Root Length Density of Rainfed Fig Trees under Different Times, Amounts, and Positions of Supplemental Irrigation

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
M. Abdolahipour
A. A. Kamgar-Haghighi
A. R. Sepaskhah
S. Zand-Parsa
T. Honar
Water Engineering Department, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
The changes in Root Length Density (RLD) of rainfed fig trees due to supplemental irrigation were studied during two growing seasons in Estahban, southern Iran, with objective of finding out the optimum position, time, and amount of supplemental irrigation. Irrigation position treatments were: (1) In a micro-catchment close to tree trunks; (2) Inside the tree canopies (1-1.1 m from tree trunks); and (3) Outside the tree canopies (2.1-2.2 m from tree trunks). Irrigation time treatments included: (a) In early spring and (b) In mid-summer; and the treatments of irrigation amount were: (i) No supplemental irrigation (control), (ii) 1,000, and (iii) 2,000 L per tree. Results showed that the highest RLD in different irrigation amounts occurred at 15-45 cm depth during late winter and late spring. However, during summers, the high RLD occurred 15 cm lower at 30-60 cm depth. Irrigation water treatments of 1,000 and 2,000 L per tree increased RLD values by 11.3 and 19.3%, respectively, in late spring and 10.5% and 14.7%, respectively, in late summer, compared with the rainfed treatment. Whereas this increase generally occurred in the wetted area; supplemental irrigation out of tree canopy could develop the root horizontal extension to a greater distance. Lower temporal variation in RLD profile was obtained for depths deeper than 75 cm, which was in agreement with soil water content variations. Supplemental irrigation applied out of tree canopy with 2,000 L per tree (200 m3 ha-1) during early spring is recommended to improve root development of fig trees in drought prone rainfed areas.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Abdel Razik, M. S. and El Darier, S. 1991. Functional adaptations of fig trees (Ficus carica, L.) in agroecosystems of the western Mediterranean desert of Egypt. Qatar Univ. Sci. Bull., 11: 183-199.
2. Abdolahipour, M., Kamgar-Haghighi, A. A. and Sepaskhah, A. R. 2018. Time and amount of supplemental irrigation at different distances from tree trunks influence on soil water distribution, evaporation and evapotranspiration in rainfed fig orchards. Agric. Water Manage., 203: 322-332.
3. Abdolahipour, M., Kamgar-Haghighi, A. A., Sepaskhah, A. R., Zand-Parsa, S. and Honar, T. 2017. Effect of time and amount of supplemental irrigation at different distances from tree trunks on quantity and quality of Estahban rain-fed fig fruit Iran Agric. Res. (in press).
4. Abdolahipour, M., Kamgar-Haghighi, A. A., Sepaskhah, A. R., Zand-Parsa, S., Honar, T. and Razzaghi, F. 2019. Time and amount of supplemental irrigation at different distances from tree trunks influence on morphological characteristics and physiological responses of rainfed fig trees under drought conditions. Sci. Hort., 253: 241-254.
5. Adriano, E., Laclau, J. P. and Rodrigues, J. D. 2017. Deep rooting of rainfed and irrigated orange trees in Brazil. Trees, 31(1): 285-297.
6. Ahmadi, S. H., Agharezaee, M., Kamgar‐Haghighi, A. and Sepaskhah, A. 2017. Compatibility of root growth and tuber production of potato cultivars with dynamic and static water‐saving irrigation managements. Soil Use and Management, 33(1): 106-119.
7. Ahmadi, S. H., Plauborg, F., Andersen, M. N., Sepaskhah, A. R., Jensen, C. R. and Hansen, S. 2011. Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field grown potatoes: root distribution. Agric. Water Manage., 98(8): 1280-1290.
8. Al-Desouki, M., Abd El-Rahman, I. and Sahar, A. 2009. Effect of some antitranspirants and supplementary irrigation on growth, yield and fruit quality of Sultani fig (Ficus carica) grown in the Egyptian western coastal zone under rainfed conditions. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 5: 899-908.
9. Babalola, O. and Lal, R. 1977. Subsoil gravel horizon and maize root growth. Plant Soil, 46(2): 337-346.
10. Bagheri, E. and Sepaskhah, A. R. 2014. Rain-fed fig yield as affected by rainfall distribution. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 117(3-4): 433-439.
