Nutritional Performance and Metabolic Characteristics of Cattle Fed Spineless Cactus

Authors
M. C. B. de Siqueira 1
M. A. Ferreira 1
J. P. I. S. Monnerat 1
J. L. Silva 2
C. T. F. Costa 3
A. A. Soares 1
I. B. de Andrade 1
J. C. C. Chagas 1
M. G. Conceição 1
1 Department of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
2 Multidisciplinary Center of Barra, Federal University of Western Bahia, Barra, Brazil.
3 Department of Agriculture, Federal Institute of Sertão Pernambucano, Floresta, Brazil.
Abstract
The effect of the inclusion of spineless cactus [0, 14.7, 29.4, 44.1, and 58.8% of Dry Matter (DM)] basis in replacement of Tifton hay on the intake and digestibility of nutrients, feeding behavior, and nitrogen compounds balance were evaluated. Five crossbred steers, rumen fistulated, with average body weight of 380±5.3 kg were assigned to a 5×5 Latin square design. The time spent with rumination activity linearly decreased (P< 0.05) with the inclusion of spineless cactus; and the feeding time showed a quadratic effect (P< 0.05), with a minimum time of 195 min d-1 estimated with 35.7% of spineless cactus inclusion. The nutrient intake showed a quadratic effect (P< 0.05), with a maximum intake of DM (8.9 kg d-1), Crude Protein (CP; 1.4 kg d-1), and Digestible Organic Matter (DOM; 5.8 kg d-1) estimated with 33.9, 29.9, and 41.8% of spineless cactus inclusion, respectively. Except (P> 0.05) to Neutral Detergent Fiber corrected to ash and protein (apNDF), the total digestibility of DM linearly increased (P< 0.05) with spineless cactus inclusion replacing Tifton hay. Except for plasma and urinary urea nitrogen, which were not affected (P> 0.05), there was a quadratic effect (P< 0.05) on nitrogen balance, with a maximum value of 170 g d-1 estimated with 33.2% of spineless cactus inclusion. It is recommended to include 41.8% spineless cactus in replacement of Tifton hay for crossbred cattle, due to the higher DOM intake without altering the nitrogen efficiency use.

