Effect of Agricultural Research on Productivity and Rural Poverty: Evidence from Iran

Authors
A. Esmaeeli 1
H. Sedighi 2
1 Department of Agricultural Economics and Development, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Most developing countries have achieved productivity growth in economic sectors like agriculture for more than 30 years. Universities and governmental research centers have tried to generate knowledge with direct social and economic effects during these decades. So, productivity and production growth can be attributed to technological changes made possible through investment in agricultural research. Also, investment in agricultural research can have high economic returns as well as helps to reduce poverty. Thus, this study investigated the impact of agricultural research investment on productivity growth and poverty reduction in Iran during 1971-2010. To this end, first, an agricultural productivity trend was estimated. Then, the effects of agricultural research expenditure on productivity growth and poverty reduction were evaluated using a system of simultaneous equations. Results indicate that agricultural productivity grew during this time and agricultural research expenditure had positive effect on agricultural productivity and helped reduce poverty. Nonetheless, barriers like low adoption rate of improved agricultural technologies, lack of awareness of potential research benefits, weak extension systems and poor infrastructural development limited the impact of agricultural research on poverty reduction. Therefore, improving the operation of extension services as well as credit and input supply systems are instruments with which to raise returns to agricultural research investments.

Keywords

1. Akbari, N. and Ranjkesh, M. 2003. Survey of Total Factor Productivity Growth of Agricultural Sector in Iran, 1966-1996. J. Agri. Dev., (11): 44-34.
2. Alene, A. D. and Coulibaly, O. 2009. The Impact of Agricultural Research on Productivity and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy, 34: 198–209.
3. Alston, J. 2010. The Benefits from Agricultural Research and Development, Innovation, and Productivity Growth. Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, No. 31, OECD Food, OECD Publishing.
4. Alwang, J. and Siegel, P. 2003. Measuring the Impacts of Agricultural Research on Poverty Reduction. Agri. Econ., 29: 1–14.
5. Barnes, A. 2002. Publicly-funded UK Agricultural R and D and ‘Social’ Total Factor Productivity. Agri. Econ., 27: 65–74.
6. Bellon, M., Hodson, D. and Bergvinson, D. 2005. Targeting Agricultural Research to Benefit Poor Farmers: Relating Poverty Mapping to Maize Environments in Mexico. Food Policy, 30: 476–492.
7. Chen, S., Ravallion, M., 2007. Absolute Poverty Measures for the Developing World, 1981–2004. Background Paper, World Bank, Washington, DC., USA.
8. De Janvry, A. and Sadoulet, E. 2002. World Poverty and the Role of Agricultural Technology: Direct and Indirect Effects. J. Dev. Stud., 38(4): 1–26.
9. Fan, S., Hazell, P. & Thorat, S. 1999. Linkages between Government Spending, Growth, and Poverty in Rural India (Research Report No. 100). Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/rr110.pdf.
10. Fan, S. H., Fang. C. H. and Zhang, X. 2003. Agricultural Research and Urban Poverty: The Case of China. World Dev., 31(4): 733–741.
11. FAO. 2010. Statistical Databases 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). http://faostat.fao.org/site/291/default.aspx.
12. Fulginiti, L. E., Perrin, R. K., Yu, B., 2004. Institutions and Agricultural Productivity in Sub-Saharan. Africa. Agric. Econ. 31: 169-180.
13. IMF, 2010. World Economic Outlook Database. 2010. International Monetary Fund, Organization of the United Nations (IMF).http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2014/01/weodata/index.aspx.
14. Kerr, J. 2000. Assessing the Impact of Agricultural Research on Poverty Alleviation: Some Issues and Priorities. Food Policy, 25: 379–388.
15. Kuroda, Y. 1997. Research and Extension Expenditures and Productivity in Japanese Agriculture, 1960-1990. Agri. Econ., 16: 111 – 124.
16. Kurodauroda,Y. 1997. Research and Extension Expenditures and Productivity in Japanese Agriculture, 1960-1990. Agri. Econ., 16: 111 – 124.
17. Mahmoudi, W. 2002. Poverty Measurement in Iran. J. Business Res., (24): 27-57.
18. Maredia, M. and Raitzer, D. 2012. Review and Analysis of Documented Patterns of Agricultural Research Impacts in Southeast Asia. Agri. Sys., 106: 46–58.
19. Nkamleu, G., 2004. Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Change in African Agriculture. Afr. Dev. Rev. 16 (1): 203-222.
20. Otsuka, K. 2000. Role of Agricultural Research in Poverty Reduction: Lessons from the Asian Experience. Food Policy, 25: 447–462.
21. Rivera Huerta, R., Dutrénit, G. and Mario Ekboir, J. 2011. Do Linkages between Farmers and Academic Researchers Influence Researcher Productivity? The Mexican Case. Res. Polic. 40: 932– 942.
22. Rosegrant, M. W. and Hazell, P. B. R. 2000. Transforming the Rural Asia Economy: The Unfinished Revolution. Oxford University Press, Hong Kong.
23. Suhariyanto, K., Lusigi, A., Thirtle, C., 2001. Productivity Growth and Convergence in Asian and African Agriculture. In: “Africa and Asia in Comparative Economic Perspective” (Eds.): Lawrence, P., Thirtle, C. Palgrave, New York.
24. Thirtle, C., Lin, L. and Piesse, J. 2003. The Impact of Research-led Agricultural Productivity Growth on Poverty Reduction in Africa, Asia and Latin America. World Dev., 31(12): 1959–1975.
25. Von Braun, J., Fan, S. and Meinzen-Dick, R. 2005. International Agricultural Research for Food Security, Poverty Reduction, and the Environment. International Food Policy Research Institute, (IFPRI,
26. World Bank. 2007. World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 19, Issue 1
January and February 2017
Pages 21-32