Performance of Selected Agricultural Spray Nozzles using Particle Image Velocimetry

Authors
S. Wang 1
G. J. Dorr 2
M. Khashehchi 3
X. He 4
1 College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, People’s Republic of China.
2 The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.
3 The University of Queensland, School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
4 College of Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, People’s Republic of China.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of nozzle configurations on spray drift and explain the influences using several atomization characteristics (length of spray sheet, spray angle, velocity distribution of flow field, fluctuation of velocity, and droplet size). Nozzles manufactured by one company (Lechler GmbH, Germany) were tested by spraying local tap water in a wind tunnel at an operating pressure of 0.3 MPa and under room temperature. The nozzles tested were compact air-induction flat fan nozzles (IDK120-02, IDK120-03), standard flat fan nozzles (ST110-02, ST110-03), and hollow-cone swirl nozzles (TR80-02, TR80-03). The atomization process was recorded using a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system, droplet size was measured by a Sympatec Helos laser-diffraction particle-size analyzer, and spray drift was evaluated in a wind tunnel with deposition measured using a calibrated fluorometer (Turner-Sequoia model 450). Results showed that spray drift was significantly different among nozzle types (P<0.0005) and that nozzle configurations influenced breakup length, spray angle, droplet size, and velocity. Nozzles producing larger droplet sizes had lower velocity. Smaller droplets were produced when longer and wider spray sheets were produced. Compared to ST and TR nozzles, IDK nozzles started to breakup in the center of the liquid sheet, producing droplets with larger diameter, lower velocity, and less velocity fluctuation. The IDK nozzle is a good choice for low spray drift at higher wind speeds.

