Determination of Optimal Pattern of Conventional Agrarian Activities of Forest Fringe Villagers in Hezarjarib Area, Iran

Authors
N. Heidari
H. Amirnejad
S. A. Hosseini
Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
For the rural population, an improvement in the income of the agriculture and allied sectors is essential for improving the welfare, rural economic prosperity, and the overall economic development. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal pattern in various activities of forest fringe villagers of Hezarjarib area in 2013 for management of resources and rural development planning. For this purpose, the sample size was estimated to be 160 households out of a total of 472, by the use of proportional random sampling method. To collect data, we used a questionnaire whose reliability coefficient was determined as 0.81, by using the split-half method. The results of linear and goal programming model showed that, among the conventional activities of villagers, animal husbandry activity with the highest proportion played the key role in households’ welfare, representing 51.42% of the total income of household. Moreover, Goal Programing (GP) model was determined as a useful model to increase households’ welfare (10.42%) and reduce deforestation (74.6%). Accordingly, it is indicated that there is a potential to improve existing conditions and access to greater welfare in the study area. Thus, the production planning and guidance according to the above results can play an important role in villagers’ activity development.

Keywords

1. Aldea, J., Martínez-Peña, F., Romero, C. and Díaz-Balteiro, L. 2014. Participatory Goal Programming in Forest Management: An Application Integrating Several Ecosystem Services. J. For., 5: 3352-3371.
2. Amini Faskhodi, A., Noori, S. H. A. and Hejazi, S. R. 2008. Determining the Farmers Cultivated Pattern in Baraan Area in the East of Esfahan, with the Help of Multi-Criteria Goal Programming Approach. J. Agr. Econ., 2(4): 177-197.
3. Animal Husbandry Research Institute. 1971. Feed Resources for Livestock in Iran. Technical Report, No 8.
4. Ballarin, A., Vecchiato, D. Tempesta, T. Marangon, F. and Troiano, S. 2011. Biomass Production in Agriculture: A Weighted Goal Programming Analysis. Ener. Policy, 39: 1123-1131.
5. Cavendish, W. 2002. Quantitative Methods for Estimating the Economic Value of Resource Use to Rural Households. In: “Uncovering the Hidden Harvest: Valuation Methods for Woodland and Forest Resources”, (Eds.): Campbell, B. M. and Luckert, M. K. Earthscan Publications, London, UK, PP. 17-65.
6. Cochran, W. G. 1977. Sampling Techniques. Third Edition, Wiley, 428 PP.
7. Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. 1961. Management Models and Industrial Application of Linear Programming. Wiley, New York.
8. Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. 1977. Goal Programming and Multiple Objective Optimization: Parts 1. Eur. J. Ope. Res., 1: 39–54.
9. Dias, H. D. and Vikramanayak, B. W. E. 1998. Manual for Training in Rural Development Planning. Translated by Farid, N. Jihad Ministry, Tehran, 268 PP.
10. Flavell, R. B. 1976. A New Goal Programming Formulation. Omega, 4: 731-732.
11. Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Organization, Office of Public Relations and International State. 2009. Portrait of Iran Forests, Grasslands and Watershed. 85 PP.
12. Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Organization, Office of Public Relations and International State. 2012. Interviews with Forest Experts. December 8, Sari.
13. Fooks, J. R. and Messer, K. D. 2012. Maximizing Conservation and In-kind Cost Share: Applying Goal Programming to Forest Protection. J. For. Econ., 18: 207–217.
14. Ignizio, J. P. 1976. Goal Programming and Extensions. Lexington Books, Massachusetts.
15. Keramatzadeh, A., Chizari, A. H. and Moore, R. 2011. Economic Optimal Allocation of Agriculture Water: Mathematical Programming Approach. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 13: 477-490.
16. Kulej, M. 2011. Business Information Systems, Operations Research. Published by PRINTPAP Lodz, Wrocław University of Technology, PP. 1-70.
17. Rehman, T. and Romero, C. 1984. Multi-criteria Decision-making Techniques and Their Role in Livestock Ration Formulation. Agri. Sys.,15: 23–49.
18. Richard, H. and Adams, Jr. 2001. Non-farm Income, Inequality and Poverty in Rural Egypt and Jordan. PRMPO, MSN MC4-415, World Bank Publication, Washington, DC, 41 PP.
19. Romero, C. 2004. A General Structure of Achievement Functions for a Goal Programming Model. Euro. J. Ope. Res., 153:675–686.
20. Sabouhi, M. and Khosravi, M. 2009. Comparison of Economic and Environmental Pptimal Cropping Pattern in Zarghan Plain in Fars Province. J. Agr. Sci. Islamic Azad University Tabriz, 11: 61-70.
21. Sarker, R. A. and Quaddus, M. A. 2002. Modeling a Nationwide Crop Planning Problem Using a Multiple Criteria Decision Making Tool, Comput. Indust. Engin., 42: 541-553.
22. Seif, A. A. 2008. Measurement, Assessment and Educational Evaluation. Sixth Edition, Doran Publications, Tehran, 552 PP.
23. Sharma, D. K., Ghosh, D. and Alade, J. A. 2006. A Fuzzy Goal Programming Approach for Regional Rural Development Planning. J. App. Math. Com., 176: 141–149.
24. Soltani, A., Shamekhi, T. Noori Naeini, S. M. S. and Arabmazar, A. 2010. Effects of Forest Resources on Income Distribution and Poverty (Case Study: Watershed of Tang Tamoradi). PhD. Thesis of Forest Policy and Economics, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, I. R. Iran.
25. Tamiz, M., Jones, D. and Romero, C. 1998. Goal Programming for Decision Making: An Overview of the Current State-of-the-art. Eur. J. Ope. Res., 111: 569–581.
26. Xevi, E. and Khan, S. 2005. A Multi-objective Optimization Approach to Water Management. J. Env. Man., 77: 269–277.
27. Yaghoobi, M. A. and Tamiz, M. 2007. A Method for Solving Fuzzy Goal Programming Problems Based on MINMAX Approach. Eur. J. Ope. Res., 177: 1580-1590.
28. Yakhkeshi, A., 2006. Integrated Management in Caspian Forest with Participation of Local People. Published by MIRMAH, Tehran, PP. 1-103.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 19, Issue 1
January and February 2017
Pages 11-20