Multi-Dimensional Appraisal of Integrated Pest Management Adoption: Evidence of Pistachio Growers in Kerman Province, Iran

Authors
M. Mohammadrezaei 1
D. Hayati 2
1 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is well known as a pro-environmental technology in agriculture. Therefore, investigating adoption of IPM mechanisms is crucial for agricultural products such as pistachio in Iran. The main purpose of this study was to assess the role of factors affecting IPM adoption by pistachio growers in Kerman Province. Survey was the research method and it was executed using researchers-designed questionnaire. Totally, 225 pistachio growers were selected as sample size, using two-stages random cluster sampling method. Validity of the questionnaire items was entirely approved by a panel of experts. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used for reliability approval. Findings revealed that individual factors including age, education, farming experience, motivations, participation and innovative spirit in conjunction with economic factors such as income, and technological costs affect IPM adoption procedure. In addition, educational services along with IPM technical knowledge and environmental attitude positively changed IPM adoption. The result of structural equation modeling illustrated that education, innovative spirit, life motivation, welfare motivation, income, technological costs, educational services and IPM technical challenges can significantly predicte IPM technical knowledge by direct effects. Indeed, IPM technical knowledge promotes environmental attitude and directly improves IPM adoption. Some practical recommendations are presented based on the research findings.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Anandajayasekeram, P., Davis, K. E. and Workneh, S. 2007. Farmer Field Schools: An Alternative to Existing Extension Systems? Experience from Eastern and Southern Africa. J. Int. Agric. Ext. Edu., 14(1): 81-93.
2. Benjamin, E.O. and Wesseler, J. H. 2016. A Socioeconomic Analysis of Bio-Control in Integrated Pest Management: A Review of the Effects of Uncertainty, Irreversibility and Flexibility. NJAS-Wageningen J. Life Sci., (77): 53-60.
3. Davis, K., Nkonya, E., Kato, E., Mekonnen, D. A., Odendo, M., Miiro, R. and Nkuba, J. 2012. Impact of Farmer Field Schools on Agricultural Productivity and Poverty in East Africa. World Dev., 40(2): 402-13.
4. Eneh, O. C. 2011. Enhancing Africa’s Environmental Management: Integrated Pest Management for Minimization of Agricultural Pesticides Pollution. Res. J. Environ. Sci., 5(6):521.
5. Hedjazi, Y. and Sharifi, M. 2014. Effects of Information Sources and Communication Channels on Adoption of Rice Integrated Pest Management: Case Study of Droudzan District of Marvdasht County, Fars Province. Agron. J. (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi), (93): 48-56. [in Persian]
6. Heong, K. L. and Escalada, M. M. 1997. Pest management of Rice Farmers in Asia. Int. Rice Res. Inst.
7. Kalmar, E., Ivey, S. L., Bradman, A., Leonard, V. and Alkon, A. 2014. Implementing an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program in Child Care Centers: A Qualitative Study. Early Child. Res. Q., 29(3): 245-254.
8. Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D. W. 1970. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 30(3): 607-610.
9. Lamichhane, J. R., Arendse, W., Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S., Kudsk, P., Roman, J. C., van Bijsterveldt-Gels, J. E., Wick, M. and Messéan, A. 2015. Challenges and Opportunities for Integrated Pest Management in Europe: A Telling Example of Minor Uses. Crop Prot., (74): 42-47.
10. Mancini, F., Van Bruggen, A. H. and Jiggins, J. L. 2007. Evaluating Cotton Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Farmer Field School Outcomes Using the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach in India. Exp. Agric., 43(01): 97-112.
11. Meissle, M., Romeis, J. and Bigler, F. 2011. Bt Maize and Integrated Pest Management: A European Perspective. Pest Manag. Sci., 67(9): 1049-58.
12. Naglova, Z. and Vlasicova, E. 2016. Economic Performance of Conventional, Organic, and Biodynamic Farms. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 18(4): 881-894.
13. Ratner, B. 2009. The Correlation Coefficient: Its Values Range between +1/− 1, or Do They? J. Targeting Meas. Anal. Mark., 17(2): 139-142.
14. Rogers, E. M. 2010. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th Edition. Simon and Schuster, New York. USA.
15. Sanyal, D., Bhowmik, P. C., Anderson, R. L. and Shrestha, A. 2008. Revisiting the Perspective and Progress of Integrated Weed Management. Weed Sci. 56(1): 161-167.
16. Sedaghat, R. 2011. Constraints in Production and Marketing of Iran’s Pistachio and the Policies Concerned: An Application of the Garret Ranking Technique. Int. J. Nut. Re. Sci., 2(1): 27-30.
17. Sheng, Y., Zhao, S., Nossal, K., and Zhang, D. 2015. Productivity and Farm Size in Australian Agriculture: Reinvestigating the Returns to Scale. Aust J Agric Resour Econ. 59:16–38
18. Timprasert, S., Datta, A. and Ranamukhaarachchi, S. L. 2014. Factors Determining Adoption of Integrated Pest Management by Vegetable Growers in Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand. Crop Prot., (62): 32-39.
19. Toleubayev, K., Jansen, K. and Van Huis, A. 2011. From Integrated Pest Management to Indiscriminate Pesticide Use in Kazakhstan. J. Sustain. Agric., 35(4): 350-75.
20. Valizadeh, N., Bijani, M. and Abbasi, E. 2018. Farmers’ Active Participation in Water Conservation: Insights from a Survey among Farmers in Southern Regions of West Azerbaijan Province, Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. (JAST), 20(5). In press.
21. Van den Berg, H. and Jiggins, J. 2007. Investing in Farmers the Impacts of Farmer Field Schools in Relation to Integrated Pest Management. World Dev., 35(4): 663-86.
22. Veisi, H. 2012. Exploring the Determinants of Adoption Behavior of Clean Technologies in Agriculture: A Case of Integrated Pest Management. Asian J. Technol. Innov., 20(1): 67-82.
23. Villano, R., and Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H. 2010. When Is Met Frontier Analysis Appropriate? An Example of Varietal Differences in Pistachio Production in Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. (JAST), (12): 379-389.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 21, Issue 4
July and August 2019
Pages 815-828