Factors Affecting the Aesthetic Behavior of Villagers towards the Natural Environment: The Case of Kermanshah Province, Iran

Authors
S. Mohammadi-Mehr
M. Bijani
E. Abbasi
Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
The natural environmental beauty preservation has become one of the most important human concerns in the present century, so that visual pollution is considered as a major obstacle to achievement of peace of mind and optimal perfection. In this respect, rural people have a major role in preserving the beauty of the natural environment. The purpose of this study was to analyze factors affecting the aesthetic behavior of Iranian villagers towards the natural environment. This study was descriptive-correlational and causal-relational and was conducted through a survey technique. Statistical population of this study consisted of all villagers in Kermanshah Province (as an indicator example of Iran) (N= 517,786). By using Krejcie and Morgan’s sample size table and stratified random sampling method, 385 people were selected as a sample. Research instrument included a questionnaire with approved validity by a panel of experts in the field of agricultural extension and education; and reliability of its items was obtained by a pilot study and calculation of Cronbach's alpha (0.64≥ α ≥0.82). Based on the findings, the causal model of factors affecting the aesthetic behavior of villagers was drawn. Results of this causal analysis indicated that ‘place attachment’ (β= 0.275) and ‘environmental aesthetic attitudes’ (β= 0.260) had highest effects on villagers' environmental aesthetic behavior, respectively. Therefore, by focusing on these two variables, the villagers' aesthetic behavior can be enhanced.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Abbasian, A. R., Chizari, M. and Bijani, M. 2017. Farmers’ Views on the Factors Inhibiting the Implementation of Soil Conservation Practices (the Case of Koohdasht Township, Iran). J. Agr. Sci. Tech. (JAST), 19(4): 797-807.
2. Abedi-Sarvestani, A. 2016. Ethical Idealism and Attitude towards Animals. Ethics Sci. Technol., 11(3): 21-27. (in Persian).
3. Ahmadi-Shapourabadi, M. A., Taghdici, A. and Rezvani, M. R. 2013. Strategies for Organization and Development of Tourism Function in Rural Areas (Case Study: Villages of Qom Province, Iran). J. Geo. Geol. (JGG), 5(4): 50-62.
4. Athari, Z., Pezeshki Rad G., Abbasi, E., Alibaygi, A. and Westholm, E. 2017. Designing a Model for Integrated Watershed Management in Iran. Water Policy, 19(2017): 1143–1159.
5. Azizi Khalkheili, T., Bakhshi Jahromi, A. and Bijani, M. 2012. Soil Conservative Behavior of Farmers: The Role of Information and Communication Media. Iran. Agric. Ext. Edu. J., 7(2): 51-61.
6. Barr, B. 2007. Factors Influencing Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: A UK Case Study of Household Waste Management. Environ. Behav., 39(4): 435-473.
7. Brady, E. 2006. Aesthetics in Practice: Valuing the Natural World. Environ. Values, 15(3): 277-291.
8. Bijani, M. and Hayati, D. 2011. Water Conflict in Agricultural System in Iran: A Human Ecological Analysis. J. Eco. Environ. Sci. (JEES), 2 (2): 27-41. DOI: 10.9735/0976-9900.2.2.27-40
9. Bijani, M., Ghazani, E., Valizadeh, N. and Fallah Haghighi, N. 2017. Pro-Environmental Analysis of Farmers' Concerns and Behaviors towards Soil Conservation in Central District of Sari County, Iran. Int. Soil. Water Conserv. Res., 5(1): 43-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.03.001
10. Clark, C. F., Kotchen, M. J. and Moore, M. R. 2003. Internal and External Influences on Pro-Environmental Behavior: Participation in a Green Electricity Program. J. Environ. Psychol. (JEP), 23(3): 237-246.
11. Dagher, G. K. and Itani, O. 2014. Factors Influencing Green Ourchasing Behaviour: Empirical Evidence from the Lebanese Consumers. J. Consum. Behav., 13(3): 188-195.
12. Danaci, H. M. 2015. Aesthetics in Cultural Landscape and Architectural Education. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., 191: 190-195.
13. Duffy, S. and Verges, M. 2010. Forces of Nature Affect Implicit Connections with Nature. Environ. Behav., 42(6): 723-739.
14. Frank, S., Furst, C., Koschke, L., Witt, A. and Makeschin, F. 2013. Assessment of Landscape Aesthetics Validation of a Landscape Metrics-Based Assessment by Visual Estimation of the Scenic Beauty. Ecol. Indic., 32(September 2013): 222-231.
15. Frick, J., Kaiser, F. G. and Wilson, M. 2004. Environmental Knowledge and Conservation Behavior: Exploring Prevalence and Structure in a Representative Sample. Person. Individual Differences, 37(8): 1597-1613.
