Analyzing the Effects of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning on Agricultural Students Knowledge regarding Sustainable Water Resources Management: Case Study of Iran

Authors
A. R. Ommani 1
M. Chizari 2
A. Noorivandi 1
1 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Shoushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) is a new trend in educational sciences. This study investigates how knowledge sharing and transferring can be facilitated by using CSCL in a problem-solving setting. Intervention of research is education regarding Sustainable Water Resources Management (SWRM) by Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). The purpose of this research was to determine whether change of knowledge was accomplished after utilization of CSCL in agricultural MSc. and PhD. students of Science and Research Branch University, Ahwaz, Iran. Education by CSCL was accomplished in a two-week period. As a part of the experimental design, 173 university students were randomly assigned and divided to four groups. The first group with 43 students was labeled pretest-posttest treatment group (E). The second group, with 44 students, labeled pretest-posttest control group (C1), only received face to face education, which was known as the control group. Thus, we compared the effect of the treatment between the first and second group. The third group as the posttest-only treatment group (C2) received the CSCL, with 44 students, and the fourth group as posttest-only control group (C3) with 42 students did not receive the treatment. The results showed that there was significant difference between posttests knowledge score of C2 and C3, and E and C1. Also, there was a significant difference between pretest and posttest in the experimental group. This result indicated the impact of treatment (CSCL) on the knowledge level of students. In addition, F-test analysis showed there were significant differences among posttests in all groups.

