Fruit Quality and Yield of Tomato as Influenced by Rain Shelters and Deficit Irrigation

Author
N. Liu
School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology , Nanjing 210044, Peoples’ Republic of China.
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the effects of the combined use of rain shelters (RS) and deficit irrigation (DI) on tomato yield and quality characteristics. Two experiments with different treatments were conducted in the southern China during the growing season in 2011 and 2012. The crops were irrigated to field capacity once average soil water content at the 0-60 cm layer in the treatment decreased to 80% of field capacity under open-field (T1, the control) and RS (T2), and 30, 40, and 50% decreased water of T2 as treatments T3, T4, and T5, respectively. The results showed that T2 increased the yield and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) by 13 and 11.5% in the two years, and improved fruit firmness (FF), total soluble solids (TSS), soluble sugar (SS), and vitamin C (VC) compared to T1. Under RS conditions, DI reduced the yield, but increased IWUE of tomato relative to T2 from 25 to 52% in 2011, and from 26 to 41% in 2012. The effects of DI on fruit quality were generally the inverse of those on fruit yield. FF, TSS, SS, VC, organic acid, and color index were positively affected by DI. With regard to the rank of comprehensive quality index (CQI) calculated by the analysis hierarchy process and modified technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution, it exhibited good fitness to the rank of single quality attributes. The highest CQI was obtained in treatment T4 in 2011, and T3 in 2012.