11. Ben Rouina, B., Taamallah, H. and Trigui, A. 1997. L'enracinement de l'olivier et ses variations en fonction de la nature du sol en milieu aride. Revue des régions arides(SEP): 182-191.
12. Chiraz, M. C. 2013. Growth of young olive trees: water requirements in relation to canopy and root development. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 4(07): 1316.
13. Condit, I. j. 1941. Fig characteristics useful in the identification of varieties. Calif. Agric., 14(1): 1-69.
14. Condit, I. J. 1947. The fig. Chronica Botanica Co. Waltham, Mass USA.
15. Dominguez, A. F. 1990. La Higuera: Frutal Mediterraneo Para Climas Calidos. Mundi-Prensa: Madrid, ESP.
16. Faghih, H. and Sabet-Sarvestani, J. 2001. Fig: Planting, Cultivation and Harvesting. Rahgosha press: Shiraz, Iran.
17. FAO. 2019. FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org.
18. Fernández, J., Moreno, F., Martin-Aranda, J. and Fereres, E. 1992. Olive-tree root dynamics under different soil water regimes. Agricoltura Mediterranea, 122: 222-225.
19. Flaishman, M. A., Rodov, V. and Stover, E. 2007. The fig: botany, horticulture, and breeding. In Horticultural Reviews. J. Janick (ed.), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA.
20. Franco, J. and Abrisqueta, J. 1997. A comparison between minirhizotron and soil coring methods of estimating root distribution in young almond trees under trickle irrigation. J. Hortic. Sci., 72(5): 797-805.
21. Gholami, M., Rahemi, M. and Rastegar, S. 2012. Use of rapid screening methods for detecting drought tolerant cultivars of fig (Ficus carica L.). Sci. Hort., 143: 7-14.
22. Grewal, S., Singh, K. and Dyal, S. 1984. Soil profile gravel concentration and its effect on rainfed crop yields. Plant Soil, 81(1): 75-83.
23. Hallaç-Türk, F. and Aksoy, U. 2011. Comparison of organic, biodynamic and conventional fig farms under rain-fed conditions in Turkey. Cell Plant Sci., 2(3): 22-33.
24. Himelrick, D. 1999. Fig Production Guide. Alabama A & M Auburn Universities, Alabama Cooperative Extension System, ANR-1145, 1(7).
25. Hoseini, G., Rahimi, M., Jafari, M. and Kartooli negad, D. 2016. Study the impacts of temperature and precipitation variations on drying fig orchards of Estahban in recent years. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 26(3): 187-198.
26. Izzi, G., Farahani, H., Bruggeman, A. and Oweis, T. 2008. In-season wheat root growth and soil water extraction in the Mediterranean environment of northern Syria. Agric. Water Manage., 95(3): 259-270.
27. Jafari, M., Abdolahipour-Haghighi, J. and Zare, H. 2012. Mulching impact on plant growth and production of rainfed fig orchards under drought conditions. J. Food Agric. Environ., 10(1): 428-433.
28. Javanmard, M. 2010. Occurrence of mould counts and aspergillus species in Iranian dried figs at different stages of production and processing. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 12: 331-338.
29. Javanmard, M. and Mahmoudi, H. 2008. A SWOT analysis of organic dried fig production in Iran. Environ. Sci., 6(1): 101-110.
30. Kamgar-Haghighi, A. A. and Sepaskhah, A. R. 2015. Effects of Different Levels of Supplementary Irrigation and Pruning Times on Rainfed Fig Trees in Wet and Dry Years. National Drought Research Institute. Shiraz, Iran.
31. Kamyab, S. 2015. Evaluation of Possibility of Supplemental Irrigation Application in Rainfed Fig Orchards of Fars Province. Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
32. Karami, A., Zare, H., Khosravani, A. and Jamali, M. 2006. Evaluation of water storage and conservation methods on Fig orchards in rain-fed condition in Estahbanat region. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center. Zarghan, Iran.
33. Karimi, S., Hojati, S., Eshghi, S., Nazary Moghaddam, R. and Jandoust, S. 2012. Magnetic exposure improves tolerance of fig ‘Sabz’ explants to drought stress induced in vitro. Sci. Hort., 137: 95-99.
34. Keleg, F., El-Gazzar, A. and Zahran, A. 1981. Studies on root distribution of Jourdan almond and Sultani fig. Alexandria J. Agric. Res., 29: 219-224.
