Determining Factors and Levels of E-skills among Agriculture Experts of Krishi Vigyan Kendras in India

Authors
R. B. Kale 1
M. S. Meena 2
P. P. Rohilla 3
1 Scientist (Agricultural Extension), ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Zone-VI, CAZRI Campus, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
2 Principal Scientist (Agricultural Extension), ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Zone-VI, CAZRI Campus, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
3 Principal Scientist (LPM), ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Zone-VI, CAZRI Campus, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Abstract
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is one of the emerging driving forces to disseminate the agricultural knowledge. Skilled extension personnel can grab these opportunities for the diffusion of agricultural technologies to farming community. Therefore, the present investigation measures E-skills among agricultural experts of Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs) — Farm Science Centers in Rajasthan and Gujarat states of India. Data were solicited from 87 proportionately selected agricultural experts from 29 KVKs. E-skills of experts were measured on 5-point Likert–type scale. The high level of E-skills among agricultural experts were identified in internet browsing, e-mailing, Micro-Soft (MS) Word, MS Power-Point and mobile use for sending the text messages. The agricultural experts’ training on ICTs had a positive and significant relationship with E-skills while experts’ age had a negtive effect. Elementary in use of ICT, analytical use of ICT, use of mobile phone for information communication and use of ICT for mass communication were the major factors that governed the E-skills. The total variance explained by these factors was found 74.88%. Tactical E-skills, informative E-skills, formal E-skills and communicative E-skills were identified as important levels of E-skills in order of their expertise. Hence, the study recommends to encourage the young professionals and to impart more ICT based trainings for improving the E-skills of agricultural experts towards tactical level of E-skills.

Keywords

1. Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V. and Day, G. S. 2003. Marketing Research. 8th Edition, Wiley, New York.
2. Ali, J. 2013. Farmers' Perspectives on Quality of Agricultural Information Delivery: A Comparison between Public and Private Sources. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 15: 685-696.
3. DiMaggio, P. and Hargittai, E. 2001. From the ‘Digital Divide’ to ‘Digital Inequality’: Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases. Working Paper Series 15, Princeton University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Princeton, NJ.
4. European E-skills Forum. 2004. E-skills for Europe: Towards 2010 and Beyond. Synthesis Report.
5. Francis, L., Katz, Y. and Jones, S. 2000. The Reliability and Validity of the Hebrew Version of the Computer Attitude Scale. Comput. Edu., 35(2):149-59.
6. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. and Anderson, R. E. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
7. Hargittai, E. 2003. How Wide a Web? Inequalities in Accessing Information Online. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
8. Kale, R. B., Babu, G. P., Mohammad, A., Meena, M. S., Vairagar, V. G. and Kad S. V. 2015a. Perceived Effect of Information and Communication Technology Use in the Performance of Dairy Scientists. Int. J. Appl. Res. Info. Tech. Comp., 6(1): 38-43.
9. Kale R. B., Meena M. S., Singh Y. V. and Meena, H. M. 2016b. Scientists’ Perception towards Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Agricultural Extension, Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett., 39(2): 91-93.
10. Kale, R. B., Rohilla, P. P., Meena, M. S. and Wadkar, S. K. 2015c. Information and Communication Technologies for Agricultural Knowledge Management in India, J. Glob. Comm., 8(1):16-22.
11. Kaushik, P. D. and Singh, N. 2004. Information Technology and Broad-Based Development: Preliminary Lessons from North India. World Dev., (32): 591-607.
12. Kumaran, M., Vimala D. D. and Nagarajan S. 2011. Perceived Skill Gaps of Fisheries Extension Officers vis-à-vis Shrimp Aquaculture. Indian J. Fish., 58(4): 147-153.
13. Livingstone, S., Van Couvering, E. and Thumim, N. 2005. Adult Media Literacy: A Review of the Research Literature. London, UK: Office of Communications (Of Com). Retrieved from http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consumer_guides/
14. Mahalakshmi, P., Deboral Vimala, D. and Krishnan, M. 2008. Development of e-learning Module on Mud Crab Fattening. Indian J. Ext. Educ., 44 (3 and 4): 22-26.
15. Maningas, R. V. 2006. Mainstreaming Farmers and Intermediaries into Information and Communications Technology (ICT): A Strategy towards Adopting ICT for Rural Development and Agricultural Extension. Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4th World Congress Conference, Proceedings of the 24-26 July 2006 Orlando, Florida (USA) Publication.
16. Meena, M. S., Singh, K. M., Meena, H. R. and Kanwat, M. 2012. Attitude: A Determinant of Agricultural Graduates’ Participation in Videoconferencing Technology. J. Agric. Sci., 4(1): 136-142.
17. Mittal, S. and Tripathi, G. 2009. Role of Mobile Phone Technology in Improving Small Farm Productivity. Agri. Eco. Res. Rev., 22: 451-59.
18. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J. and Stansbury, M. 2003. Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.
19. Movahedi R. and Nagel, U. J. 2012. Identifying Required Competencies for the Agricultural Extension and Education Undergraduates.J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 14: 727-742.
20. Mruthyunjaya and Adhiguru, P. 2005. ICT for Livelihood Security: A Reality Check, Mainstreaming ICTs, (22). March-April, 2005, One World South Asia, New Delhi. http://www.digitalopportunity.org/article/view/113295/1/1089 last accessed 12-11-2013
21. Norris, P. 2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Raabe, K. 2008. Reforming the Agricultural Extension System in India. What Do We Know About What Works Where and Why?. IFPRI Discussion Paper 775, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.
23. Saravanan, R. 2008. E-arik. In: “Transforming Government: E-government Initiatives in India”, (Eds.): Bagga R. K., and Gupta, P.. The ICFAI University Press, Hyderabad, PP. 260-269.
24. Sivakami, S. and Karthikeyan C. 2009. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Expert System for Performing Agricultural Extension Services in India. Expert Sys. Appl., 36: 9634-9636.
25. Steyaert, J. 2002. Inequality and the Digital Divide: Myths and Realities. In: “Advocacy, Activism and the Internet”, (Ed.): McNutt, S. H. J.. Lyceum Press, Chicago, PP. 199–211.
26. Tayade, A., Chinchmalatpure, U. R. and Supe, S. V. 2011. Information and Communication Technology Used by the Scientists in Krishi Vigyan Kendra and Regional Research Centre. J. Glob. Comm., 4 (1): 16-26.
27. Van Dijk, J. 2005. The Deepening Divide. Inequality in the Information Society. Sage, London, UK.
28. Van Deursen, A. J. and van Dijk, J. A. 2010. Measuring Internet Skills. Int. J. Human-Comp. Interaction, 26(10): 891–916.
29. Van Deursen, A. J., Courtois, C., and van Dijk, J. A. 2014. Internet Skills, Sources of Support and Benefiting from Internet Use. Int. J. Human-Comp. Interaction, 30(4): 278-290.
30. Warschauer, M. 2003. Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. Youssef, A. B., Dahmani, M. and Omrani, N. 2013. Information Technologies, Students’ E-skills and Diversity of Learning Process. Educ. Info. Technol., 20(1): 141-159.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 18, Issue 7
November and December 2016
Pages 1749-1760