Keywords

1. AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.
2. Batista, A. M. V., Ribeiro Neto, A. C., Lucena, R. B., Santos, D. C., Dubeux, J. C. B. and Mustafa, A. F. 2009. Chemical Composition and Ruminal Degradability of Spineless Cactus Grown in Northeastern Brazil. Rangeland Ecol. Manage., 62: 297-301.
3. Ben Salemn, H. 2010. Nutritional Management to Improve Sheep and Goat Performances in Semiarid Regions. R. Bras. Zootec., 39: 337-347.
4. Carvalho, M. C., Ferreira, M. A., Cavalcanti, C. V. A., Véras, A. S. C., Silva, F. M. and Azevedo, M. 2005. Substituição do Feno de Capim Tifton (Cynodon spp cv 85) por Palma Forrageira (Opuntia fícus indica Mill) e Comportamento Ingestivo de Vacas da raça Holandesa. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci., 27: 505-512.
5. Calomeni, G. D., Gardinal, R., Venturelli, B. C., Freitas Júnior, J. E., Vendramini, T. H. A., Takiya, C. S., Souza, H. N. and Rennó, F. P. 2015. Effects of Polymer-Coated Slow-Release Urea on Performance, Ruminal Fermentation, and Blood Metabolites in Dairy Cows. R. Bras. Zootec., 44: 327-334.
6. Chizzotti, M. L., Valadares Filho, S. C., Valadares, R. F. D., Chizzotti, F. H. M., Campos, J. M. S., Marcondes, M. I. and Fonseca, M. A. 2006. Consumo, Digestibilidade e Excreção de Ureia e Derivados de Purinas em Novilhas de Diferentes Pesos. R. Bras. Zootec., 35: 1813-1821.
7. Cruz, M. C. S., Véras, A. S. C., Ferreira, M. A., Batista, Â. M. V., Santos, D. C. and Coelho, M. R. S. 2006. Balanço de Nitrogênio e Estimativas de Perdas Endógenas em Vacas Lactantes Alimentadas Com Dietas Contendo Palma Forrageira e Teores Crescentes de Ureia e Mandioca. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci., 28: 47-56.
8. Detmann, E. and Valadares Filho, S. C. 2010. On the Estimation of Non-Fibrous Carbohydrates in Feeds and Diets. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec., 62: 980-984.
9. Detmann, E. Souza, M. A. Valadares Filho, S. C. Queiroz, A. C. Cabral, L. S., Valente, T. N. P., Berchielli, T. T. 2012. Métodos para análise de alimentos. Visconde do Rio Branco, MG.
10. Felix, T. L., Loerch, S. C. and Fluharty, F. L. 2014. Protein Supplementation for Growing Cattle Fed a Corn Silage-Based Diet. J. Anim. Sci., 30: 327-332.
11. Ferreira, M. A., Bispo, S. V., Rocha Filho, R. R., Urbano, S. A. and Costa, C. T. F. 2012. The Use of Cactus as Forage for Dairy Cows in Semi-Arid Regions of Brazil. In: “Organic Farming and Food Production”. Petr Konvalina (Org.), InTech, South Bohemia, PP. 1- 22.
12. Forbes, J. M. 2003. The Multifactorial Nature of Food Intake Control. J. Anim. Sci., 81: 139-144.
13. Köppen, W. 1948. Climatologia: Con un estudio de los climas de la tierra. Fondo de Cultura Econômica. México.
14. Machado, M. G., Detmann, E., Mantovani, H. C., Campos Valadares Filho, S. de, Bento, C. B. P., Marcondes, M. I., Assunção, S. A. 2016. Evaluation of the Length of Adaptation Period for Changeover and Crossover Nutritional Experiments with Cattle fed Tropical Forage-Based Diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 222: 132-148.
15. Mertens, D. R. and Loften, J. R. 1980. The Effect of Starch on Forage Fiber Digestion Kinetics In Vitro. J. Dairy Sci., 63: 1437-1446.
16. Mertens, D. R. 1994. Regulation of Forage Intake. In: “Forage Quality Evaluation and Utilization”, (Ed.): Fahey, J. F. G. C. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, PP. 450-493.
17. Monteiro, C. C. F., Melo, A. A. S., Ferreira, M. A., Campos, J. M. S., Souza, J. S. R., Silva, E. T. S., Andrade, R. P. X. and Silva, E. C. 2014. Replacement of Wheat Bran with Spineless Cactus (Opuntia fícus indica Mill cv Gigante) and Urea in the Diets of Holstein ×Gyr Heifers. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 46: 1149-1154.
18. Mourino, F., Akkarawongsa, R. and Weimer, P. J. 2001. Initial pH as a Determinant of Cellulose Digestion Rate by Mixed Ruminal Microorganisms In Vitro. J. Dairy Sci., 84: 848-859.
19. Nefzaoui, A. and Ben Salem, H. 2001. Opuntia spp. a Strategic Fodder and Efficient Tool to Combat Desertification in the Wana Region. In: “Cactus (Opuntia spp.) as forage”, (Ed.): Mondragon-Jacobo, C. and Pérez-González, S. FAO, Rome. PP. 73–90.
20. NRC, 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Edition, National Research Council. Academy Press, Washington, DC.
21. Salomão, B. M., Valadares Filho, S. C., Villela, S. D. J., Santos, S. A., Costa, E., Silva, L. F. and Rotta, P. P. 2015. Desempenho Produtivo de Bovinos Alimentados com Cana-de-açúcar com Diferentes Níveis de Concentrado. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec., 67: 1077-1086.
22. Slyter, L. L. 1986. The Ability of pH-Selected Mixed Ruminal Microbial Population to Digest Fiber at Various pHs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52: 390-391.
23. Valadares Filho, S. de C., Marcondes, M. I, Chizzotti, M. L. And Rodrigues Paulino, P. V. 2010. Nutrient Requirements of Zebu Beef Cattle—BR-Corte. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
24. Valente, É. E. L., Paulino, M. F., Detmann, E., Valadares Filho, S. C., Barros, L. V., Acedo, T. S., Couto, V. R. M. and Lopes, S. A. 2011. Levels of Multiple Supplements or Nitrogen Salt for Beef Heifers in Pasture during the Dry Season. R. Bras. Zootec., 40: 2011-2019.
25. Wangsness, P. J., Chase, L. E., Peterson, A. D., Hartsock, T. G., Kellmel, D. J. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1976. System for Monitoring Feeding Behavior of Sheep. J. Anim. Sci., 42: 1544–1549.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 20, Issue 1
January and February 2018
Pages 13-22