35. Lal, R. and Shukla, M. K. 2004. Principles of soil physics. CRC Press.
36. Leonel, S. and Damatto Junior, E. R. 2007. Root distribution of fig trees cultivated with organic manure. Rev. Bras. Frutic., 29(1): 191-194.
37. Linsenmeier, A. W., Löhnertz, O. and Lehnart, R. 2011. Geostatistical analysis and scaling of grapevine root distribution. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 32(2): 211-219.
38. Maiorano, J., Antunes, L., Regina, M. d. A., Abrahão, E. and Pereira, A. 1997. Botânica e caracterização de cultivares de figueira. Informe Agropecuário, Belo Horizonte, 18(188): 22-24.
39. Malik, R., Dhankar, J. and Turner, N. 1979. Influence of soil water deficits on root growth of cotton seedlings. Plant Soil, 53(1): 109-115.
40. Masmoudi, M., Masmoudi-Charfi, C., Mahjoub, I. and Mechlia, N. B. 2007. Water requirements of individual olive trees in relation to canopy and root development. Water saving in the Mediterranean agriculture and future research needs, 1: 73-80.
41. Melgarejo, P. 1996. La Higuera (Ficus carica L.). Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Orihuela: 83.
42. Morgan, K. T., Obreza, T. and Scholberg, J. 2007. Orange tree fibrous root length distribution in space and time. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 132(2): 262-269.
43. Newman, E. 1966. A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. J. Appl. Ecol.: 139-145.
44. Oliveira, M. R. G., Van Noordwijk, M., Gaze, S. R., Brouwer, G., Bona, S., Mosca, G. et al. 2000. Auger Sampling, Ingrowth Cores and Pinboard Methods. In Root Methods: A Handbook. A.L. Smit, A.G. Bengough, C. Engels, M. van Noordwijk, S. Pellerin and S.C. van de Geijn (eds.), Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
45. Oweis, T. and Hachum, A. 2012. Supplemental irrigation, a highly efficient water-use practice. 2nd Ed. edn. ICARDA: Aleppo, Syria.
46. Palese, A., Nuzzo, V., Dichio, B., Celano, G., Romano, M., Xiloyannis, C. et al. 2000. The influence of soil water content on root density in young olive trees. Acta Horticulturae, 537(1): 329-336.
47. Puangbut, D., Jogloy, S., Vorasoot, N., Akkasaeng, C., Kesmala, T., Rachaputi, R. C. et al. 2009. Association of root dry weight and transpiration efficiency of peanut genotypes under early season drought. Agric. Water Manage., 96(10): 1460-1466.
48. Rigitano, O. 1955. A figueira cultivada no Estado de São Paulo. ESLALQ.
49. Searles, P. S., Saravia, D. A. and Rousseaux, M. C. 2009. Root length density and soil water distribution in drip-irrigated olive orchards in Argentina under arid conditions. Crop and Pasture Science, 60(3): 280-288.
50. Sharifzadeh, M., Kamgar-Haghighi, A. A., Sepaskhah, A. R., Honar, T., Abdolahipour, M., Kamyab, S. et al. 2012. Factors Contributing to Application of Supplemental Irrigation Technique in Fig Production: Evidence from a Survey in Iran. National Drought Research Institute. Shiraz, Iran.
51. Smucker, A. and Aiken, R. 1992. Dynamic root responses to water deficits. Soil Science, 154(4): 281-289.
52. Stover, E., Aradhya, M., Ferguson, L. and Crisosto, C. H. 2007. The fig: overview of an ancient fruit. HortScience, 42(5): 1083-1087.
53. Traub, H. P. and Stansel, R. 1930. The lateral root spread of the fig tree. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science(27): 109-113.
54. Wasaya, A., Zhang, X., Fang, Q. and Yan, Z. 2018. Root phenotyping for drought tolerance: a review. Agronomy, 8(11): 241.
55. Whitmore, J. S. 2000. Drought management on farmland. Springer Science & Business Media.
56. Zribi, W., Faci, J., Medima, E. and Aragues, R. 2017. Spatial distribution of soil water content, soil salinity and root length density in a drip irrigated nectarine orchard under plastic-mulched and bare soils. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 19(7): 1577-1588.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 22, Issue 4
May and June 2020
Pages 1137-1150