Tillage, Crop Establishment, and Weed Management for Improving Productivity, Nutrient Uptake, and Soil Physico-chemical Properties in Soybean-wheat Cropping System

Authors
A. Monsefi 1
A. R. Sharma 2
N. Rang Zan 3
1 Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
2 Directorate of Weed Science Research, Jabalpur, India.
3 Department of Soil Science, University of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Ramin, Mollasani, Khozestan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
The effect of tillage (conventional and zero tillage), crop establishment (raised-bed and flat-bed), and weed management practices (herbicide alone and integrated approach) was studied on productivity, profitability, nutrient uptake and physico-chemical properties of soil in soybean–wheat cropping system, at New Delhi during 2010–2012. Sixteen treatment combinations consisting of four tillage and crop establishment practices, viz. Conventional Tillage–raised-bed (CT–bed), CT–flat-bed, Zero Tillage–raised-bed (ZT–bed) and ZT–flat-bed; and four weed management practices, viz. unweeded control, herbicide+Hand Weeding (HW), herbicide combination, and crop residue + herbicide were laid out in a split-plot design. Soybean produced higher seed yield (+7.6%) under raised-bed and wheat under flat-bed (+6.2%), but the system productivity was highest under CT–flat-bed. Pre-emergence application of pendimethalin followed by HW gave higher yield of soybean, while all weed control treatments were found equally good for wheat. Conventional tillage resulted in higher uptake by soybean of N (+5.0%), P (+4.4%) and K (+3.1%) than ZT, particularly under raised-bed conditions. In wheat, CT and ZT resulted in almost similar nutrient uptake under flat-bed. Total nutrient uptake of the system was similar for N and P under all tillage and crop establishment practices, while herbicide+HW gave 4.9–7.2% higher uptake than herbicide combination or crop residue+herbicide. Net benefit: cost ratio of the system was the highest (> 2.0) under ZT–flat-bed and herbicide combination. There was beneficial effect on physico-chemical properties of soil under ZT and residue application, but it is necessary to run the experiment in long-term to see the cumulative effect over time.

Keywords

1. Acharya, C. L. and Sood, M. C. 1992. Effect of Tillage Methods on Soil Physical Properties and Water Expense of Rice on an Acidic Alfisol. J. Indian Soci. Soil. Sci., 40: 409-414.
2. Azooz, R. H. and Arshad, M. A. 1996. Soil Infiltration and Hydraulic Conductivity under Long-term No-tillage and Conventional Tillage Systems. Can. J. Soil Sci., 76: 143-152.
3. Behera, U. K., Sharma, A. R. and Pandy, H. N. 2007. Sustaining Productivity of Wheat–soybean Cropping System through Integrated Nutrient Management Practices on the Vertisols of Central India. Plant Soil, 297: 185-199.
4. Bhattacharyya, R., Prakash, V., Kundu, S. and Gupta, H. S. 2006. Effect of Tillage and Crop Rotations on Pore Size Distribution and Soil Hydraulic Conductivity in Sandy Clay Loam Soil of the Indian Himalayas. Soil Till. Res., 86: 129-140.
5. Buschiazzo, D. E., Panigatti, J. L. and Unger, P. W. 1998. Tillage Effects on Soil Properties and Crop Production in the Sub-Humid and Semi-Arid Argentinean Pampas. Soil Till. Res., 49: 105-116.
6. FAO. 2010. Investing in Sustainable Crop Intensification: The Case for Soil Health: Report of the International Technical Workshop. Integrated Crop Management, FAO, Rome, 6. On WWW at: http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/.
7. Jat, M. L., Srivastava, A., Sharma, S. K., Gupta, R. K., Zaidi, P. H., Rai, H. K. and Srinivasan, G. 2005. Evaluation of Maize-wheat Cropping System under Double-no-till Practice in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. In: Paper Presented in the 9th Asian Regional Maize Workshop, September 6-9, Beijing, China.
8. Kumar, M. and Das, T. K. 2008. Integrated Weed Management for System Productivity and Economics in Soybean (Glycine max)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) System. Indian J. Agro., 53(3): 189-194.
9. Monsefi, A., Sharma, A. R. and Das, T. K. 2013. Conservation Tillage and Weed Management for Improving Productivity, Nutrient Uptake and Profitability of Soybean (Glycine max) Grown after Wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian J. Agro., 58(4): 570-577.
10. Obalum, S. E. and Obi, M. E. 2010. Physical Properties of a Sandy Loam Ultisol as Affected by Tillage-mulch Management Practices and Cropping Systems. Soil Till. Res., 108: 30-36.
11. Ram, H., Kler, D. S., Singh, Y. and Kumar, K. 2010. Productivity of Maize (Zea mays) – Wheat (Triticum aestivum) System under Different Tillage and Crop Establishment Practice. Indian J. Agro., 55(3): 185-190.
12. Sayre, K. D., Limon-Ortega, A. and Govaerts, B. 2005. Experiences with Permanent Bed Planting Systems CIMMYT/Mexico. In: “Evaluation and Performance of Permanent Raised Bed Cropping Systems in Asia, Australia and Mexico”, (Eds.): Roth C. H., Fischer R. A. and Meisner, C. A.. Proceedings of a Workshop Held in Griffith, Australia, ACIAR Proceedings 121, ACIAR, Griffith, PP. 12–25.
13. Shaver, T. M., Petrson, G.A., Ahuja, L. R., Westfall, D. G., Sherrod, L. A. and Dunn, G. 2002. Surface Soil Physical Properties after Twelve Years of Dry Land No-till Management. Soil Sci. Soc. Ame. J., 66: 1296-1303.
14. Sheibani, S. and Ghadiri, H. 2012. Integration Effects of Split Nitrogen Fertilization and Herbicide Application on Weed Management and Wheat Yield. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 14(1): 77- 86.
15. Vaezi, A. R. and Bahrami, H. A. 2014. Relationship between Soil Productivity and Erodibility in Rainfed Wheat Lands in Northwestern Iran. J. Agri. Sci. Tech., 16: 1455-1466.
16. Yaduraju, N. T. and Mishra, J. S. 2002. Zero-tillage in Rice–wheat Cropping System on Vertisols in Madhya Pradesh: Prospects and Problems. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Herbicide Resistance Management and Zero-tillage in Rice–wheat Cropping System, March 4–6, 2002. CCSHAU, Hisar India, PP. 117–119.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 18, Issue 2
March and April 2016
Pages 411-421