Keywords

1. Ahmadi, N., Motallebzade, K. and Fatemi, M. A. 2014. The Effect of Cooperative Learning Strategies on Iranian Intermediate Students’ Writing Achievement. Open Acc. Lib. J., 1: 1-9. e961. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1100961
2. Ahmadpour, A., Mirdamadi, S. M. and Soltani, S. 2016. Attitude towards On-the-job E-Learning: The Case of Agricultural Extension Workers in Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 18 (1): 27-38.
3. Al-Bataineh, A., Anderson, S., Toledo, C. and Wellinski, S. 2008. A Study of Technology Integration in the Classroom. Int. J. Instr. Media, 35(4): 381-387.
4. Barajas, M. 2003. Virtual Learning Environments in Higher Education: A European View. University of Barcelona, Barcelona.
5. Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A. and Gijselaers, W. H. 2005. Computer Support for Knowledge Construction in Collaborative Learning Environments. Comput. Hum. Behav., 21: 623-643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.036.
6. Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. and Ciganek A. P. 2012. Critical Success Factors for E-Learning in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis between ICT Experts and Faculty. Comput. Educ., 58: 843-855.
7. Coffin, C. and O’Halloran, K. 2008. Researching Argumentation in Educational Contexts: New Directions, New Methods. Int. J. Res. Meth. Educ., 31(3): 219–227.
8. Crook, C. K. 2000. Motivation and the Ecology of Collaborative Learning. In: “Rethinking Collaborative Learning”, (Eds.): Joiner, R., Littleton, K., Faulkner, D. and Miell D.. London: Free Association Press, PP. 161-178.
9. Davies J., Graff M. (2005). Performance in E-learning: Online Participation and Student Grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4): 657-663.
10. Dillenbourg, P. 1999. What Do You Mean by 'Collaborative Learning'? In: “Collaborative E-Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches”, (Ed.): Dillenbourg P.. Elsevier, Oxford, PP. 1-15.
11. Drie, J., Boxtel, C., Jaspers, J. and Kanselaar, G. 2004. Effects of Representational Guidance on Domain Specific Reasoning in CSCL. Comput. Hum. Behav., 21(4): 575–602.
12. Gress, C. L. Z., Fior, M., Hadwin, A. F. and Winne, P. H. 2010. Measurement and Assessment in Computer-supported Collaborative Learning. Comput. Hum. Behav., 26(5): 806-814.
13. Guiller, J., Durndell, A. and Ross, A. 2008. Peer Interaction and Critical Thinking: Face-to-face or Online Discussion? Learn. Instr., 18(2): 187-200.
14. Groves, M. (2008). The Constructivist Approach in Adult Education. California State university, Monterey Bay.
15. Hung, D., Tan, S. C. and Chen, D. T. 2005. How the Internet Facilitates Learning as Dialog: Design Considerations for Online Discussions. Int. J. Instr. Media, 32(1): 37–46.
16. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. and Smith, K. 2007. The State of Cooperative Learning in Postsecondary and Professional Settings. Educ. Psychol. Rev., 19: 15–29.
17. Kala, S., Isaramalai, S. and Pohthong, A. 2010. Electronic Learning and Constructivism: A Model for Nursing Education. Nurs. Educ. Today, 30: 61–66.
18. Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J., Kreijns, K. and Beers, P. J. 2004. Designing Electronic Collaborative Learning Environments. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 52(3): 47-66.
19. Kollar, I., Fischer, F. and Slotta, D. J. 2007. Internal and External Scripts in Computer-supported Collaborative Inquiry Learning. ? Learn. Instr., 17(6): 708–721.
20. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W. and van Buuren, H. 2007. Measuring Perceived Sociability of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Comput. Educ., 49(2): 176–192.
21. Lee, Y. H. 2015. Facilitating Critical Thinking Using the C-QRAC Collaboration Script: Enhancing Science Reading Literacy in a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environment. Comput. Educ., 88: 182-191.
22. Magnisalis, I., Demetriadis, S. and Karakostas, A. 2011. Adaptive and Intelligent Systems for Collaborative Learning Support: A Review of the Field. IEEE T. Learn. Technol., 4(1): 5–20.
23. Masoumi, D and Lindstrom, B. 2012. E-Learning as a Cultural Artifact, an Empirical Study of Iranian Virtual Institutions. In: “Proceedings Cultural Attitudes Towards Technology and Communication 2012”, (Eds.): Strano, M., Hrachovec, H., Sudweeks, F. and Ess, C.. Murdoch University, Australia, PP. 393-409.
24. Noohi, E., Abbaszadeh, A and Sayad Bagher, M. 2013. Collaborative Learning and Communication Technology in Graduate Students’ Education. Future Med. Educ. J., 3(3): 15-19.
25. Noorivandi, A and Ommani, A.R. (2012). Analyzing the Immediate Effects of In-service Education on Expert Attitude Level Regarding the Importance of Soil Conservation by Using Solomon Four Group Design in Jihade Keshavarzi in Ahwaz Township. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(16): 2496-2501.
26. Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. A. J., Busstra, M. C., Mulder, M. and Chizari, M. 2011. Differences in Learning Processes between Successful and Less Successful Students in Computer-supported Collaborative Learning in the Field of Human Nutrition and Health. Comput. Hum. Behav., 27(1): 309–318.
27. Noroozi, O., Busstra, M. C., Mulder, M., Biemans, H. J. A., Tobi, H., Geelen, A., Veer, P. and Chizari, M. 2012. Online Discussion Compensates for Suboptimal Timing of Supportive Information Presentation in a Digitally Supported Learning Environment. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 60(2): 193-221.
28. Noroozi, O., Teasley, S. D., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A and Mulder, M. 2013a. Facilitating Learning in Multidisciplinary Groups with Transactive CSCL Scripts. Int. J. Comp-Supp. Coll., 8(2): 189-223.
29. Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, J. A., Mulder, M. and Chizari, M. 2013b. Facilitating Argumentative Knowledge Construction through a Transactive Discussion Script in CSCL. Comput. Educ., 61: 59–76.
30. Nuutinen, J., Sutinen, E., Botha, A. and Kommers, P. 2010. From Mindtools to Social Mindtools: Collaborative Writing with Woven Stories. Brit. J. Educ. Technol., 41(5): 753-775.
31. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P.A., Erkens,G and Jaspers, J. 2011. Group Awareness of Social and Cognitive Performance in a CSCL Environment: Effects of a Peer Feedback and Reflection Tool. Comput. Hum. Behav., 27(3): 1087–1102.
32. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J. and Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Awareness of Group Performance in a CSCL Environment: Effects of Peer Feedback and Reflection. Comput. Hum. Behav., 26(2): 151–161.
33. Piki, A. 2011. Learner Engagement in Computer-supported Collaborative Learning Environments: A Mixed-methods Study in Postgraduate Education. Thesis Submitted to the University of London for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Royal Holloway University, London.
34. Roberts, T. S. 2005. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning in Higher Education: An Introduction. In: “Computer-supported Collaborative Learning in Higher Education”, (Ed.): Roberts T. S.. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, PP. 1–18.
35. Sadeghi, H. and Kardan, A. A. 2015. A Novel Justice-based Linear Model for Optimal Learner Group Formation in Computer-supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Comput. Hum. Behav., 48: 436–447.
36. Sarmiento-Klapper, J. W. 2009. Sustaining Collaborative Knowledge Building: Continuity in Virtual Math Teams. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
37. Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. 2006. Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology. In: “The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Science”, (Ed.): Sawyer, R. K.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
38. Schoor, C. and Bannert, M. 2011. Motivation in a Computer-supported Collaborative Learning Scenario and Its Impact on Learning Activities and Knowledge Acquisition. Learn. Instr., 21: 560-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.11.002.
39. Shakibaei, Z., Khalkhali, A. and Andesh, M. 2011. Meta-analysis of Studies on Educational Technology in Iran. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 28: 923 – 927.
40. Shuttleworth, M. 2009. Solomon Four Group Design. Retrieved Dec. 30, 2013 from Explorable.com: http://explorable.com/solomon-four-group-design
41. Splitter, L. 2009. Authenticity and Constructivism in Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education. Springer Science and Business Media. Online at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/53t61n7634849x58
42. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. and Suthers, D. 2006. Computer-supported Collaborative Learning. In: “The Cambridge Handbook of The Learning Science”, (Ed.): Sawyer, R. K.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. and Suthers, D. 2006. Computer-supported Collaborative Learning: An historical perspective. In: “Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences” (Ed.): Sawyer, R. K.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, PP. 409-426. Retrieved from: http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/cscl/CSCL_English.pdf
44. Wilson, B. G. 1995. Metaphors for instruction: Why we talk about learning environments. Edu. Tech., 35(5): 25-30.
45. Zhang, L., Wen, H., Li, D. and Fu, Z. 2010. E-Learning Adoption Intention and Its Key Influence Factors based on Innovation Adoption Theory. Math. Comp. Model. Agri., 51: 1428–1432.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 18, Issue 7
November and December 2016
Pages 1735-1747