Some Physicochemical Properties of Date Syrup, Concentrate, and Liquid Sugar in Comparison with Sucrose Solutions

Authors
M. Mardani 1
M. T. Golmakani 2
G. Mesbahi 2
1 School of Biomedical Sciences, Graham Center for Agricultural Innovation and Functional Grains Center, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
2 Department of Food Science and Technology, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
The date fruit is of high nutritional value and its chemical composition is unique in providing energy, minerals, and vitamins for human. Date syrup, date concentrate and liquid date sugar are among semi-finished liquid products produced from low quality dates at industrial scale. In this research, some physicochemical properties of date syrup, concentrate, and liquid sugar in comparison with sucrose solutions were studied and the possibility of replacing sucrose with date liquid products was investigated. The results showed that the main chemical component of all three date products was simple sugars of fructose and glucose. Ash and protein contents of date liquid sugar were much lower than date syrup. pH values of date liquid products were also significantly different. Concentration of total phenolic and flavonoid compounds in date syrup was much greater than date liquid sugar. Overall, processing of date syrup to date liquid sugar reduced its nutritional quality while improving technological properties. It can be concluded that in choosing date liquid products as raw materials in food formulation, for the products that brown color of date liquid products does not affect the appearance of the final products, usage of date syrup or date concentrate is proposed. However, in other foods where brownish color of date syrup or date concentrate deteriorates sensory attributes of the final products, date liquid sugar is suggested. Date liquid products are also good candidates for high sugar products with sugar crystallization problem.