16. Fielding, K. S., McDonald, R. and Louis, W. R. 2008. Theory of Planned Behavior, Identity and Intentions to Engage in Environmental Activism. J. Environ. Psychol. (JEP), 28(4): 318-326.
17. Gifford, E. V., Kohlenberg, B., Hayes, S. C., Pierson, H., Piasecki, M., Antonuccio, D. and Palm, K. 2011. Does Acceptance and Relationship-Focused Behavior Therapy Contribute to Bupropion Outcomes? A Randomized Controlled Trial of FAP and ACT for Smoking Cessation. Behav. Therapy, 42(4): 700-715.
18. Gosling, E. and Williams, K. J. 2010. Connectedness to Nature, Place Attachment and Conservation Behavior: Testing Connectedness Theory among Farmers. J. Environ. Psychol. (JEP), 30(3): 298-304.
19. Gregory, G. D. and Leo, M. D. 2003. Repeated Behavior and Rnvironmental Psychology: The Role of Personal Involvement and Habit Formation in Explaining Water Consumption. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. (JASP), 33(6): 1261-1296.
20. Gruehn, D. and Roth, M. 2010. Landscape Preference Study of Agricultural Landscapes in Germany. J. Landscape Eco., 9: 67-78.
21. Han, H. 2015. Travelers' Pro-Environmental Behavior in a Green Lodging Context: Converging Value-Belief-Norm Theory and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Tour. Manage., 47(4): 164-177.
22. Howley, P. 2011. Landscape Aesthetics: Assessing the General Publics' Preferences towards Rural Landscapes. Ecolo. Eco., 72(12): 161-169.‌
23. Kaplan, S. and Talbot, J. F. 1983. Psychological Benefits of a Wilderness Experience. Behav. Natur. Environ., 6: 163-203.
24. Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D. W. 1970. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Edu. Psychol. Measur., 30(3): 607-610.‌
25. Management and Planning Organization of Kermanshah Province. 2016. Statistical report of Management and Planning Organization of Kermanshah Province, No Published. (in Persian)
26. Mansourfar, K. 2006. Advanced Statistical Methods: Using Applied Software. University of Tehran Press. (in Persian).
27. Menatizadeh, M., Zamani, G. H. and Karami, E. 2015. Modeling Farmers’ Environmental Behavior in Shiraz County by Using Value-Belief-Norm Theory. Iran. J. Agric. Econ. Dev. Res., 45(4): 613-624. (in Persian)
28. Mohammadzadeh, L., Sadighi, H. and Abbasi, E. 2016. Assessment of Farmer-oriented Agricultural Extension Intervention in Iran. J. Agric. Edu. Ext., 23(2): 175-187.
29. Mosavi. S. H., Alipour, A. and Shahvari, N. 2017. Liberalizing Energy Price and Abatement Cost of Emissions: Evidence from Iranian Agro-Environment. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. (JAST), 19(3): 511-523.
30. Najafi Alamdarlo, H., Ahmadian, M. and Khalilian, S. 2014. Application of Stochastic Dynamic Programming in Water Allocation, Case Study: Latian Dam. World Appl. Sci. J., 30(7): 838-843.
31. Najafi Alamdarlo, H. 2018. The Economic Impact of Agricultural Pollutions in Iran, Spatial Distance Function Approach. Sci. Total Environ., 616-617: 1656-1663.
32. Navah, A. R. and Forotankia, S. (2012). Investigating the Relationship between Rational Action and Environmental Behavior (The Case of Andimeshk Urban Society). Environ. Sci. Eng., 00(51): 69-78. (in Persian)
33. Nordlund, A. M. and Garvill, J. 2002. Value Structures behind Pro-Environmental Behavior. Environ. Behav., 34(6): 740-756.‌
34. Noorollah-Noorivandi A, Ajili, A. Chizari, M. and Bijani, M. 2009. The Socio-Economic Characteristics of Farmers Regarding Adoption of Sustainable Soil Management. J. Human Eco., 27(3): 201-205. DOI: 10.1080/09709274.2009.11906211
35. Paille, P. and Boiral, O. 2013. Pro-Environmental Behavior at Work: Construct Validity and Determinants. J. Environ. Psychol. (JEP), 36(12): 118-128.‌
36. Porteous, J. D. 2013. Environmental Aesthetics: Ideas, Politics and Planning. Routledge, London.
37. Price, J. C. and Leviston, Z. 2014. Predicting Pro-Environmental Agricultural Practices: The Social, Psychological and Contextual Influences on Land Management. J. Rur. Stud., 34(4): 65-78.
