Management of Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Tomatoes Using Mating Disruption and Attract and Kill

Authors
1 Rural Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. Dom Manoel de Medeiros n/n, Two Brothers, 52171-900, Recife, Brazil.
2 Academic Unit of Garanhuns, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Av. Good Shepherd, n / n, Boa Vista, 55292-270, Garanhuns, PE, Brazil.
Abstract
The mating disruption technique has been widely used for the control of several lepidopteran pests. In the present study, we assessed the efficiency of two formulations of SPLAT Neo, a wax emulsion containing E-11-hexadecenol, with and without the insecticide cypermethrin, in affecting mating disruption of Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Guenée). We also determined the best phenological age or stage of the crop for the application of the pheromone formulation, based on its effectiveness in reducing injuries on tomato fruits. We performed two field trials. The first field trial had three treatments: (1) Areas treated once (30 days after transplanting seedlings) with SPLAT Neo (mating disruption, formulation without cypermethrin); (2) Areas treated once with SPLAT Cida Neo (attract and kill, formulation with cypermethrin), and (3) Control plots, i.e. areas treated with the growers’ pest management procedures, based on pre-scheduled calendar applications of conventional insecticides. The use of SPLAT Neo with and without cypermethrin resulted in a significant season-long reduction of the average number of N. elegantalis eggs throughout the tomato cycle, compared to the control. Areas that received two SPLAT Neo applications had a lower number of males captured by monitoring pheromone traps, a lower number of eggs laid in the field, and significantly lower levels of fruit injury at pre, first, and second tomato harvests. The crop subjected to a single SPLAT Neo application, however, experienced reduction in fruit injury only at the second harvest. Our data suggest that two SPLAT Neo applications promote efficient control of N. elegantalis, resulting in significant reduction of fruit damage in tomato.

Keywords


1. Blackmer, J. L., Eiras, A.E, and Souza, C. L. M. 2001. Oviposition Preference of Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and Rates of Parasitism by Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) on Lycopersicon esculentum in São José de Ubá, RJ, Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol., 30: 89-95.
2. Bohnenblust, E., Hull, L. A. and Krawczyk, A. 2011. A Cmparison of Various Mating Disruption Technologies for Control of Two Internally Feeding Lepidoptera in Apples. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 138: 202–211.
3. Cardé, R.T. and Minks, A.K. 1995. Control of Moth Pests by Mating Disruption: Success and Constraints. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 40: 559-585.
4. Eiras, A. E. and Blackmer, J. L. 2003. Eclosion Time and Larval Behaviour of the Tomato Fruit Borer, Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Sci. Agric., 60: 195-197.
5. Fernández, S. and Salas, J. 1985. Estúdios Sobre la Biologia Del Perfurador del Tomate Neoleucinodes elegantalis Guenee (Lepidoptera: Pyraustidae). Agron. Trop., 35: 77-82.
6. Gravena, S. and Benvenga, S. R. 2003. Manual Prático para Manejo Ecológico de Pragas do Tomate. 1st Edition, Gravena-ManEcol LTDA, Jaboticabal, SP.
7. Green, R. H. 1993. Application of Repeated Measures Designs in Environmental Impact and Monitoring Studies. Aust. J. Ecol., 18: 81-98.
8. Härter, W. R., Grützmacher, A. D., Nava, D. E., Goncalves, R. S. and Botton, M. 2010. Isca Tóxica e Disrupção Sexual no Controle da Mosca-da-Fruta Sul-Americana e da Mariposa-Oriental em Pessegueiro. Pesq. Agropec. Bras., 45: 229-235.
9. Knight, A. L., Stelinski, L. L., Hebert, V., Gut, L., Light, D. and Brunner, J. 2012. Evaluation of Novel Semiochemical Dispensers Simultaneously Releasing Pear Ester and Sex Pheromone for Mating Disruption of Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Appl. Entomol., 136: 79–86.
10. Mafra-Neto, A. 2005. Supressão de Pragas com Feromônio Sexual. Isca Tecnológicas (Iscas Tecnológicas. Boletim Informativo), Vacaria.
11. Miller, J. R., Gut, L. J., de Lame, F. M. and Stelinski, L. L. 2006. Differentiation of Competitive vs. Non-competitive Mechanisms Mediating Disruption of Moth Sexual Communication by Point Sources of Sex Pheromone. Part I. Theory1. J. Chem. Ecol., 32: 2089–2114.
12. Paine, M. D. 1996. Repeated Measures Designs. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 15: 1439-1441.
13. Pastori, P. L., Arioli, C. J., Botton, M., Monteiro, L. B. and Mafra-Neto, A. 2008. Avaliação da Técnica de Disrupção Sexual Utilizando Emissores SPLAT Visando ao Controle de Bonagota salubricola (Meyrick) e Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidóptera: Tortricidae) na Pré-colheita de Maçãs da Cultivar ‘Fuji’. Bioassay, 3: 1-8.
14. Reis, P. R. and Souza, J. C. 1996. Controle da Broca-pequena, Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), com Inseticidas Fisiológicos, em Tomateiro Estaqueado. An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil, 25: 65-69.
15. Salas, J., Alvarez, C. and Parra, A. 1991. Contribuicion al Conocimiento de la Ecologia del Perforador del Fruto del Tomate Neoleucinodes elegantalis Guenee (Lepidóptera: Pyrastidae). Agron. Trop., 41: 275-284.
16. SAS Institute. 2001. PROC User's Manual, Version 8.02 TS level 2MO. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
17. Stelinski, L. L., Miller, J. R., Ledebuhr, R., Siegert, P. and Gut, L. J. 2007. Season-long Mating Disruption of Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by one Machine Application of Pheromone in Wax Drops (SPLAT-OFM). J. Pest. Sci., 80: 109–117.
18. Stelinski, L. L., Il’Ichev, A. L. and Gut, L. J. 2009. Efficacy and Release Rate of Reservoir Pheromone Dispensers for Simultaneous Mating Disruption of Codling Moth and Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Entomol. Soc. Amer., 102: 315-323.
19. Stelinski, L. L., Lapointe, S. L. and Meyer, W. L. 2010. Season-long Mating Disruption of Citrus Leafminer, Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton, with an Emulsified Wax Formulation of Pheromone. J. Appl. Entomol., 134: 512–520.
20. Stewart-Oaten, A., Murdoch, W. W. and Parker, K. R. 1986. Environmental Impact Assessment: “Pseudoreplication” in Time. Ecol., 67: 929-940.
21. Teixeira, L. A. F., Mason, K., Mafra-Neto, A. and Isaacs, R. 2010. Mechanically-applied Wax Matrix (SPLAT-GBM) for Mating Disruption of Grape Berry (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Crop Prot., 29: 1514-1520.
22. Witzgall, P., Stelinski, L., Gut, L. and Thomson, D. 2008. Codling Moth Management and Chemical Ecology. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 53: 503-522.
23. Youm, O., Maliki, Y., D. R. Hall, Farman, D. I. and Foster, J. E. 2012. Pheromone-mediated Mating Disruption in the Millet Stem Borer, Coniesta ignefusalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Crop Prot., 31: 50-57.
24. Zucchi, R. A., Silveira Neto, S. and Nakano, O. 1993. Guia de Identificação de Pragas Agrícolas. FEALQ, Piracicaba, SP.