Biological Control of Fusarium Dry Rot of Potato Using Some Probiotic Bacteria

Authors
1 Department of Plant Protection, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Plant Protection Research, Agricultural and Natural Resources Center of Khorasan-Razavi, Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
In this study, the antagonistic activity of 1,000 bacterial isolates from different areas of Iran and two isolates of Pseudomonas fluorescens: CHA0 and UTPf5 were individually assayed against two isolates of Fusarium solani and two isolates of F. oxysporum that cause potato dry rot in Mashhad, Iran. Using in vitro dual culture plate technique, most of the tested isolates significantly reduced mycelia growth of Fusarium spp. on PDA after 7 days of incubation at 25oC, compared to the untreated control. Thirty bacteria isolates with the most inhibition and P. fluorescens CHA0 were selected for experiments on potato tubers. All isolates were tested on tuber of potato cultivar Agria under in vivo conditions. There was no significant difference between rot diameter by P. fluorescens CHA0 and the infected control, but other isolates reduced dry rot development after 21 days of incubation at 25-27oC, as compared to the untreated control. However, three isolates, namely, VUPf40, VUPf44, and VUPf506 that belong to the P. fluorescens species were the most effective. Talc-based formulation of these three effective bacteria and P. fluorescens CHA0 were assessed for their in situ efficacy against potato dry rot development, caused by F. solani FPO67, on treated tubers compared to the control. The formulation of these bacteria significantly decreased dry rot development, but only P. fluorescens VUPf506, with 79.8% reduction of fungi development, and 18.57% prevalence, was the most effective in reduction of potato dry rot in natural conditions. Based on these results, P. fluorescens VUPf506 can be considered as a promising alternative to chemical fungicides.