Keywords

1. Abbès, F., Kchaou, W., Blecker, W., Ongena, M., Lognay, G., Attia, H. and Besbes, S. 2013. Effect of Processing Conditions on Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Properties of Date Syrup. Ind. Crop. Prod., 44: 634-642.
2. Ahmed, I. A. and Ahmed, W. K. 1995. Chemical Composition of Date Varieties as Influenced by the Stage of Ripening. Food Chem., 54: 305–309.
3. Ahmed, J. and Ramaswamy, H. S. 2006. Physico-chemical Properties of Commercial Date Pastes (Phoenix dactylifera). J. Food Eng., 76: 348-352.
4. Al-Farsi, M. A. and Lee, Ch. Y. 2008. Nutritional and Functional Properties of Dates: A Review. Critical Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 48: 877-887.
5. Al-Hooti, S. N., Sidhu, J. S., Al-Saqer, J. M. and Al-Othman, A. 2002. Chemical Composition and Quality of Date Syrup as Affected by Pectinase/Cellulase Enzyme Treatment. Food Chem., 79: 215-220.
6. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 16th Edition, Ed. by Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
7. AOAC. 1997. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 16th Edition, Ed. by Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
8. Brand-Williams, W., Culivier, M. E. and Berset, C. 1995. Use of a Free Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity. LWT–Food Sci. Tech., 28: 25-30.
9. Brasil, I. M., Maia, G. A. and Figueiredo, R. W. 1995. Physical-chemical Changes during Extraction and Clarification of Guava Juice. Food Chem., 54: 383-386.
10. Caliskan, O. and Polat, A. A. 2011. Phytochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Selected Fig (Ficus carica L.) Accessions from the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Scientia Hortic., 128: 473-478.
11. Cepeda, E. and Villaran, M. C. 1999. Density and Viscosity of Malus Floribunda Juice as a Function of Concentration and Temperature. J. Food Eng., 41: 103-107.
12. Chen, H. J., Chung, C. P., Chiang, W. and Lin, Y. L. 2011. Anti-inflammatory Effects and Chemical Study of a Flavonoid-enriched Fraction from Adlay Bran. Food Chem., 126: 1741–1748.
13. Dillard, C. J. and German, J. B. 2000. Phytochemicals: Nutraceuticals and Human Health. J. Sci. Food Agric., 80: 1744-1756.
14. Dragsted, L. O., Strube, M. and Larsen, J. C. 1993. Cancer-protective Factors in Fruits and Vegetables: Biochemical and Biological Background. Pharmaco. Toxico., 72: 116-135.
15. Drewnowski, A., Nordensten, K. and Dwyer, J. 1998. Replacing Sugar and Fat in Cookies: Impact on Product Quality and Preference. J. Food Quality Pref., 9: 13-20.
16. El-Sharnouby, G. A., Al-Eid S. and Al-Otaibi, M. 2009. Utilization of Enzymes in the Production of Liquid Sugar from Dates. African J. Biochem. Res., 3(3): 041-047.
17. Fallico, B., Zappala, M., Arena, E. and Verzera, A. 2004. Effects of Conditioning on HMF Content in Unifloral Honeys, Food Chem., 85: 305–313.
18. Khalil, M. I., Sulaiman, S. A. and Gan, S. H. 2010. High 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Concentrations Are Found in Malaysian Honey Samples Stored for More than One Year. Food Chem. Toxicol., 48: 2388–2392.
19. Farahnaky, A., Farhat, I. A., Mitchell J. R. and Hill, S. E. 2009. The Effect of Sodium Chloride on the Glass Transition of Potato and Cassava Starches at Low Moisture Contents. Food Hydroco., 23(6) 1483-1487.
20. Fuhrman, B., Lavy, A. and Aviram, M. 1995. Consumption of Red Wine with Meals Reduces the Susceptibility of Human Plasma and Low-density Lipoprotein to Lipid Peroxidation. Am. J. Clinic. Nutr., 61: 549-554.
21. Iran National Standard Organization. 2013. Date Syrup-specifications and Tests Methods: 5075, Tehran, Iran.
22. Joseph, J. A., Shukitt-Hale, B., Denisova, N. A., Bielinski, D., Martin, A., McEwen, J. J. and Bickford, P. C. 1999. Reversals of Age Related Declines in Neuronal Signal Transduction, Cognitive, and Motor Behavioral Deficits with Blueberry, Spinach, or Strawberry Dietary Supplementation. J. NeuroSci., 19: 8114-8121.
23. Lo Coco, F., Valentini, C., Novelli, V. and Ceccon, L. 1996. High-performance Liquid Chromatographic Determination of 2-Furaldehyde and 5-Hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde in Honey. J. Chromatograph. A, 749: 95-102.
24. Lu, X., Wang, J., Al-Qadiri, H. M., Ross, C. F., Powers, J. R., Tang, J. and Rasco, B. A. 2011. Determination of Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Capacity of Onion (Allium cepa) and Shallot (Allium oschaninii) Using Infrared Spectroscopy. Food Chem., 129: 637-644.
25. Okuda, T., Yoshida, T. and Hatano, T. 1992. Antioxidant Effects of Tannins and Related Phenols. In: “Phenolic Compounds in Foods and Their Effect on Health”, (EdS.): Huang, M. T., Ho, C. T. and Lee, C. Y.. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
26. Oroian, M. 2012. Physicochemical and Rheological Properties of Romanian Honeys. Food Biophy., 7(4): 296-307.
27. Prior, R. L. and Cao, G. 2000. Antioxidant Phytochemicals in Fruits and Vegetables: Diet and Health Implications. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 35: 588-592.
28. Renaud, S. and De Lorgeril, M. 1992. Wine, Alcohol, Platelets, and the French Paradox for Coronary Heart Disease. Lancet, 339: 1523-1526.
29. Sablani, S. S., Shrestha, A. K. and Bhandari, B. R. 2008. A New Method of Producing Date Powder Granules: Physicochemical Characteristics of Powder. J. Food Eng., 87: 416–421.
30. Wargovich, M. J. 2000. Anticancer Properties of Fruits and Vegetables. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 35: 573-575.
31. Zuritz, C. A., Puntes, E. M., Mathey, H. H., Perez, E. H., Gascon, A., Rubio, L. A., Carullo, C. A., Chernikoff, R. E. and Cabeza, M. S. 2005. Density, Viscosity and Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of Clear Grape Juice at Different Soluble Solid Concentrations and Temperatures. J. Food Eng., 71: 143-149.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 18, Issue 3
May and June 2016
Pages 657-668