Impact of Defoliation Timings and Leaf Pubescence on Yield and Fiber Quality of Cotton

Authors
O. Gormus 1
A. El Sabagh 2
F. Kurt 1
1 Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey.
2 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypty.
Abstract
Defoliation is an important management practice of cotton production. Field experiments were conducted for exploring response of cotton to defoliant application times at various percentages of boll opening on seed cotton yield and fiber quality. Experiments were arranged in split-plot design with defoliation times (control, 40, 60, and 80% open boll) as the main plots and cultivars (hairy leaf, semi-smooth leaf, and smooth leaf) as subplots, with three replicates. The pooled results indicated that early application of harvest aid products significantly reduced seed cotton yield, boll number per plant, micronaire and fiber length. Significant reductions in seed cotton yield occurred with defoliant applications both prior to and after 60% open boll application timing. Application at 40% followed by boll opening had the maximum number of the green leaves remaining on the plant at 14, 21, and 28 days after treatments and a corresponding high trash content and high leaf grade. However, except for the leaf grade, the number of green leaves remaining on the plant after defoliation and the trash content, varietal differences were non-significant. Smooth leaf cultivar (SG 125) had the highest number of green leaves left on the plant after treatment (79.2) compared with hairy (71.9) and semi-smooth leaf (77.1) cultivars. It was concluded that cotton cultivars with varying levels of leaf hairiness impacted the defoliation efficacy of the harvest aid products.

