Selectable Traits in Sorghum Genotypes for Tolerance to Salinity Stress

Authors
E. Shakeri
Y. Emam
Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is moderately tolerant to salinity and it is important as a candidate crop for both fodder and grain in salt-affected areas. This pot experiment was conducted at Research Greenhouse of College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Iran, to evaluate the relative effectiveness of biochemical traits and stress tolerance indices contributing to genotypic differences in salinity tolerance in 30 lines and 14 cultivars of sorghum. In addition, a new indicator, Storage Factor Index (SFI), was defined and used to quantify the Na+ partitioning between shoot and root. Among the indices, stress tolerance index was found useful as a selection criterion. Furthermore, the tolerant genotypes had higher K+/Na+ ratio in shoot and root with greater SFI, indicating that most of Na+ was stored in their roots. Although peroxidase and superoxide dismutase were enhanced under salinity conditions in both sensitive and tolerant genotypes, only Catalase (CAT) activity was found to be promoted in tolerant lines/cultivars. Proline accumulation did not appear to be related to salinity tolerance in sorghum lines/cultivars. Overall, our findings suggested that salinity tolerance in sorghum genotypes was not only associated with Na+ exclusion from the shoot, but also with the enhancement of CAT activity.

Keywords

1. Ali, S., Gautam, R. K., Mahajan, R., Krishnamurthy, S. L., Sharma, S. K., Singh, R. K. and Ismail, A. M. 2013. Stress Indices and Selectable Traits in SALTOL QTL Introgressed Rice Genotypes for Reproductive Stage Tolerance to Sodicity and Salinity Stresses. Field Crop. Res., 154: 65-73.
2. Almodares, A., Hadi, M. R., Kholdebarin, B., Samedani, B and Kharazian, Z. A. 2014. The Response of Sweet Sorghum Cultivars to Salt Stress and Accumulation of Na+, Cl- and K+ Ions in Relation to Salinity. J Environ. Biol, 35(4):733-799.
3. Arias-Baldrich, C., Bosch, N., Begines, D., Feria, A. B., Monreal, J. A. and Garcia-Maurino, S. 2015. Proline Synthesis in Barley under Iron Deficiency and Salinity. J. Plant Physiol., 183: 121-129.
4. Arzani, A. 2008. Improving Salinity Tolerance in Crop Plants: A Biotechnological View. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant., 44: 373-383.
5. Arzani, A. and Ashraf. M. 2016. Smart Engineering of Genetic Resources for Enhanced Salinity Tolerance in Crop Plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 35(3): 146-189.
6. Barati, A., Moghaddam, M., Mohammadi, S.A., Ghazvini, H. A. and Sadeghzadeh, B. 2017. Identification of QTLs Associated with Agronomic and Physiological Traits under Salinity Stress in Barley. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 19: 185-200.
7. Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P. and Teare, I. D. 1973. Rapid Determination of Free Proline for Water-Stress Studies. Plant Soil., 39: 205-207.
8. Bavei, V., Shiran, B. and Arzani, A. 2011. Evaluation of Salinity Tolerance in Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Using Ion Accumulation, Proline and Peroxidase Criteria. Plant Growth Regul., 64: 275-285.
9. Bazrafshan, A. H. and Ehsanzadeh, P. 2016. Evidence for Differential Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in Sesamum indicum L. Genotypes under NaCl Salinity. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 18: 207-222
10. Beauchamp, C. and Fridovich, I. 1971. Superoxide Dismutase: Improved Assays and an Assay Applicable to Acrylamide Gels. Anal Biochem., 44; 276-87.
11. Chance, B. and Maehly, A. C. 1995. Assay of Catalase and Peroxidase. In: “Methods in Enzymology”, (Eds.): Culowic, S. P. and Kaplan, N. O. Academic Press, Inc. New York, 2: 764-765.
