Utilizing Deficit Irrigation to Enhance Growth Performance and Water-use Efficiency of Eggplant in Arid Environments

Author
Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Mutah University P.O. Box 7, Karak 61710, Jordan.
Abstract
The objective of this research was to investigate the effects of deficit irrigation on physiological and agronomic terms of eggplant to maximize the Water Use Efficiency (WUE) without affecting the final yield and fruit quality parameters under arid environment. Therefore, two field experiments were conducted at two different sites: Ghor Al-Safi, Jordan Valley and Sail Al-Karak, Karak Valley, Karak Province, Jordan, using a common eggplant cultivar (Classic) using five irrigation levels: 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% based on field capacity. The most stressful Deficit Irrigation (DI) treatments (40 and 20%) resulted in significant effects on leaf area, leaf relative water content, leaf water potential and leaf mineral content. Biochemical parameters also showed an increase in proline and a decrease in chlorophyll content under water deficit conditions. Fruit weight and total yield decreased with DI. The control (100% irrigation treatment) plants revealed higher nutrient contents than the water-stressed plants. The fruit TSS and titratable acidity were increased at both sites as the irrigation regime decreased from 100 to 20%. Fruit nutrient content decreased with increasing water deficit. However, the differences were not significant between the control (100% irrigation treatment) and the 80% irrigation treatment. The 80% treatment showed high water use efficiency with relatively small effects on plant growth performance compared with the control. As a result, DI level at 80% can be utilized to increase WUE without a significant effect on crop growth performance.

