Optimization of Ultrasonic Reactor Geometry for Biodiesel Production using Response Surface Methodology

Authors
B. Mostafaei 1
B. Ghobadian 1
M. Barzegar 2
A. Banakar 1
1 Department of Mechanics Engineering of Agricultural Machinery, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Biodiesel fuel, which is produced by transesterification reaction between alcohol and vegetable oil/animal fat is proposed as a clean alternative to petro diesel fuel. Today, one of the new technologies to produce biodiesel is using ultrasonic energy that makes production faster, with improved quality and less expensive. Various factors that affect the design of ultrasonic reactors are ratio of vibrating rod diameter to reactor diameter, reactor height, depth of horn penetration into fluid and chamber characteristics (material and shape). In this paper, two parameters namely the ratio of vibrating rod diameter to reactor diameter and reactor height were studied in order to increase the reaction efficiency. In all performed tests, the horn diameter of 14 mm, molar ratio of alcohol to oil of 5 to 1, catalyst concentration of 0.7% wt?? oil, depth of horn penetration into fluid of 15 mm and a cylindrical reactor were used. Experimental design involved the use of Central Composite Design (CCD) and the statistical Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Considering the empirical model, a significant relationship was found between independent and dependent variables with a regression coefficient of 0.99. Taking into account the desirability of increasing the efficiency, the optimal function of reactor diameter and reactor height were 63 and 110 mm, respectively with a reaction yield of 87%. In order to verify the model, function responses in the defined area were tested with five replicates and the average efficiency of the reaction was 87.2%. The obtained model suggests the simultaneous reverse effects of reactor diameter and height on the reaction efficiency.

