Zoning the Villages of Central District of Dena County in Terms of Sustainability of Livelihood Capitals

Authors
1 Department of Rural Development Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Geography, Ghent University, Belgium.
Abstract
The sustainable livelihood approach was introduced as a sustainable rural development approach in the late 1980s with the aim of poverty alleviation in the rural communities. This approach has offered a broad framework for assessing the various dimensions of sustainability. An important component of this framework is livelihood capitals in a way that it is not possible to achieve sustainable rural livelihood with no regard to the livelihood capitals and assets in rural areas. Thus, the purpose of this descriptive-analytic survey research was zoning the villages of the Central District of Dena County in terms of the sustainability of livelihood capitals. The statistical population of this study was 2500 rural households in the Central District of Dena County, of which 300 households were selected using cluster random sampling method with appropriate allocation based on Krejcie and Morgan’s table. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire whose face validity was confirmed by a panel of experts, and its reliability was confirmed in a pre-test and calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Findings of the research showed that, in most studied villages, 3 capitals (social, physical, and human) were above the average and 2 capitals (financial and natural) as well as the total capital was less than average. Additionally, there was a gap and heterogeneity between the villages in terms of social, human, natural capital as well as financial capital, whereas there was a homogeneity in terms of physical and total capital as well. Besides, the most studied villages were potentially unsustainable in terms of financial and natural capital, average level in terms of human and physical capital and total capital, and potentially sustainable in terms of social capital. In addition, cluster analysis to categorize villages indicated that 9, 4, and 7 villages were categorized as non-privileged, semi-privileged, and privileged, respectively. Furthermore, the result of Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA) indicated that there was a significant difference between three categories of villages in terms of social, physical, financial and natural capital, and total capital. Therefore, non-privileged and semi-privileged villages should be given more consideration by planners, who need to pay more attention to regional planning than general planning.

Keywords

Subjects


1. AliBeygi, J. and Mahdizadeh, H. 2017. The Study on Role of Small Industries on Improving the Livelihoods of Rural Households (Case Study: Sirvan and Chrdavl Counties- Ilam). Agr. Econ., 10(4): 139-155.
2. Amanpour, S., Mokhtari Chelcheh, S., Hosseini Kahnoj, S. R. and Veisi, E. 2015. Spatial Analysis and Evaluation of Rural Development (Case Study: Counties of Chaharmahal & Bakhtiyari). Res. Rur. Plan, 4(2): 97-110.
3. Barrera-Mosquera, V., de los Rios-Carmenado, I., Cruz-Collaguazo, E. and Coronel-Becerra, J. 2010. Analysis of Available Capitals in Agricultural Systems in Rural Communities: The Case of Saraguro, Ecuador. Span. J. Agr. Res., 8(4): 1191-1207.
4. Chambers, R. and Conway, G. 1992. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. IDS Discussion Paper 296, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, Sussex, UK.
5. Chen, H., Zhu, T., Krott, M., Calvo, J. F., Ganesh, S. P. and Makoto, I. 2013. Measurement and Evaluation of Livelihood Assets in Sustainable Forest Commons Governance. Land Use Policy, 30: 908–914.
6. Cherni, J. A. and Hill, Y. 2009. Energy and Policy Providing for Sustainable Rural Livelihoods in Remote Locations – The Case of Cuba. Geoforum, 40: 645–654.
7. Choobchian, Sh., Kalantari, Kh., Asadi, A. and Taghavi Motlagh, S. A. 2015. Measurement and Comparison of Different Dimensions of Sustainable Coastal Fishing Management in Beach Seine Cooperatives in Guilin. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 17: 1463-1472.
8. Dehghani Pour, M.., Barati, A. A., Azadi, H. and Scheffran, J. 2018. Revealing the Role of Livelihood Assets in Livelihood Strategies: Towards Enhancing Conservation and Livelihood Development in the Hara Biosphere Reserve, Iran. Ecol Indic., 94: 336-347.
