contingent valuation method with a dichotomous choice questionnaire based on a logit model was applied to determine the conservation value and people's willingness to pay for preserving the park. The required data was collected through completed questionnaires. Results indicated that the influence of the variables of bid, monthly income, gender, job and education level on households’ willingness to pay are statistically significant. Therefore, an increase in income, education level, and people's expertise increases their willingness to pay, and an increase in bid decreases their willingness to pay. The Iranian households' average monthly willingness to pay for this park's conservation value was estimated at 4,328.6 Rials. The results of the study indicated that the use of the public capacities to protect the natural resources and the environment is a step in financing and participation of people for better protection of the environment.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Akbari, N., Shajari, H. and Bidram, R. 2007. Estimating consumers' willingness to pay for vehicle gasoline Price. Journal of Economic Research. Vol. 42, No. 79, pp. 39-58.
2. Amirnejad, H. and Khalilian. P. 2006. Determining the conservation and recreational values of Noshahr Sisangan park by Using people' willingness to pay, Research and Development Magazine, Vol. 21, No. 19, pp. 15 - 24.
3. Khorshiddost, A. 1997. The role of pricing methods and economic analysis in the Environmental Assessment, Environmental Studies, Vol. 11, No. 20, pp. 102-93.
4. Askari, A. and Mehregan, N. 2001. Estimating cultural heritage visitor willingness to pay by using VCM (Case study: Ganjnameh Hamedan). Journal of Economic Research, No. 1, pp. 93–115.
5. Falihi, N. 2005. Economic valuation of environmental resources, Anzali Wetland, Ph.D. dissertation, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch.
6. Ghorbani, R. 2007. An Analysis of spatial distribution of urban parks in Tabriz and its inferior state, Research projects of Tabriz University.
7. Majnouneian, H. 1977. Comparing the economic value of Tehran' Farahabad and Khazaneh Parks Master's thesis, Tehran University Press.
8. Yakhkeshi, A. 1974. An introduction to Iran's national parks and forests, printing, Tehran University Press.
9. Scheafer, R. L., William Mendenhall, and Ott L. 2006. Elementary survey sampling, 7th edition, Belmont, CA: Thompson.
10. Amigues, J. P., Boulatoff, C., Desaigues, B., Guathier, C. and Keith, J.E. 2002. The benefits and costs of riparian analysis habitat preservation, A Willingness to accept/Willingness to Pay Contingent Valuation Approach. Ecological Economics, No. 43, pp. 17–31.
11. Brookshire, D. S., Eubanks, D.S., and Randall, A. 1983. Estimating option price and existence value for wildlife resources. Land Economics, Vol. 12 No. 59, pp. 1-5.
12. Greene, W. 2002, Econometric analysis, Prentice Hall.
13. Hadker, N., Sharma, S., David, A., Muraleedharan, T. R. 1997, Willingness to pay for Borivil National Park: Evidence from a contingent valuation”. Ecological Economics, Vol. 45. No. 21, pp. 105-122.
14. Hanememann. W. 1994. Valuing environment through contingent valuation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 19-43.
15. Judge, G. and et al., 1988. The theory and practice of econometrics, 2nd edition, Wiley, New York.
16. Khorshiddoust, A. M. 2005. Contigent valuation in estimating the willingness to pay for environmental conservation in Tabriz”, Environmental Studies,Vol.51. No. 30, pp. 12-21.
17. Kristrom, B. 1999. On the incorporation of non-market outputs of forests into national accounting systems, In the Living Forest: Non-Market Benefits of Forestry, Commission, the stationary Office, London, UK.
18. Lee, C., and Han, S. 2002. Estimating the use and preservation values of national parks tourism resources using a contingent valuation method. Tourism Management, Vol. 63. No. 23, pp. 531-540.
19. Lehtonen, E., Kuuluvainen, J., Pouta, E., Rekola, M. 2003. Non-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland. Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 66 No.23, pp. 195-204.
20. Leinhoop, N., and MacMillan, D. 2007. Valuing wilderness in Iceland: Estimation of WTP using the stall approach to contingent valuation. Land Use Policy, Vol. 64 No. 24, pp. 289-295.
21. Marta-pedroso, C., H. Freitas, and T. Domigos 2007. Testing for the survey mode effect on contingent valuation data qualify. A case study of web based versus in person interviews, Ecological Economics, No. 62 (3), pp. 388-398.
22. Mirzaei, M. 2000. Vegetation and Ecological Value of Semidesert Area Soutwest of Qom (the panther Valley). Thesis Plant Sciences. Tarbiyat Modares University press.
23. Pagiola, S. 2001. Valuing the benefits of investment in cultural heritage: The historic core of split. In paper presented at the International Conference on Economic Valuation of Cultural Heritage, Cagliari pp 19-20.
24. Reynisdottir. M, Song, H. and Agrusa, J. 2008. Willingness to pay entrance fees to natural attractions: An Icelandic case study. Tourism Management. No.29, pp 1076-1083.
25. Salzar, s. and mendez, L. 2005. Estimating then on-market benefits of an urban park: Dose proximity matter?, Land Use Policy, No. 241, pp. 296-305.
26. Sanders, L. D., Walsh. R. G. and Loomis, J, B. 1990. Toward empirical estimation of the total value of protecting rivers. Water Resources Research.
27. Smith, V. and Kerry, D. 1996. Can Contingent Valuation Distinguish Economic Values for Different Public Goods, Land Economics, Vol .72, No. 2, pp. 139-151
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 22, Issue 5
July and August 2020
Pages 1165-1175