Suitability Analysis for Determining Potential Agricultural Land Use by the Multi-Criteria Decision Making Models SAW and VIKOR-AHP (Case study: Takestan-Qazvin Plain)

Authors
H. R. Pourkhabbaz 1
S. Javanmardi 1
H. A. Faraji Sabokbar 2
1 Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology, Behbahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Cartography, Faculty of Geography, Tehran University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Suitability analysis is a prerequisite for sustainable agricultural production and it involves evaluation of the environmental parameters. The development and creation of appropriate points for this land use without considering environmental capability will result in the appearance of several ecological, economic, and social problems. The Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Models were used for solving such problems. Takestan-Qazvin region is one of the biomes that have difficulties due to lack of a systematic administration on environmental resources. This research was done in the framework of the ecological model and by using multicriteria decision making methods such as Analytic Network Process (ANP), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje - Analytical Hierarchy Process (VIKOR-AHP)in GIS environment with the aim of choosing the suitable locations for agricultural land use in Takestan-Qazvin Plain. However, the purpose of this study was twofold: first, it was aimed at determining the ecological capability of agricultural land use by using ANP and SAW methods. Second, the suitable agricultural alternatives in this region were ranked using the integrated VIKOR and AHP models. In these methods, the ratings and the weights of the criteria are known precisely. Ecological factors such as physical and biological parameters and economic - social factors were chosen as the major criteria affecting the agriculture land use. The research indicated that north parts of the study area were not suitable for agricultural development. Finally, the conclusion showed that the application of decision making models could be useful in environmental capacity evaluation of agricultural land use.

Keywords

1. Afshari, A., Mojahed, M. and Yusuff, R. M. 2010. Simple Additive Weighting approach to Personnel Selection Problem. Int. J. In. Manag. Technol., 1(5): 511-515.
2. Asadi, A., Kalantari, Kh. and Choobchian, Sh. 2013. Structural Analysis of Factors Affecting Agricultural Sustainability in Qazvin Province, Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 15: 11-22.
3. Azar, F. S. 2000. Multiattribute Decision-making: Use of Three Scoring Methods to Compare the Performance of Imaging Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection. Technical Report MS-BE-00-01, MS-CIS-00-10.
4. Bryan, B. A. and Crossman, N. D. 2008. Systematic Regional Planning for Multiple Objective Natural Resource Management. J. Environ. Manag., 88: 1175–1189.
5. Chang, C. L. and Hsu, C. -H. 2009. Multi-criteria Analysis via the VIKOR Method for Prioritizing Land-use Restraint Strategies in the Tseng-Wen Reservoir Watershed. J. Environ. Manag., 90: 3226–3230.
6. Chang, C. H. 2010. A Modified VIKOR Method for Multiple Criteria Analysis. Environ. Monit. Assess., 168: 339–344.
7. Chu, H. B., Lu, W. X. and Zhang, L. 2013. Application of Artificial Neural Network in Environmental Water Quality Assessment. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 15: 343-356.
8. Chung, E. S. and Lee, K. S. 2009. Prioritization of Water Management for Sustainability Using Hydrologic Simulation Model and Multicriteria Decision Making Techniques. J. Environ. Manag., 90: 1502–1511.
9. Eastman, R. J. 2006. Guide to GIS and Image Processing. Clark University, USA, 328 PP.
10. FAO. 1993. Guidelines for Land-use Planning. FAO Development Series No. 1, FAO, Rome, 96 PP.
11. Grant, W. E. 1998. Ecology and Natural Resource Management: Reflection from a System Perspective Management. Ecol. Mod., 108: 67-76.
12. Kackar, R. N. 1985. Off-line Quality Control, Parameter Design and the Taguchi Method. J. Qual. Technol., 17:176–188.
13. Leung, L. C., Hui, Y. V. and Zheng, M. 2003. Analysis of Compatibility between Interdependent Matrices in ANP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. Soc., 54(7): 758–768.
14. Makhdoum, M. F. 1999. Fundamental of Land Use Planning. Tehran University Publication, 234 PP.
15. Malczewski, J. 2004. GIS-based Land-use Suitability Analysis: A Critical Overview. Progress Planning, 3(1): 62-65.
16. McHarg, I. L. 1995. Design with Nature. Wiley, New York, 208PP.
17. Nisar Ahamed, T. R., Gopal Rao, K. and Murthy, J. S. R. 2000. GIS-based Fuzzy Membership Model for Crop-land Suitability Analysis. Agr. Sys., 63: 75-95.
18. Opricovic, S. 1998. Multi-criteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Yugoslavia.
19. Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G. H. 2004. Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 156(2): 445-455.
20. Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G. H. 2007. Extended VIKOR Method in Comparison with Outranking Methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 178: 514–529.
21. Ou Yang, Y. -P., Shieh, H. -M. and Tzeng, G. -H. 2009. A VIKOR Technique with Applications Based on DEMATEL and ANP. MCDM CCIS, 35: 780–788.
22. Saaty, T. L. 1996. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. 1st Edition, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, USA, 225 PP.
23. Saaty, T. L. 2004. The Analytic Network Process: Dependence and Feedback in Decision Making. Part 1.Theory and Validation Examples. SESSION 4B: “Theory and Development of the Analytic Hierarchy Process/Analytic Network Process”. In The 17th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, August 6-11, 2004 at The Whistler Conference Centre, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada.
24. Shee, D. Y., Tzeng, G. H. and Tang, T. I. 2003. AHP, Fuzzy Measure and Fuzzy Integral Approaches for the Appraisal of Information Service Providers in Taiwan. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag., 6(1): 8–30.
25. Sicat, R. S., Carranza, E. J. M. and Nidumolu, U. B. 2005. Fuzzy Modeling of Farmers’ Knowledge for Land Suitability Classification. Agr. Syst., 83: 49–75.
26. Tong, L. I., Chen, C. C. and Wang, C. H. 2007. Optimization of Multi-response Processes Using the VIKOR Method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 31: 1049–1057.
27. Tsai, W. H. and Chou, W. C. 2009. Selecting Management Systems for Sustainable Development in SMEs: A Novel Hybrid Model Based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Exp. Syst. Applic., 36: 1444–1458.
28. Vahdani, B., Hadipour, H., Salehi Sadaghiani, J. and Amiri, M. 2010. Extension of VIKOR Method Based on Interval-valued Fuzzy Sets. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 47: 1231–1239.
29. Wu, W. -W. 2008. Choosing Knowledge Management Strategies by Using a Combined ANP and DEMATEL Approach. Exp. Syst. Applic., 35: 828–835.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 16, Issue 5
September and October 2014
Pages 1005-1016