Phenology and Yield of Spring Maize (Zea mays L.) under Different Drip Irrigation Regimes and Planting Methods

Authors
H. Singh Brar 1
K. Kumar Vashist 1
S. Bedi 2
1 Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India.
2 Department of Botany, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India.
Abstract
Maize response to deficit water and planting methods was studied for assessing phenological development and yield under Punjab conditions. Experiment was planned with eleven (9+2) treatments; nine treatments were the combinations of three levels of Cumulative Pan Evaporation (CPE) i.e. Drip Irrigation (DI) to replenish 60, 80, and 100% of base (30 mm) CPE and three planting methods i.e. 1Row/Ridge, 1Row/Bed and 1Row (zigzag)/Bed. The additional two treatments i.e. flat and ridge sown, were kept as control. Each increase from DI60 to DI100 caused significant earliness in visibility of collar of the 8th leaf, tasselling, and silking and significant delay in dough stage and physiological maturity. Irrigation water applied was linearly related to the duration of the reproductive phase and grain yield. Higher Dry Matter (DM) production and longer reproductive phase led to significantly higher grain yield under DI100. All phenological stages were delayed under flat sown as compared to ridge sown control. Ridge sown was better than flat sown control with respect to DM and grain yield. Drip irrigation treatments showed advancement in tasselling and silking and significantly late physiological maturity with longer reproductive phase that resulted in significantly higher crop DM and grain yield as compared to the mean of the two control treatments. Crop phenology was affected by drip irrigation regimes and increase in drip irrigation regimes was linearly and positively related with length of reproductive phase. Thus, grain yield was also increased significantly. However, crop phenology and yield were not affected much by the planting methods used.