9. Esmaeilzadeh, H., Salehpour, Sh. and Esmaeilzadeh, Y. 2016. Analyzing Development Level of Alborz Province Counties Using Combinatorial Method, Plan. Spa., 20(3): 1-34.
10. Forouzani, M., Yazdanpanah, M. and Taheri, F. 2017. Analyzing the Factors Affecting Optimal Management of Saline Water by Application of Sustainable Livelihoods Framework. Rur. Dev. Stra., 3(3): 317–334.
11. Ghadiri Masoum, M., Rezvani, M. R., Jomepuor, M. and Baghyani H. R. 2015. Leveling Living in Rural Mountain Rourism Capital Case: High Taloqan District in the City of Taloqan. Spa. Econ. Rur. Dev., 4(12): 1–18.
12. Ghadiri Masoum, M., Zianoushin, M. M. and Khorasani M. A. 2010. Economic Sustainability and Its Relation to Spatial-Location Features in Iran: A Case Study of the Villages in Kouhin Subdistrict of Kaboudrahang County, J. Village Dev., 13(2): 1–29.
13. Horsley, J., Prout, S., Tonts, M. and Ali, S. H. 2015. Sustainable Livelihoods and Indicators for Regional Development in Mining Economies. Extractive Indust. Soc., 2: 368–380.
14. Ibrahim, A. Z., Hassan, K., Kamaruddin, R. and Anuar, A. R. 2017. Examining the Livelihood Assets and Sustainable Livelihoods among the Vulnerability Groups in Malaysia. IPJAF, 1(3): 52-63.
15. Jomehpour, M. and Keyoumarse, N. 2012. Investigation of Tourism Impact on the Livelihood Activities and Assets of Rural Households, (Case Study: Zeeyarat Village in Gorgan County). Tour. Stud., 7(17): 87-119.
16. Kalantari, Kh. 2003. Data Processing and Analysis in Socio-Economic Research. Sharif Publication, Tehran, 392 PP.
17. Karami, A. and Abdshahi, A. 2011. Ranking of Townships in Kohgiloyeh and Boyerahmad Province in Terms of Development Using Fuzzy Approach, J. Agri. Econ. Res., 3(3): 117–136.
18. Khosrozadyan, M., Gheniyan, M. and Abdshahi, A. 2016. Prioritization of Agricultural Exploitation Systems for Behbahan Township Based on the Model of Sustainable Livelihoods. Cooper. Agri., 5(19): 143-166.
19. Kibria, A. S., Costanza, R., Groves, C. and Behie, A. M. 2018. The Interactions between Livelihood Capitals and Access of Local Communities to the Forest Provisioning Services of the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh. Ecosys. Serv., 32: 41-49.
20. Krantz, L. 2001. The Sustainable Livelihood Approach to Poverty Reduction. SIDA. Division for Policy and Socio-Economic Analysis, 44.
21. Krejcie, R. and Morgan, D.W. (1970), Determining sample size for research activities. Edu & Psychol Meas, 30: 607-610.
22. Liu, Y. and Xu, Y. 2016. A Geographic Identification of Multidimensional Poverty in Rural China under the Framework of Sustainable Livelihoods Analysis. Appl, Geogr., 73: 62–76.
23. Morse, S. and McNamara, N. 2013. Sustainable Livelihood Approach: A Critique of Theory and Practice. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
24. Pandey, R., Jha, S. K., Alatalo, J. M., Archie, K. M. and Gupta, A. K. 2017. Sustainable Livelihood Framework-Based Indicators for Assessing Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation for Himalayan Communities, Ecol. Indic., 79: 338–346.
25. Rezvani, M. R., Motiee Langroudi, S. H., Pour Taheri, M. and Azizi, F. 2015. Immigration and Sustainable Social Development in Rural Areas (Case Study: Immigrant Villages in Tehran Metropolitan Area). Reg. Plan., 5(19): 71-84.
