Determining Agricultural Water Poverty Index in Kermanshah Province: The Case of Mahidasht Basin, Iran

Authors
K. Zarafshani 1
M. Saadvandi 2
1 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Razi University, Kermanshah, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agriculture, Tarbiat-Modares University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
As an assessment method of the water resources, Water Poverty Index (WPI) has become an available tool in water resources management. In particular, Agricultural Water Poverty Index (AWPI) is an assessment tool for agricultural water in rural areas. During the past decades, Mahidasht Basin in Kermanshah Province has been declared by water policy makers as “forbidden” basin in terms of water exploitation. Therefore, effective water resource management in the basin is deemed important. AWPI provides an appropriate tool in managing water resources more effectively. AWPI is an extension of Water Poverty Index (WPI) with five components including resources, access, use, capacity, and environment. This study sought to investigate the Agricultural Water Poverty Index in Mahidasht Basin in Kermanshah Province. Results revealed that Mahidasht Basin is faced with severe Agricultural Water Poverty (AWP= 49.06). Moreover, although farmers had limited water resources (R= 27.4) but these limited resources were highly accessible (A= 74.9). The result of this study has practical implications for water policy makers in Kermanshah Province. For example, agricultural policy makers can use the result of this study to devise better policies to alleviate agricultural water poverty in Mahidasht Basin where it is faced with water crisis.

Keywords

1. Ali Khan, T. and Adil Abbasi, M. 2013. Synthesis of Parameters Used to Check the Suitability of Water for Irrigation Purposes. Int. J. Environ. Sci., 3(6): 2031-2038.
2. Fabac, R. and Zver, I. 2011. Applying the Modified SWOT–AHP Method to the Tourism of Gornje Medimuje. Tour. Hospitality Manage., 17(2): 201-215.
3. Forouzani, M. and Karami, K. 2010. Agricultural Water Poverty Index and Sustainability. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 31(2): 415-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/agro:2010026.
4. Forouzani, M., Karami, E. and Zamani, Gh. H. 2013. Agricultural Water Poverty in Marvdasht County, Southern Iran. Water Policy, 15: 669-690.
5. Forouzani, M., Karami, E, Zamani, Gh. H. and Rezaei Moghaddam, K. 2013. Agricultural Water Poverty: Using Q-Methodology to Understand Stakeholders’ Perceptions. J. Arid Environ., 97: 190-204.
6. Forouzani, M., Karami, E., Zibaei, M. and Zamani, Gh. H. 2012. Agricultural Water Poverty Index for a Sustainable World. Sustain. Agric. Rev., 10: 127–155.
7. Iran Overview. Word Bank. 2015. Retrieved September 2016. http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/iran/overview
8. Jemmali, H. and Matoussi, M. S. 2013. A Multidimensional Analysis of Water Poverty at Local Scale: Application of Improved Water Poverty Index for Tunisia. Water Policy, 15: 98- 115.
9. Jemmali, H. and Sullivan, C. 2014. Multidimensional Analysis of Water Poverty in MENA Region: An Empirical Comparison with Physical Indicators. Soc. Indicator. Res., 115(1): 227-253.
10. Komnenic, V., Ahlers, R. and Zaag, P. 2009. Assessing the Usefulness of the Water Poverty Index by applying it to a Special Case: Can One Be Water Poor with High Levels of Access? Phys. Chem. Earth., 34: 219-224.
11. Lewis, J. R. 2001. Evaluation of Procedures for Adjusting Problem-Discovery Rates Estimated From Small Samples International. J. Human–Comput. Inter., 13(4): 445–479.
12. Lawrence, P., Meigh, J. and Sullivan, C. 2003. The Water Poverty Index: An International Comparison. Keele Economics Research Papers, KERP 2002/19, Centre for Economic Research, Keele University, United Kingdom, PP. 1–19.
13. Mlote, S. D. M., Sullivan, C. and Meigh, J. 2002. Water Poverty Index: A Tool for Integrated Water Management. Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Water Demand Management for Sustainable Development, 30–31 October, 2002, Dar es Salaam.
14. Ramanathan, R. 2001. A Note on the Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Environmental Impact Assessment. J. Environ. Manage., 63(1): 27-35.
15. Su, X. Y., Wu, J. Y., Zhang, H. J., Li, Z. Q., Sun, X. H., and Deng, Y. 2012. Assessment of Grain Security in China by Using the AHP and DST Methods. JAST, 14: 715- 726.
16. Sullivan, C. 2002. Calculating a Water Poverty Index. World Dev., 30: 1195-1211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.08.003.
17. Sullivan, C., Meigh, J. and Lawrence, P. 2003. Application of the Water Poverty Index at Different Scales: A Cautionary Tale. Water Int., 31(3): 412-426
18. Sullivan, C. and Meigh, J. 2003. Considering the Water Poverty Index in the Context of Poverty Alleviation. Water Policy, 5: 513–528.
19. Sullivan, C., Meigh, J. and Lawrence, P. 2006. Application of the Water Poverty Index at Different Scales: A Cautionary Tale. Int. Water Resour. Assoc. Water Int., 31(3): 412–426.
20. Semsar Yazdi, A. A. and Labbaf Khaneiki, M. 2007. The Drought of 2001 and the Measures Taken by Yazd Regional Water Authority. In: “Groundwater for Emergency Situations”, (Eds.): Vrba, J. and Salamat, A. R. UNESCO, Paris, PP. 58–71.
21. Zarafshani, K., Sharafi, L., Azadi, H., Hosseininia, Gh., De Maryer, Ph. and Witlox, F. 2012. Drought Vulnerability Assessment: The Case of Wheat Farmers in Wesrern Iran. Global Planetary Change, 98-99: 122-130.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 19, Issue 3
May and June 2017
Pages 541-552