Keywords

Subjects


1. Al-Mughrabi, K. I. 2010. Biological Control of Fusarium Dry Rot and other Potato Tuber Diseases Using Pseudomonas fluorescens and Enterobacter cloacae. Biol. Control., 53: 280-284.
2. Al-Mughrabi, K. I., Vikram, A., Peters, R. D., Howard, R. J., Grant, L., Barasubiye, T., Lynch, K., Poirier, R., Drake, K. A., Macdonald, I. K., Lisowski, S. L. I. and Jayasuriya, K. E. 2013. Efficacy of Pseudomonas syringae in the Management of Potato Tuber Diseases in Storage. Biol. Control., 63: 315-322.
3. Azadvar, M., Najafinia, M. and Ershad, D. 2007. Study on Causal Agents of Potato Tuber Rot in Store and Cold-Room of Jiroft Region. Pajohesh & Sazandegi, 75: 97-101.
4. Boyd, A. E. W. 1972. Potato Storage Diseases. Rev. Plant Pathol., 51: 297-321.
5. Chen, C., Belanger, R. R., Benhamou, N. and Paullitz, T. C. 2000. Defense Enzymes Induced in Cucumber Roots by Treatment with Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR). Physiol. Mol. Plant Path., 59: 13-23.
6. Desjardins, A. E., Christ-Harned, E. A., McCormic, S. P. and Secor, G. A. 1993. Population Structures and Genetic Analysis of Field Resistance to Thiabendazole in Gibberella pulicaris from Potato Tubers. Phytopathol., 83: 164-170.
7. Eskandari, M. 2000. Fusarium Dry Rot of Potatoes in Khorasan. Paper Presented at: Plant Protection Congress, 14th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, Isfahan Industrial University, Iran.
8. Frances, J., Bonaterra, A., Moreno, M. C., Cabrefiga, J., Badosa, E. and Montesinos E. 2006. Pathogen Aggressiveness and Postharvest Biocontrol Efficiency in Pantoea agglomerans. Postharvest. Biol. Technol., 39: 299-307.
9. Janisiewez, W. J. 1988. Biocontrol of Postharvest Diseases of Apples with Antagonist Mixtures. Phytopathol., 194-198.
10. Kotan, R., Sahin, F., Demiric, E., Ozbek, A., Eken, C. and Miller, S.A. 1999. Evaluation of Antagonistic Bacteria for Biological Control of Fusarium Dry Rot of Potato. Phytopathol., 89: 35-41.
11. Kotan, R., Sahin, F., Demiric, E. and Eken, C. 2009. Biological Control of the Potato Dry Rot Caused by Fusarium Species Using PGPR Strains. Biol. Control., 50: 194-198.
12. Lapwood, D. H., Read, P. J. and Spokes, J. 1984. Methods for Assessing the Susceptibility of Potato Tubers of Different Cultivars to Rotting by Erwinia carotovora Subspecies Atroseptica and Carotovora. Plant. Pathol., 33: 13-20.
13. Petera, R. D., Macdonald, I. K., Maclsaac, K. A. and Woodworth, S. 2001. First Report of Thiabendazole-Resistance Isolates of Fusarium sambusinum Infecting Stored Potatoes in Nova Scotia, Canada. Plant. Dis., 85: 1030.
14. Platt, H. W. 1997. Resistance to Thiabendazole in Fusarium Species and Helminthosporium solani in Potato Tubers Treated Commercially in Eastern Canada. Phytoprotection, 78: 1-10.
15. Radmehr, A. 2010. Agricultural Statistics, the First of Crop Year 2008-2009. Office of Statistics and Information Technology, Department of Planning and Economy, Ministry of Agriculture, Tehran.
16. Rajavel, R. 2000. Seed Born Colletotricbum capsici (Syd). Butter Bisby and Its Management. MSc. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore, India.
17. Recep, K., Fikrettin, S., Erkol, D. and Cafer, E. 2009. Biological Control of the Potato Dry Rot Caused by Fusarium Species Using PGPR Strains. Biol. Control., 50: 194-198.
18. Sadfi, N., Cherif, M., Fliss, I., Boudabbous, A. and Antoun, H. 2001. Evaluation of Bacterial Isolates from Salty Soil and Bacillus thuringiensis Strains for the Biocontrol of Fusarium Dry Rot of Potato Tubers. J. Plant Pathol., 83: 101-118.
19. Sadfi, N., Cherif, M., Hajlaoui, M. R. and Boudabbous, A. 2002. Biological Control of the Potato Tubers Dry Rot Caused by Fusarium roseum var. sambucinum under Greenhouse, Field and Storage Conditions Using Bacillus spp. Isolates. J. Phytopathol., 150 (11 and 12): 640–648.
20. Schisler, D. A. and Slininger, P. J. 1994. Selection and Performance of Bacterial Strains for Biologically Controlling Fusarium Dry Rot of Potatoes Incited by Gibberella pulicaris. Plant. Dis., 78: 251- 255.
21. Schisler, D. A. and Slininger, P. J. 1997. Microbial Selection Strategies that Enhance the Likelihood of Developing Commercial Biological Control Products. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 19: 172-179.
22. Schisler, D. A., Slininger, P. J., Kleinkopf, G., Bothast, R. J. and Ostrowski, R. C. 2000. Biological Control of Fusarium Dry Rot of Potato Tubers under Commercial Storage Conditions. Am. J. Potato. Res., 77: 29–40.
23. Secor, G. A. and Gudmestad, N. C. 1999. Managing Fungal Diseases of Potato. Can. J. Plant Pathol., 21: 213-221.
24. Shaad, N. W., Jones, J. B. and Chun, W. 2001. Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. The American Phytopathological Society, Florida.
25. Slininger, P. J., Schisler, D. A., Burkhead, D. and Bothast, R. J. 2003. Postharvest Biological Control of Potato Sprouting by Fusarium Dry Rot Suppressive bBacteria. Biocontrol. Sci. Technol., 13: 477–494.
26. Stevenson, W. R., Loria, R., Franc, G. D. and Weingartner, D. P. 2001. Compendium of Potato Diseases. The American Phytopathological Society, Florida.
27. Van den Boogert, P. H. J. F. and Luttikholt, A. J. G. 2004. Compatible Biological and Chemical Control Systems for Rhizoctonia solani in Potato. Eur. J.Plant Pathol., 110: 111-118.
28. Vidhyasekaran, P. and Muthuamilan M. 1995. Development of Formulation of Pseudomonas flourescens for Control of Chickpea Wilt. Plant Dis., 79: 180-182.
29. Wang, Z., Wilson, W. A., Fujino, M. A. and Roach, P. J. 2001. Antagonistic Controls of Autophagy and Glycogen Accumulation by Snf1p, the Yeast Homolog of AMP-activated Protein Kinase, and the Cyclin-dependent Kinase Pho85p. Mol. Cell Biol., 21(17): 42-52.
30. Wisniewski, M. E. and Wilson, C. L. 1992. Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables: Recent Advances. Hort. Sci., 27: 94-98.