Keywords

1. Anthony, W. S. and Rayburn, S. T. 1989. Cleanability of Smooth- and Hairy-Leaf Cottons Quality Effects. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. (USA), 32: 1127-1130.
2. Awan, H. U., Awan, I. U., Mansoor, M., Khakwani, A. A., Khan, M. A., Farullah, G. and Khattak, B. 2012. Effect of Defoliant Application at Different Stages of Boll Maturity and Doses of Sulfur on Yield and Quality of Upland Cotton. Sarhad J. Agric., 28: 245-247.
3. Bange, M. P. and Milroy, S. P. 2001. Timing of Crop Maturity in Cotton: Impact of Dry Matter Production and Partitioning. Field Crop Res., 2(10): 143-155.
4. Bednarz, C. W., Shurley, W. D. and Anthony, W. S. 2002. Losses in Yield, Quality, and Profitability of Cotton from Improper Harvest Timing. Agron. J., 94: 1004-1011.
5. Buttar, G.S. and Singh, S. 2013. Effect of Ethrel Dose and Time of Application on Growth, Yield and Duration of Bt Cotton in Semi Arid Region of Punjab. J. Cotton Res. Dev., 27(1): 60-62.
6. Cetin, O., Uzen, M. N. and Temiz, G. 2015. Effect of N-Fertigation Frequency on the Lint Yield, Chlorophyll, and Photosynthesis Rate of Cotton. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 17: 909-920.
7. Cicek, B., Oglakcı, M. and Copur, O. 2003. Effect of Defoliation on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Quality Components. J. Faculty Agric. 7(1-2): 45-52.
8. Copur, O., Demirel, U., Polat, R. and Gur, M.A. 2010. Effect of Different Defoliants and Application Times on the Yield and Quality Components of Cotton in Semi-Arid Conditions. Afr. J. Biotechnol, 9(14): 2095-2100.
9. Eder, Z. P. 2013. Cotton Leaf Grade as Influenced by Harvest Aid Regimes and Cultivar Characteristics. PhD Thesis of Agronomy, Texas A&M University, USA.
10. El-Kassaby, A. T. and Kandil, T. A. A. 1985. Effect of Defoliants and Nitrogen Fertilization on Egyptian Cotton Yield (Gossypium barbadense L.). J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 10(1): 23-31.
11. Faircloth, J.C. 2002. Storm Resistance and Weather Related Seedcotton Loss from Spindle Picked Upland Cotton. PhD. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. USA.
12. Faircloth, J. C., Edmisten, K. L., Wells, R. and Stewart, A. M. 2004a. The Influence of Defoliation Timing on Yields and Quality of Two Cotton Cultivars. Crop Sci., 44: 165-172.
13. Faircloth, J. C., Edmisten, K. L., Wells, R. and Stewart, A. M. 2004b. Timing Defoliation Applications for Maximum Yields and Optimum Quality in Cotton Containing a Fruiting Gap. Crop Sci., 44: 158-164.
14. Gwathmey, C. O. and Hayes, R. M. 1997. Harvest-Aid Interactions under Different Temperature Regimes in Field-Grown Cotton. J. Cotton Sci., 1: 1-28.
15. Gwathmey,C. O., Bednarz, C. W., Fromme, D. D., Holman, E. M. and Miller, D. K. 2004. Response to Defoliation Timing Based on Heat-Unit Accumulation in Diverse Field Environments. J. Cotton Sci., 8: 142-153.
16. Hake, K., Banks, J.C., Bourland, F., Sasser, P., Tugwell, P. and Williford, R. 1992. Boll Weathering. Cotton Physiology Today. National Cotton Council, November 1992, 3:10 Nat.Cotton Council of Am., Memphis.
17. Kelley, M., Boman, R., Brashears, A. and Hequet, E. 2002. Harvest Timing Effects on Yield and Quality of Stripper Cotton in the Texas High Plains. In: “Proc. BeltwideCotton Conf.”, TX 4-8 January 2002, San Antonio.
18. Kelley, M. S. 2002. Harvest Aid Combination and Application Timing Effects on Lint Yield and Fiber Quality. MSc. Thesis, Texas Tech. Univ., Lubbock, USA.
19. Kelley, M. S. 2011. Harvest Aid Combination and Application Timing Effects on Lint Yield and Fiber Quality. MSc. Thesis, Texas Tech University, USA.
20. Kelley, M., Keeling, W., Wanjura, J. D. and G. Morgan. 2012. High Plains and Northern Rolling Plains Cotton Harvest Aid Guide. http://lubbock.tamu.edu/cotton/pdf/2011HarvestAidGuide.pdf.
21. Larson, J. A., Gwathmey, C. O. and Hayes, R. M. 2002. Cotton Defoliation and Harvest Timing Effects on Yields, Quality, and Net Revenues. J. Cotton Sci., 6: 13-27.
22. Larson, J. A., Gwathmey, C. O. and Hayes, R. M. 2005. Effects of Defoliation Timing and Desiccation on Net Revenues from Ultra-Narrow-Row Cotton. J. Cotton Sci., 9: 204- 214.
23. Lokhande, S. and Reddy, K. R. 2015. Cotton Reproductive and Fiber Quality Responses to Nitrogen Nutrition. Int. J. Plant Prod., 9: 191-209.
24. Mauney, J. R. and Stewart, J. M. 1986. Cotton Physiology. The Cotton Foundation, Memphis, TN.
25. Morey, P. R., Sasser, P. E., Bethea, R. M. and Kopetzky, M. T. 1976. Variation in Trash Composition in Raw Cottons. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 37: 407-412.
26. MSTAT-C. 1989. Microcomputer Statistical Program. Michigan State University of Agriculture, Michigan, Lansing, USA.
27. Novick, R. G., Jones, J. E., Anthony, W. S., Aguillard, W. and Dickson, J. I. 1991. Genetic Trait Effect on Nonlint Trash of Cotton. Crop Sci., 31: 1029-1034.
28. Ogunlela, V. B. and Odion, E. C. 2006. Response of Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to Partial Defoliation at Different Growth Stages in a Semi-Arid Tropical Environment. J. Food Agric. Environ., 4(3-4): 157-161.
29. Oosterhuis, D. M. 1999. Yield Response to Environmental Extremes in Cotton. Proc. Cotton Research Meeting and Summaries of Cotton Research in Progress, University of Arkansas, Arkansas, USA.
30. Samani, M. R. K., Khajehpour, M. R. and Ghavaland, A. 1999. Effects of Row Spacing and Plant Density on Growth and Dry Matter Accumulation in Cotton on Isfhan. Iran. J. Agric. Sci., 29: 667-679.
31. Sarlach, R. S., Sohu, R. S. and Gill, M. S. 2010. Effect of Ethrel on Yield and Fibre Quality Traits in Upland Cotton. Crop Improv., 37: 83-86.
32. Singh, K., Singh, H., Singh, K. and Rathore, P. 2013. Effect of Transplanting and Seedling Age on Growth, Yield Attributes and Seed Cotton Yield of Bt Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Ind. J. Agric. Sci., 83: 508-513
33. Singh, K., Rathore, P. and Singh, K. 2014. Dose and Time Dependent Efficacy Alteration of Different Defoliants on Seed Cotton Yield. J. Env. Biol., 36: 891-895.
34. Smith, C. W., Cothren, J. T. and Varvil, J. J. 1986. Yield and Fiber Quality of Cotton Following Application of 2-Chloroethyl Phosphonic Acid. Agron. J., 78: 814-818.
35. Snipes, C. E. and Baskin, C. C.1994. Influence of Early Defoliation on Cotton Yield, Seed Quality, and Fiber Properties. Field Crop Res., 37: 137-143.
36. Townsend, T. 2013. World Fiber Production. ICAC 1st International Fiber Conference, 9-11 June 2013, Guimarães, Portugal.
37. Valco, T. D. and Snipes, C. E. 2001. Uniform Harvest Aid Performance and Lint Quality Evaluation. In: “Cotton Harvest Management: Use and Influence of Harvest Aids”, (Eds.): Supak, J. R. and Snipes, C. E. Number Five The Cotton Foundation Reference Book Series, The Cotton Foundation, Publisher Memphis, TN, USA. PP. 167-180.
38. Wright, S. D., Hutmacher, R. B., Banuelos, G., Rios, S. I., Hutmacher, K. A., Munk, D. S., Wilson, K. A., Wrobles, J. F. and Keeley, M. P. 2014. Impact of Pima Defoliation Timings on Lint Yield and Quality. J. Cotton Sci., 18: 48-58.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 19, Issue 4
July and August 2017
Pages 903-915