A Panel Data Approach for Investigation of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and CO2 Causality Relationship

Authors
I. Saleh 1
S. Abedi 2
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Energy and Environment, Faculty of New Sciences and Technology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
One of the current challenges and complications in the world is the climate change and global warming, which has numerous and varied effects and consequences in different regions. In this regard, the effects of economic activities on the increase in greenhouse gases and also the effects of greenhouse gases on economic activities have become increasingly controversial. In this study, an investigation was done upon the bidirectional causality relationship between real gross domestic product per capita and carbon dioxide emissions per capita in different countries. For this purpose, the Vector Auto-Regression Model with the micro panel application was used and the World Bank member countries were divided into different groups. Results indicated bidirectional causality relationship between Gross domestic product (GDP) and CO2 for three groups of countries. In addition, there was a one-way causal relationship from GDP o carbon dioxide volume for subgroups of countries with high average economic growth rate (HGR) and the rest of the world countries (ROW). This means that, to accomplish the international goals of decreasing the emissions of pollutant gases, collaboration between HGR and ROW group of the countries with industrial countries is indispensable. Moreover, heterogeneous non-causality test for Iran suggests that the economic activities are having increasingly negative environmental impacts on the country.

Keywords

1. Azomahou, T., Laisney, F. and Van, P. N. 2006. Economic Development and CO2 Emissions: A Nonparametric Panel Approach. J. Public Econ., 90: 1347-1363.
2. Acaravci, A. and Ozturk, I. 2010. On the Relationship between Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth in Europe. Energy, 35: 5412-5420.
3. Amiri, A. and Gerdthamb, U. 2013. Impact of Maternal and Child Health on Economic Growth: New Evidence Based Granger Causality and DEA Analysis. Newborn and Child Health, Study Commissioned by the Partnership for Maternal, Lund University, Sweden.
4. Choe, J. I. 2003. Do Foreign Direct Investment and Gross Domestic Investment Promote Economic Growth? Rev. Dev. Econ., 7: 44-57.
5. Costantini, V. and Martini, Ch. 2009. The Causality between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: A Multi-sectoral Analysis Using Non-stationary Cointegrated Panel Data: Working Paper No. 102. Dipartimento di Economia, Università degli Studi Roma Tre.
6. Dinda, S. and Coondoo, D. 2006. Income and Emission: A Panel Data Based Co-integration Analysis. Ecol Econ., 57: 167-181.
7. Dijkgraaf, E. and Vollebergh, H. R. J. 2001. A Note on Testing for Environmental Kuznets Curves with Panel Data. Research Centre for Economic Policy (OCFEB), Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
8. Everett, T., Ishwaran, M., Ansaloni, GP. and Rubin, A. 2010. Economic growth and the environment,MPRA Paper 3585, University Library of Munich, Germany. pp.51
9. Ferda, H. 2008. An Econometric Study of CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Income and Foreign Trade in Turkey. 31st IAEE Annual International Conference. Istanbul, Turkey, PP. 18.
10. Granger, C. W. J. 1969. Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37: 424-38.
11. Hansen H. and Rand J. 2004. On the Causal Links between FDI and Growth in Developing Countries. Development Economics Research Group (DERG), Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Miméo.
12. Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., and Rosen, H. 1988. Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data. Econometrica, 56: 1371-95.
13. Hatzigeorgiou, E., Polatidis, H. and Haralambopoulos, D. 2011. CO2 Emissions, GDP and Energy Intensity: A Multivariate Cointegration and Causality Analysis for Greece, 1977–2007. Appl. Ene., 88: 1377–1385.
14. Hossain, M. 2011. Panel Estimation for CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Trade Openness and Urbanization of Newly Industrialized Countries. Ene Pol., 39: 6991-6999.
15. Hurlin, C. and Venet, B. 2001. Granger Causality Tests in Panel Data Models with Fixed Coefficients. University Paris IX, Miméo.
16. Hurlin, C., 2004a. Testing Granger Causality in Heterogeneous Panel Data Models with Fixed Coefficients. University Orléans, Miméo.
17. Hurlin, C. 2004b. A Note on Causality Tests in Panel Data Models with Random Coefficients. University Orléans, Miméo.
18. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Geneva, Switzerland.
19. Lee, C. G. 2009. Foreign Direct Investment, Pollution and Economic Growth: Evidence from Malaysia. Appl. Econ., 41(13): 1709-1716.
20. Lau, E., Chye, X. and Choong, Ch. 2011. Energy Growth Causality: A Panel Analysis. International Conference On Applied Economics (ICOAE), Greece, pp.355-361.
21. Levin, A., Lin, C. F. , Chu,C. S. J. 2002.Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties. J.Economet., 108: 1-24.
22. Liu, G. 2006. A Causality Analysis on GDP and Air Emissions in Norway: Discussion Paper No. 447. Research Department, Statistics Norway.
23. Lean, H. H. and Smyth, R. 2009. CO2 Emissions, Electricity Consumption and Output in Asian: Discussion Paper DEVDP 09-13. Development Research Unit, Monash University, Australia. pp.31.
24. Maddala,G. S. and Wu, S. 1999. A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 631-652.
25. Maddison, D. and Rehdanz, K. 2008. Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth. "Homogeneous Causality in Heterogeneous Panels": Working Paper No.1437. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Germany.
26. Masih, M., Al-Sahlawi, M. and DeMello, L. 2010. What Drive Carbon-Dioxide Emissions:Income or Electricity Generation? Evidence from Saudi Arabia. The Journal of Energy and Development, 33(2): 201-213
27. Moghadasi, R. and Golriz, Z. 2011. The Relationship between Carbon Dioxide Emissions and GDP Based on Combined Data. Agri. Econ. Dev., 25(4): 480-487.
28. Nair-Reichert, U. and Weinhold, D. 2001. Causality Tests for Cross-country Panels: A New Look at FDI and Economic Growth in Developing Countries. Oxford Econ. Stat., 63: 153-71.
29. Perman, R., Ma, Y., McGilvray, J., and Common, M. 2003. Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. 3rd Edition, Pearson Education Limited, Essex, Harlow, PP. 94.
30. Pigou, A. C. 1920. The Economic of Welfare. Macmillan and co., limited, London,pp.976.
31. Pao, H. and Tsai, C. 2010. CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in BRIC Countries. Ene. Pol., 38: 7850-7860.
32. Pao, H. and Tsai, C. 2011. Modeling and Forecasting the CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, and Economic Growth in Brazil. Energy, 36: 2450-2458.
33. Sinha, D. 2009. The Energy Consumption-GDP Nexus: Panel Data Evidence from 88 Countries: MPRA Paper No. 18446. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18446/,
34. Taskin, F. and Zaim, O. 2000. Searching for a Kuznets Curve in Environmental Efficiency Using Kernal Estimation. Econ. Lit., 68: 217-223.
35. The World Bank. 1992. World Development Report. Washington DC.
36. Wang, S., Zhou, D., Zhou, P. and Wang, Q. 2011. CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in China: A Panel Data Analysis. Ene. Pol., 39: 4870-4875.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 16, Issue 5
September and October 2014
Pages 947-956