Fruit Set and Yield of Apricot Cultivars under Subtropical Climate Conditions of Hatay, Turkey

Authors
O. Çalışkan 1
A. A. Polat 2
1 Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Antakya/ Hatay-Turkey
2 Mustafa Kemal University, Agriculture Faculty, Horticulture Department, Antakya-Hatay/TURKEY
Abstract
Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) is a species particularly prone to erratic fruit set, and its flower bud drop has been repeatedly reported in different cultivars and growing conditions. A number of potential causes have been explored, but a clear main cause remains elusive. In this study, fruit set was determined for 11 apricot cultivars (‘Precoce de Tyrinthe’, ‘Feriana’, ‘Beliana’, ‘Priana’, ‘Bebeco’, ‘Early Kishinewski’, ‘Precoce de Colomer’, ‘Canino’, ‘Silistre Rona’, ‘Rouge de Sernhac’ and ‘Tokaloglu’) grown on the coast of the Mediterranean region of Turkey from 2006 to 2008. Trees budded on apricot seedlings and planted 6×6 m in 1997. On four branches of each tree randomly selected from all four directions, blossom number, percentage of initial and final fruit set, and yield per tree were determined during the experimental period. Fruit set differed significantly depending on year and cultivar. Based on three-year averages, percentage of fruit set was highest on ‘Tokaloglu’ (14%), followed by ‘Beliana’ (8.8%) and ‘Precoce de Tyrinthe’ (8.2%). The lowest fruit set (2.3%) was in ‘Early Kishinewski’ and ‘Canino’. High yields per tree were found in Tokaloglu’ (29.1 kg), ‘Precoce de Tyrinthe’ (29.0 kg), ‘Rouge de Sernhac’ (27.9 kg), and ‘Beliana’ (23.0 kg). ‘Tokaloglu’, ‘Beliana’, ‘Precoce de Tyrinthe’, and ‘Rouge de Sernhac’ cultivars showed good performance for both fruit set and yield per tree under subtropical climate conditions. However, findings of this study also suggested that fruit set and fruit drops in apricots should be assessed together with total yield amounts by years. The influence of the cultivar on fruit yield was more determinant than the seasonal effect.

