Investigation of the Role of Structural, Leadership, and Strategy Factors in Cooperatives Entrepreneurship

Authors
S. A. R. Pishbin 1
A. Alambeigi 1
H. Iravani 2
1 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agricultural, Economics and Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Development and Management, College of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
There are more than one million agricultural cooperatives members in Iran. In the meantime, the rapid development of the animal husbandry in Iran has forced cooperatives to meet the members’ scientific and practical needs for completing production cycle of the dairy industry. Livestock production covers a wide spectrum of livestock activities including bee keeping, silkworm raising, and aquaculture, indicating widespread business systems in Iranian animal husbandry. Due to significant livestock population, various animal products, such as raw milk, red meat, white meat (chicken and fish), eggs, and honey are produced. Thus, the mentioned cooperatives need to meet the markets demands for keeping competitive advantage more than any time before. Only when innovation is fostered, market competitive advantage can be maintained. Today, sustainability and innovation issues have a great importance in some organizations such as agriculture cooperatives. The term “entrepreneurship” is coined to describe this need to keep organizations in competitive situation by innovations tools. Presently, it is believed that entrepreneurship can be developed. Organizational, personal, and environmental aspects are important factors toward entrepreneurship fostering. This study took into consideration three factors in cooperatives, including structure, strategy, and leadership.The results of research revealed that these three variables play important role in entrepreneurship development in cooperatives. Thus, consideration of these aspects can help in development and boost cooperatives profits. The result of modeling by structural equations methods showed that 38% of the variance of entrepreneurship as a dependent variable could be explained by these three factors in cooperatives.

Keywords

1. Aloulou, W. and Fayolle, A. 2005. A Conceptual Approach of Entrepreneurial Orientation within Small Business Context. J. Enterp. Cult., 13: 24–45.
2. Chen, Y. -S., Lin, M. -J. J. and Chang, C. H. 2009. The Positive Effects of Relationship Learning and Absorptive Capacity on Innovation Performance and Competitive Advantage in Industrial Markets. Ind. Market. Manag., 38: 152−158.
3. CORC (Central Organization of Cooperatives of Iran). 2014. Annual Reports on Cooperatives. Available at: http://www.corc.ir/Portal/Home/Default.aspx.
4. Covin, J. G. and Slevin, D. P. 1991. A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior. Entrep. Theory Pract., 25: 7−25.
5. Fornell, C. and Lacker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Market. Res., 18: 39–50.
6. Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G. and Kuratko, D. F. 2009. Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy. Entrep. Theory Pract., 33: 19-46.
7. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A. and Sirmon, D. G. 2003. A Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship: The Construct and Its Dimensions. J. Manag., 29: 963−989.
8. Kwantes, C. and Boglarsky, C. 2007. Perceptions of Organizational Culture, Leadership, Effectiveness and Personal Effectiveness across Six Countries. J. Intern. Manag., 13: 204–230.
9. Li, Y., Liu, Y. and Zhao, Y. 2005. The Role of Market and Entrepreneurship Orientation and Internal Control in the New Product Development Activities of Chinese Firms. Ind. Market. Manag., 35: 336–347.
10. Lumpkin, G. T., Brigham, K. H. and Moss, T. W. 2010. Long-term Orientation: Implications for the Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance of Family Businesses. Entrep. Reg. Develop., 22: 241–264.
11. Lumpkin, G. T. and Dess, G. G. 2001. Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle. J. Bus. Venturing, 16: 429−451.
12. Lumpkin, G. T. and Dess, G. G. 1996. Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. Acad. Manage. Rev., 21: 135−172.
13. Moreno, A. M. and Casillas, J. C. 2008. Entrepreneurial Orientation and Growth of SMEs: A Causal Model. Entrep. Theory Pract., 32: 507–28.
14. Morris, M., Coombes, S., Schindehutte, M. and Allen, J. 2007. Antecedents and Outcomes of Entrepreneurial and Market Orientations in a Non-profit Context: Theoretical and Empirical Insights. JLOS, 13: 12–39.
15. Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjoerg, K. and Wiklund, J. 2007. Entrepreneurial Orientation, Risk Taking, and Performance in Family Firms. FBR, 20: 33–47.
16. Parry, K. and Proctor-Thomson, S. 2003. Leadership, Culture and Performance: The Case of the New Zealand Public Sector. .J Cha. Manag., 3: 376–390.
17. Salavou, H. and Lioukas, S. 2003. Radical Product Innovations in SMEs: The Dominance of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Creativity Innov. Manag., 12: 94−108.
18. Sarin, S. and McDermott, C. 2003. The Effect of Team Leader Characteristics on Learning, Knowledge Application, and Performance of Cross-functional New Product Development Teams. Decision Sci., 34: 707–739.
19. Tyagi, Y. and Verma, S. 2004. Economic Rate of Return of Innovations in Technology Dissemination Component of the National Agricultural Technology Project. Submitted to the National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE), Hyderabad.
20. Wiklund, J. and Shepherd, D. 2005. Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurationally Approaches. J. Bus. Venturing, 20: 71−91.
21. Wiklund, J. 1999. The Sustainability of the Entrepreneurial Orientation— performance Relationship. Entrep. Theory Pract., 3: 37–48.
22. Wilemon, D. and Thamhain, H. 1983. Team Building in Project Management. Project Management Quarterly, 1: 73–80.
23. Zahra, S. A. and Garvis, D. M. 2000. Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effect of International Environmental Hostility. J. Bus. Venturing, 15: 469−492.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 17, Issue 5
September and October 2015
Pages 1115-1125