12. Chaparzadeh, N., Amico, M. L., Nejad, R. K., Izzo, R. and Izzo, F. N. 2004. Antioxidative Responses of Calendula officinalis under Salinity Conditions. Plant Physiol Biochem., 42: 695-701.
13. Dhindsa, R. S., Dhindsa, P. P. and Thorpe, T. A. 1981. Leaf Senescence: Correlated with Increased Levels of Membrane Permeability and Lipid Peroxidation, and Decreased Levels of Superoxide Dismutase and Catalase. J. Exp. Bot., 32(1): 93-101.
14. Fernandez, G. C. J. 1992. Effective Selection Criteria for Assessing Plant Stress Tolerance. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, Taiwan, PP. 257-270.
15. Fernandez, C.G.J. 1993. Effective Selection Criteria for Assessing Plant Stress Tolerance. In: “Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress”, (Ed.): Kuo, C. G. AVRDC, Shanhua, Taiwan, PP. 257-270.
16. Fischer, R. A. and Maurer, R. 1978. Drought Resistance in Spring Wheat Cultivars. I. Grain Yield Responses. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 29: 897-912.
17. Gengmao, Z., Yu, H., Xing, S., Shihui, L., Quanmei, S. and Changhai, W. 2014. Salinity Stress Increases Secondary Metabolites and Enzyme Activity in Safflower. Indust. Crops. Pro., 64: 175-181.
18. Gupta, B. and Huang, B. 2014 Mechanism of Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Characterization. Inter J. Genom., 18 p.
19. Horneck, D. A. and Hanson, D. 1998. Determination of Potassium and Sodium by Flame Emission Spectrophotometry. In: “Handbook of Reference Methods for Plant Analysis”, (Ed.): Kalra, Y. P. CRC Press, Boca Raton, PP. 153-155.
20. Houshmand, S., Arzani, A., Maibody, S. A. M. and Feizi, M. 2005. Evaluation of Salt-Tolerant Genotypes of Durum Wheat Derived from In Vitro and Field Experiments. Field Crop. Res., 91: 345-354.
21. Hu., L., Li, H., Pang, H. and Fu, J. 2012. Responses of Antioxidant Gene, Protein and Enzymes to Salinity Stress in Two Genotypes of Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne) Differing in Salt Tolerance. J. Plant Physiol., 160: 145-156.
22. Isal, R. and Aragues, R. 2010. Yield and Plant Ion Concentrations in Maize (Zea mays L.) Subject to Diurnal and Nocturnal Saline Sprinkler Irrigations. Field Crop. Res. 116: 175-183.
23. Kafi, M., Shariat Jafari, M. H. and Moayedi A. 2013. The Sensitivity of Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Developmental Stages to Salinity Stress: An Integrated Approach. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 15: 723-736.
24. Krishnamurthy, L., Serraj, R., Hash, C. T., Dakheel, A. J. and Reddy, B. V. 2007. Screening Sorghum Genotypes for Salinity Tolerant Biomass Production. Euphytica., 156: 15-24.
25. Lacerda, C. F., Cambraia, J., Oliva, M. A., Ruiz, H. A. and Prisco, J. T. N. 2003. Solute Accumulation and Distribution during Shoot and Leaf Development in Two Sorghum Genotypes under Salt Stress. Environ. Exp. Bot., 49: 107-120.
26. Lacerda, C. F., Cambraia, J., Oliva, M. A. and Ruiz, H. A. 2005. Changes in Growth and in Solute Concentrations in Sorghum Leaves and Roots during Salt Stress Recovery. Environ. Exp. Bot., 54: 69-76.
27. Lee, M. H., Cho, E. J., Wi, S. G., Bae, H., Kim, J. E., Cho, J. Y., Lee, S., Kim, J. H. and Chung, B. Y. 2013. Divergences in Morphological Changes and Antioxidant Responses in Salt-Tolerant and Salt-Sensitive Rice Seedlings after Salt Stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 70: 325-335.