Keywords


1. Abd El-Aal, F. S., Abdel Mouty, M. M. and Ali, A. H. 2008. Combined Effect of Irrigation Intervals and Foliar Application of Some Antitranspirants on Eggplant Growth, Fruits Yield and Its Physical and Chemical Properties. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 4(5): 416-423.
2. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Requirements: Irrig. Drain. Paper No. 56. FAO, Rome, Italy.
3. Amiri, E., Abdzad Gohari, A. and Esmailian, Y. 2012. Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen on Yield, Yield Components and Water Use Efficiency of Eggplant. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 11(13): 3070-3079.
4. Aziz, S. A., Ahmad, S. T., Rasheed, B. A., Sharef, H. B. and Talb, D. H. 2013. The Impacts of Deficit Irrigation Levels and Intervals on Tomatoes and Eggplants Yield in Unconditions Plastic House. J. Zankoy Sulaimani Part A, 15(2): 125-135.
5. Barrs, H. D. and Weatherley, P. E. 1962. A Re-examination of the Relative Turgidity Technique for Estimating Water Deficits in Leaves. Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 15: 413-28.
6. Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P. and Teare, I. D. 1973. Rapid Determination of Free Proline for Water Stress Studies. Plant Soil, 39: 205-207.
7. Bharambe, P. R. and Joshi, P. S. 1993. Effect of Soil Water Potential on Growth, Yield and Some Biochemical Changes in Sorghum. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 41(2): 342-343.
8. Chapman, H. D. and Pratt, P. F. 1982. Method and of Analysis of Soil, Plant and Water. 2nd Edition, California University Agricultural Division, California, 170 PP.
9. Correia, F. N. 1999. Water Resources in Mediterranean Region. Water Int., 24(1): 22-30.
10. Cox, E. F. 1972. A Photoelectric Digital Scanner for Measuring Leaf Area. New Phytol., 71 (5): 819-823.
11. Demirel, K., Genc, L., Bahar, E., Inalpulat, M., Smith, S. and Kizil, U. 2014. Yield Estimate Using Spectral Indices in Eggplant and Bell Pepper Grown Under Deficit Irrigation. Fresen. Environ. Bull., 23 (5): 1232-1237.
12. Ebrahim, A., Gohari1, A. A. and Esmailian, Y. 2012. Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen on Yield, Yield Components and Water Use Efficiency of Eggplant. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 11(13): 3070-3079.
13. Gleick, P. H. 2000. The World’s Water 2000–2001. Island Press, Washington, DC.
14. Heuer, B. and Nadler, A. 1998. Physiological Response of Potato Plants to Soil Salinity and Water Deficit. Plant Sci., 137: 43-51.
15. Honda, N. 1971. Influence of Soil Moisture on Growth and Leaf Properties of Tobacco. III. On the Absorption of Mineral Nutrients. Bull. Okayama Prefectural Agric. Exp. Station, 30: 37-41.
16. Inskeep, W. P. and Bloom, P. R. 1985. Extinction Coefficients of Chlorophyll a and b in N, N-dimethylformamide and 80% Acetone. Plant Physiol., 77: 483-485.
17. Javadi, T., Arzani, K. and Ebrahimzadeh, H. 2008. Study of Proline, Soluble Sugar, and Chlorophyll a and b Changes in nine Asian and One European Pear Cultivar under Drought Stress. Acta Hortic., 769: 241-246.
18. Jordan Valley Authority (JVA). 2006. Reclaimed Water Irrigation in the Jordan Valley, Practical Recommendations for Farmers and Extension Workers. GTZ Project, Jordan.
19. Kirnak, H., Kaya, G., Tas, I. and Higgs, D. 2001. The Influence of Water Deficit on Vegetative Growth, Physiology, Fruit Yield and Quality in Eggplant. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol., 27(3-4): 34-46.
20. Kirnak, H., Tas, I., Kaya, C. and Higgs, D. 2002. Effects of Deficit Irrigation on Growth, Yield, and Fruit Quality of Eggplant under Semi-arid Conditions. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 53: 1367-1373.
21. Klute, A. 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Physical and Mineralogical Properties. 2nd Edition, Agronomy, American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science of America, Madison, WI, 9.
22. Liu, Y., Fiskum, G. and Schubert, D. 2002. Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species by Mitochondrial Electron Transport Chain. J. Neurochem., 80: 780-787.
23. Mahadeen, A., Mohawesh, O., Al-Absi, K. and Al-Shareef, W. 2011. Effect of Irrigation Regimes and Frequency on Water Use Efficiency and Tomato Fruit (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Grown under an Arid Rnvironment. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 57: 105-114.
24. Mohawesh, O. and Al-Absi, K. 2009. Physiological Response of Two Apple Genotypes to Different Water Regimes under Semiarid Conditions. Adv. Hortic. Sci., 23(3): 158-165.
25. Mohawesh, O., Al-Absi1, K. and Tadros, M. 2010. Effect of Antitranspariant Application on Physiological and Biochemical Parameters of Three Orange Cultivars Grown under Progressive Water Deficit. Adv. Hortic. Sci., 24(3): 183-194.
26. Mohawesh, O. and Talozi, S. 2012. Comparison of Hargreaves and FAO56 Equations for Estimating Monthly Evapotranspiration for Semiarid Environment. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 58(3): 321-334.
27. Mohawesh, O. and Karajeh, M. 2014. Effects of Deficit Irrigation on Tomato and Eggplant and Their Infection with the Root-knot Nematode under Controlled Environmental Conditions. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 60: 1019-1102.
28. Sarker, B. C., Hara, M. and Uemura, M. 2005. Proline Synthesis, Physiological Responses and Biomass Yield of Eggplants during and after Repetitive Soil Moisture Stress. Scientia Hortic., 103: 387-402.
29. Shatanawi, M., Duwayri, M., Haddad, N. and Naber, S. 2007. Analysis of Water, Agriculture and Food Security Polices in Jordan. Jordan J. Agric. Sci., 2: 270-279.
30. Simonne, E. H., Joseph, D. E. and Harris, C. E. 1998. Effects of Irrigation and Nitrogen Rates on Foliar Mineral Composition of Bell Pepper. J. Plant Nutr., 21: 2545-2555.
31. SPSS Software Products. 1997. SigmaStat Version 2.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.
32. US Salinity Laboratory Staff. 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. US Department of Agricultural Hand Book 60, US Department of Agricultural Soils, Washington, DC.
33. Yoshiba, Y., Kiyosue, T., Nakashima, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. and Shinozaki, K. 1997. Regulation of Levels of Proline as an Osmolyte in Plants under Water Stress. Plant Cell Physiol., 38: 1095-1102.