Keywords

1. Canakci, M. and Van Gerpen, J. 2001. Biodiesel Production from Oils and Fats with High Free Fatty Acids. Trans. ASAE, 44(6): 1429–1436.
2. Carraretto, C., Macor, A., Mirandola, A., Stoppato, A. and Tonon, S. 2004. Biodiesel as Alternative Fuel: Experimental Analysis and Energetic Evaluations, Energy Sour., 29: 2195–2211.
3. Klı´ma, J. Frias-Ferrer, A. Gonza´lez-Garcı´a, J. Ludvı´k, J. Sa´ez, V. and Iniesta, J. 2007. Optimisation of 20kHz Sonoreactor Geometry on the Basis of Numerical Simulation of Local Ultrasonic Intensity and Qualitative Comparison with Experimental Results, Ultrason. Sonochem. 14: 19–28.
4. David, F. Sandra, P. And Wylie, P. L. 2003. Improving the Analysis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters Using Retention Time Locked Methods and Retention Time Databases: Application Food, Agilent Application Note. I. Agilent Technologies. Available on: http://www.chem.agilent.com/Library/applications/5988-5871EN.pdf
5. Demirbas, A. 2006. Biodiesel Production via Non-catalytic SCF Method and Biodiesel Fuel Characteristics. Energy Conv. Mgmt. 47: 2271–82.
6. Freedman, B. Pryde, E. H. and Mounts, T. L. 1984. Variables Affecting the Yields of Fatty Esters from Transesterified Vegetable Oils. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61: 1638–1643.
7. Gogate, P. R. Sutkar, V. S. and Pandit, A. B. 2011. Sonochemical Reactors: Important Design and Scale up Considerations with a Special Emphasis on Heterogeneous Systems, Chem. Eng. J., 166: 1066–1082.
8. Ji, J. Wang, J., Li, Y., Yu, Y. and Xu, Z. 2006. Preparation of Biodiesel with the Help of Ultrasonic and Hydrodynamic Cavitation. Ultrasonics, 44: e411–e414.
9. Kim, H. J., Kang, B. S., Kim, M. J., Park, Y.M., Kim, D. K., Lee, J. S. and Lee, K. Y. 2004. Transesterification of Vegetable Oil to Biodiesel Using Heterogeneous Base Catalyst. Catal. Today, 93–95: 315–20.
10. Kumar, A. Kumaresan, T. Pandit, A. B. and Joshi, J. B. 2006. Characterization of Flow Phenomena Induced by Ultrasonic Horn. Chem. Engin. Sci., 61: 7410-7420.
11. Hanh, H. D., Dong, N. T., Starvarache, C., Okitsu, K., Maeda, Y. and Nishimura, R. 2008. Methanolysis of Triolein by Low Frequency Ultrasonic Irradiation, Energy Converse. Manage., 49: 276–280.
12. Hingu, M. H. Gorate, P. R. and Rathod, V. K. 2010. Synthesis of Biodiesel from Waste Cooking Oil Using Sonochemical Reactors, Ultrason. Sonochem., 17: 827–832.
13. Ma, F., Clements, L. D. and Hanna, M. A. 1998. The Effects of Catalyst, Free Fatty Acids, and Water on Transesterification of Beef Tallow. Trans. ASAE, 41: 1261–1264.
14. Mootabadi, H., Salamatinia, B., Bhatia, S. and Abdullah, A. Z. 2010. Ultrasonic Assisted Biodiesel Production Process from Palm Oil Using Alkaline Earth Metal Oxides as the Heterogeneous Catalyst. Fuel, 89: 1818–1825.
15. Murugesan, A., Umarani, C., Chinnusamy, T. R., Krishnan, M., Subramanian, R. and Neduzchezhain, N. 2009. Production and Analysis of Bio-diesel from Non-edible Oils: A Review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 13: 825–834.
16. Nanzai, B., Okitsu, K., Takenaka, N., Bandow, H., Tajima, N. and Maeda, Y. 2009. Effect of Reaction Vessel Diameter on Sonochemical Efficiency and Cavitation Dynamics, Ultrason. Sonochem., 16:163–168.
17. Noureddini, H. and Zhu, D. 1997. Kinetics of Transesterification of Soybean Oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 74(11): 1457–1463.
18. Rashid, U., Anwar, F., Ansari, T. M., Arif, M. and Ahmad, M. 2009. Optimization of Alkaline Transesterification of Rice Bran Oil for Biodiesel Production Using Response Surface Methodology, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 84: 1364–1370.
19. Singh, A. K., Fernando, S. D. and Hernandez, R. 2007. Base Catalyzed Fast-transesterification of Soybean Oil Using Ultrasonication. Energy Fuels, 21: 1161-1164.
20. Stavarache, C., Vinatoru, M., Nishimura, R. and Maeda, Y. 2005. Fatty Acids Methyl Esters from Vegetable Oil by Means of Ultrasonic Energy. Ultrason. Sonochem., 12:367–72.
21. Sutkar, V. S. and Gogate, P. R. 2009. Design Aspects of Sonochemical Reactors: Techniques for Understanding Cavitational Activity Dstribution and Effect of Operating Parameters. Chem. Engin. J., 155: 26–36.
22. Thanh, L. T., Okitsu, K., Sadanaga, Y., Takenaka, N., Maeda, Y. And Bandow, H. 2010. Ultrasound-assisted Production of Biodiesel Fuel from Vegetable Oils in a Small Scale Circulation Process. Bioresource Technol., 101: 639–645.
23. Worapun, I., Pianthong, K. and Thaiyasuit, P. 2011. Optimization of Biodiesel Production from Crude Palm Oil Using Ultrasonic Irradiation Assistance and Response Surface Methodology, J. Chem. Technol. Biot., 87(2): 189-197.
24. Yin, X., Ma, H., You, Q., Wang, Z. and Chang, J. 2012. Comparison of Four Different Enhancing Methods for Preparing Biodiesel through Transesterification of Sunflower Oil. Appl. Energy, 91: 320–325.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 15, Issue 4
July and August 2013
Pages 697-708