Qualitative and Physical Properties of Barley Grains under Terminal Drought Stress Conditions

Authors
1 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Sciences, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Molecular Physiology, Agriculture Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
3 Young Researchers and Elite club, Islamic Azad University, Arak Branch, Arak, Islamic Republic of Iran.
4 Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center of Yazd, Yazd, Islamic Republic of Iran.
5 Department of Agronomy, Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, University of Agricultural and Natural Resources, Mazandaran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Drought stress is the major limitation for crop yield, which depending on the time of occurrence, could decrease the number of grain as well as their weight. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is one of the tolerant cereals that its grain components have an important role in human and animal nutrition; however, physical and biochemical properties of grains affected through drought stress are still poorly understood. In this study, barley genotypes (n= 6) with different levels of drought tolerance were studied in a 2-year field experiment under well-watered and terminal drought stress conditions. In order to measure physical properties of grains, digital images were taken and some morphological features were obtained by using Image Analysis Toolbox of MATLAB software. Biochemical properties of grains were also measured. Results proved that size, weight and also quality of the grains were significantly affected by drought stress (P< 0.01). Grain starch content decreased and protein content increased under drought stress at anthesis stage in all genotypes, but drought-sensitive genotypes interestingly had more percentage increase in protein content. Furthermore, genotypes varied in total sugar, sucrose, glucose and fructose content. Drought stress affected grain size and finally 1,000-grain weight of barley genotypes by reducing area and minor axis length of grains. Correlations between 1,000-grain weight and minor axis length, grain area, starch and sucrose content were significant (P< 0.01). These results emphasized in both conditions that size-dependent features of grain particularly minor axis length and area may be serving as useful traits for estimation of 1,000-grain weight and biochemical properties in barley.