Keywords

1. Ahmed, R., Mahmood, A., Ikraam, M. and Hassan, B. 2002. Influence of Different Irrigation Methods and Band Placement of Nitrogen on Maize Productivity. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 4: 540-543.
2. Bakht, J., Ahmad, S., Tariq, M., Akber, H. and Shafi, M. 2006. Response of Maize to Planting Methods and Fertilizer Nitrogen. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 1: 8-14.
3. Bergez, J. E., Deumier, J. M., Lacroix, B., Leroy, P. and Wallach, D. 2002. Improving Irrigation Schedules by Using a Biophysical and a Decisional Model. Eur. J. Agron., 16: 123-135.
4. Cakir, R. 2004. Effect of Water Stress at Different Development Stages on Vegetative and Reproductive Growth of Maize. Field Crop. Res., 89: 1-16.
5. Dagdelen, N., Yilmaz, E., Sezgin, F. and Gurbuz, T. 2006. Water-yield Relation and Water Use Efficiency of Cotton and Second Crop Corn in Western Turkey. Agric. Water Manage., 82: 63-85.
6. El-Hendawy, S. E., Hokam, E. M. and Schmidhalter, U. 2008. Drip Irrigation Frequency: The Effects and Their Interaction with Nitrogen Fertilization on Sandy Soil Water Distribution, Maize Yield and Water Use Efficiency under Egyptian Conditions. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 194: 180-192.
7. EL-Tantawy, M., Ouda, S. A. and Khallil, F. 2007. Irrigation Scheduling for Maize Grown under Middle Egypt Conditions. Res. J. Agric. Bio. Sci., 3: 456-462.
8. Fairweather, H., Austin, N. and Hope, H. 2003. Water Use Efficiency: An Information Package. Land and Water, Canberra, Australia.
9. Farre, I. and Faci, J. M. 2006. Comparative Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to Deficit Irrigation in a Mediterranean Environment. Agric. Water Manage., 83: 135-143.
10. Herrero, M. P. and Johnson, R. R. 1981. Drought Stress and Its Effects on Maize Reproductive Systems. Crop Sci., 21: 105-110.
11. Howell, T. A., Yazar, A., Schneider, A. D., Dusek, D. A. and Copeland, K. S. 1995. Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Maize in Response to LEPA Irrigation. Trans. ASAE, 38: 1737-47.
12. Hussaini, M. A., Ogunlela, V. B., Ramalan, A. A. and Falaki, A. M. 2001. Growth and Development of Maize (Zea mays L.) in Response to Different Levels of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Irrigation. Crop Res., 22: 141-149.
13. Jackson, M. L. 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis. Constable and Co. Ltd., 10 Orange St., London, WCZ.
14. Jat, M. L., Pal, S. S, Singh, R., Singh, D. and Gill, M. S. 2008. Effect of Moisture Regimes and Nitrogen Management Options on Crop and Water Productivity and Nitrogen-use Efficiency in Maize (Zea mays L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivium) Cropping Systems. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 78: 881-883.
15. Kumar, A. 2008. Growth, Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Different Maize (Zea mays L.)-based Cropping Systems under Varying Planting Methods and Irrigation Levels. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 78: 244-47.
16. Mahant, and Aggarwal, G. C. 1991. Effect of Irrigation and Straw Mulch on Canopy Temperature of Maize. J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ., 28: 472-478.
17. Mehta, S. 2009. Physiological Basis of Yield Behavior under Different Planting Methods and Nitrogen Levels in Winter Maize. PhD. Dissertation, Department of Botany, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
18. Minhas, P. S., Jalota, S. K., Arora, V. K., Jain, A. K., Vashist, K. K., Choudhary, O. P., Kukkal, S. S. and Vashist, B. B. 2010. Managing Water Resources for Ensuing Sustainable Agriculture: Situational Analysis and Options for Punjab. Research Bulletin No. 2/2010. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhaina, India.
19. Mohammadzadeh, S., Sadighi, H. and Rad, G. P. 2014. Modeling the Process of Drip Irrigation System Adoption by Apple Orchardists in the Barandooz River Basin of Urmia Lake Catchment, Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 16: 1253-66.
20. Moser, S. B., Feil, B., Jampatong, S. and Stamp, P. 2006. Effects of Pre-anthesis Drought, Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate and Variety on Grain Yield, Yield Components and Harvest Index of Tropical Maize. Agric. Water Manage., 81: 41-58.
21. Mugalkhod, A.S., Shivamurthy, D., Kumar, A. and Biradar, M. S. 2011. Growth Parameters of Baby Corn (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Planting Methods and Irrigation Schedules under Drip. Plant Archiv., 11: 539-541.
22. Mwale, S. S., Azam-Ali, S. N. and Massawe, F. J. 2007a. Growth and Development of Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea) in Response to Soil Moisture. 1. Dry Matter and Yield. Eur. J. Agron., 26: 345-353.
23. Mwale, S. S., Azam-Ali, S. N. and Massawe, F. J. 2007b. Growth and Development of Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea) in Response to Soil Moisture. 2. Resource Capture and Conversion. Eur. J. Agron., 26: 354-362.
24. Narang, R. S., Singh, N., Barr, R. S. and Mahal, S. S. 1989. Water Management in Winter Maize Grown on Sandy Loam Soils. Indian J. Agron., 36: 4-7.
25. NeSmith, D. S. and Ritchie, J. T. 1992. Short and Long-term Responses of Maize to a Pre-anthesis Soil Water Deficit. Agron. J., 84: 107-113.
26. Nielsen, R. L. 2002. Corn Growth and Development: What Goes on from Planting to Harvest. (http://www.agry.purdue.edu/Ext/pubs/AGRY-97-07_v1-1.pdf)
27. Olsen, R., Cole, C. V., Watenabale, F. S. and Dean, L. A. 1954. Estimation of Available Phosphorus by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. USDA Circ., 933: 19.
28. Piper, C. S. 1966. Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans Publishers, Bombay, India.
29. Rangaswamy, R. 1995. A Text Book of Agricultural Statistics. New Age International Publishers limited, New Delhi, PP. 358-362.
30. Sandhu, B. S. and Hundal, S. S. 1991. Effect of Method and Date of Sowing on Phenophases and Productivity of Winter Maize (Zea mays). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 61: 178-181.
31. Sharma, P. K. 1991. Method for conserving moisture in dry land. Indian Fmg. 41: 21-24.
32. Singh, K. 2005. Performance of Spring Planted Maize in Relation to Planting Dates, Methods of Sowing and Nitrogen Levels. MSc. Thesis, Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhaina, India.
33. Singh, M. 2011. Growth, Yield and Water Productivity of Spring Planted Hybrid Maize (Zea mays L.) Cultivars as Influenced by Method and Time of Planting and Irrigation Regimes. PhD. Dissertation, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. India.
34. Subbiah, B. V. and Asija, G. L. 1956. A Rapid Procedures for the Estimation of Available Nitrogen in Soils. Curr. Sci., 25: 259-60.
35. Traore, S. B., Carlson, R. E., Pilcher, C. D. and Rice, M. E. 2000. Bt and Non-Bt maize Growth and Development as Affected by Temperature and Drought Stress. Agron. J., 92: 1027-1035.
36. Viswanatha, G. B., Ramachandrappa, B. K. and Nanjappa, H. V. 2002. Soil-plant Water Status and Yield of Sweet Corn (Zea mays L. Saccharata) as Influenced by Drip Irrigation and Planting Methods. Agric. Water Manage., 55: 85-91.
37. Wang, J. D., Gong, S. H., Sui, J., Xu, H. and Yu, Y. D. 2008. Effects of Drip Irrigation Frequency on the Farmland Soil Water-heat Distribution and Spring Maize Growth in North China. Trans. Chin Soc. Agric. Eng., 24: 39-45.
38. Wang, Q., Wang, P., Yang, X., Zhai, Z., Wang, X. and Shen, L. 1993 Effects of Nitrogen Application Time on Root Distribution and Its Activity in Maize (Zea mays L.). Sceintia Agri. Sin., 12: 136-141.
39. Westgate, M. E. 1994. Water Status and Development of the Maize Endosperm and Embryo during Drought. Crop Sci., 34: 76-83.
40. Westgate, M. E. and Boyer, J. S. 1985. Carbohydrate Reserves and Reproductive Development at Low Leaf Water Potentials in Maize. Crop Sci., 25: 762-769.
41. Winkel, T., Renno, J. F., Payne, W. A. 1997. Effect of the Timing of Water Deficit on Growth, Phenology and Yield of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) Grown in Sahelian Conditions. J. Exp. Bot., 48: 1001-1009.
42. Wopereis, M. C. S., Ropff, M., Maligaya, A. and Tuong, T. 1996. Drought-stress Responses of Two Lowland Rice Cultivars to Soil Water Status. Field Crop Res., 46: 21-39
43. Yang, C. M., Fan, M. J. and Hsiang, W. M. 1993. Growth and Yield Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) to Soil Water Deficits. II. Effects of Water Deficit Timing and Strength. J. Agric. Res. China, 42: 173-180.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 18, Issue 3
May and June 2016
Pages 831-843