26. Roknodin Eftekhari, A. R., Mahdavi, D. and Pour Taheri, M. 2011. Sustainability Assessment of Tourism in Cultural-Historical Villages of Iran with an Emphasis on Sustainable Tourism Development Paradigm. Tour. Stud., 14: 1-39.
27. Sadeghzadeh, M., Allahyari, M. S., Ansari, M. H. and Nezhad Rezaei, N. 2015. Analysis of Paddy Farms Sustainability in Rasht Township Using Sustainable Livelihood Approach. J. Agr. Econ. Res., 6(4): 55–70.
28. Sarrafi, M. and Shamsaei, M. 2014. Sustainable Livelihoods Framework a Strategy for Household Empowerment in an Informal Settlement, Islamabad Neighborhood, Tehran. Soffeh, 65: 79–94.
29. Serrat, O. 2017. The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach. In: “Knowledge Solutions”. Springer, Singapore, PP. 21-26.
30. Shahrokhi Sardoo, S. 2013. Evaluating and Ranking the Centers of Rural Districts of Jiroft County Based on Quality of Life (QoL) Criteria. MSc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University.
31. Shakoori, A. and Bahrami, Sh. 2014. Study the Effect of Rural Tourism on Poverty Reduction from the Perspective of Sustainable Livelihoods: Case of Ghale Noo and Kellin Villages in Ray Township. J. Com. Dev., 6(1): 1-24.
32. Sharafi, Z., Nooripour, M. and Karamidehkordi, E. 2018. Assessing Livelihood Capitals and Their Sustainability in Rural Households (The Case of the Central District of Dena County). Iran Agri. Ext. Edu. J., 13(2): 51-70.
33. Shiri, Sh., Bijani, M., Chaharsoughi Amin, H., Noori, H. and Soleymanifard, A. 2011. Effectiveness Evaluation of the Axial Plan of Wheat from Expert Supervisors' View in Ilam Province. World Appl. Sci. J., 14(11): 1724-1729.
34. Singh, P. K. and Hiremath, B. N. 2010. Sustainable Livelihood Security Index in a Developing Country: A Tool for Development Planning. Ecol. Indic., 10: 442-451.
35. Su, F., and Shang, H. Y. 2012. Relationship Analysis between Livelihood Assets and Livelihood Strategies: A Heihe River Basin Example, Sci. Cold Arid Reg., 4(3): 265–274.
36. Tang, Q., Bennett S. J., Xu, Y., and Li, Y. 2013. Agricultural Practices and Sustainable Livelihoods: Rural Transformation within the Loess Plateau, China. Appl. Geo., 41: 15-23.
37. Tavakoli, M., Ahmadi, Sh. and Fazelniya, Gh. 2017. Analysis of Factors Affecting Rural Livelihoods (The Case Study: Villages of Sardasht Township), J. Geo. Plan., 58: 63-81.
38. Udoh, E. J., Akpan, S. B. and Uko, E. F. 2017. Assessment of Sustainable Livelihood Assets of Farming Households in Akwa Ibom State. Nigeria. J. S. D., 10(4): 83-96.
39. Valizadeh, N., Bijani, M., and Abbasi, E. 2018. Farmers’ Active Participation in Water Conservation: Insights from a Survey among Farmers in Southern Regions of West Azerbaijan Province. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 20(5): 895-910.
40. Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Yang, Q., Kush, J., Xu, Y. and Linglin, X. 2016. Assessment of Sustainable Livelihoods of Different Farmers in Hilly Red Soil Erosion Areas of Southern China. Ecol. Indic., 64: 123-131.
41. You, H., and Zhang, X. 2017. Sustainable Livelihoods and Rural Sustainability in China: Ecologically Secure, Economically Efficient or Socially Equitable?. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 120: 1-13.
42. Ziaeian Firozabadi, P. Anvari, A. and Vellaei, M. 2016. Classification of Development Level in Villages of Marhamatabad Rural District, Parviz Miandoab County. J. Space Econ. Rur. Dev., 4(4): 129-146.