Keywords

1. Adrian, R. J. 1988. Statistical Properties of Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements in Turbulent Flow. Laser Anemometry in Fluid Mechanics, 3: 115-129.
2. Arvidsson, T., Bergström, L. and Kreuger, J. 2011. Spray Drift as Influenced by Meteorological and Technical Factors. Pest Manag. Sci., 67(5): 586-598.
3. ASAE, ANSI/ASAE S572.1 MAR. 2009. Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra. Developed by the Pest Control and Fertilizer Application. Approved by the Power and Machinery Division Standards Committee; Adopted by ASAE PM41.
4. Butler Ellis, M. C., Swan, T., Miller, P. C. H., Waddelow, S., Bradley, A. and Tuck, C. R. 2002. Design Factors Affecting Spray Characteristics and Drift Performance of Air Induction Nozzles. Biosystems Eng., 82: 289-296
5. Butler Ellis, M. C., Tuck, C. R. and Miller, P. C. H. 1997. The Effect of Some Adjuvants on Sprays Produced by Agricultural Flat Fan Nozzles. Crop Prot., 16: 41-50.
6. Cloeter, M. D., Qin, K., Patil, P. and Smith, B. 2010. Planar Laser Induced Fluorescence (PLIF) Flow Visualization applied to Agricultural Spray Nozzles with Sheet Disintegration; Influence of an Oil-in-water Emulsion. 22nd ILASS-Americas, May 2010, Cincinnati, OH, USA: 1-9.
7. Czaczyk, Z. 2012. Influence of Air Flow Dynamics on Droplet Size in Condition of Air-assisted Sprayers. Atomization Sprays, 22: 275-282.
8. Dorr, G. J., Hewitt, A. J., Adkins, S. W., Hanan, J., Zhang, H. and Noller, B. 2013. A Comparison of Initial Spray Characteristics Produced by Agricultural Nozzles. Crop Prot., 53: 109-117.
9. Dorr, G. J., Kempthorne, D. M., Mayo, L. C., Forster, W. A., Zabkiewicz, J. A., McCue, S. W., Belward, J. A., Turner, I. W. and Hanan, J. 2014. Towards a Model of Spray-canopy Interactions: Interception, Shatter, Bounce and Retention of Droplets on Horizontal Leaves. Ecol. Modell., 290: 94-101.
10. Fritz, B. K., Hoffmann, W. C., Bagley, W. E., Kruger, G. R., Czaczyk, Z. and Henry, R. S. 2014. Measuring Droplet Size of Agricultural Spray Nozzles-measurement Distance and Airspeed Effects. Atomization Sprays, 24(9): 747-760.
11. Herbst, A. 2001. Droplet Sizing on Agricultural Sprays: A Comparison of Measuring Systems Using a Standard Droplet Size Classification Scheme. 17th ILASS-Europe, B. Ineichen., 2-6 September, 2001, Zürich, Switzerland, PP. 397-402.
12. Hewitt, A. J. 1997. The Importance of Droplet Size in Agricultural Spraying. Atomization Spray, 7(3): 235–244.
13. Hijazi, B., Decourselle, T., Minov, S. V., Nuyttens, D., Cointault, F., Pieters, J. and Vangeyte, J. 2012. The Use of High-Speed Imaging Systems for Applications in Precision Agriculture. New Technologies: Trends, Innovations and Research, Prof. Constantin Volosencu (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0480-3, InTech: 279-296, Available from:http://www.intechopen.com/books/new-technologies-trends-innovations-and-research/the-use-of-high-speed-imaging-systems-for-applications-in-precision-agriculture
14. Hilz, E. and Vermeer, A. W. P. 2013. Spray Drift Review: The Extent to which a Formulation can Contribute to Spray Drift Reduction. Crop Prot., 44: 75-83.
15. ISO. 1996. International Standard ISO 5682-1 Equipment for Crop Protection: Spraying Equipment. Part 1. Test Methods for Sprayer Nozzles. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
16. Kashdan, J. T., Shrimpton, J. S. and Whybrew, A. 2004. Two-phase Flow Characterization by Automated Digital Image Analysis. Part 2: Application of PDIA for Sizing Sprays. Part. Part. Syst. Charact., 21: 15-23.
17. Kashdan, J. T., Shrimpton, J. S. and Whybrew, A. 2007. A Digital Image Analysis Technique for Quantitative Characterisation of High-speed Sprays. Opt. Lasers Eng., 45: 106-115.
18. Lad, N., Aroussi, A. and Muhamad Said, M. F. 2011. Droplet Size Measurement for Liquid Spray using Digital Image Analysis Technique. J. Appl. Sci., 11: 1966-1972.
19. Lefebvre, A. H. 1989. Atomization and Sprays, Combustion: An International Series. Taylor and Francis, Washington, DC.
20. Maynagh, B. M., Ghobadian, B., Jahannama, M. R. and Hashjin, T. T. 2009. Effect of Electrostatic Induction Parameters on Droplets Charging for Agricultural Application. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 11: 249-257.
21. Miller, P. C. H. and Butler Ellis, M. C. 2000. Effects of Formulation on Spray Nozzle Performance for Applications from Ground-based Boom Sprayers. Crop Prot., 19: 609-615.
22. Miller, P. C. H., Tuck, C. R., Murphy, S., and Ferreira, M. 2008. Measurement of the Droplet Velocities in Sprays Produced by Different Designs of Agricultural Spray Nozzle. Paper ID ILASS08-8-5, 22nd ILASS-Europe, 8-10 Sepptember 2008, Como Lake, Italy.
23. Nuyttens, D., Baetens, K., De Schampheleire, M. and Sonck, B. 2007. Effect of Nozzle Type, Size and Pressure on Spray Droplet Characteristics. Biosyst. Eng., 97: 333-345.
24. Qin, K., Cloeter, M., Tank, H., Liu, L., Wilson, S. and Yin, D.-W. 2010. Modeling the Spray Atomization of Emulsion Embedded Agricultural Solutions. J. ASTM Int., 7: 1-9.
25. Reichard, D. L., Zhu, H., Fox, R. D. and Brazee, R. D. 1992. Computer Simulation of Variables that Influence Spray Drift. Trans. ASAE, 35: 1401-1407.
26. Sayinci, B., Bastaban, S. and Sánchez-Hermosilla, J. 2012. Determination of Optimal Spot Roundness Variation Interval for Droplet Size Analysis on Water Sensitive Paper. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 14: 285-298.
27. Song, J., Liu, Y. Zhang, J., He, X., Zeng, A. and Herbst, A. 2011. Drift Mechanism of Flat Fan Nozzle. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 42: 63-69. (in Chinese with English Abstract)
28. Thompson, J. C. and Rothstein, J. P. 2007. The Atomization of Viscoelastic Fluids in Flat-fan and Hollow-cone Spray Nozzles. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 147: 11-22.
29. Vallet, A. and Tinet, C. 2013. Characteristics of Droplets from Single and Twin Jet Air Induction Nozzles: A Preliminary Investigation. Crop Prot. 48: 63-68.
30. Wang, S., He, X., Song, J., Zhang, L., Dorr, G. J. and Herbst, A. 2014. Measurement Comparison and Fitted Distribution Equation of Droplet Size for Agricultural Nozzles. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 30: 34-42. (in Chinese with English Abstract)
31. Westerweel, J. 1997. Fundamentals of Digital Particle Image Velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol., 8: 1379-1392.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 17, Issue 3
May and June 2015
Pages 601-613