Keywords


1. Ahmadi, A. and Baker, D. A. 2001a. The Effect of Water Stress on Grain Filling Processes in Wheat. J. Agric. Sci., 136: 257-269.
2. Ahmadi, A. and Baker, D. A. 2001b. The Effect of Water Stress on the Activities of Key Regulatory Enzymes of the Sucrose to Starch Pathway in Wheat. Plant Growth Regul., 35: 81-91.
3. Alqudah, A. M., Samarah, N. H. and Mullen, R. E. 2011. Drought Stress Effect on Crop Pollination, Seed Set, Yield and Quality. In: “Alternative Farming Systems, Biotechnology, Drought Stress and Ecological Fertilization, Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 6”, (Ed.): Lichtfouse, E.. Springer, PP. 193- 215.
4. AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis of AOSC International. 16th Edition,. AOAC, Arlington, USA, 452 PP.
5. Baik, B. K. and Ullrich, S. E. 2008. Barley for Food: Characteristics, Improvement, and Renewed Interest. J. Cereal Sci., 48: 233-242.
6. Bannayan, M., Sanjani, S., Alizadeh, A., Lotfabadi, S. S. and Mohamadian, A. 2010. Association between Climate Indices, Aridity Index, and Rainfed Crop Yield in Northeast of Iran. Field Crop. Res., 118: 105-114.
7. Bleidere, M. 2008. Genetic and Environmental Effect on the Grain Quality of Spring Barley. Latvian J. Agron. (Agronomijas vēstis)., 11: 33-38.
8. Bradford, M. M. 1976. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-dye Binding. Anal. Biochem., 72: 248-254.
9. Burger, W. C. and LaBerge, D. E. 1985. Malting and Brewing Quality. In: “Barley”, (Ed.): Rasmussen, D. C.. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, PP. 367–401.
10. CGC. 2006. Official Grain Grading Guide. Canadian Grain Commission, Winnipeg Canada. Available in http://www.grainscanada.gc.ca/oggg-gocg/2013/06-barley-2013-eng.pdf.
11. Clarke, B., Liang, R., Morell, M., Bird, A., Jenkins, C. and Li, Z. 2008. Gene Expression in a Starch Synthase IIa Mutant of Barley: Changes in the Level of Gene Transcription and Grain Composition. Funct. Integr. Genom., 8: 211-221.
12. Cossani, C. M., Slafer, G. A. and Savin, R. 2009. Yield and Biomass in Wheat and Barley under a Range of Conditions in a Mediterranean Site. Field Crop. Res., 112: 205-213.
13. Dolferus, R., Ji, X. and Richards, R.A. 2011. Abiotic Stress and Control of Grain Number in Cereals. Plant Sci., 181: 331-341.
14. Duffus, C. 1992. Control of Starch Biosynthesis in Developing Cereal Grains. Biochem. Soc. Trans., 20: 13-18.
15. Fábián, A., Jäger, K., Rakszegi, M. and Barnabás, B. 2011. Embryo and Endosperm Development in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Kernels Subjected to Drought Stress. Plant Cell Rep., 30: 551-563.
16. Fox, G. P., Kelly, A., Poulsen, D., Inkerman, A. and Henry, R. 2006. Selecting for Increased Barley Grain Size. J. Cereal Sci., 43: 198-208.
17. González, A., Martin, I. and Ayerbe, L. 2008. Yield and Osmotic Adjustment Capacity of Barley under Terminal Water-stress Conditions. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 194: 81-91.
18. Jung, K. H., An, G. and Ronald, P. C. 2008. Towards a Better Bowl of Rice: Assigning Function to Tens of Thousands of Rice Genes. Nat. Rev. Genet., 9: 91-101.
19. Keeling, P., Bacon, P. and Holt, D. 1993. Elevated Temperature Reduces Starch Deposition in Wheat Endosperm by Reducing the Activity of Soluble Starch Synthase. Planta, 191: 342-348.
20. Majumdar, S. and Jayas, D. 2000. Classification of Cereal Grains Using Machine Vision. IV. Combined Morphology, Color, and Texture Models. Trans. ASAE, 43: 1689-1694.
21. Maleki Farahani, S., Chaichi, M. R., Mazaheri, D., Tavakkol Afshari, R. and Savaghebi, Gh. 2011. Barley Grain Mineral Analysis as Affected by Different Fertilizing Systems and by Drought Stress. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 13: 315-326.
22. Nicolas, M. E., Lambers, H., Simpson, R. J. and Dalling, M. J. 1985. Effect of Drought on Metabolism and Partitioning of Carbon in Two Wheat Varieties Differing in Drought-Tolerance. Ann. Bot., 55: 727-742.
23. Plaut, Z., Butow, B., Blumenthal, C. and Wrigley, C. 2004. Transport of Dry Matter into Developing Wheat Kernels and Its Contribution to Grain Yield under Post-anthesis Water Deficit and Elevated Temperature. Field Crop. Res., 86: 185-198.
24. Rizza, F., Ghashghaie, J., Meyer, S., Matteu, L., Mastrangelo, A. M. and Badeck, F. W. 2012. Constitutive Differences in Water Use Efficiency between Two Durum Wheat Cultivars. Field Crop. Res., 125: 49–60
25. Samarah, N., Alqudah, A., Amayreh, J. and McAndrews, G. 2009. The Effect of Late‐terminal Drought Stress on Yield Components of Four Barley Cultivars. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 195: 427-441.
26. Schulman, A. H., Runeberg-Roos, P. and Jääskeläinen, M. 2000. Grain Filling and Starch Synthesis in Barley. Dev. Crop Sci., 26: 147-167.
27. Shouche, S., Rastogi, R., Bhagwat, S. and Sainis, J. K. 2001. Shape Analysis of Grains of Indian Wheat Varieties. Comput. Electron. Agric., 33: 55-76.
28. Thitisaksakul, M., Jiménez, R. C., Arias, M. C. and Beckles, D. M. 2012. Effects of Environmental Factors on Cereal Starch Biosynthesis and Composition. J. Cereal Sci., 56: 67-80.
29. Ugarte, C., Calderini, D. F. and Slafer, G. A. 2007. Grain Weight and Grain Number Responsiveness to Pre-anthesis Temperature in Wheat, Barley and Triticale. Field Crop. Res., 100: 240-248.
30. Walker, C. K. and Panozzo, J. F. 2012. Measuring Volume and Density of a Barley Grain Using Ellipsoid Approximation from a 2-D Digital Image. J. Cereal Sci., 55: 61-68.
31. You, S. and Izydorczyk, M. 2007. Comparison of the Physicochemical Properties of Barley Starches after Partial α-Amylolysis and Acid/Alcohol Hydrolysis. Carbohydr. Polym., 69: 489-502.
32. Zhao, C., Liu, L., Wang, J., Huang, W., Song, X. and Li, C. 2005. Predicting Grain Protein Content of Winter Wheat Using Remote Sensing Data Based on Nitrogen Status and Water Stress. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 7: 1-9.
33. Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A Decimal Code for the Growth Stages of Cereals. Weed Res., 14: 415-421.