28. Munns, R. and Tester, M. 2008. Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 59: 651-681.
29. Netondo, G. W., Onyango, J. C. and Beck, E. 2004. Sorghum and Salinity: I. Response of Growth, Water Relations, and Ion Accumulation to NaCl Salinity. Crop Sci., 44: 797-805.
30. Noreen, Z. and Ashraf, M. 2009. Assessment of Variation in Antioxidative Defence System in Salt-treated Pea (Pisum sativum) Cultivars and its Putative Use as Salinity Tolerance Markers. J. Plant Physiol., 166: 1764-1774.
31. Pandolfi, C., Azzarello, E., Mancuso, S. and Shabala, S. 2016. Acclimation Improves Salt Stress Tolerance in Zea mays Plants. J. Plant Physiol., 201: 1-8.
32. Pessarakli, M. 2011. Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. 3rd Edition, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Publishing Company, Florida. 1188 PP.
33. Pirasteh-Anosheh, H. and Emam, Y. 2016. Induced Salinity Tolerance and Altered Ion Storage Factor in Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Upon Salicylic-Acid Priming. Iran. Agric. Res. Under press.
34. Pirasteh-Anosheh, H., Ranjbar, G., Emam, Y. and Ashraf, M. 2014. Salicylic-Acid–Induced Recovery Ability in Salt-stressed Hordeum vulgare Plants. Turk. J. Bot., 38: 112-121.
35. Porch, T. G. 2006. Application of Stress Indices for Heat Tolerance Screening of Common Bean. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 192: 390-394.
36. Poustini, K., Siosemardeh, A. and Ranjbar, M. 2007. Proline Accumulation as a Response to Salt Stress in 30 Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Cultivars Differing in Salt Tolerance. Gene. Resour. Crop Evol., 54: 925-934.
37. Seckin B, Turkan I, Sekmen A. H. and Ozfidan, C. 2010. The Role of Antioxidant Defence Systems at Differential Salt Tolerance of Hordeum marinum Huds. (Sea Barley Grass) and Hordeum vulgare L. (Cultivated Barley). Environ. Exp. Bot., 69: 76-85.
38. Shabala, S., Haridai, Y. and Jacobsen, S. E. 2013. Genotypic Difference in Salinity Tolerance in Quinoa Is Determined by Differential Control of Xylem Na+ Loading and Stomatal Density. J. Plant Physiol., 170: 906-914.
39. Sio-Se Mardeh A., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K. and Mohammadi, V. 2006. Evaluation of Drought Resistance Indices under Various Environmental Conditions. Field Crop. Res., 98: 222-229.
40. Tari, I., Laskay, G., Takacs, Z. and Poor, P. 2013. Response of Sorghum to Abiotic Stresses: A Review. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 199(4): 264-274.
41. Tavakoli, M., Poustini, K. and Alizadeh, H. 2016. Proline Accumulation and Related Genes in Wheat Leaves under Salinity Stress. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 18: 707-716.
42. Verbruggen, N. and Hermans, C. 2008. Proline Accumulation in Plants: A Review. Amino Acid., 35: 753-759.
43. Xue, Y. F. and Liu, Z. P. 2008. Antioxidant Enzymes and Physiological Characteristics in Two Jerusalem Artichoke Cultivars Under Salt Stress. Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 6: 776-781.
44. Yan, K., Xu, H., Cao, W. and Chen, X., 2015. Salt Priming Improved Salt Tolerance in Sweet Sorghum by Enhancing Osmotic Resistance and Reducing Root Na+ Uptake. Acta Physiol. Plantarum., 37(10): 1-10.
45. Zhu, M., Shabala, L., Cuin, T. A., Huang, X., Zhou, M., Munns, R. and Shabala, S. 2016. Nax Loci Affect SOS1-Like NaC/HC Exchanger Expression and Activity in Wheat. J. Exp. Bot., 67: 835-844.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 19, Issue 6
November and December 2017
Pages 1319-1332