Institutional Mapping of Nano-Technological Innovation System in the Agricultural Sector of Iran

Authors
R. Maghabl 1
K. Naderi Mahdei 1
A. Yaghoubi Farani 1
M. Mohammadi 2
1 Department of Agricultural Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Technology Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Nature and rate of technological change is defined inside technological innovation system, a concept developed out of Innovation System Approach. The main purpose of this study was to institutionally map nanotechnological innovation system of Iranian agriculture by investigating current state of hard and soft institutions regarding functions of the system. This study consisted of qualitative and quantitative phases. In the qualitative part, a thematic content analysis was used to compare the current and desired states of high level laws and documents. The quantitative phase was a descriptive survey. In the quantitative phase, the statistical population consisted of active researchers in the field of nanotechnology from agricultural national research institutes and centers, agricultural colleges, and knowledge-based companies. Using Krejcie and Morgan’s table and stratified random sampling, 405 participants were selected. After ranking functions of the system based on their importance, current and desired functional state of hard institutions were compared through paired t-test. In the qualitative phase, current state of NanoTechnological Innovation in Agricultural (NTIA) system was investigated in terms of functions of soft institutions, i.e. 23 high level documents and laws related to nanotechnology, using ATLAS.ti software. Results showed that the functional gap between soft and hard institutions of the innovation system was very deep. This trend indicated that the capacities of various operators of NTIA system were not fully used to advance nanotechnology applications in agriculture.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Ali, A. and Kunal Sinha, K. 2014. Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges in Nanotechnology Innovation in India. J. Soc. Sci. Poli. Imp., 2(2): 227-251.
2. Aligica, P. D. 2006. Institutional and Stakeholder Mapping: Frameworks for Policy Analysis and Institutional Change. Public. Organ. R., 6: 79–90.
3. Bagheri Moghaddam, N., Mousavi Dorcheh, S. M., Nasiri, M. and Moallemi, E. A. 2012. Motors of Innovation, a Novel Approach for Analyzing Technological Innovation Systems. National Research Institute for Science Policy. 4:1-283. (In Persian).
4. Bergek A., Jacobsson S., Carlsson B., Linmark S. and Rickne A. 2008. Analyzing the Functional Dynamics of Technological Innovation Systems: A Scheme of Analysis. Res. Policy, 37: 407-429.
5. Capron, H. and Cincera, M. 2007. EU Pre-Competitive and Near-the-Market S and T Collaborations. Busi. Econ. Rev., 50(1): 135-159.
6. Carlsson, B. and Stankievicz, R. 1991. On the Nature, Function, and Composition of Technological Systems. J. Evol. Econ., 1(2): 93-118.
7. Cortes-Lobos, R. 2013. Nanotechnology Research in US Agri-food Sectoral System of Innovation: Toward Sustainable Development. A Dissertation Presented to the Academic Faculty, In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology.
8. Cristina, C., Patarapong, I. and Koson, S. 2012. Measuring Systemic Problems in National Innovation Systems. An Application to Thailand. Res. Policy, 41(8): 1476–1488.
9. EU SCAR (2012), Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems in transition – a reflection paper, Brussels, European Commission.
10. Hekkert, M. P. and Negro, S. 2009. Functions of Innovation Systems as a Framework to Understand Sustainable Technological Change: Empirical Evidence for Earlier Claims. Tech. Forecast. Soc. Change., 76: 584-594.
11. Iranian Initiative Nanotechnology. 2015. Nanotechnology Campaign Performance Reporting in 2014. Available Online at: http://www. http://nano.ir/section/1/108 (In Persian).
12. Jacobsson, S. and Johnson, A. 2000. The Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technology: An Analytical Framework and Key Issues for Research. Ener. Policy, 28: 625-640.
13. Jahanshiri, E. and Walker, S. 2015. Agricultural Knowledge-Based Systems at the Age of Semantic Technologies. Inter. J. Know. Engin., 1(1): 64-67.
14. Koutsouris, A. 2012. Facilitating Agricultural Innovation Systems: A Critical Realist Approach. Stud. Agri. Econ., 114(2): 64–70.
15. Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D. W. 1970. Determining Sample Size for Activities. Educ. Psychol. Measur., 1(30): 608.
16. Maghabl, R., Chizari, M., Khayyam Nekouei, S. M., and Tabatabaei, M. 2012. Investigating the Researchers, Attitude and the Obstacle Hampering Nanotechnology Development in the Agricultural Sector of Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 14: 493-503.
17. Malakouti, M. J. 2014. The Proper Use of Fertilizer for Crops in Iran. Moballeghan Group Press, 3: 315-344. (in Persian)
18. Ministry of Jihad-e Agriculture. 2015. Organizational Structure of Ministry of Jihad-e Agriculture. Available Online at: http://www.maj.ir/Portal/Home/Default.aspx?CategoryID=b00692d1-0c4c-45f2-80e68b703c8d00 d2. (In Persian).
19. Mohammadi, M. 2010. Identify Agricultural Innovation System From the Perspective of Institutional Mapping. Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO). Engin. Inst. Agri, 1: 1-280. (in Persian)
20. Mohammadi M., Tabatabaeian S. H., Elyasi M., and Roshani S. 2013. Formation of Emerging Technological Innovation System in Iran; Case of Nanotechnology Sector. J. Sci. Tech. Policy, 5(4): 19-32. (in Persian)
21. New Communication and Technology Studies Office. 2015. Familiarity with Technology and Innovation Policies and Laws. Publication of Department of Infrastructure. Res. Indus. Affairs, 1: 1-124.
22. OECD. 1999. Managing National Innovation Systems. OECD Publications Service, France.
23. Pourrahim, R., Farzadfar, Sh. And Golnaraghi, A. R. 2008. Agriculture and Nanoatechnology. Sepehr Press, 1: 263-266. (in Persian)
24. Prasad, R., Kumar W. and Prasad K. S. 2014. Nanotechnology in Sustainable Agriculture: Present Concerns and Future Aspects. Afric. J. Biotech., 13(6): 705-713.
25. Qu, X., Alvarez, P. J. J. and Li, Q. 2013. Applications of Nanotechnology in Water and Wastewater Treatment, Water Research. Doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058.
26. Rai, V., Acharya, S. and Dey, N. 2012. Implications of Nanobiosensors in Agriculture. J. Biomat. Nanobiotech., 3: 315-324.
27. Ranaei, H., Mortazavi, M. and Mehrabi, A. A. 2006. Establishing and Institutionalizing National Agricultural Innovation System in Iran. J. Agri. Econ. Dev., 14(56): 77-108. (in Persian)
28. Rezaei, R., Hoseini, S. M., Shabanali fami, H. and Safa, L. 2009. Identify and Analyze the Barriers to Nanotechnology Development in the Iranian Agricultural Sector. J. Sci. Tech. Policy, 2(1): 17-26. (in Persian)
29. Sekhon, B. S. 2010. Food Nanotechnology: An Overview. Nanotech. Sci. Appl., 3: 1–15.
30. Sharifzadeh, A. and Abdollahzadeh, Gh. H. 2011. Identify Current and Desired Status of Various Operators in the Agricultural Research System. J. Sci. Tech. Policy., 4(1): 77-112. (in Persian)
31. Temel, T., Janssen, W. and Karimov, F. 2002. The Agricultural Innovation System of Azerbaijan: An Assessment of Institutional Linkages. ISNAR Country, Costa Rica.
32. Walter, W., Powell, W. W. and Snellman, K. 2014. The Knowledge Economy. Stanford University.
33. Zamani-Miandashti, N. and Malek-Mohammadi, I. 2012. Effectiveness of Agricultural Human Resource Development Interventions in Iran (Three Cases in Fars Province). J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 14: 11-25.
34. Zhang, M., Gao, B., Ying, Y., Xue Y. and Mandu. I. 2012. Synthesis of Porous MgO-Biochar Nanocomposite for Removal of Phosphate and Nitrate from Aqueous Solutions. Chem. Engin. J., 210(1): 26-32.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 20, Issue 3
May and June 2018
Pages 445-457