Keywords

1. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
2. Basiouny, F. M., Basiouny, K. and Maloney, M. 1994. Influence of Water Stress on Abscisic Acid and Ethylene Production in Tomato under Different PAR Levels. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech., 69: 535–541.
3. Bucheli, P., Voirol, E., De, L., Torre, R., Lopez, J., Rytz, A., Tanksley, S. and Petiard, V. 1999. Definition of Nonvolatile Markers for Flavor of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as Tools in Selection and Breeding. J. Agric. Food Chem., 47: 659–664.
4. Candido, V., Miccolis, V. and Perniola, M. 2000. Effects of Irrigation Regime on Yield and Quality of Processing Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Cultivars. III International Symposium on Irrigation of Horticultural Crops. Acta Horticulturae, 537: 779–788.
5. Cetin, ӧ., Uygan, D., and Boyac, H., Yildirim, O. 2002. Effects of Different Irrigation Treatments on Yield and Quality of Drip-irrigated Tomatoes under Eskisehir Conditions. In IV Vegetable Agriculture Symposium, 17–20, September, Bursa, Turkey. (in Turkish)
6. Colla, G., Casa, R., Cascio, B., Saccardo, F., Temperini, O. and Leoni, C. 1999. Responses of Processing Tomato to Water Regime and Fertilization in Central Italy. Acta Horticulturae, 487: 531–535.
7. Comeau, C., Privé, J. P. and Moreau, G. 2012. Beneficial Impacts of the Combined Use of Rain Shelters and Reflective Groundcovers in an Organic Raspberry Cropping System. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.,155: 117–123
8. Deng, H., Yeh, C. H. and Willis, R. J. 2000. Inter-company Comparison Using Modified TOPSIS with Objective Weights. Comput. Oper. Res., 27: 963–973.
9. Dorais, M., Papadopoulos, A. and Gosselin, A. 2001. Greenhouse Tomato Fruit Quality. Horticultural Reviews, 26: 239–319.
10. Easterling, D. R., Meehl, G. A., Parmesan, C., Changnon, S. A., Karl, T. R. and Mearns, L. O. 2000. Climate Extremes: Observations, Modeling Impacts Sci., 289: 2068–2074.
11. Ebel, R. C., Proebsting, E. L. and Patterson, M. E. 1993. Regulated Deficit Irrigation May Alter Apple Maturity, Quality, and Storage Life. HortSci., 28: 141–143.
12. Ho, L. C. and White, P. J. 2005. A Cellular Hypothesis for the Induction of Blossom-end Rot in Tomato Fruit. Ann. Bot., 95: 571–581.
13. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K. and Johnson, C. A. 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Intelmann, D., Jaros, D. and Rohm, H. 2005. Identification of Colour Optima of Commercial Tomato Catsup. Eur. Food Res. Technol., 221: 662–666.
15. Johnstone, P. R., Hartz, T. K., Lestrange, M., Nunez, J. J. and Miyao, E. M. 2005. Managing Fruit Soluble Solids with Late-season Deficit Irrigation in Drip-irrigated Processing Tomato Production. HortSci., 40: 1857–1861.
16. Kan, I. 2008. Yield Quality and Irrigation with Saline Water under Environmental Limitations: The Case of Processing Tomatoes in California. Agr. Econ., 38: 57–66.
17. Labate, J. A., Grandillo, S., Fulton, T., Muńos, S., Caicedo, A. and Peralta, I. 2007. Tomato. In: “Genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding in Plants: Vegetables”, (Ed.): Kole, C.. Springer, New York, 5: 1–125.
18. Liu, M. C. and Chen, D. K. 2002. Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Yield and Quality of Cherry Tomato. China Vegetables, 6: 4–6.
19. Madrid, R., Barba, E. M., Sánchez, A. and García, A. L. 2009. Effects of Organic Fertilizers and Irrigation Level on Physical and Chemical Quality of Industrial Tomato Fruit (cv. Nautilus). J. Sci. Food Agric., 89: 2608–2615.
20. Marouelli, W. A. and Silva, W. L. C. 2007. Water Tension Thresholds for Processing Tomatoes under Drip Irrigation in Central Brazil. Irri. Sci., 25: 41–418.
21. Masaki, T. 1987. Vegetable Cultivation under the Plastic Rain Shelters. Jpn. Agr. Res., 20: 180–184.
22. Ozbahce, A. and Tari, A. F. 2010. Effects of Different Emitter Space and Water Stress on Yield and Quality of Processing Tomato under Semi-arid Climate Conditions. Agric. Water Manage., 97: 1405–1410.
23. Patane, C. and Cosentino, S. L. 2010. Effects of Soil Water Deficit on Yield and Quality of Processing Tomato under a Mediterranean Climate. Agric. Water Manage., 97: 131–138.
24. Peet, M. 1992. Fruit Cracking in tomato. Hort. Technol., 2: 216–223.
25. Pulupol, L. U., Behboudian, M. H. and Fisher, K. J. 1996. Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Attributes of Glasshouse Tomatoes Produced under Deficit Irrigation. HortSci., 31: 926–929.
26. Qi, H. Y., Li, T. L., Zhang, J., Wang, L. and Chen, Y. H. 2003. Effects on Sucrose Metabolism, Dry Matter Distribution and Fruit Quality of Tomato under Water Deficit. Agr. Sci. China, 2: 1253–1258.
27. Ruiz-Altisent, M., Lleó, L. and Riquelme, F. 2006. Instrumental Quality Assessment of Peaches: Fusion of Optical and Mechanical Parameters. J. Food Eng., 74: 490–499.
28. Sanders, D. C., Howell, T. A., Hile, M. M. S., Hodges, L., Meek, D. and Phene, C. J. 1989. Yield and Quality of Processing Tomatoes in Response to Irrigation Rate and Schedule. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 114: 904–908.
29. Sensoy, S., Ertek, A., Gedik, I. and Kucukyumuk, C. 2007. Irrigation Frequency and amount Affect Yield and Quality of Field-grown Melon (Cucumis melo L.). Agric. Water Manage., 88: 269–274.
30. Spiro, R. G. 1966. Analysis of Sugars Found in Glycoproteins. In: “N Methods in Enzymology”, (Eds.): Eufeld, E. S. and Ginsburg, V.. Complex Carbohydrates. Academic Press, New York, VIII: 3–26.
31. Toor, R. K., Savage, G. P. and Heeb, A. 2006. Influence of Different Types of Fertilizers on the Major Antioxidant Components of Tomatoes. Food Compos. Anal., 19: 20–27.
32. Topcu, S., Kirda, C., Dasgan, Y., Kaman, H., Cetin, M., Yazici, A. and Bacon, M. A. 2007. Yield Response and N-fertilizer Recovery of Tomato Grown under Deficit Irrigation. Eur. J. Agron., 26: 64–70.
33. Viskelis, P., Jankauskiene, and J. and Bobinaite, R. 2008. Content of Carotenoids and Physical Properties of Tomatoes Harvested at Different Ripening Stages. Foodbalt, 166–170.
34. Wang, F., Kang, S. Z., Du, T. S., Li, F. S. and Qiu, R. J. 2011. Determination of Comprehensive Quality Index for Tomato and Its Response to Different Irrigation Treatments. Agric. Water Manage., 98: 1228–1238
35. Weltzin, J. F., Loik, M. E., Schwinning, S., Williams, D. G., Fay, P., Haddad, B., Harte, J., Huxman, T. E., Knapp, A. K., Lin, G., Pockman, W. T., Shaw, M. R., Small, E., Smith, M. D., Smith, S. D., Tissue, D. T. and Zak, J. C. 2003. Assessing the Response of Terrestrial Ecosystems to Potential Changes in Precipitation. BioSci., 53: 941–952.
36. Xiao, C. L., Chandler, C. K., Price, J. F., Duval, J. R., Mertely, J. C. and Legard, D. E. 2001. Comparison of Epidemics of Botrytis Fruit Rot and Powdery Mildew of Strawberry in Large Plastic Tunnel and Field Production Systems. Plant Dis., 85: 901–909.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 17, Issue 3
May and June 2015
Pages 691-704