Keywords

1. Alburquerque, N., Burgos, L. and Egea, J. 2003. Apricot Flower Development and Abscission Related to Chilling, Irrigation, and Type of Shoots. Sci. Hortic., 98: 265-276.
2. Alburquerque, N., Burgos, L. and Egea, J. 2004. Influence of Flower Bud Density, Flower Bud Drop and Fruit Set on Apricot Productivity. Sci. Hortic., 102: 397-406.
3. Asma, B. 2000. Apricot Culture. Evin Publication, Malatya, 243 PP. (in Turkish)
4. Atkinson, C. J. and Taylor, L. 1994. The Influence of Autumn Temperature on Flowering Time and Cropping of Pyrus communis cv. Conference. J. Hortic. Sci., 69: 1067-1075.
5. Atkinson, C. J. and Lucas, A. S. 1996. The Response of Flowering Date and Cropping of Pyrus communis cv. Concorde to Autumn Warming. J. Hortic. Sci., 71:427-434.
6. Balta, M. F., Muradoğlu, F., Aşkın, M. A. and Kaya, T. 2007. Fruit Sets and Fruit Drops in Turkish Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Varieties Grown under Ecological Conditions of Van, Turkey. Asian J. Plant Sci., 6: 298-303.
7. Campoy, J. A., Ruiz, D. and Egea, J. 2010. Effect of Shading and Thidiazuron+Oil Treatments on Dormancy Breaking, Blooming and Fruit Set in Apricot in Warm-Winter Climate. Sci. Hort., 125: 203-210.
8. Choi, C. and Andersen, R. 2001. Variable Fruit Set in Self Fertile Sweet Cherry. Can. J. Plant Sci., 81:753-760.
9. Caprio, J. M. and Quamme, H. A. 1999. Weather Conditions Associated with Apple Production in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia. Can. J. Plant Sci., 79(1): 129-137.
10. Crabbe, J. 1994. Dormancy. In: “Encyclopedia of Agricultural Science”, (Eds.): Arntzen, C. J. and Ritter, E. M.. Academic Press, New York, PP. 597-611.
11. Crabbe, J. and Barnola, P. 1996. A New Conceptual Approach to Bud Dormancy in Woody Plant: Plant Dormancy, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. CAB International, Wallingford, PP. 8-114.
12. Ercisli, S. 2009. Apricot Culture in Turkey. Sci. Res. Essays, 4(8): 715–719.
13. Erez, A. 2002. Bud Dormancy, Phenomenon, Problems and Solutions in the Tropics and Subtropics. In: “Temperate Fruit Crops in Worm Climates”, (Ed.): Erez, A.. Kluwer Academic Publishers, the Netherlands, PP. 17-48.
14. Garcia-Montiel, F., Serrano, M., Martinez-Romero, D. and Alburquerque, N. 2010. Factors Influencing Fruit Set and Quality in Different Sweet Cherry Cultivars. Span. J. Agric. Res., 8(4): 1118-1128.
15. Gradziel, T. M. and Weinbaum, S. A. 1999. High Relative Humidity Reduces Anther Dehiscence in Apricot, Peach and Almond. HortSci., 34: 322-325.
16. Guerriero, R. and Bartolini, S. 1991. Main Factors Influencing Cropping Behaviour of Some Apricot Cultivars in Coastal Areas. Act. Hort., 293: 229-243.
17. Gülcan, R., Misirli, A. and Aksoy, U. 1995. Evaluation of Some Biological and Pomological Properties of Apricot Hybrids. Acta Hort., 384: 195-199.
18. Hormaza, J. I., Yamane, H. and Rodrıgo, J. 2007. Apricot. In: “Genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding”, (Ed.): Kole, C.. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, New York, Tokyo, 7: 173-189.
19. Jackson, J. E. and Hammer, P. J. C. 1980. The causes of Year-to-year Variation in the Average Yield of Cox’s Orange Pippin apple in England. J. Hort. Sci., 55: 149-156.
20. Julian,C., Herrero, M. and Rodrigo, J. 2007. Flower Bud Drop and Pre-blossom Frost Damage in Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.). J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual., 81: 21-25.
21. Küden, A. B., Kaska, N. and Paydas, S. 1995. Determining the Chill Units of Adana and Chilling Requirements of Apricots. Acta Hort., 384: 309-313.
22. Küden, A. B., Kaska, N. and Cebeci, E. 1992. Bazı Ilıman Iklim Meyve Türlerinde Soğuklama Gereksinimlerinin ve Büyüme Derece Saatleri Toplamının Saptanması. Turk. 1st Nati. Hort. Cong., PP. 9-12.
23. Legave, J. M. 1978. Aspects of Floral Necrosis before of Lowering in Apricot. Annales de l’amelioration des plantes., 28: 333-340.
24. Layne, R. E. C., Bailey, C. H. and Hough, L. F. 1996. Apricots. In: “Fruit Breedings .I. Tree and Tropical Fruits”, (Eds.): Janick, J., Moore, J. N.. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore, PP. 79-109.
25. McLaren, G. F., Fraser, J. A. and Grant, J. E. 1996. Some Factors Influencing Fruit Set in Sundrop Apricot. New Zealand J. Crop Hortic. Sci., 24: 55-63.
26. Nageib, M. M, Malaka, A. Saleh, El-Shamma, M. S., Salwa, A. Kh., Mansour, A. E. M. and Nagwa, S. Z. 2012. Effect of Shading at Different Dormancy Periods on Kanino Apricot Productivity. J. Appl. Sci. Res., 8(8): 4290-4295.
27. Polat, A. A. and Yılmaz, M. 1987. Investigations Adaptations of Some Native and Foreign Apricot Varieties to Adana Conditions. J. Sci. Eng., 2(1): 127-146. (in Turkish with an English Summary)
28. Polat, A. A. 1988. Apricot Culture and Its Problems in the Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Derim, 5(2): 66-84. (in Turkish with an English Summary)
29. Polat, A. A. 2010. Apricot Production in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, Hatay, Turkey. Acta Hort., 862: 343-350.
30. Polat, A. A. and Caliskan, O. 2010. Determination of Growth and Fruit Quality Parameters of Some Apricot Cultivars in Subtropical Climate Conditions of Turkish Mediterranean Region. Acta Hort., 862: 320-330.
31. Polat, A. A., Durgac, C., Kamiloglu, Ö. and Caliskan, O. 2004. Investigation on the Adaptation of Some Low-chill Apricot Cultivars to Kirikhan (Turkey) Ecological Conditions. Acta Hort., 636: 395-400.
32. Rodrigo, J. 2000. Spring Frost in Deciduous Fruit Crops. Hort. Rev., 12: 223-264.
33. Rodrigo, J. and Herrero, M. 2002. Effects of Pre-blossom Temperatures on Flower Development and Fruit Set in Apricot. Sci. Hortic., 92: 125-135.
34. Ruiz, D. and Egea, J. 2008. Analysis of the Variability and Correlations of Floral Biology Factors Affecting Fruit Set in Apricot in a Mediterranean Climate. Sci. Hortic., 115: 154-163.
35. SAS Institute. 2005. SAS Online Doc, Version 9.1. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
36. Steel, R. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill., New York, 633p.
37. Torricalles, A., Domingo, R., Gelego, R. and Ruiz-Sanchez, M. C. 2000. Apricot Tree Response to Witholding Irrigation at Different Phenological Periods. Sci. Hortic., 85: 201-215.
38. Viti, R. and Monteleone, P. 1995. High Temperature Influence on the Presence of Flower Bud Anomalies in Two Apricot Varieties Characterized by Different Productivity. Acta Hort., 384: 283-289.
39. Yelmen, H. 2007. Doğu Akdeniz Bölgesinde Farklı Soğuklama Yöntemleri Kullanılarak Olasılıklı Soğuklama Süre Haritalarının Cıkarılması. Unpublished PhD. Thesis, Institute of Natural Science, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey, p. 119.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 16, Issue 4
July and August 2014
Pages 863-872