38. Prior, J. 2017. Sonic Environmental Aesthetics and Landscape Research. Landscape Res., 42(1): 6-17.
39. Raeisi, A.A., Bijani, M. and Chizari, M. 2018. The Mediating Role of Environmental Emotions in Transition from Knowledge to Sustainable Behavior toward Exploit Groundwater Resources in Iran’s Agriculture. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res., In press. DOI: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2018.01.002
40. Rahdoost, B. 2008. A Pedagogical Analysis of Environmental Literacy. Quarterly J. Zibashenakht, 18: 109-124. (in Persian)
41. Ramkissoon, H., Weiler, B. and Graham Smith, L. D. 2012. Place Attachment and Pro-Environmental Behaviour in National Parks: The Development of a Conceptual Framework. J. Sust. Tour., 20(2): 257-276.
42. Robinson, K. W. and Elliott, K. C. 2011. Environmental Aesthetics and Public Environmental Philosophy. Ethics Policy Environ., 14(2): 175-191.
43. Rubinstein, R. I. and Parmelee, P. A. 1992. Attachment to Place and the Representation of the Life Course by the Elderly. In Place Attachment, Springer US, PP. 139-163.
44. Sabzali Parikhani, R., Sadighi, H. and Bijani, M. 2018. Ecological Consequences of Nanotechnology in Agriculture: Researchers’ Perspective. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. (JAST), 20(2): 205-219.
45. Salehi Emran, E. and Aghamohammadi, A. 2008. Study of Knowledge, Attitude and Environmental Skills of Primary School Teachers in Mazandaran Province. Quarterly J. Edu., 24(3): 92-117. (in Persian)
46. Salehi, S., Chizari, M., Sadighi, H. and Bijani, M. 2018. Assessment of Agricultural Groundwater Users in Iran: A Cultural Environmental Bias. Hydro. J., 26(1): 285-295. DOI: 10.1007/s10040-017-1634-9
47. Scannell, L. and Gifford, R. 2010. The Relations between Natural and Civic Place Attachment and Pro-Environmental Behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. (JEP), 30(3): 289-297.
48. Shiri, S., Bijani, M., Chaharsoughi Amin, H., Noori, H. and Soleymanifard, A. 2011. Effectiveness Evaluation of the Axial Plan of Wheat from Expert Supervisors' View in Ilam Province. World. Appl. Sci. J, 14(11): 1724-1729.
49. Statistical Center of Iran. 2016. Results of 2016 Census in Iran. Available at: https://www.amar.org.ir/english
50. Stern, P. C. 2000. Towards a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior, J. Soc. Issu., 56(3): 407-424.‌
51. Svabo, C. and Ekelund, K. 2015. Environmental Aesthetics: Notes for Design Ecology. Nordes, 1(6): 1-9.
52. Tohmé, G. 1992. Cultural Development and Environment. UNESCO Publication.
53. Uzzell, D., Pol, E. and Badenas, D. 2002. Place Identification, Social Cohesion, and Environmental Sustainability. Environ. Behav., 34(1): 26-53.
54. Valizadeh, N. and Bijani, M. (2017a). Analysis of Affective Components on Environmental Aesthetics Attitude from the Viewpoint of Rural People in Miandoab Township. Iran. J. Agric. Econ. Development Res., 47(3): 719-730. (in Persian)
55. Valizadeh, N. and Bijani, M. 2017b. Application of Maslow's Needs Theory to Analyze Environmental Aesthetics Attitude of Rural people in Miandoab Township. Iran. Agric. Ext. Edu. J., 12(2): 73-87. (in Persian)
56. Valizadeh, N., Bijani, M. and Abbasi, E. 2018a. Farmers’ Active Participation in Water Conservation: Insights from a Survey among Farmers in Southern Regions of West Azerbaijan Province, Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. (JAST), 20(5): 895-910.
57. Valizadeh, N., Bijani, M., Abbasi, E., and Ganguly, S. 2018b. The Role of Time Perspective in Predicting Iranian Farmers' Participatory-based Water Conservation Attitude and Behavior. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ., In press. DOI: 10.1080/10911359.2018.1485602
58. Walker, A. J. and Ryan, R. L. 2008. Place Attachment and Landscape Preservation in Rural New England: A Maine Case Study. Landscape Urban Plan., 86(2): 141-152.
59. Yazdanpanah, M., Hayati, D., Thompson, M., Zamani, GH. and Monfared, N. 2014. Policy and Plural Responsiveness: Taking Constructive Account of the Ways in which Iranian Farmers Think about and Behave in Relation to Water. J. Hydro., 514: 347-357.
60. Zelenski, J. M. and Nisbet, E. K. 2014. Happiness and Feeling Connected the Distinct Role of Nature Relatedness. Environ. Behav., 46(1): 3-23.
61. Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T. and Iyer, R. 2014. Engagement with Natural Beauty Moderates the Positive Relation between Connectedness with Cature and Psychological Well-Being. J. Environ. Psycho. (JEP), 38(6): 55-63.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 20, Issue 7
November and December 2018
Pages 1353-1367